Overblog
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
7 décembre 2011 3 07 /12 /décembre /2011 18:05

thales-logo-lg

 

07/12/2011 Aerocontact

 

PARIS, 6 décembre (Reuters) - Thales annonce mardi avoir signé un accord pour racheter Tampa Microwave, une société privée spécialisée dans les terminaux de communications tactiques par satellite (Satcom).

 

Le rachat, qui est conditionné par l'obtention de certaines approbations réglementaires, devrait être conclu au premier trimestre 2012, précise un communiqué.

 

Le montant de la transaction n'est pas communiqué.

 

"Complémentaires de l'actuel portefeuille de produits de Thales, les domaines d'activité stratégique de Tampa Microwave élargiront les capacités de Thales dans le domaine des Satcom large bande", lit-on dans le communiqué. (Noëlle Mennella, édité par Danielle Rouquié)

Partager cet article
Repost0
6 décembre 2011 2 06 /12 /décembre /2011 19:55

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3c/Alenia_C27J_Spartan_04.jpg/600px-Alenia_C27J_Spartan_04.jpg

photo by Dmitry A. Mottl

 

6 Dec 2011 By MARCUS WEISGERBER DefenseNews

 

The U.S. Army is not prepared to fight to keep the C-27J cargo aircraft program alive should an Air Force recommendation to cancel the program be finalized by senior Pentagon officials.

 

Gen. Raymond Odierno, the Army chief of staff, was briefed in October on options to address the Air Force proposal.

 

Army aviation officials proposed Odierno insist the Air Force continue conducting direct support missions of critical Army supplies, and the Army National Guard recommended transferring C-27J procurement money and the mission back to the Army, according to a service official.

 

Since then, the Army backed off the option to reacquire the program, according to a second service official. An Army spokesman declined to comment on the move since the budget has not been finalized.

 

At the same time, the decision is likely to set up a fight between the Air Force and Air National Guard since a number of Guard wings gave up aircraft over the past few years in anticipation of receiving C-27Js.

 

The debate between the parties over the future of the C-27J, built by L-3 Communications and Alenia Aeronautica, has intensified in recent weeks in advance of the Pentagon finalizing its 2013 budget proposal, expected to determine the fate of the program.

 

 

The Air Force recommendation to cancel the once-joint program in its draft 2013 funding plan has become a hotly contested issue.

 

Certain lawmakers have voiced opposition to canceling the program, including the entire Connecticut congressional delegation, which wrote Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter urging him to "reject any recommendation to terminate the program or reduce the current [Air National Guard] beddown plan."

 

The Connecticut air guard has been slated to receive the planes but the Air Force has yet to purchase the aircraft for the wing. Other Air National Guard units are flying the C-27J.

 

Air and Army Guard officials say the C-27J is the best U.S. aircraft for delivering critical supplies and troops to hard-to-reach places on the battlefield. As the Pentagon's budget shrinks, the officials say it can conduct the so-called direct-support mission at a fraction of the cost of the four-engine C-130.

 

The C-27J is cheaper to fly than the C-130J and the CH-47 Chinook helicopter, according to Brig. Gen. Mark Bartman, the assistant adjunct general for air in Ohio. Flying one cargo pallet or 10 soldiers in a C-130J costs about $7,100 per hour, while the C-27J can accomplish the same mission for $2,100 per hour.

 

"It's not to say that the C-130J cannot accomplish the same mission as the C-27J; however, the C-27J is a much more cost-effective, 'right- sized' platform moving forward in the current budget environment, and also gives the Army the greatest amount of flexibility in fixed-wing airlift," Bartman said.

 

While the Chinook can accomplish the same mission, it is not the best use of the twin-rotor helicopter, according to a former Army division commander.

 

"We flew some of our CH-47s on routes that should have been fixed-wing routes at a cost in lost combat assault sorties and extended use of the CH-47," the former commander in Afghanistan said.

 

Since the August deployment of two C-27Js to Afghanistan, the 179th Air Wing of the Ohio Air National Guard has "removed the burden" of forward operating base resupply from the CH-47 fleet, the official said.

 

The 179th's C-27Js have flown more than 900 sorties, moving more than 6,900 people and almost 400 tons of time-sensitive, mission-critical cargo. Though the C-27J became an Air Force program, the Army's requirement to have organic, direct support airlift did not change.

 

The Air Force intended to buy 38 C-27Js. National Guard wings in Ohio, Maryland, Michigan and Mississippi are supposed to split the first batch. Other aircraft are set for wings in Connecticut, North Dakota and Montana, but they have not been funded.

 

The adjunct generals from six of those states wrote Carter on Nov. 30 urging him not to cancel the program. A decision to cancel the effort would "negatively impact the National Guard and will weaken our national and homeland defense," they wrote.

 

The one-time Joint Cargo Aircraft program was turned over to the Air Force in 2009. At the time, Gen. George Casey, then-Army chief of staff, and Gen. Norton Schwartz, the Air Force chief, struck a deal in which the Air Force would receive the C-27J aircraft, but would fly under Army parameters.

 

The decision was met with skepticism in Army and Air Force ranks. The Air Force typically flies fully loaded cargo planes between hubs, while the Army uses the C-23 Sherpa to move small numbers of troops and equipment to forward locations. The Air Force pledged to fly these "direct support" missions using the C-27J and C-130.

 

Now under a substantial budget crunch, Air Force leaders have proposed eliminating the aircraft from the service's inventory and conducting the mission with C-130s.

 

The Army, which led the Joint Cargo Aircraft program, originally intended to replace the C-23 with the C-27J. When it turned the program over to the Air Force, the decision to retire the Sherpa was not reversed, even though many aircraft can fly for another 20 years, one Army National Guard official said.

Partager cet article
Repost0
6 décembre 2011 2 06 /12 /décembre /2011 19:05

http://images.focus-news.net/7f2efde58bb317f151aff537f3329cee.jpg

photo focus-news.net (AFP)

 

06 December 2011 FOCUS News Agency

 

Bucharest. The Romanian parliament on Tuesday ratified an accord to host US missile interceptors on its soil, a day before a meeting of the 28 NATO members in Brussels, AFP reported.

 

The Senate unanimously adopted the draft law ratifying the Romania-US agreement signed in September that would allow the establishment and operation of a US land-based ballistic missile defence system in Romania as part of NATO's efforts to build a continental missile shield.

 

"The location of some elements of the US missile shield represents a very important contribution to the security of Romania, the US and and the entire alliance," Foreign Minister Teodor Baconschi told senators, according to Mediafax news agency.

 

The draft law was adopted by the lower house in November and is now set to be promulgated by President Traian Basescu.

 

The deployment of the missile interceptors is expected to take place in 2015 at a former airbase in southern Romania.

 

The missile shield, which is based on US technology, is one of the transatlantic alliance's main development axes for the coming years, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen has said.

 

Along with Romania, Turkey, Poland and Spain have also agreed to take part in the project.

Partager cet article
Repost0
6 décembre 2011 2 06 /12 /décembre /2011 18:40

http://www.usinenouvelle.com/mediatheque/2/2/0/000137022_5.jpg

 

06 décembre 2011 par Astrid Gouzik – L’USINE NOUVELLE

 

Le groupe italien d’aéronautique et de défense annonce mardi 6 décembre avoir remporté un contrat d’un montant de 691 millions de dollars, soit 514 millions d’euros.

 

A travers sa filiale DRS technologies, Finmeccanica va fournir des équipements pour les sous-marins américains. Le contrat porte notamment sur "la fourniture de systèmes de combat et de sonars".

 

Ce contrat pourrait permettre au groupe, très fragilisé ces derniers mois, de redresser un peu ses finances. En effet, il annonçait mi-novembre avoir perdu 324 millions d'euros en 9 mois. En effet, sur la même période, le groupe est frappé par une chute de 21% de ses commandes. Et il a dû passer une provision de 753 millions d'euros en raison du retard du Boeing 787.

Partager cet article
Repost0
6 décembre 2011 2 06 /12 /décembre /2011 18:00

http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/4BE83779-43DA-433B-83A8-1AEC06050F2A/0/LAND2011293021.jpg

photo Sergeant Russ Nolan, MOD 2011

 

6 December 2011 army-technology.com

 

British Army Apache AH Mk1 helicopter pilots and ground crew have completed the two-month long Crimson Eagle exercise in the US as part of the Apache Conversion to Role course.

 

The exercise, held at the El Centro Naval Air Facility in California and at Gila Bend Air Force Auxiliary Field in Arizona, included aviation environmental training, judgemental training and a live firing phase.

 

The tactical exercises are designed to enable the pilots to achieve limited combat-ready status and gain working experience in the sort of terrain and altitudes that may be encountered during real-time overseas deployments.

 

During the aviation environmental and judgemental training exercises, Apache pilots demonstrated expertise in handling the aircraft in mountainous and desert conditions, including dust landings and limited power training during the day and night.

 

The live firing phase is the final evaluation in weapons handling to ensure pilots achieve live firing qualifications.

 

Wattisham Station Attack Helicopter Force Chief of Staff lieutenant colonel Peter Bullen said: "Exercise Crimson Eagle is a challenging exercise during which students have had an opportunity to practice skills in a demanding environment with conditions similar to those in Afghanistan."

 

The pilots will undergo a period of further training prior to completion of the Conversion To Role course after which they will be assigned to one of the Apache squadrons within 16 Air Assault Brigade to gain Limited Combat Ready status as well as wider exposure.

 

Exercise Crimson Eagle has been conducted nine times in the US by the Army Air Corps since 2006, and the most recent exercise was conducted earlier this year.

 

The UK Army Apache AH Mk1 fleet consists of 67 aircraft that support UK and coalition forces in Afghanistan and Libya to provide deterrence and close combat attack capabilities for ISAF forces, as well as to perform escort duties for other aircraft.

 

The Apache AH Mk1 is an all-weather, day and night attack helicopter equipped with a 30mm chain gun, rockets and Hellfire missiles, and is designed to detect and destroy armoured vehicles.

Partager cet article
Repost0
6 décembre 2011 2 06 /12 /décembre /2011 17:45

http://www.defpro.com/data/gfx/news/a93706ba33145832f0a11146d18962f0f4f3fa0a_big.jpg

Virginia-class attack submarine.

(Photo: Huntington Ingalls Industries)

 

December 6, 2011 defpro.com

 

PARSIPPANY, NJ | DRS Technologies, Inc., A Finmeccanica Company, announced that its DRS Laurel Technologies business unit, a subcontractor to Lockheed Martin, received an award for a U.S. Navy Submarine Technology Insertion Hardware (TIH) contract that will provide submarine combat and sonar systems designed around commercially available hardware and software.

 

DRS has been awarded a five year indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract with a ceiling value of $691 million from Lockheed Martin to provide the production hardware.

 

“We have worked very closely with the Lockheed Martin team to meet a very aggressive schedule for the production hardware to support the U.S. Navy’s TIH Upgrade,” says Patrick Marion, vice president and general manager of DRS Laurel Technologies.

 

“These new TIH production units will continue our long term relationship with Lockheed Martin and provide high quality products in support of Lockheed Martin programs around the world,” Marion added.

 

The Navy's Technology Insertion Hardware program includes design, development and production of hardware for the next two submarine technology insertions planned for Seawolf, SSGN, 688/688i, Virginia Class, and future submarine systems and platforms. The U.S. Navy will provide the Royal Australian Navy with similar technology insertions for the Collins Class submarines through the Foreign Military Sales program.

Partager cet article
Repost0
5 décembre 2011 1 05 /12 /décembre /2011 21:12

http://www.defensenews.com/pgf/stories44/120511_astute_315.JPG

Cmdr. Iain Breckenridge, standing with binoculars,

guides the submarine Astute to a berth in Norfolk, Va.,

on Nov. 28. (MC1 Todd A. Schaffer / U.S. Navy)

 

5 Dec 2011 By CHRISTOPHER P. CAVAS DefenseNews

 

Missile Tests Belie HMS Astute's 'Jinx' Label

 

NORFOLK, Va. - HMS Astute, Britain's first new attack submarine in more than two decades, is the most advanced undersea craft ever fielded by the Royal Navy. But the sub's many improvements often have been masked by a long-running series of developmental and operational problems - including design issues, cost overruns, production missteps, lengthy construction delays, an embarrassingly public grounding last year in Scotland and a tragic shooting on board in April.

 

Now operating from the U.S. East Coast as part of a lengthy trials period, the Astute finally has had a chance to show what it can do, and in November test-fired Tomahawk cruise missiles in the Gulf of Mexico. But the British media, even in reporting on its successes, continue to label the ship a jinx.

 

Cmdr. Iain Breckenridge, the submarine's commanding officer, bristled when asked about the jinx moniker during a Nov. 29 interview on board his ship.

 

"The media will always jump at an easy target. So we're an easy target, they're having a field day," he said.

 

"Fine by me, that's well behind us. I don't dwell on it, I don't look back. Myself and my team move forward to prove what a great submarine she is. With the Tomahawk firings recently, our successful torpedo firings in the summer in the U.K., pushing forward to get all trials completed, getting to Norfolk to meet the senior U.S. leadership, going to AUTEC [the U.S. Navy's Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center test range] in January to finish trials, and getting her back to the U.K. in March, ready to go back into the yard for her final maintenance period before she becomes operational, for us, that's all good news.

 

"So the media won't use that, because that's not an interesting story. If anything minor happens, they'll jump on it and go, 'wow, wow, jinxed submarine!'

 

"Well, ask any of my ship's company, any of our supporting personnel, anyone in the Navy, any of our families, any of our friends in the U.S. submarine force; in fact, anybody that basically understands what a first-of-class submarine's got to go through, and they'll recognize that the term 'jinx' is just a very easy one that the media jumps on.

 

"Does it bother me? Used to, initially. Not bothered by it anymore. There are much more important things to deal with. It's a fantastic submarine to deliver to the front line as soon as possible. And I've got a really good team helping me do that."

 

Tests, Tests and More Tests

 

Breckenridge, a veteran submariner who previously commanded HMS Tireless, brought the Astute to the U.S. in October to begin a series of weapons, sensors, systems and warm-weather trials.

 

"We've got to prove the design, and prove the build," he said. "Over subsequent submarines, they just have to prove the build."

 

The boat loaded Tomahawk cruise missiles at the U.S. Navy's submarine base in Kings Bay, Ga., then launched two T-hawks from the Gulf of Mexico onto a missile range at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla. "Both flew beautifully," Breckenridge said.

 

Operations on the AUTEC range in January will fully prove the submarine's new Type 2076 integrated sonar suite, and more Spearfish torpedoes will be test-fired.

 

Breckenridge ticked off a list of new features aboard the sub, which is fitted with six 21-inch torpedo tubes, one more than previous classes. The weapons room also is larger, with a lower deck, allowing for a 50 percent increase in the number of weapons carried - "on the order of 36," he said.

 

The submarine features a large lockout chamber aft of the fin, or sail, and can carry a drydeck shelter to allow swimmers to enter and leave the sub while submerged.

 

"That was a real design driver for the boat, and that's why we've got a big sail," he explained. "The shapes and curves [of the hull] help the dry deck shelter sit in the right place."

 

In the control room, Breckenridge pointed proudly to the Thales Optronics mast displays. Astute is the first British submarine to dispense with traditional periscopes and adopt photronics masts, similar to the arrangement aboard U.S. Virginia-class submarines.

 

"Much as I loved my old peri-scopes, this is much better," he said. Using the periscope on older submarines at night, he said, required "lights off, curtains draped, black lighting, can't see anything, not good for your eyes. This submarine," he said, has a "better working environment, better for the team. A really good capability. This is U.K. trail-blazing stuff."

 

The attack center control room on Astute is traditionally located forward on 1 Deck - topmost of the sub's three deck levels - but without the need for hull-penetrating periscopes, designers will have more flexibility to move it. Later ships in the seven-unit class, Breckenridge said, may move the room to 2 Deck and aft a bit. "There's more room down there," he said.

 

The captain was especially proud of the sub's maneuvering and hovering capabilities, featuring independent diving plane controls handled by a new, complex autopilot system.

 

"One of the limiting factors in designing a submarine maneuvering envelope is having a stern plane failure to dive or rise," Breckenridge explained. "In my situation, I've got a much wider operating envelope because, if the stern plane does fail to dive, it's probably only going to be one of them, and I can immediately correct it by slowing down and putting the noncasualty plane to rise. It gives us a much broader operating envelope."

Partager cet article
Repost0
5 décembre 2011 1 05 /12 /décembre /2011 17:40

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/66/F-35A_-_Inauguration_Towing.jpg

photo US DoD


December 2, 2011 defense-aerospace.com

(Source: Radio Netherlands, published Dec. 2, 2011)


A possible delay in the first series of the Joint Strike Fighter planes will not necessarily affect the delivery of two Dutch test planes, according to the Dutch Ministry of Defence.


The head of the JSF programme said it should be slowed down. Lockheed Martin is due to deliver the first Dutch test plane by August 2012 and the second in March 2013.


US Vice Admiral David Venlet told the website AOL that the production of the officially named F-35 Lightning II (Joint Strike Fighter) should be slowed down after tests in the past 12 months have revealed potential cracks and weak spots in the fighter plane’s airframe.


"Most of them are little ones, but when you bundle them all up and package them and look at where they are in the airplane and how hard they are to get at after you buy the jet, the cost burden of that is what sucks the wind out of your lungs.” Vice Admiral Venlet said.


He stressed that safety and performance have not been compromised. The irregularities do mean that parts of the airframe will last less long. The vice admiral called it a mistake that the first planes were already being produced while models were still being tested.


The Pentagon has ordered 30 planes this year. The number is due to increase every year, so that by 2017 200 planes will be delivered to the US air force. The US plans to buy more than 2,400 F-35s at a cost of 283 billion euros. The Netherlands is due to make a final decision whether to replace its ageing fleet of F-16s with modern JSFs after 2015.


Dutch Labour MP Angelien Eijsink wants more clarity about a possible delay. “There are problems with the sensors and the ejector seat and I can list another ten problems.” She said she was already aware of the problems with the airframe.


Defence Minister Hans Hillen is due to visit the Pentagon and Lockheed Martin next year, when he will find out more about developments. The JSF programme has been dogged by delays and technical problems.

Partager cet article
Repost0
5 décembre 2011 1 05 /12 /décembre /2011 13:35

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/98/Sdd_f136_006.jpg

 

5 December 2011 By Stephen Trimble – Flight Global

Washington DC - General Electric and Rolls-Royce have abandoned an almost six-year campaign to save the F136 alternate engine for the Lockheed Martin F-35 from termination.

Both companies have decided to stop self-funding the development of the F136, and to discontinue one of the most aggressive and sustained lobbying campaigns in the history of US weapons contracting.

The Department of Defense has been trying to cancel the alternate engine programme since 2006. Until earlier this year, however, Congress had faithfully restored funding for the F136 every time the DoD tried to delete the programme's budget.

That changed when a new Congress was elected last year, with a wave of budget-cutting fervour. The fiscal year 2011 defence budget was passed without funding for the F136, and an attempt to insert an amendment to the appropriations bill to support the programme was defeated.


GE and Rolls-Royce offered to continue self-funding the programme to complete the remaining 20% of the development work. The completed F136 would then have been offered as an alternative to the Pratt & Whitney F135 for production examples of the F-35.

"Difficult circumstances are converging that impact the potential benefit of an F136 self-funded development effort," said Dan McCormick, president of the GE/Rolls-Royce Fighter Engine Team joint venture.

The decision leaves P&W alone in the market for the F-35 propulsion system, although Rolls-Royce supplies the lift fan system for the F-35B short take-off and vertical variant.

Partager cet article
Repost0
5 décembre 2011 1 05 /12 /décembre /2011 12:45

cyber warfare

December 5, 2011 defpro.com

FARNBOROUGH, England | Lockheed Martin UK has officially opened its first Security Intelligence Centre (SIC) at Farnborough, extending its global reach and augmenting facilities in the United States. The Centre was opened today by Gerald Howarth MP, Minister for International Security Strategy.

The 2.5 million pounds Sterling investment in UK facilities will strengthen Lockheed Martin's Intelligence driven computer network defence and ability to stay ahead of the rapidly evolving and persistent threats in cyber space. The role of the SIC will be detection, identification and response to information security incidents. This is accomplished by bringing together three primary capabilities: pervasive sensors, data management and analyst collaboration.

It will be manned by a team of highly skilled and trained cyber intelligence analysts who hold UK passports. They will integrate into Lockheed Martin's global computer network defence, while developing their own intrinsic strengths, and contribute to an active global exchange in cyber capability and tradecraft.

Cyber attacks are becoming increasingly sophisticated and persistent. So far, Lockheed Martin is demonstrating success in countering this threat. Lockheed Martin cyber intelligence analysts examine attacks at a macro level – breaking attacks into phases called the Cyber Kill Chain, analysing this data to identify patterns of persistent campaigns spanning multiple attacks, and implementing new mitigations to keep ahead of the threats.

Giri Sivanesan, Lockheed Martin UK Head of Cyber, commented: "Cyber attacks are coming from a wide range of sources. There's a growing realisation at the Government level of the impact this growing threat could have on individuals, business and the national infrastructure. In the future we will be looking to support more customers in the public and private sector through advanced cyber defence solutions and training customer staff in the latest cyber tradecraft. Customers who have already reached a certain level of maturity in cyber defence will benefit the most from our advanced services."

Minister for International Security Strategy, Gerald Howarth MP said: "I am delighted to attend the opening of Lockheed Martin's new Security Intelligence Centre. The internet has transformed everyday life but with greater openness, interconnection and dependency comes greater vulnerability. As recognised in the Government's Cyber Security Strategy, the threat to our national security from cyber attacks is real and growing and is a threat that we must face together across society.

"I welcome Lockheed Martin UK's commitment to the cyber security effort. Today is further proof of the seriousness with which industry takes cyber security and is part of building a real and meaningful partnership with Government. We must ensure cyberspace remains open to innovation and make Britain one of the most secure places in the world to do business."

Partager cet article
Repost0
4 décembre 2011 7 04 /12 /décembre /2011 08:45

http://seeker401.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/cps_nnu84_100908113427_photo02_photo_.jpg

 

Dec 2, 2011 By Jim Wolf (Reuters)

 

WASHINGTON - The Obama Administration plans to complete an anti-ballistic missile shield to protect European allies against Iran "whether Russia likes it or not," the U.S. envoy to NATO said on Friday.

 

Moscow's objections to the project, which includes participation by Romania, Poland, Turkey and Spain, "won't be the driving force in what we do," Ivo Daalder, the ambassador, told reporters at a breakfast session.

 

 

The U.S. estimate of the Iranian ballistic missile threat has gone up, not down, over the two years since President Barack Obama opted for a new, four-phased deployment to protect the United States and NATO allies, Daalder said.

 

"It's accelerating," Daalder said of the U.S.-perceived threat of Iran's ballistic missiles, "and becoming more severe than even we thought two years ago."

 

 

"We're deploying all four phases, in order to deal with that threat, whether Russia likes it or not," he added. At the same time, he urged Moscow to cooperate in both to deal with Iran and to see for itself that, as he put it, the system's capabilities pose its strategic deterrent force no threat.

 

 

If the perceived threat from Iran ebbs, "then maybe the system will be adapted to that lesser threat," Daalder said.

 

Obama pleased the Kremlin in September 2009 by scrapping his predecessor's plan for longer-range interceptor missiles in Poland and a radar installation in the Czech Republic, a move that helped to improve U.S.-Russian ties.

 

But Moscow says that the revised version, using land- and sea-based Standard Missile-3 interceptors, could undermine its security if planned interceptor improvements become capable of neutralizing Russia's strategic nuclear deterrent force.

 

 

Washington and NATO have invited Russia to join in some aspects of the project, including possible joint early warning. Before agreeing to any such cooperation, Moscow is demanding a legally binding pledge from the United States that Moscow's nuclear forces would not be targeted by the system.

 

 

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said on Wednesday that if the deadlock continues, Moscow would boost its early-warning radar to protect its nuclear missile sites, deploy weapons that could overcome a shield and potentially target missile defense installations to its south and west.

 

 

With NATO continuing largely to shrug off Russia's concerns, Moscow's ambassador to NATO, Dmitry Rogozin, was quoted as saying this week that Russia may review its cooperation with the supply route through Russia for NATO forces in Afghanistan.

 

 

Daalder said the sides remain at odds over, among other things, Russia's demand for the legally binding pledge, before any cooperation, that its nuclear forces would not be targeted by the NATO elements.

 

 

"They have gotten themselves quite hung up on our unwillingness to put this in legally binding writing," he said.

The administration was not convinced that such a pledge would be ratified by the U.S. Senate, he said, nor should Moscow be convinced that even if it were, "we wouldn't necessarily at some point walk away from it," as the George W. Bush administration did from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the only U.S.-Russia missile defense pact.

That withdrawal opened the way for the creation of an anti-missile defense shield that the U.S. government says is designed to protect the United States from countries like Iran and North Korea.

 

Daalder said that if the United States ever were placing interceptors to counter Russia's nuclear missiles, "we wouldn't deploy them in Europe. We would deploy them in the United States."

 

The physics of missile defense intercepts make it "easier and better to approach an incoming missile from the opposite side than it is to try to chase it down." he said. "That's the way that it works."

Partager cet article
Repost0
1 décembre 2011 4 01 /12 /décembre /2011 18:55

http://sitelife.aviationweek.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/15/4/7f5bfdf7-92aa-4464-94ca-df08d8c0ae81.Full.jpg

source Ares A Defense Technology Blog

 

01 Dec 2011 | Ref. 220/2011 BAE Systems

 

SAN DIEGO – BAE Systems and AVX Aircraft Company have combined expertise in system and subsystem integration and rotorcraft design to compete for the U.S. Navy’s Medium Range Maritime Unmanned Aerial System (MRMUAS). The MRMUAS will provide a multi-intelligence, reconfigurable platform for operation from all air-capable ships. The joint team recently submitted its response to the Navy’s Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) to develop this future sea and land-based vertical take-off and landing unmanned aerial system.

 

This solution integrates AVX’s patented new aircraft configuration with BAE Systems’ onboard common autonomous mission systems, payloads, mission control system and support capabilities to provide the U.S. Navy a weapon system that exceeds MRMUAS mission requirements. The team’s highly capable, flexible and affordable weapon system leverages state-of-the-art subsystems, a modular open system architecture and a common mission system design that facilitates reuse.

 

After examining a range of air vehicle options for MRMUAS, including modifying existing commercial and military helicopters, BAE Systems and AVX concluded the Navy’s requirements cannot be met by systems currently on the market. The team brings together AVX’s extensive rotorcraft experience and BAE Systems’ system and subsystem integration expertise, to provide the Navy a weapon system that exceeds MRMUAS mission requirements at low total ownership cost.

Partager cet article
Repost0
1 décembre 2011 4 01 /12 /décembre /2011 08:45

http://www.meretmarine.com/objets/500/26306.jpg

 

30 Nov 2011 By KATE BRANNEN DefenseNews

 

The U.S. Senate approved an amendment to the 2012 defense authorization bill that would allow the United States to exchange certain F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) aircraft with the United Kingdom.

 

Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, sponsored the amendment, which was approved by unanimous consent Nov. 30.

The Senate has also voted to limit debate on the authorization bill to another 30 hours, giving the legislation a chance to make it out of the Senate. If passed, the Senate authorization bill will have to be resolved with the House version passed earlier this year before making its way to the president for his signature.

 

The Pentagon requested the JSF amendment in a June 14 letter from Elizabeth King, assistant secretary of defense for legislative affairs, to Vice President Joseph Biden, in his role as president of the Senate.

 

The JSF trade, which the Pentagon describes as "mutually beneficial" and "cost neutral," requires such a legislative amendment to be implemented.

 

According to King's letter, the United States would give the United Kingdom one of its carrier variants (F-35C) in exchange for a short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL) version (F-35B).

 

The United Kingdom decided last year, as part of its Strategic Defense and Security Review, to stop buying the F-35B. Instead, the Royal Navy will only buy the F-35C, which is being designed for conventional takeoffs and landings on aircraft carriers.

 

The cost-savings measure resulted in the U.K. having an extra F-35B on its hands.

 

The United States, which is buying the F-35B for the Marine Corps and the F-35C for the Navy, was not scheduled to receive its F-35Bs until later. A third variant, the F-35A, is being developed for the Air Force.

 

Under the exchange, the United Kingdom would have to cover any costs required to upgrade its F-35B aircraft so that it would be identical to the version the U.S. had planned to buy, according to the letter. The United Kingdom would also be responsible for any unique requirements it has for the F-35C.

 

Under the plan, United States would get an F-35B two years earlier. This means $10 million in additional operations and maintenance costs for the Marine Corps in 2013 and 2014 due to increased flight hours, fuel, training costs, etc.

 

In January, former Defense Secretary Robert Gates put the F-35B portion of the JSF program on probation for two years, saying he had serious concerns about the aircraft's performance in tests.

 

"If we cannot fix this variant during this time frame and get it back on track in terms of performance, cost and schedule, then I believe it should be canceled," Gates said.

 

A separate amendment, also approved Nov. 30, requires Defense Secretary Leon Panetta to submit a report to Congress on the F-35B's probationary period.

 

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., sponsored this amendment, which was also approved by unanimous consent.

Partager cet article
Repost0
1 décembre 2011 4 01 /12 /décembre /2011 08:30

http://www.shephardmedia.com/static/images/article/apache_1.jpg

 

30 November 2011 -  by Beth Stevenson - shephardmedia.com

 

UK Army Air Corps (AAC) Apache attack helicopters participating in ‘Operation Ellamy’ in Libya this year achieved ‘very little’ due to inefficient command and control (C2) and a lack of intelligence on the ground, according to a senior British Army officer.

 

Speaking at the Air Power in Irregular Warfare conference at Farnborough on 30 November, Lt Col Paul Tennant, CO 3 Regt AAC, described the Op Ellamy Apache mission as ‘hard work’.

 

‘These guys embarked on some pretty brave missions,’ he said, describing the aircraft as ‘absolutely fantastic'.

 

According to Tennant, there was a 'lack of really dependable intelligence' in Libya: 'How do you assess risk if you do not have decent intelligence? You end up depending on hearsay and opinion,’ he said. Tennant also criticised inefficient C2 procedures.

 

During some six months of deployment to Libya, Apache airframes completed some 72 combat hours which Tennant said amounted to an average of two days work for the Apache while in Afghanistan. AAC Apaches conducted a total of 25 strike missions and took out some 100 targets.

 

'I don't want the wrong conclusion to be drawn from the success of the mission; we achieved, other than politically, very little', said Tennant. He added that one redeeming fact was that there had been 'no hits' on the Apache airframes.

 

He described 'substantial challenges' during the mission, such as transporting the Apache by ship, which Tennant said demanded more from the crew than it should have, including constant efforts to make sure the platform did not fall overboard. 'There were huge lessons learned,' he said.

 

'The AH [attack helicopter] sinks like a stone', Tennant continued, describing how it could lose buoyancy and sink within 16 seconds. The explosive canopies on the doors could also kill crew in the water from the impact of the blast with crews needing to get rid of the doors before the aircraft hits the water. In addition, he described how the UK needed to prepare more for such a mission type and develop the capability of the Apache.

 

However, Tennant generally praised the performance of the aircraft, describing how the UK aircraft had 'done a couple of things to it to make it better than the American variant’.

 

‘We use the FCR (fire control radar) in a more innovative way,' he said while describing how the mission had been conducted without any significant US assistance.

Partager cet article
Repost0
1 décembre 2011 4 01 /12 /décembre /2011 08:25

http://www.shephardmedia.com/static/images/article/duro_2.gif

 

30 November 2011 - by the Shephard News Team

 

General Dynamics European Land Systems has announced that it has been awarded a contract by the Swiss Army for delivery of the DURO Armoured Personnel Carriers (APC) for the Swiss Global Mobility Task Force (GMTF). Under the contract the company will deliver an additional 70 vehicles.

 

According to General Dynamics the procurement of these vehicles was approved in the 2010 Swiss Armament Procurement Program.

 

The DURO is a highly protected and mobile wheeled vehicle, capable of transporting up to 11 soldiers. It meets the Swiss Army's requirements for a vehicle that provides troop protection and mobility for military applications, as well as peacekeeping operations.  The GMTF Armoured Personnel Carrier is part of the DURO and EAGLE family of protected wheeled vehicles in the weight category of up to 14 tons. In the GMTF version, the DURO is 6.90 m long, 2.16 m wide and 2.67 m high. With its modular protection system, the vehicle offers very high ballistic, mine and IED protection. On the road, the GMTF reaches a top speed of 100 km/h and manages gradients of up to 60 percent and lateral inclines of up to 30 percent.

 

With high on-road and off-road mobility, the GMTF has a 245 hp Cummins turbocharged diesel engine, an Allison 5-speed automatic transmission, unique DeDion axle system with patented anti-roll bar, tire pressure control system and permanent all-wheel drive. All vehicles are equipped with an air-conditioning system and a NBC overpressure system for enhanced comfort and protection.

 

General Dynamics has already delivered 220 DURO GMTF vehicles to the Swiss Army, procured through the 2008 Swiss Armament Procurement Program. The Swiss Parliament approved the procurement of 70 additional vehicles to increase the DURO GMTF fleet availability for training and deployment.

 

The company said that deliveries will take place in the fall of 2013. The vehicles will be manufactured at General Dynamics' facility in Kreuzlingen, Switzerland.

Partager cet article
Repost0
30 novembre 2011 3 30 /11 /novembre /2011 18:05

http://safran-group.com/IMG/jpg/US-Vector-250.jpg

 

30.11.2011 Safran press release

 

Acquise par Vectronix* en décembre 2009, la société américaine Optics1 apporte à Sagem (Safran) un savoir-faire précieux dans le domaine de l’optronique portable.

 

Pour conforter son emprise sur le marché américain, Vectronix (société suisse entrée dans le giron de Sagem en 2003) a considérablement développé sa filiale locale, Vectronix Inc. en la dotant notamment d’un centre de production. « Pour consolider notre développement outre-Atlantique, il nous manquait toutefois une capacité locale de développement et d’intégration, note Jean Harter, directeur de Vectronix. C’est dans ce but que nous avons acquis la société Optics1 en décembre 2009. »

Implantée en Californie et dans le New Hampshire, Optics1 jouit d’une solide réputation en matière de R&D et de fabrication de systèmes optroniques. « Nous sommes capables de concevoir des équipements hautement intégrés, non seulement pour répondre aux besoins du Pentagone, mais aussi pour fournir des équipements de métrologie à destination du marché civil », précise son président-directeur général, Dane Hileman.

 

Innovant et réactif

Avec une soixantaine de salariés, Optics1, qui peut faire figure de poids léger parmi les contractants du Pentagone, a su tirer parti de sa « petite » taille en développant des atouts de rapidité d’exécution, de flexibilité et de valeur ajoutée. « Nous pouvons concevoir des systèmes et les mettre sur le marché beaucoup plus vite que nos concurrents », résume Dane Hileman. Optics1 et Vectronix Inc. qui partagent le même terrain d’excellence, l’optronique portable, renforcent en cela leurs synergies. Véritable incubateur de technologies, le premier est complémentaire du deuxième qui lui fait bénéficier de ses capacités de production et de commercialisation.

 

Success story

Parmi les derniers succès d’Optics1 figure le « Clip On Thermal Imager », une optique thermique très légère (≤150g) pouvant être clipsée sur des jumelles de vision nocturne (JVN) ou des viseurs déjà existants, afin d’augmenter leurs performances. « Il s’agit d’un matériel pour lequel aucun besoin n’avait été officiellement exprimé, souligne Dan Hileman. Nous l’avons proposé aux Forces Spéciales Nord Américaines qui l’ont immédiatement adopté. Le marché potentiel est immense, avec plus de deux millions de ce type de jumelles en service à travers le monde. »

 

* Filiale de Sagem

Partager cet article
Repost0
30 novembre 2011 3 30 /11 /novembre /2011 13:10

http://www.defpro.com/data/gfx/news/9ec5116721985c8f7c2394ae5dd681f9dbfd5121_big.jpg

U.S. Army Special Forces soldiers practice with the M3 Carl Gustav.

(Photo: U.S. Army, William Hatton)

 

November 30, 2011 defpro.com

 

Defence and security company Saab has signed a contract with the U.S. Army for the company’s Carl-Gustaf man-portable weapon system. This marks the first time the Army has bought the 84mm recoilless rifle system. The Army and U.S. Special Operations Command placed a combined order with a total value of USD 31.5 million (SEK 209 million).

 

“This is very positive and it further proves the capability of the Carl-Gustaf system. It also shows the high level of trust our customers have for the system.” says Tomas Samuelsson, Senior Vice President and Head of Saab’s business area Dynamics.”

 

“Saab is thrilled that the U.S. Army has joined with our existing US Special Operations Command customer in using the Carl-Gustaf system”, said Saab North America President, Dan-Åke Enstedt.

 

The Carl-Gustaf system has along and successful history, and has successively been modernized and adapted to meet new requirements. A true multi-role, man-portable shoulder-fired weapon, the system is in use in more than 40 countries worldwide. With the Carl-Gustaf M3 version, Saab offers state-of-the-art capability for demanding customers investing in the future.

 

With several locations across the U.S., Saab North America provides a broad range of products, services, and solutions, ranging from defence to homeland security, to customers in the U.S. and Canada.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 novembre 2011 2 29 /11 /novembre /2011 18:20

http://postmediaottawacitizen.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/jsf-id36524_600-copy.jpg?w=300&h=209

 

November 29, 2011. By David Pugliese Defence Watch

 

The latest questions in the House of Commons on DND’s F35 purchase are focusing on the differences of costs between Norway’s purchase and Canada’s acquisition of the Joint Strike Fighter.

 

Norway has put the total cost at around $40 billion for 52 aircraft (although the lowest figure sometimes used is around $27 billion. Norwegian officials acknowledge that while they are highly supportive of the purchase they do not know the actual final cost).

 

So the question has arisen in the Commons about why is Canada spending $14.7 billion (DND’s estimate for total F35 procurement and 20 years of maintenance) and Norway is spending much more.

 

“Norway has acknowledged that the true cost of their 52 F-35s will be $40 billion or more,” NDP procurement critic Matthew Kellway said Monday.

 

He repeated the party’s call to put the next generation fighter project out for open bidding.

 

The Conservative government won’t be doing that of course. Associate Defence Minister Julian Fantino did not answer the question about the discrepancy in the cost that Norway is paying versus what Canada will pay.

 

He instead repeated some of his familiar comments. “Our government’s preference is to put our trust in our pilots and materiel experts who know the importance of the F-35 program that is producing Twenty First Century fighter jets our military needs while at the same time sustaining quality aerospace jobs across Canada,” Fantino responded.

 

But the question remains – why the cost difference?

 

Norway’s F-35s will be using similar communications software for use over Arctic areas. It is also one of the countries, besides Canada, that is looking at the installation of a drag chute. Both nations are buying the same model of the plane.

 

Part of the cost difference is on the operating and maintenance life-cycle cost. DND is estimating am operating and maintenance total cost of $7 billion over 20 years for its 65 F35s.

 

Norway’s Defense Minister Grete Faremo, however, stated in June that the operating and maintenance life-cycle cost, spanning 25 to 30 years of projected service for Norway’s 52 F-35s is estimated at $26.8 billion. The Norwegians believe it makes more sense to project the cost on the actual life of the aircraft – 25 to 30 years.

 

Even still, the differences appear quite substantial between the Norwegian and Canadian figures.

 

Any thoughts out there from Defence Watch readers on the cost issue?

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 novembre 2011 2 29 /11 /novembre /2011 17:55

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/First_MQ-9_Reaper_at_Creech_AFB_2007.jpg

photo USAF

 

29 Nov 2011By PIERRE TRAN DefenseNews

 

PARIS - A left-led French Senate has adopted a budgetary amendment calling for procurement of the General Atomics Reaper UAV while safeguarding funds for development of a new-generation combat drone planned as a common project with Britain, the upper house said in a statement.

 

The amendment seeks to reverse a government decision to acquire the Heron TP drone from Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), partnered with Dassault Aviation.

 

"The Senate wanted, in the general interest, to separate the operational needs of the Armed Forces from the industrial policy considerations," the amendment text said. "With this in mind, the Senators wanted, in the short term, to put priority on the safety of our troops by giving them the best equipment at the best price, in this case, the Reaper from General Atomics, while allowing, in the medium term, the emergence of an industrial sector by setting aside a larger amount of funds for French and European companies than that envisaged in the government's industrial plan."

 

The amendment, adopted Nov. 29 by a Socialist-led Senate, seeks to cut the amount for UAV acquisition in the draft 2012 defense budget law from 318 million euros ($423.8 million) to 209 million.

 

The 209 million euros is the amount General Atomics proposed in May for a non-French modified package consisting of seven air vehicles, two ground stations and maintenance for 10 years.

 

Under the Reaper offer, EADS would modify the U.S.-built UAV at a cost of 40 percent of the acquisition, or 88 million euros, bringing the total value of the package to 297 million euros, the amendment said.

 

That compares with an offer made by Dassault and IAI, also in May, for a package of seven modified Heron TP UAVs for 320 million euros. Modifications by Dassault, mainly adapting the satellite communications and integrating extra sensors, would bring the total amount to 370 million euros, the amendment said.

 

The Dassault-IAI deal also included two ground stations and 10 years' maintenance, the amendment said.

 

The senators debated the amendment until 4 a.m., a parliamentary official said.

 

"It was Homeric," the official said.

 

But senators of both right and left voted in favor of the amendment, which pushes the government to buy the American Reaper UAV, which can be armed.

 

The U.S. Air Force's selection of Boeing over Airbus for its KC-X tanker program made it extremely difficult for French senators to call for the purchase of a U.S. system, the official said. But the lack of operational and industrial sense in the French government's decision to buy the Israeli drone meant the Senate adopted the amendment, he said.

 

Besides the cut in procurement funding, the amendment called for the move of 80 million euros into technology studies for the future Anglo-French drone, and 29 million euros for upgrades to the current Harfang medium-altitude, long-endurance UAV operating in Afghanistan.

 

The 80 million euros for research studies would benefit Dassault and/or EADS for work on the planned Anglo-French program, rather than IAI, the amendment said.

 

Although the amendment does not specify the money should go to the unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV) project in the Lancaster House Treaty, that was the intention, the parliamentary official said.

 

The amendment pointed up concern over the lack of competition in the government's pick of the Heron TP.

 

"This decision to choose the Heron TP drone, with a tender, is difficult to understand: it is financially disadvantageous, militarily debatable and industrially hazardous," the amendment said.

 

Defense Minister Gérard Longuet told the Senate's foreign affairs and defense committee that the Heron TP was 30 percent more expensive and 20 percent less effective than the Reaper, the amendment said.

 

Dassault was not available for comment.

 

A bipartisan group from the Senate foreign affairs and defense committee drafted the amendment, which will go to a joint committee of seven senators and seven members of parliament from the National Assembly for review.

 

It is unlikely the joint committee will agree on the same text, and the lower house, the National Assembly, will probably carry the day, the parliamentary official said.

 

The Senate and National Assembly defense committees put the safety of service personnel above any political concerns, an industry source said.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 novembre 2011 2 29 /11 /novembre /2011 17:35

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/base/util/130775_1.jpg

 

By capping UAV funds, the French Senate aims to force the defense ministry

to buy the MQ-1 Predator instead of the costlier Heron TP. (USAF photo)

 

Nov. 29, 2011 defense-aerospace.com

(Source: French Senate Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee; issued Nov. 28, 2011)

(Issued in French only; unofficial translation by defense-aerospace.com)

 

PARIS --- The Senate has adopted the amendment tabled by the Foreign Affairs, Defense and Armed Forces committee regarding the Heron TP interim drone.

 

By this amendment, which was adopted in committee by a bipartisan majority of 33 votes to 3, the Senate wanted to separate, in the general interest, the immediate operational needs of the forces from any consideration of industrial policy.

 

In this spirit, Senators decided to privilege, in the short term, the security of our troops by providing them with the best equipment available at the lowest price, in this case General Atomics’ Reaper unmanned aerial vehicle while fostering, in the medium term, the emergence of a specialized industry sector by reserving a substantially higher share of funding than it was due to receive under the government’s industrial plan.

 

Consequently, the Senate vote capped at 209 million euros the funding available for the interim procurement of a MALE drone capability, until the arrival of the third-generation French-British UAV.

 

This level of funding will finance the off-the-shelf procurement of the American Reaper drone.

 

The 80 million euros thus saved will directly benefit French and European industry, and particularly their initial research and technology efforts, while obviating the need to procure the Heron TP drone made by the Israeli firm IAI, which is more expensive and lower-performing than its American competitor.

 

The Minister of Defence, Gérard Longuet, acknowledged, is his testimony before the foreign affairs, defence and armed services committee, that the Heron TP drone is about 30% more expensive than the Reaper while under-performing it by a margin of about 20%.

 

Senators note that the firm IAI was initially selected in 1997 to supply its Hunter UAV, which was adapted to French requirements by SAGEM, and subsequently, in 2002, to supply the Heron 1, which was adapted by EADS. Unfortunately, neither of these initiatives allowed the emergence of a national industrial capability in the field of MALE (medium altitude, long endurance) drones.

 

 

(EDITOR’S NOTE: While the French Senate doesn’t have the power to impose its will on the lower House and the government, it is worth noting that this initiative risks disrupting the government’s policy in terms of MALE UAVs by forcing its reappraisal in a more public context. Click here for more information on this subject)

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 novembre 2011 2 29 /11 /novembre /2011 08:45

http://www.defenceweb.co.za/images/stories/JOINT/JOINT_NEW/US/cluster_bomb.jpg

 

28 November 2011 defenseWeb - Reuters

 

A US-led push to regulate, rather than ban, cluster munitions failed after 50 countries objected, following humanitarian campaigners' claims that anything less than a outright ban would be an unprecedented reversal of human rights law.

 

While the United States, China and Russia want rules about the manufacture and use of cluster bombs, activists say such regulations would legitimise the munitions, backtracking from the Oslo Convention, an international treaty that seeks a worldwide ban.

 

"Against all odds it looks like we're going to have success this evening," Steve Goose, head of the arms division at Human Rights Watch, told a press conference in Geneva, Reuters reports.

 

"How often do you see the U.S., Russia, China, India, Israel and Belarus push for something, and they don't get it? That has happened largely because of one powerful alliance driving the Oslo partnership."

 

Cluster bombs, dropped by air or fired by artillery, scatter hundreds of bomblets across a wide area and can kill and maim civilians long after conflicts end.

 

U.S. officials say it makes sense to bring in rules because 85-90 percent of cluster munition stockpiles are held by countries that are not parties to the Oslo Convention and have no intention of joining.

 

A senior U.S. official said cluster munitions were a military necessity and were needed to hit targets spread over wide areas, while using alternative armaments would cause more collateral damage and prolong conflicts.

 

Opponents want them banned because they are indiscriminate weapons, raining bomblets that may fail to explode on impact and lie dormant, ready to kill or injure anyone who picks them up or touches them by mistake.

 

Those lining up against the U.S. plan included the International Committee of the Red Cross and the top U.N. officials for human rights, emergency relief and development.

 

The U.N. agency chiefs said cluster bombs were a particular threat to children, who were attracted by their unusual, toy-like shapes and colours. They said they were extremely concerned at plans to do anything less than ban them.

 

"The adoption of (the U.S.-led plan) that contains such provisions would set a disturbing precedent in international humanitarian law. It would, for the first time, create a new international treaty that is actually weaker than existing international humanitarian law," they said in a statement.

 

The U.S. measure, which would have regulated cluster bombs under the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW), proposed to ban those manufactured before 1980 and to ensure a failure rate of no more than one percent by 2018.

 

Opponents say the old weapons are likely to be phased out anyway and failure rates are unverified.

 

"The actual failure rates of cluster munitions used in actual wars are much higher than in tests," said Grethe Ostern of Norwegian People's Aid. "There are many differences between testing conditions and real conditions."

 

She cited a "top notch" cluster bomb used by Israel in Lebanon which was supposed to have a one percent failure rate but in fact failed more than 10 percent of the time.

 

Human Rights Watch's Goose contrasted the U.S. approach on cluster bombs to its approach to torture, and said nobody would accept a proposal to regulate and allow torture.

 

"Wouldn't it be better to have something out there for people who still practice torture? No."

 

Activists said the opposition to the U.S. proposal was led by Norway, Mexico and Austria, while 12 signatories to the 2008 Oslo Convention, including Japan, France and Germany, said they were in favour of regulation of cluster bombs under the CCW.

 

China and Russia, which like the United States are major producers of cluster munitions, were strongly supportive of the U.S. measure.

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 novembre 2011 1 28 /11 /novembre /2011 20:15

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/06/F-16C-510th-Fighter-Squadron.jpg/800px-F-16C-510th-Fighter-Squadron.jpg

photo USAF

 

BRUSSELS, Nov. 28 (UPI)

 

A Belgian company has received another U.S. government contract for depot-level maintenance of U.S. Air Force F-16s in Europe.

 

The award to Societe Anonyme Belge de Constructions Aeronautiques from the U.S. government, Ogden Air Logistics Center, is an indefinite-delivery contract for 2012-16.

 

The contract was given at the end of a yearlong re-competition procedure.

 

SABCA is an engineering and manufacturing company that has participated in licensed production programs of combat aircraft and military helicopters for the Air Force and others. It is a prime or subcontractor for upgrade programs on F-16s, A-10s, Alpha Jets, Mirage and other aircraft types.

 

SABCA began working with F-16s more than 30 years ago, assembling and delivering new F-16 A/Cs to different end-users. Since then, more than 1,150 F-16 A/Cs have been assembled, upgraded, inspected, repaired or repainted by the company.

 

The United States gave the company a seven-year indefinite-delivery contract for in-theater depot-level support to the Air Force Europe's F-16s in 2005.

 

The monetary value of the contract and other details weren't disclosed.

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 novembre 2011 1 28 /11 /novembre /2011 13:10

http://cdnpullz.defencetalk.com/wp-content/themes/dtstyle/scripts/timthumb.php?src=http://www.defencetalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/italians-mRAP.jpg&w=375&h=245&zc=1

 

November 28th, 2011 By USArmy – DEFENCE TALK

 

Early in the evening of Oct. 20, Italian combat engineer Cpl. Tizano Testa hurriedly clamored over the cab of a 19-ton, 18-foot high MaxxPro-Base armored fighting vehicle while trying to install a night-vision camera on the roof.

 

The soldier behind the wheel of the massive vehicle, Francesco Monteforte, was waiting to drive through the motor pool parking lot with the windshield armor down -- essentially driving in a steel box without a window -- and needed the camera to see.

 

"The way you drive at home, there should be no difference if I attach it or not!" said Testa sarcastically. Within a few minutes the wind picked up and it began to rain. At this time of year the late afternoon light fades fast, making the task of getting the camera properly attached and functioning even more difficult.

 

"Can you see anything yet?" Testa called out in English, heavily accented in a Neapolitan-Italian dialect. He was obviously impatient to get moving. As an afterthought, he added a few sharp words in Italian intended for the camera.

 

Finally, Monteforte called out from inside the vehicle: "Wait! It's good -- I see! Avanti! Let's go!"

 

Testa and Monteforte are two of the 32 students from the 21st Engineers, members of the Italian Combat Service Support Battalion based out of Caserta, located approximately 40 miles north of Naples, who came to the U.S. Army Europe Joint Multinational Training Command to attend a two-week intensive mine-resistant, ambush-protected, or MRAP, vehicle driver/operator certification course.

 

"Even though it's already getting pretty dark, they shouldn't be taking so long to get moving," said Aubrey Gorden, lead instructor and multinational training specialist in charge of the JMTC MRAP driver certification program. "But they'll cut that time in half tomorrow. I've rarely taught a group with such a high learning curve -- and I've been working with multinationals my entire career."

 

Gorden climbed into the passenger seat next to a confident, smiling Monteforte. Throughout the training an instructor rides in each vehicle with a group of students to ensure they are safely operating the vehicle, which involves backing, three-point turns, serpentine figure eights, quick stops and starts, obstacle navigation and real-life scenarios they may confront in combat.

 

In order to receive their certification and MRAP license, students are required to log a minimum of 50 miles of daytime driving and 30 miles at night using both night-vision video cameras and standard headlights separately. Prior to certification, students must demonstrate proficiency driving the vehicle, know its capabilities, safety and general operating features as a passenger, as well as a driver, and identify the required tasks and warning gauges in order to keep up with the vehicle's general maintenance.

 

"Grafenwoehr has everything we need to really train a Soldier well in such a short period of time," said Anthony Orejel, a certification instructor, referring to the training area's terrain and road conditions.

 

"The Italian language is a difficult hurdle, of course, but we quickly got over it," said Gorden with a chuckle. "We teach multinationals from virtually every corner of the world, but the nature of teaching is to learn, so we adapt to how each group of students learn best -- that's part of making any successful program work. The main thing is to ensure that all students we teach are properly certified and have the training to safely and expertly operate the vehicle in combat."

 

Since the program's inception in 2009, the training has grown to cover not only driving various types of MRAPs but also safety, rollovers, recovery and maintenance. Initially, the course was intended for U.S. Soldiers only, but when NATO and allied multinational partners requested training JMTC was all too happy to open the program up to them. In the last three years JMTC has evolved into a place where U.S. Soldiers and their coalition counterparts from all over the globe learn how to work together.

 

The MRAP is an armored fighting vehicle outfitted with a sophisticated array of improvised explosive device, or IED, countermeasures and safety features. The vehicle is designed with a V-shaped hull that deflects the blast of an IED or land mine away from the vehicle, and suspension floors and seats that reduce injuries caused by an explosive's shockwaves. The 10-ton armored body is bolted together instead of welded to the vehicle's chassis to facilitate quick repairs.

 

Italian Cpl. Fabiana Gatta had only praise for the vehicle's performance on the range -- no small flattery from a citizen of a land famously known for its love of high-performance automobiles, renowned champion Formula-1 drivers and gridlocked city squares.

 

"It's pretty fast. Sitting up so high you sometimes don't become aware how fast you are going until the instructor tells you to 'slow it down!' The steering is a lot smoother than you would imagine. I could even drive this through rush hour time in downtown Naples, no problem!" he added with a laugh. "After this training I could get through with no dents, you know, that would be a first for me in my town!"

 

In October, JMTC hosted a Full-Spectrum Training Exercise, or FSTE, with over 5,200 U.S. and multinational troops taking part, one of the largest coalition exercises to take place in Europe since the last Return of Forces to Germany, known as REFORGER, in May of 1993. In 2011 alone, JMTC instructors trained over 22,000 multinational troops from 38 countries.

 

"JMTC is the place for combined U.S. and multinational training and we are exceptionally good at it," said Col. Curtis J. Carson, JMTC chief of staff. "The conflicts faced today do not allow for a quick, seamless transition to effective partnership except through training. We're building tomorrows coalitions today, right here at JMTC."

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 novembre 2011 1 28 /11 /novembre /2011 08:30

http://www.defensenews.com/pgf/stories40/112511afp_cluster_bombs_file_315.JPG

 

Abu Ali Ahmad, left, shows a friend a crate full of detonated cluster bombs in a field in southern Lebanon in 2006. An effort to regulate the use of cluster bombs failed to get enough support from countries that have signed the Oslo Convention. (File photo / Agence France-Presse)

 

25 Nov 2011 By KATE BRANNEN DefenseNews

 

A U.S.-led effort to regulate the use of cluster bombs failed to get sufficient support from countries that have signed the Oslo Convention, an international treaty that bans the weapons.

 

The protocol was rejected Nov. 25 after several weeks of negotiations between member states of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) in Geneva.

 

If it had passed, the legally binding protocol would have banned cluster bombs manufactured before 1980 and required safeguards and regulations for those manufactured after that date. China and Russia, who, along with the United States, are major producers of the weapons, supported the effort.

 

Meanwhile, several of the 111 signatories of the Oslo Convention believed this regulatory approach undermined or at least diluted the outright ban. Human Rights Watch, the International Committee of the Red Cross and other groups opposed the treaty and praised its defeat.

 

It is unclear when the major users will be brought to the table again, a senior U.S. official said.

 

Until the last hour of negotiations, amendments were being offered to address the Oslo countries' concerns, but in the end they were insufficient, the U.S. official said.

 

Part of the U.S. argument for the protocol was that if enacted, it would prohibit more cluster munitions for the United States than the Oslo Convention has prohibited for all of its member states combined.

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 novembre 2011 1 28 /11 /novembre /2011 06:30

http://www.meretmarine.com/objets/500/33010.jpg 

crédits : US NAVY

 

28/11/2011 MER et MARINE

 

Le dernier-né de la flotte des porte-avions nucléaires de l'US Navy est en escale à Marseille. Arrivé vendredi dernier, il devrait appareiller demain mardi. L'USS H.W. Bush revient d'un déploiement de cinq mois dans l'océan Indien et est sur la route de retour vers la base navale de Norfolk.

 

Dixième unité du type Nimitz/Theodore Roosevelt, le CVN 77 a été mis sur cale en 2003 et remis à l'US Navy en janvier 2009. Long de 333 mètres pour un déplacement de 98.000 tonnes en charge, le navire, armé par 5600 marins, peut embarquer 68 avions et hélicoptères. Il dispose de deux réacteurs à eau pressurisée fournissant une puissance de 205 MW et assurant une vitesse maximale de 31 noeuds. Pour son autodéfense, le CVN 77 compte, en plus de sa chasse embarquée, deux lanceurs verticaux (24 missiles ESSM) et deux systèmes surface-air à courte portée RAM. Pour son premier déploiement, le nouveau porte-avions américain est accompagné des croiseurs lance-missiles USS Gettysburg (CG 64) et Anzio (CG 68), ainsi que des destroyers lance-missiles USS Truxton (DDG 103) et USS Mitscher (DDG 57). Fort de plus de 6000 marins, ce groupe aéronaval a pris le nom de George H.W. Bush Carrier Strike Group (GHWB CSG).

Partager cet article
Repost0

Présentation

  • : RP Defense
  • : Web review defence industry - Revue du web industrie de défense - company information - news in France, Europe and elsewhere ...
  • Contact

Recherche

Articles Récents

Categories