Overblog
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
4 février 2015 3 04 /02 /février /2015 08:50
Armor: Poland Produces Their Own APFSDS

 

January 11, 2015: Strategy Page

 

Poland has ordered 13,000 120mm APFSDS (Armor Piercing Fin Stabilized Discarding Sabot, for smooth bore guns) tank gun shells from a local manufacturer for delivery by 2017. These are for Poland’s recently acquired forces of 237 second hand German Leopard 2 tanks. Poland bought some German APFSDS shells initially, but since the Cold War ended Poland has been producing APFSDS for the 125mm guns used by its T-72s, which the Leopards are replacing. Polish ammo plants will buy new manufacturing equipment to produce the 120mm APFSDS but will be able to build the shells at lower cost, and comparable quality to other nations and thus be able to grab some export business. Poland still has some locally upgraded T-72s (the PT-91) and continues to manufacturer 125mm APFSDS for these.

 

APFSDS weigh about 23 kg (50 pounds) and tend to be about  is 900mm (35 inches) long and use 8.1 kg (18 pounds) of slow burning explosives to propel the shell out the 120mm smooth barrel to a top speed of 1,555 meters (5,100 feet) a second. The sabots fall away after the shell leaves the barrel, leaving the 10 kg (22 pound), 25mm diameter (and 800mm long) depleted uranium or tungsten penetrator to continue on to the target (up to 5,000 meters away).

 

Most modern 120mm tank guns fire a shell that uses a smaller 25mm “penetrator.” The 25mm rod of tungsten (or depleted uranium) is surrounded by a “sabot” that falls away once the shell clears the barrel. This gives the penetrator higher velocity and penetrating power. This is the most expensive type of 120mm shell and already comes in several variants. There is APDS (Armor Piercing Discarding Sabot) and APFSDS (Armor Piercing Fin Stabilized Discarding Sabot, for smooth bore guns). The armor piercing element of discarding sabot rounds is less than half the diameter of the shell and made of very expensive, high density metal. Its smaller size enables it to hit the target at very high speeds, up to 1,900 meters (5,900 feet) a second. This is the most common type of anti-tank shell and is constantly being improved. Thus in the 1970s depleted (nonradioactive) uranium was introduced by the U.S. to replace the slightly lighter tungsten penetrators. The depleted uranium penetrators were more effective.

 

About twenty armies now have 120 mm and 125mm smoothbore guns which can obtain slightly more penetrating power using depleted uranium instead of tungsten. While composite armor was developed to defeat APDS but it was not always successful. HEAT (High Explosive Anti Tank) rounds have fallen from favor because their success depends on hitting a flat surface on the tank. Modern tanks have few flat surfaces. On the plus side, HEAT shells must be fired at lower speeds, are good at any range, and many are now built with a fragmentation capability to make them useful for anti-personnel work. The AP type shells are less effective at longer ranges. Similar to HEAT, more expensive and still in use, is the HESH (High Explosive Squash Head) shell. This item hits the tank, the explosive warhead squashes, and then explodes. The force of the explosion goes through the armor and causes things to come lose and fly about the inside of the tank (the spall effect). The vehicle may appear unharmed, but the crew and much of its equipment are not. Works at any range but is somewhat defeated by spaced and composite armor.

 

Then there is the controversy over the health issues associated with depleted uranium, which is a metal that is one of the heaviest known. It is very effective at punching holes through enemy tanks. It is so named because all the harmful radiation has been "depleted" from it as a by-product of manufacturing nuclear fuel.  But because it's still considered a "nuclear" material it is controlled by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. In effect, these anti-tank shells are technically "nuclear weapons." U.S. export laws had to be changed to allow the export of depleted uranium ammo.

 

Early on there were rumors that depleted uranium created dangerous levels of radiation when handled or used. In reality, depleted uranium is no more toxic than tungsten and other heavy metals. It is true that when depleted uranium penetrators go through armor, and come under enormous stress, they do produce brief, but high, bursts of radiation. This seems to be because a chunk of depleted uranium will absorb most of the radiation it produces through normal decay, which it cannot do once shattered. However, it is unlikely that the resulting "pulse" of radiation will cause injury or illness, particularly given the damage produced by the explosive effect and shell fragments inside a vehicle hit. The Poles don’t have any depleted Uranium, so they will be using tungsten.

Partager cet article
Repost0
17 juin 2014 2 17 /06 /juin /2014 11:50
Cassidian Optronics delivers sighting systems for the modernisation of several NATO states' Leopard 2 main battle tanks

 

 

Jun 17, 2014 ASDNews Source : Airbus Defence and Space

 

    Contracts worth over a,15 m from Germany, Canada and Denmark

 

Cassidian Optronics, a subsidiary of Airbus Defence and Space, has been awarded contracts for the modernisation of more than 100 Leopard 2 main battle tanks in Germany, Canada and Denmark. The contract to equip the gunner and commander sights with modern sensors is worth over €15 m.

 

ATTICA, a third-generation thermal imaging device from Cassidian Optronics, constitutes the main element of the deliveries, along with additional sensors and system components. The device was introduced as standard in the PERI R17 commander’s sight in Germany in 2013. In Canada and Denmark, the camera will now also become standard in the gunner’s sight, in addition to the commander’s sight. This will serve to further standardise the LEOPARD user nations’ configuration of their tanks.

 

Read more

Partager cet article
Repost0
14 avril 2014 1 14 /04 /avril /2014 10:30
photo KMW

photo KMW

 

 

13/04/2014 lorientlejour.com (Reuters)

 

Le ministre allemand de l'Economie Sigmar Gabriel s'oppose à la vente par l'Allemagne de plusieurs centaines de chars de combat à l'Arabie saoudite, rapporte dimanche le Bild am Sonntag.

 

Selon des informations parues dans les médias, jamais confirmées officiellement en raison de la sensibilité de ce genre de dossiers, le royaume wahhabite est intéressé par l'acquisition d'un maximum de 800 chars Leopard 2.

 

Ryad chercherait depuis des années à acheter ces engins aux entreprises Krauss-Maffei Wegmann et Rheinmetall et a réservé 18 milliards d'euros dans son budget de la défense.

 

"Le gouvernement n'approuvera pas cette vente controversée", écrit le Bild am Sonntag, citant des sources gouvernementales.

 

"Gabriel a joué un rôle clé, car il a pris position personnellement contre une livraison de chars à cette maison royale autocratique", ajoute le journal.

 

Ces ventes doivent être approuvées par le conseil de sécurité nationale, qui rassemble la chancelière Angela Merkel et ses ministres de l'Economie, de la Défense, du Développement et des Affaires étrangères, mais ses décisions ne sont jamais rendues publiques.

 

Par le passé, le président du Parti social-démocrate (SPD) avait jugé "honteux" que l'Allemagne figure parmi les plus grands pays exportateurs d'armes au monde.

Partager cet article
Repost0
14 février 2014 5 14 /02 /février /2014 08:50
La Finlande modernise sa cavalerie blindée

 

13 février 2014 par Michael Delaunay – 45enord.ca

 

Le 17 janvier 2014, le ministre finlandais de la Défense, Carl Haglund, a donné son accord à l’achat de 100 chars Leopard 2A6 d’occasions auprès des Pays-Bas, après une période de négociations débuté en décembre 2013. La facture totale s’élève à
200 millions d’euros, soit 274 millions de dollars US. Cet achat devrait permettre à l’arme blindée finlandaise d’être opérationnelle au moins jusque dans les années 2030.

Les livraisons seront étalées sur quatre ans, de 2015 à 2019 et le contrat inclut la fourniture des munitions et des pièces de rechange pour une période de 10 ans.

Le contrat inclut également une formation des personnels ainsi que la livraison des équipements logistiques, des simulateurs, des outils spéciaux ainsi que des équipements d’essais.

La version 2A6 du char allemand offre une meilleure protection ainsi qu’une puissance de feu et un système de tir améliorés comparativement au modèle précédent, le 2A4, qui équipe la cavalerie finlandaise à hauteur de 139 exemplaires et qui sera progressivement remplacé.

Les Leopard 2A4 ont été achetés d’occasions en 2002 à l’Allemagne. Une fois leur potentiel opérationnel complètement épuisé, ces derniers serviront de réserve de pièces détachées et de véhicules d’entrainement. Avant l’acquisition des Leopard 2A4, la cavalerie finlandaise était équipé de 160 T-72M1, achetés à l’Union soviétique dans les années 1980, ainsi que d’un certain nombre de T-55 soviétiques.

Par ailleurs, 80 des 100 chars seront livrés en configuration de stockage puisqu’il s’agit de chars mis sous cocon par l’armée hollandaise en 2011.

Les “Leopard” de l’armée hollandaise

L’armée hollandaise a mis en service près de 450 chars Leopard 2 depuis le début des années 1980. Une grosse partie a ensuite été vendue à l’Autriche, au Portugal à la Norvège et au Canada.

C’est en 2011 que la totalité des chars Loepard 2 restants ont été mis sous cocons afin de réaliser des économies sur le budget de la défense afin de réduire le déficit public.

Ce sont donc 188 chars Leopard qui ont été mis en vente. Des négociations ont eu lieu avec l’Indonésie et le Pérou, mais pour des raisons de respects de droit l’homme, entre autres, ces négociations n’ont pas abouti.

Les coupures dans le budget de défense finlandais

Dans un contexte de coupes budgétaires généralisées dans la plus grande partie des pays occidentaux, les autorités finlandaises ont fait le choix d’acheter d’occasion des chars d’un standard plus élevé que leurs Leopard 2A4. Un Leopard 2A6 neuf vaut 10 millions d’euros, la mise au standard 2A6 des 2A4 est évaluée à 5 millions d’euros par blindé, alors que ce contrat permet au ministère de la Défense finlandais d’acheter 100 chars à 2 millions d’euros l’unité. Il est à noter que ces derniers ont été rétrofités au standard 2A6 par l’armée hollandaise dans le milieu des années 2000.

Les effets de la crise financière de 2008 se font ressentir de plus en plus durement en Europe et les budgets militaires ne cessent de baisser ainsi que le volume des forces armées. L’armée finlandaise n’y échappe pas et risque de se retrouver dans une position très délicate si son budget continue d’être coupé.

Le ministre de la défense finlandais, Carl Haglund, a même déclaré que “Si les niveaux du budget de la défense restent en l’état, dans les années 2020, les forces armées ne seraient plus en mesure de défendre toute la Finlande”

Ce qui a été également relevé par un rapport parlementaire en date de décembre 2012, intitulé Security And Defense Policy, qui concluait que si les dépenses militaires n’étaient pas augmentées après 2016 la capacité de l’armée finlandaise à protéger tout le territoire national serait altérée. Actuellement, le budget de la défense finlandais s’élève à 2,8 milliards d’euros (3,82 milliards de dollars US), soit à peine 1,5% du PIB (GDP), un des taux les plus bas de l’Union européenne.

Carl Haglund a ajouté, que pour maintenir les capacités de défense des armées finlandaises, il faudrait injecter 50 millions d’euros (soit 68,5 millions de dollars US) en 2016, puis 150 millions d’euros par an d’ici à 2020.

 

La coopération des pays nordiques en matière de défense

Pour plusieurs raisons et notamment du fait de leurs liens historiques, les pays nordiques ont noué de nombreux partenariats de défense. Ce qui se traduit souvent, mais pas systématiquement, par des achats d’équipements similaires, comme pour le char Leopard qui équipe les armées finlandaise, norvégienne et suédoise. Cela peut également se traduire par des achats d’équipements neufs ou d’occasions entre pays nordiques, comme en décembre 2013, lorsque la Norvège a acquis auprès du Danemark plusieurs lances roquettes multiples M270 (MLRS) pour sept millions de dollars. Ou encore, une coopération dans le domaine de la surveillance aérienne entre la Finlande, la Norvège et la Suède, et la liste ne s’arrête pas là.

Les liens historiques mais aussi et surtout la baisse des budgets militaire, ainsi que l’augmentation exponentielle des prix des équipements militaires modernes, poussent les pays nordiques à accentuer leur coopération militaire par la mutualisation des coûts d’entretien ou de formation par exemple. En 2010, lors d’une rencontre des ministres des affaires étrangères nordiques, dans le cadre du conseil Nordique, le ministre norvégien Jonas Gahr Store a déclaré que “Dans dix ou quinze ans, il est vraisemblable que nos pays n’auront plus de systèmes de défense distincts : c’est trop cher et ce n’est pas avisé”. En juin 2008, les chefs d’Etats-major finlandais, norvégiens et suédois ont publié un rapport mettant l’accent sur le besoin de mutualiser leurs dépenses afin d’en améliorer le rendement; et enfin en février 2009 le « Rapport Stoltenberg» a enfoncé le clou en rappelant la nécessité d’une coopération militaire nordique.

Pour éviter un déclassement et la perte de la capacité à défendre leurs pays, les nations nordiques multiplient les synergies au niveau militaire. Eero Heinäluoma, le porte-parole de l’Eduskunta (assemblée nationale finlandaise) a déclaré que quand la question du remplacement de la soixantaine d’avions F/A-18 Super Hornet va se poser après 2020, il faudrait penser à un partenariat avec la Suède pour obtenir le meilleur rapport coûts/efficacité possible avec le nouveau chasseur suédois Grippen. Cela permettrait de partager les coûts de la maintenance et de la formation entre les deux pays qui pourraient être rejoint par le Danemark.

Partager cet article
Repost0
2 juillet 2013 2 02 /07 /juillet /2013 17:50
Rheinmetall receives major order worth €475 million for new Leopard 2 and self-propelled howitzer project

22.06.2013 Rheinmetall - army-guide.com

 

An important new order from an Arab customer underscores Rheinmetall’s role as a leading international supplier of army technology products.

 

Specifically, Rheinmetall will be supplying complete L55-type tank guns for over sixty Leopard 2A7 main battle tanks, together with fire control electronics and electro-optical sensors for the medium-calibre weapon station.

 

In addition, Rheinmetall will manufacture the chassis and L52 main armament for over twenty PzH 2000 self-propelled howitzers, as well as supplying a complete driver training vehicle.

 

The Düsseldorf-based Rheinmetall Group will also be responsible for a spare parts package and special tools as well as training and documentation services.

 

The order also encompasses 120mm ammunition for the Leopard and 155mm ammunition for the PzH 2000 in multiple variants, together with MTLS modular propelling charges for the artillery system.

 

Rheinmetall has over forty years’ experience in developing and manufacturing armoured fighting vehicles. The Leopard 2 continues to set the global standard for modern main battle tanks. In service with the armies of 18 nations, over 3,600 now exist. Rheinmetall played a decisive part in developing and producing the Leopard 2. Of the 2,125 A4 versions of the Leopard 2 built, Rheinmetall completely manufactured 977 of these systems in Kiel on behalf of the armed forces of Germany and the Netherlands.

 

By contributing a number of crucial components, Rheinmetall has a major technological stake in the overall Leopard system. For example, Rheinmetall is responsible for the 120mm smoothbore gun, still considered to be most effective tank main armament anywhere. Produced under licence, this cutting edge weapon is also integrated into America’s M1 Abrams as well as a number of other main battle tanks.

 

Moreover, both the Leopard and PzH 2000 benefit tremendously from Rheinmetall’s unsurpassed expertise in the field of large-calibre ammunition. In both of these fighting vehicles, the perfectly harmonized combination of main armament and ammunition attests to the company’s unique competence in weapons and munitions as well as systems engineering.

 

Rheinmetall’s technological dominance also extends to the world of combat support vehicles: closely based on the Leopard and developed by Rheinmetall, the Büffel/Buffalo 3 armoured recovery vehicle forms a veritable “Main Battle Tank System” when teamed with the Leopard 2. Likewise based on the Leopard 2 chassis, Rheinmetall’s highly specialized Kodiak armoured engineering vehicle impressively underscores the company’s system capabilities and competence, which extend far beyond the classic main battle tank.

 

Furthermore, in the field of C4I and fire control technology, Rheinmetall occupies a unique position in the global marketplace. Adapted to meet individual customer requirements, the company supplies individual solutions that can be integrated into higher-echelon command and control systems.

Partager cet article
Repost0
9 mai 2013 4 09 /05 /mai /2013 11:35
photo KMW

photo KMW

May 08, 2013 By Matthias Gebauer and Otfried Nassauer – Spiegel.de

 

In recent years, Chancellor Angela Merkel's government has significantly expanded German arms exports abroad, often to countries with questionable human rights records. Now Berlin has approved a deal to export over 100 tanks to Indonesia.

 

The German government has once again approved a controversial deal to export arms to a country with questionable democratic credentials. The German Security Council, which meets in secret, has approved a deal by defense firm Rheinmetall to export 104 Leopard 2 battle tanks to Indonesia.

 

In addition, 50 Marder 1A2 infantry fighting vehicles are to be delivered as part of the deal, as are 10 other military vehicles, including armored recovery vehicles, mobile bridges and military engineering vehicles. While the broad outlines of the deal had been reported by Reuters previously, the exact numbers of tanks and armored vehicles involved come from a government response to a parliamentary inquiry made by Green Party lawmaker Katja Keul and seen by SPIEGEL ONLINE.

 

Indonesia's interest in German arms had long been apparent, but Berlin had remained silent on its intentions. Previously, Indonesia had approached the Netherlands regarding its interest in acquiring Leopard tanks, which are widely considered to be the most modern battle tanks available. But the Dutch parliament declined to approve the deal due to concerns about the human rights situation in Indonesia. Jakarta then turned to Germany. The German parliament has no veto right over arms deals.

 

Rheinmetall has further developed the Leopard tank, providing it with greater protection and systems allowing for street fighting in residential areas. It is this model, called MBT Revolution, in which Indonesia was interested.

 

Changing Approach to Weapons Deals

 

A possible arms deal with Indonesia was under discussion as far back as the summer of 2012, when Chancellor Angela Merkel visited the country. At the time, Jakarta was open about its interest in military vehicles made in Germany, saying the anticipated deal was merely an effort to update its weapons systems and insisted the tanks would not be used against its own people, during protests, for example. Still, human rights activists were concerned about the possible deal. Amnesty International accuses Jakarta of contravening human rights in some provinces and the country ranks 100th on Transparency International's corruption index.

 

The German Security Council, made up of the chancellor and select cabinet members, has approved several deals to export tanks in recent years, thereby significantly changing the country's erstwhile restrictive approach to arms exports. Previous governments had approved deals involving the export of warships and submarines to questionable countries because it is difficult to use such weapons against the civilian population. Tanks, however, remained taboo. "That which floats is okay. That which rolls is not." Such was the dictum followed during the long reign of former Foreign Minister Dietrich Genscher.

 

Regional Interests

 

More recently, however, billion-euro tank deals have been approved as a matter of course. In recent years, the security council has approved export deals to such autocratic countries as Saudi Arabia, justifying the decision by pointing to the importance of regional stability to Germany's own national interests. Saudi Arabia, for example, is seen as a strategic counterweight to Iran and also cooperates intensely with German secret services in the fight against international terrorism.

 

A similar argument was used to justify the approval of an arms deal involving the export of tanks to Qatar. Berlin granted Krauss-Maffei Wegmann permission in April to export 62 Leopard 2 tanks in addition to other military vehicles in a deal worth €1.89 billion. Rheinmetall is an important supplier in the deal, delivering the canons and weapons systems for the tanks in addition to machine guns, spare parts and munitions.

 

"Qatar is in many areas an important partner for Germany and the European Union in the region. In addition, it has legitimate security and defense interests," Berlin said in defending the deal. The justification would likely be similar for a deal with Qatar's neighbor, United Arab Emirates. According to the response to Keul's inquiry, the country received permission last year to purchase machine guns and other weaponry, including munitions, from German production.

Partager cet article
Repost0

Présentation

  • : RP Defense
  • : Web review defence industry - Revue du web industrie de défense - company information - news in France, Europe and elsewhere ...
  • Contact

Recherche

Articles Récents

Categories