Overblog Tous les blogs Top blogs Entreprises & Marques Tous les blogs Entreprises & Marques
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
MENU
15 avril 2013 1 15 /04 /avril /2013 07:35

Patriot missile

 

TOKYO, 12 avr 2013 marine-oceans.com (AFP)

 

Le Japon a ordonné que les pilotes des avions en réfèrent en premier lieu à l'armée américaine lorsqu'ils pénètrent dans l'espace aérien à proximité de la principale base des Etats-Unis à Okinawa, dans le sud de l'archipel nippon, après de nouvelles menaces nord-coréennes.

 

Cette mesure, contenue dans une directive du ministère japonais des Transports rendue publique tard dans la soirée de vendredi par l'agence de presse Kyodo News concerne une zone de trente kilomètres de rayon autour de la base de Kadena, où des missiles Patriot ont été installés.

 

En prévision d'un ou plusieurs éventuels tirs de missiles de moyenne portée de la Corée du Nord qui pourraient intervenir dans les heures ou jours à venir, le gouvernement du Japon a donné aux forces d'autodéfense (nom officiel de l'armée japonaise) l'autorisation officielle de détruire tout missile nord-coréen qui menacerait le territoire nippon.

 

Dans ce but, des missiles Patriot ont été installés dans le centre de Tokyo et autour de la capitale, et des destroyers équipés du système radar Aegis et de moyens d'interception ont été déployés en mer du Japon.

 

Le Japon a aussi décidé de mettre en place de façon permanente des Patriot sur deux bases militaires de l'île méridionale d'Okinawa.

 

Ce pays s'est dit vendredi prêt à faire face à tout type de scénario après de nouvelles menaces proférées par la Corée du Nord à l'encontre de l'archipel nippon.

 

Plus tôt dans la journée, par la voix de son agence officielle de presse KCNA, la Corée du Nord a qualifié de "provocantes" les déclarations de Tokyo sur son intention d'intercepter tout missile qui serait tiré par Pyongyang et risquerait de frapper le territoire japonais.

 

Le régime nord-coréen a prévenu qu'un tel geste risquerait de plonger le Japon "dans des flammes nucléaires".

 

Et d'ajouter, toujours via KCNA: "le Japon est toujours dans la ligne de mire de notre armée révolutionnaire et si le Japon fait le moindre geste, l'étincelle de la guerre touchera le Japon en premier".

Partager cet article
Repost0
14 avril 2013 7 14 /04 /avril /2013 23:00

Nuclear north korea

 

SEOUL, 14 avril - RIA Novosti

 

La Corée du Nord a critiqué la proposition de Séoul qui avait invité le régime communiste à entamer des négociations, indiquant qu'un tel dialogue "n'aurait pas de sens" tant que les Etats-Unis et la Corée du Sud poursuivront leurs manœuvres militaires conjointes.

 

"C'est un stratagème astucieux du gouvernement du Sud visant à masquer sa politique de confrontation et à dissimuler sa responsabilité dans les démarches criminelles qui ont provoqué la crise dans le parc industriel de Kaesong", a déclaré un fonctionnaire nord-coréen cité par l'agence officielle du régime de Pyongyang KCNA.

 

Selon le responsable, les exercices conjoints américano-sud-coréens, qui se poursuivront jusqu'à la fin du mois d'avril, contribuent à l'escalade du conflit.

 

"De quelles négociations peut-on parler dans ces conditions? Un tel dialogue n'aurait pas de sens", a indiqué l'officiel.

Début mars, la Corée du Nord a résilié tous les accords de non-agression et de dénucléarisation conclus avec la Corée du Sud. Un mois plus tard, le régime de Pyongyang a annoncé son intention de procéder à un tir d'essai d'un missile balistique de portée moyenne Musudan.

 

Vendredi 12 avril, la Corée du Sud s'est déclarée prête à entamer des négociations avec Pyongyang.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 avril 2013 5 12 /04 /avril /2013 11:35

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-84TVHptcvLs/UWdBSMjXdlI/AAAAAAAAYk0/ycSqmB-Dyyo/s1600/Pegasus+CTD_1.jpg

The airbags are planned to bring helicopters back to the

surface if they are submerged. (all photos: Aus DoD)

 

11.04.2013 Defense Studies

A West Australian company will begin trials of its new airbags designed for defence force helicopters in case they crash into water.

The airbags are planned to bring helicopters back to the surface if they are submerged, keeping them afloat for up to four hours.


The Defence force's Duncan Watson says he believes it is the first time the lightweight bags will be deployed on the land-based helicopters.

"With the past history where we had an aircraft go down and a loss of crew obviously in today's world life is more important than anything else," he said.


"Thus, this is why we need these ability to be able to operate safely over water."

The L3-Nautronix company developed the lightweight, detachable emergency floating device which will enable the helicopter to remain afloat.


It operates automatically or under pilot control with no wired connection to the chopper.

Duncan Watson says existing airbags on the market were inadequate.


"The weight of these current bags that are in operation grossly outweighs what we could be carrying underneath the helicopter," he said.

"These helicopters give you that ability to survive over water if you have to ditch so it's mainly to be able to recover the crew more than anything else but the aircraft possibly."

(ABC)

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 avril 2013 5 12 /04 /avril /2013 07:35

F16A photo Dennis Chang

 

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla., April 11 (UPI)

 

Pratt & Whitney has been contracted by the U.S. Air Force for support services to company engines used by the Royal Thai Air Force.

 

The materials management program contract is part of a U.S. Foreign Military Sales deal.

 

Under the one-year award, Pratt & Whitney will provide parts and repair services for F100-PW-220 engines in intermediate engine shops and at the depot level.

 

"Pratt & Whitney is proud of our decades long partnership with the Royal Thai Air Force, providing dependable engines and affordable readiness," said Howie Chandler, vice president, Military Business Development and Aftermarket Services for Pratt & Whitney. "We look forward to expanding our level of support to the Royal Thai Air Force's F-16 fleet."

 

The value of the contract was not disclosed.

 

Pratt & Whitney reports it also has received a contract from the Republic of Singapore to provide seven advanced F100-PW-229 EEP engines to power F-16 fighters. flown by its the Republic of Singapore Air Force (RSAF) fleet of Lockheed Martin F-16 fighters

 

Delivery of the engines begins this year and ends in 2014.

 

"Pratt & Whitney has been partnering with the Republic of Singapore Air Force for many years, providing dependable and affordable engines," Chandler said. "We are pleased to be able to continue to support and look forward to continuing this great relationship."

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 avril 2013 5 12 /04 /avril /2013 07:35

Sea-Based X-Band Radar source MDA

 

WASHINGTON, 11 avr 2013 marine-oceans.co (AFP)

 

Un puissant radar militaire américain a été installé en mer afin de détecter tout tir éventuel de missile par la Corée du Nord, a affirmé dans la nuit de mercredi à jeudi un haut responsable de la Défense américaine.

 

"Le SBX est en position", a déclaré cette source qui s'exprimait sous couvert d'anonymat auprès de l'AFP. Le Pentagone avait annoncé le déploiement du SBX (Sea-based X-Band Radar), arguant le 2 avril qu'il s'agissait d'une mission "de routine", officiellement "pas liée" aux tensions sur la péninsule coréenne.

 

Sans fournir plus de détail, ce responsable a confirmé que le SBX, une plate-forme semi-submersible surmontée d'un énorme radome, a été positionné en mer pour traquer d'éventuels missiles nord-coréens.

 

Cet appareil était auparavant à Pearl Harbor à Hawaii. Haut de 85 mètres, il est capable de détecter le lancement d'un missile à 2.000 kilomètres à la ronde.

 

Il complète une panoplie de radars américains dans la région capables de déterminer l'origine d'un tir et d'en suivre la trajectoire, notamment deux destroyers équipés du système antimissile Aegis.

 

Les Etats-Unis et la Corée du Sud ont sommé jeudi la Corée du Nord d'arrêter de "jouer avec le feu" et de renoncer au tir de missile qu'elle semble vouloir effectuer au mépris des sanctions internationales et au risque d'embraser la péninsule.

 

Les Américains ont par ailleurs annoncé le déploiement d'une batterie antimissile THAAD sur leur base militaire de Guam dans le Pacifique, située à 3.380 kms au sud-est de la Corée du Nord et désignée ostensiblement comme cible par le régime de Kim Jong-un.

 

Le Japon et la Corée du Sud ont eux aussi déployé leurs propres moyens antimissiles face à ce tir annoncé.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 avril 2013 5 12 /04 /avril /2013 07:35

Nuclear north korea

 

MOSCOU, 11 avril - RIA Novosti

 

Réunis à Londres, les chefs de diplomatie des pays du G8 ont condamné les programmes nucléaire et balistique de la Corée du Nord et appelé Pyongyang à "s'abstenir de tout acte de provocation", rapporte jeudi la presse internationale en référence au communiqué final de la réunion ministérielle.
 
"Les ministres ont condamné dans les termes les plus forts le développement continuel du programme d'armes nucléaires et de missiles balistiques de la Corée du Nord, notamment l'enrichissement d'uranium", lit-on dans le communiqué.
 
Selon les médias, ils ont aussi menacé de nouvelles sanctions le régime de Pyongyang en cas de nouveau test de missile ou de nouvel essai nucléaire.
 
Furieux du nouveau train de sanctions adopté par l'Onu après son troisième essai nucléaire en février dernier et des manœuvres militaires américano-nord-coréennes en cours, Pyongyang a multiplié ces derniers temps les déclarations belliqueuses, agitant même le spectre d'une guerre "thermonucléaire".
 
Séoul a prévenu mercredi que la Corée du Nord aurait déployé jusqu'à cinq missiles de moyenne portée sur sa côte est, et que Pyongyang pourrait procéder "à tout moment" à un tir de missiles Musudan, dont le rayon d'action est de 3.500 km.
 
En 2005, la Corée du Nord s'est proclamée puissance nucléaire. En 2006, 2009 et 2013, elle a procédé à des essais nucléaires souterrains, suscitant l'indignation de la communauté internationale. Le Conseil de sécurité de l'Onu a adopté des résolutions sommant Pyongyang de renoncer à des activités nucléaires. En avril, les autorités nord-coréennes ont annoncé leurs projets de reprise de l'enrichissement d'uranium sur le site de Yongbyon.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 avril 2013 5 12 /04 /avril /2013 02:03

Portee-des-missiles-nord-coreens-apr-2013.jpg

 

12 avril 2013 Romandie.com (AFP)

 

WASHINGTON - Les Etats-Unis ne pensent pas que la Corée du Nord soit en mesure de lancer un missile nucléaire, a déclaré jeudi à l'AFP un haut responsable américain, après qu'un élu américain eut affirmé le contraire en citant un rapport du renseignement militaire.

 

Les Nord-Coréens n'ont jamais démontré cette capacité et nous ne pensons pas qu'ils en soient capables actuellement, a ajouté ce responsable sous couvert de l'anonymat.

 

Le Pentagone a également indiqué qu'il était inexact de suggérer que le régime nord-coréen a complètement testé, mis au point ou démontré le type de capacités nucléaires évoquées par l'élu.

 

Plus tôt dans la journée, un représentant républicain du Colorado (ouest), Doug Lamborn, a cité un rapport du renseignement militaire américain, la Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), selon lequel la Corée du Nord disposerait de la capacité de miniaturiser une arme nucléaire et de la monter sur un missile balistique.

 

L'élu s'exprimait lors d'une audition du secrétaire à la Défense Chuck Hagel et du plus haut gradé américain, le général Martin Dempsey.

 

La DIA estime avec une assurance modérée que le Nord dispose d'armes nucléaires qui peuvent être fixées sur des missiles balistiques. Cependant leur fiabilité sera faible, a déclaré M. Lamborn, citant ce rapport selon lui terminé le mois dernier.

 

Je ne peux pas évoquer les détails d'un rapport qui est entièrement classifié, mais il est inexact de suggérer que le régime nord-coréen a complètement testé, mis au point ou démontré le type de capacités nucléaires évoquées dans ce passage, a réagi dans un communiqué le porte-parole du Pentagone George Little.

 

Les Etats-Unis continuent de surveiller de près le programme nucléaire nord-coréen et appelle la Corée du Nord à honorer ses obligations internationales, ajoute-t-il.

 

Le régime de Pyongyang a procédé à trois essais nucléaires depuis 2006. Il a par ailleurs réussi à mettre un satellite en orbite le 12 décembre mais ne dispose pas à ce stade des moyens de lancer un missile balistique intercontinental (ICBM), comme le Taepodong-2 qu'il s'efforce de mettre au point.

 

Selon les experts, il y a un long chemin à parcourir entre la capacité de faire détoner un engin nucléaire et le miniaturiser pour le placer au sommet d'un missile balistique.

 

Le Nord a déployé deux missiles sur sa côte orientale, des Musudan, dont le lancement pourrait intervenir au cours des tout prochains jours. Ces missiles auraient une portée théorique de 3.000 à 4.000 kilomètres mais Pyongyang ne les a jamais testés.

 

La seule capacité balistique avérée sur le plan opérationnel de la Corée du Nord est le missile No-Dong-1, d'une portée de 1.300 kilomètres, selon l'Arms Control Association.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 avril 2013 5 12 /04 /avril /2013 01:56

Missile balistique Musudan

 

11/04/2013 par Jacques N. Godbout - 45enord.ca

 

Le renseignement militaire américain (la Defense Military Agency) a conclu avec une «certitude raisonnable» que la Corée du Nord a bel et bien la capacité de lance des missiles balistiques dotés d’armes nucléaires, bien que les armes ne seraient probablement peu fiables, ont indiqué des responsables de du renseignement ce jeudi 11 avril.

Une étude datée du mois dernier de la Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) est arrivée à cette conclusion qui donne froid dans le dos et illustre l’importance des enjeux qui entourent l’escalade des tensions dans la péninsule coréenne.

 

La conclusion de l’évaluation a été rendue publique lors d’une d’une audience du Comité des forces armés de la Chambre des représentants.


«La DIA évalue avec une certitude raisonnable que le Nord dispose actuellement d’armes nucléaires qui peuvent être «livrés» par missiles balistiques, mais la fiabilité sera faible», a déclaré le un membre du Comité de la Chambre, le représentant républicain du Colorado, Doug Lamborn, citant le rapport de la DIA intitulé «Évaluation de la menace dynamique 8099: la Corée du Nord programme d’armes nucléaires (mars 2013 ).»

 

Un responsable américain a plus tard déclaré que la citation rapportée par Lamborn était dans une section de l’étude qui avait été marquée par erreur «non classifiée».

 

Interrogé pour savoir s’il était d’accord avec l’évaluation, le général Martin Dempsey, chef d’État-major interarmées des États-Unis a refusé de commenter, disant qu’il n’avait pas vu le rapport.

 

Les experts, tant à l’intérieur qu’à l’extérieur du gouvernement américain, ne s’entendent pas sur l’évaluation de la capacité de la Corée du Nord de concevoir et de fabriquer un engin nucléaire qui serait assez petit pour servir de tête de missile.

 

Certains experts croient que les Nord-Coréens sont capables de construire un dispositif nucléaire qui pourrait être monté sur les vieux modèles de missile de portée intermédiaire, mais d’autres experts ne sont pas d’accord.

 

Le consensus au sein du gouvernement américain était jusqu’à maintenant que la Corée du Nord n’avait pas encore d’un dispositif nucléaire qui pourrait être monté sur des missiles à longue portée qui pourraient en théorie atteindre les territoires américains.

 

Interrogé lors de la même audience aujourd’hui, le secrétaire à la Défense, Chuck Hagel a déclaré qu’il ne croyait pas que la Corée du Nord ait la «capacité en ce moment» de frapper les États-Unis avec un missile à longue portée.

 

Mais un responsable de la Défense a nuancé ces propos en précisant que, dans cette déclaration, le secrétaire américain ne parlait que du territoire continental

 

Les responsables américains s’accordent à dire que, s’ils ne peuvent peut-être pas encore atteindre le continent américain, les missiles peuvent en revanche atteindre l’île de Guam, un territoire américain dans le Pacifique, et les États américains d’Hawaii et de l’Alaska.

 


 
Partager cet article
Repost0
12 avril 2013 5 12 /04 /avril /2013 00:11

Nuclear north korea

 

12 avril 2013 Romandie.com (AFP)

 

BASE AERIENNE DE MANAS (Kirghizstan) - De hauts responsables américains ont pressé la Chine vendredi d'utiliser toute son influence pour stopper les actions déstabilisantes de la Corée du Nord, affirmant que des intérêts régionaux et internationaux étaient en jeu.

 

La Chine a un énorme intérêt dans la stabilité et la recherche incessante de la Corée du Nord à se doter d'un missile nucléaire armé est l'ennemie de la stabilité, a déclaré un haut responable de l'administration américaine qui se rendait à Séoul avec le secrétaire d'Etat américain John Kerry. Cela nous donne à nous et aux Chinois un objectif très puissant en commun pour la dénucléarisation, a-t-il ajouté.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 20:20

Sea-Based X-Band Radar source MDA

Les Américains ont déployé un radar flottant.

 

11/04/2013 lalibre.be (AFP)

 

Un puissant radar militaire américain a été installé en mer afin de détecter tout tir éventuel de missile par la Corée du Nord, a affirmé dans la nuit de mercredi à jeudi un haut responsable de la Défense américaine. "Le SBX est en position", a déclaré cette source qui s'exprimait sous couvert d'anonymat auprès de l'AFP. Le Pentagone avait annoncé le déploiement du SBX (Sea-based X-Band Radar), arguant le 2 avril qu'il s'agissait d'une mission "de routine", officiellement "pas liée" aux tensions sur la péninsule coréenne.

 

Sans fournir plus de détail, ce responsable a confirmé que le SBX, une plate-forme semi-submersible surmontée d'un énorme radome, a été positionné en mer pour traquer d'éventuels missiles nord-coréens. Cet appareil était auparavant à Pearl Harbor à Hawaii. Haut de 85 mètres, il est capable de détecter le lancement d'un missile à 2.000 kilomètres à la ronde. Il complète une panoplie de radars américains dans la région capables de déterminer l'origine d'un tir et d'en suivre la trajectoire, notamment deux destroyers équipés du système antimissile Aegis.

 

Les Etats-Unis et la Corée du Sud ont sommé jeudi la Corée du Nord d'arrêter de "jouer avec le feu" et de renoncer au tir de missile qu'elle semble vouloir effectuer au mépris des sanctions internationales et au risque d'embraser la péninsule. Les Américains ont par ailleurs annoncé le déploiement d'une batterie antimissile THAAD sur leur base militaire de Guam, dans le Pacifique. Le Japon et la Corée du Sud ont eux aussi déployé leurs propres moyens antimissiles face à ce tir annoncé.

 

Le G8 menace de nouvelles sanctions la Corée du Nord en cas de test de missile

 

Les ministres des Affaires étrangères du G8 ont "condamné dans les termes les plus forts" l'attitude de la Corée du Nord et menacé de nouvelles sanctions le régime de Pyongyang en cas de nouveau test de missile, selon le communiqué final publié à l'issue de leur réunion jeudi à Londres. Les chefs de la diplomatie des huit grandes puissances ont "condamné l'évolution continuelle du programme d'armes nucléaires et de missiles balistiques" de la Corée du Nord, notamment l'enrichissement d'uranium. Les agissements de la Corée du Nord "constituent une violation directe des résolutions du Conseil de sécurité de l'Onu", ont-ils relevé.

 

Dans leur communiqué, les ministres "appuient" aussi la résolution du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU en faveur "d'un renforcement des sanctions" en cas de nouvel essai nucléaire ou de tir de missile de la part de Pyongyang. Le test nucléaire mené par la Corée du Nord en février et ses deux tirs de missile l'an dernier "ont porté atteinte à la stabilité régionale, compromis les perspectives d'une paix durable dans la péninsule coréenne et menacé la paix et la sécurité internationale", poursuit le communiqué.

 

Les ministres du G8 soulignent que l'attitude agressive de la Corée du Nord "ne fera que l'isoler un peu plus", demandant à Pyongyang d'entamer des négociations avec la communauté internationale sur le désarmement nucléaire. Furieux du nouveau train de sanctions adopté par l'ONU après son troisième essai nucléaire en février et des manoeuvres militaires en cours entre les Etats-Unis et la Corée du Sud, Pyongyang a multiplié ces dernières semaines les déclarations belliqueuses, agitant même le spectre d'une guerre "thermonucléaire".

 

Le renseignement militaire sud-coréen affirme que Pyongyang est désormais prêt à procéder à un tir de missile, qui pourrait survenir autour du 15 avril. Dans leur déclaration finale, les chefs de la diplomatie du G8 ont également évoqué le conflit en Syrie, se disant "atterrés" par le nombre de morts, évalués à 70.000 par l'ONU. Ils ont appelé tous les pays à accroître leur aide au peuple syrien en répondant autant qu'ils le peuvent aux appels de l'ONU.

 

Mais ils n'ont fait aucune mention de l'éventuelle fourniture d'armes aux rebelles, réclamée par l'opposition syrienne, se contentant d'appeler "à une plus grande assistance" au peuple syrien "sur le plan humanitaire". Mercredi, l'opposition syrienne a de nouveau tenté, en marge du G8, de convaincre les Etats-Unis de lui fournir des armes, un appel qui a coïncidé avec l'annonce de l'allégeance à Al-Qaïda du Front jihadiste Al-Nosra, en première ligne contre le régime syrien. M. Kerry "n'a rien promis", selon son ministère.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 16:35

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e2/Republic_of_China_Army_Flag.svg/800px-Republic_of_China_Army_Flag.svg.png

 

Apr 11, 2013 ASDNews Source : VSE Corp.

 

    VSE will provide technical assistance, supply chain management, and logistics support to Taiwan

 

VSE Corporation (NASDAQ: VSEC) has been awarded a Cost-Plus Award Fee delivery order under its Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Naval Ship Transfer and Repair (N*STAR) contract through the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) International Fleet Support Program. The delivery order has a four year period of performance and a value of $23,734,925.

 

Under this delivery order, VSE will support Taiwan’s Maritime Defense efforts, managed by the Army Aviation and Missile Command’s Integrated Material Management Center (AMCOM IMMC) Lower Tier Project Office (LTPO). The work focuses on technical assistance, supply chain management, equipment procurement, logistics, integration, facilities and administrative support to the LTPO office in the upgrade and maintenance of the Taiwan Maritime Defense Systems under the FMS agreement.

 

“We are pleased to support the AMCOM IMMC LTPO on this important effort,” said Federal Group President Donnelle Moten. “We will continue to ensure that this program provides reliable, affordable and timely defense to the U.S. and our partner nations.”

 

“The trust the LTPO has placed in our ability to perform this complex work reflects across all of VSE and demonstrates the spirit, focus and collaboration we practice every day with our customers,” added VSE CEO Maurice “Mo” Gauthier. “We are extremely proud to be selected for this important U.S. Army program and to further expand our presence in the FMS marketplace.”

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 16:35

Missile balistique Musudan

 

MOSCOU, 11 avril - RIA Novosti

 

L'armée nord-coréenne pourrait procéder aux essais du missile Musudan, selon les experts interrogés par RIA Novosti jeudi 11 avril.

 

Plus tôt, se référant à la déclaration du porte-parole du ministère de la Défense japonais, l'agence Kyodo rapportait que le dispositif mobile destiné au lancement du missile nord-coréen Musudan, déployé près de la ville de Wonsan au nord-est du pays, était en position relevée.

"Je pense que le lancement aura lieu, d'autant que ce missile n'a pas encore été testé. Il s'agira d'un essai destiné à montrer les performances de ce missile", déclare le général Viktor Essine, ancien commandant de l'état-major des forces balistiques stratégiques russes (RVSN). Selon lui, cet essai ne sera pas suivi d'une attaque du territoire nord-coréen et personne ne tentera d'intercepter le missile car la trajectoire de vol du Musudan ne survolera pas les sites stratégiques sud-coréens et japonais. "Les technologies nord-coréennes sont si limitées qu'un lancement sur deux échoue", rappelle le général Essine.

Igor Korotchenko, rédacteur en chef du magazine Défense nationale, est persuadé que Pyongyang continue de montrer ses muscles pour dissuader Séoul et ses alliés américains de l’attaquer. "La Corée du Nord tape sur les nerfs de ses "ennemis". Elle cherche à montrer qu'il ne faut pas la toucher car elle aurait de quoi riposter. Difficile de dire si le lancement aura lieu ou non : des signes sont visibles mais Pyongyang doit avoir conscience que cette action ne fera que solidariser ses adversaires et la privera du soutien international", déclare Igor Korotchenko.

Il rappelle que Pyongyang ne dispose pas encore d'ogives nucléaires mais seulement de charges nucléaires pouvant être transportées par les voies maritime, ferrée ou routière. "La Corée du Nord veut qu'on lui fournisse du carburant, des produits alimentaires et d'autres biens matériels en échange de l'assouplissement de sa position à l'égard de son voisin méridional", est-il convaincu.

La Corée du Nord s'est proclamée puissance nucléaire en 2005 puis a mené trois essais nucléaires souterrains en 2006, 2009 et 2013 qui ont provoqué les objections de la communauté internationale. Le Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies a adopté des résolutions exigeant qu’elle cesse son activité nucléaire. Les autorités nord-coréennes ont annoncé en avril leur intention de reprendre les travaux à l'usine d'enrichissement d'uranium de Yongbyon.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 15:44

Missile balistique Musudan

 

11.04.2013 15h01 Romandie.com (ats)

 

Une ou deux rampes de lancement de missile de moyenne-portée Musudan sont orientées vers le ciel en Corée du Nord, ont indiqué des médias japonais, citant un responsable du ministère nippon de la Défense. Séoul redoute que Pyongyang ne procède à un essai dans les heures ou jours à venir.

 

Les chaînes de télévision nippone ont évoqué des observations par satellite. Contacté par l'AFP, le ministère japonais de la Défense a refusé de commenter ces informations.

 

Mouvements

 

A Séoul, une source du renseignement militaire sud-coréen a expliqué à l'agence Yonhap que deux missiles Musudan avaient été régulièrement sortis de leur hangar sur la côte est, puis rentrés. Au même moment, au moins cinq véhicules lanceurs mobiles étaient eux aussi déplacés.

 

"Il y a des signes indiquant que le Nord pourrait tirer les missiles Musudan à tout moment dans un avenir proche", a précisé cette source à l'agence de presse sud-coréenne. "Mais le Nord n'a cessé de déplacer ses missiles", a-t-elle ajouté.

 

La Corée du Nord cherche à "lasser" les agents américains et sud-coréens chargés de surveiller les rampes, selon une autre source du renseignement sud-coréen. Les Etats-Unis et la Corée du Sud ont relevé d'un cran mercredi leur niveau de vigilance.

 

Date anniversaire

 

La Corée du Nord a transporté en train, en début de semaine dernière, deux missiles Musudan et les a installés sur des véhicules équipés d'un dispositif de tir, selon Séoul.

 

Le Musudan aurait une portée théorique de 3000 kilomètres, soit la capacité d'atteindre la Corée du Sud ou le Japon. L'engin pourrait même toucher des cibles à 4000 kilomètres en n'emportant qu'une charge légère, et donc théoriquement frapper Guam, île du Pacifique située à 3380 kilomètres de la Corée du Nord et où se trouvent 6000 soldats américains.

 

L'éventuel tir de missile pourrait survenir d'ici au 15 avril, jour de naissance du fondateur de la République démocratique populaire de Corée (nom officiel de la Corée du Nord), Kim Il-sung, décédé en 1994.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 14:08

http://www.mod.go.jp/j/photo/images/20121207d.jpg

crédits : mod.go.jp

 

April 10, 2013 spacewar.com (AFP)

 

Tokyo - Japan has deployed missile batteries in its heaving capital to defend the 30 million people who live in the greater Tokyo area from any North Korean attack.

 

Here are some key facts about Japan's ability to protect itself.

 

WHAT IS JAPAN'S MILITARY CAPABILITY?

 

Japan's Self Defense Forces have a total of approximately 250,000 full time service personnel. As of March 2012, Japan had 143 military vessels and 420 combat aircraft. It spends around $50 billion on its military every year, equivalent to around one percent of Gross Domestic Product.

 

The military is well-equipped, well-trained and makes use of technology.

 

Japan is also host to around 47,000 US military service personnel, who have with them a large amount of military hardware.

 

South Korea has deployed two Aegis destroyers, one off each coast, equipped with advance radar warning systems to track any missile launch.

 

WHAT HAS JAPAN DONE TO DEFEND AGAINST A NORTH KOREAN MISSILE?

 

Japan PAC Missiles

 

Four Aegis-equipped destroyers routinely ply waters around the archipelago. Presently, two of them are in the Sea of Japan (East Sea).

 

http://www.mod.go.jp/j/photo/images/20121207d.jpg

 

There are 16 Patriot Advanced Capability (PAC)-3 firing units based in Japan's four different regions. The number of individual PAC-3 launchers is reported to be 28. The US forces in Okinawa are reported to have a further 24.

 

In anticipation of Pyongyang's launch, four PAC-3 batteries were moved to the Defense Forces headquarters in Tokyo and three other ground force camps surrounding the capital.

 

However, some commentators warn that North Korea's most recent missile technology allows them to launch from the back of a moving vehicle. This could make any incoming North Korean missile more difficult to intercept because it is harder to calculate a trajectory.

 

IN WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES WOULD JAPAN TRY TO SHOOT DOWN A NORTH KOREAN MISSILE?

 

Japan's law allows its military to shoot down a North Korean missile in the air over its territory or over the high seas when it is headed toward its territory and feared to endanger lives or property.

 

Analysts say Japan is unlikely to be the target of any launch, but that the technological or mechanical failure of a North Korean missile intended to be fired into the Pacific might mean a missile -- or parts of it -- could fall on the country.

 

It is likely this eventuality that Tokyo is guarding against.

 

WHAT HAS HAPPENED DURING PREVIOUS NORTH KOREAN LAUNCHES?

 

North Korea fired a rocket without warning on August 31, 1998, in what it said was an attempt to put a satellite into orbit. The first stage landed in the Sea of Japan and the second crossed Honshu island and fell into the Pacific.

 

That launch led to the 2003 decision to deploy Aegis destroyers equipped with sea-based SM-3 interceptor missiles and the land-based Patriot surface-to-air missiles.

 

On March 27, 2009, Japan's defence minister issued a shoot-down order for the first time in response to North Korea's preparations to launch a modified rocket.

 

The rocket blasted off on April 5, flying harmlessly hundreds of kilometres (miles) above Japan's northeast. Japan's defence forces did not try to intercept it.

 

On March 30, 2012, another shoot-down order was issued when North Korea said it was launching a satellite, however the long-range rocket disintegrated soon after lift off on April 13.

 

A third shoot-down order was issued on December 7, 2012, as North Korea readied a rocket that flew south over Okinawa five days later.

 

The rocket passed over the southern island chain outside the range of Japanese SM-3 and PAC-3 interceptor missiles, which were not launched.

 

Japan's defence minister issued the latest shoot-down order on April 7.

 

WHAT IS LIKELY TO HAPPEN THIS TIME?

 

Toshimitsu Shigemura, a Korean affairs specialist and professor at Tokyo's Waseda University, said North Korea is not aiming the rocket at Japan.

 

"Japan has the right under international law to shoot down a missile which is passing over if it is launched without warning. North Korea may criticise Japan for such an action but may not do anything further," he said.

 

Masao Okonogi, an honorary professor at Keio University, said North Korea may be aiming the rocket toward Guam or Hawaii.

 

"There is a remote possibility that part of the missile will fall over Japan. Such debris will burn up on re-entry so it is very unlikely that anything will actually hit Japan.

 

"If, however, the rocket is fired toward Japan, it is clearly military action and it is inevitable that Japan will try to shoot it down."

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 12:35

Anders Fogh Rasmussen photo Nato

 

SEOUL, 11 avril - RIA Novosti

 

La Corée du Nord devrait renoncer à sa rhétorique de la guerre, a déclaré jeudi à Séoul le secrétaire général de l'Otan Anders Fogh Rasmussen sur fond de tensions croissantes sur la péninsule coréenne.

 

En visite à Séoul pour évoquer la crise coréenne avec des hauts responsables sud-coréens, dont le ministre des Affaires étrangères Yun Byung-se, le secrétaire général de l'Alliance a exhorté le Nord "à mettre fin aux propos et aux gestes hostiles". 

 

Ces derniers temps, les relations entre Séoul et Pyongyang se sont nettement dégradées. Début avril, les services de renseignement ont annoncé que la Corée du Nord avait déployé deux missiles balistiques à moyenne portée de type Musudan sur sa côte orientale. La portée théorique du missile Musudan est d'environ 3.000-4.000 km. 

 

Le 5 avril, Pyongyang s'est déclaré incapable de garantir la sécurité des ambassades étrangères à partir du 10 avril en cas de conflit et a proposé à l'ambassade russe, ainsi qu'aux autres représentations diplomatiques, d'envisager l'évacuation de leur personnel. Le 9 avril, Pyongyang a invité les étrangers se trouvant sur le territoire de la Corée du Sud à quitter le pays, "la situation évoluant vers une guerre nucléaire".

 

Le programme du déplacement de M.Rasmussen, à Séoul jusqu'à samedi, prévoit un entretien avec la présidente sud-coréenne, Park Geun-hye.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 11:35

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-zg3mSCBaVow/UWFiaIUltlI/AAAAAAAAYhM/5ReFej3iQSM/s1600/Gripen_TAF.jpg

 

8 Apr 2013 bangkokpost.com

 

The air force plans to deploy Gripen fighter jets to assist in an anti-piracy mission in the Strait of Malacca next year.

 

Air force chief Prajin Jantong said he was about to request government permission for the deployment to participate in the "Eyes in the Sky" project with defence forces in Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore.

 

ACM Prajin said the air force has nine Gripen fighter jets.

 

Three more jets will arrive either in late August or early September to complete Thailand's first fleet of 12 Gripen 39C jets.

 

At that time the air force will announce the roles of its jets.ACM Prajin also said the Network Centric system of the air force will be completed in 2015.

 

The system would link the information systems of Gripen jets and the navy's warships: the HTMS Chakri Naruebet aircraft carrier, and HTMS Taksin and HTMS Naresuan frigates.

 

It will also connect to the anti-air warfare systems of the army and the Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (C4-I) system of the Royal Thai Armed Forces Headquarters.

 

An air force source said connecting the communication systems of the Gripen jets and F jets is technically possible, but will depend on whether the United States will permit the link.

 

The Royal Thai Air Force started to deploy Gripen jets on March 15, 2009, and each Gripen jet has 160 flying hours a year.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 11:35

Su-35-en-vol

 

April 11, 2013: Strategy Page

 

After more than a year of haggling over the details, Russia has agreed to sell China 24 Su-35 fighters. The big obstacle to this sale was the Chinese inability to assure Russia that the new Russian technology in these aircraft would not be stolen by Chinese aviation firms. Apparently a mutually agreeable compromise was worked out.

 

At first China refused to buy Su-35 fighters from Russia if a "no unauthorized duplication" clause was included in the contract. The Chinese wanted to buy the Su-35s but were not willing to sign a binding agreement to not copy the Russian design. China is already producing unauthorized copies of the Russian Su-27, as the J11 and Russia is not happy with that at all. China has since designed a two-seat fighter bomber version (the J16), a stealthy version (J17) and obtained an aircraft carrier version of the Su-30 (the Su-33) from Ukraine and are producing a copy (as the J15).

 

China insists these are all Chinese designs that just happen to bear some resemblance to Russian fighters. In response Russia halted combat aircraft sales to China but still sold jet engines for these aircraft. So far, China has been unsuccessful in building copies of these engines. The engine sales are too lucrative to pass up, as they enable the Russian engine manufacturers to continue developing new designs. The Chinese plan to steal these as soon as they figure out how to handle the exotic manufacturing skills required to build these engines.

 

The Su-35 is a 34 ton fighter that is more maneuverable than the original, 33 ton, Su-27, and has much better electronics. It can cruise at above the speed of sound. It also costs at least fifty percent more than the Su-27. That would be some $60 million (for a barebones model), about what a top-of-the-line F-16 costs. The Su-27 was originally developed to match the F-15, which is larger than the single engine F-16. The larger size of the Su-27/35, allows designers to do a lot more with it in terms of modifications and enhancements.

 

The Su-35 has some stealth capabilities (or at least be less detectable to most fighter aircraft radars). Russia claims the Su-35 has a useful life of 6,000 flight hours, and engines good for 4,000 hours. Russia promises world-class avionics, plus a very pilot-friendly cockpit. The use of many thrusters and fly-by-wire will produce an aircraft even more maneuverable than Su-30s (which were Su-27s tweaked to be extremely agile). The Su-35 was in development for two decades before it was declared ready for production in 2005. But even then there were problems with the new engines that gave it superior performance. Russia says the engine problems are solved, but only time will tell if that is true.

 

The Su-35 is not meant to be a direct rival for the F-22, because the Russian aircraft is not nearly as stealthy. The Su-35 carries a 30mm autocannon (with 150 rounds) and up to eight tons of munitions, hanging from 12 hard points. This reduces stealthiness, which the F-22 and F-35 get around by using an internal bay for bombs and missiles. But if the maneuverability and advanced electronics of the proposed Su-35 live up to the promises, the aircraft would be more than a match for every fighter out there except the F-22. Since the Su-35 is to sell for well under $100 million each, there should be a lot of buyers.

 

Meanwhile China has not had an easy time with its Su-27 clone the J11. This aircraft entered service in 1998, but production was very slow and only a hundred were produced. It was during this process that the Chinese mastered many of the technical details of building and modifying the Russian aircraft. China then modified the Su-27 design and produced at least a hundred of the 33 ton J11A. This model was equipped with modern, Chinese made, electronics and is capable of hauling eight tons of radar guided air-to-air missiles and smart bombs. Then came the J11B, which was the same size and weight as the J11A but had a more capable AESA radar and is intended to specialize in air-to-ground missions, while also being able to take care of itself in air-to-air combat.

 

The Su-35 would give China lots of ideas (and technology) for the J11C, no matter what promises were made to the Russians.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 11:35

Nuclear north korea

 

Apr 11, 2013 ASDNews (AFP)

 

The United States has warned North Korea it is skating a "dangerous line" with an expected missile launch that could start a whole new cycle of escalating tensions in a region already on a hair-trigger.

 

South Korean and US forces remained on heightened alert Thursday with both experts and officials suggesting a launch was likely in the build-up to April 15 birthday celebrations for the North's late founder Kim Il-Sung.

 

It might also coincide with visits by US Secretary of State John Kerry and NATO chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who will both be in Seoul on Friday.

 

"North Korea... with its bellicose rhetoric, its actions, has been skating very close to a dangerous line," US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said Wednesday.

 

"Our country is fully prepared to deal with any contingency, any action that North Korea may take or any provocation that they may instigate," Hagel added.

 

South Korean intelligence says the North has prepared two mid-range missiles for imminent launch from its east coast, despite warnings from ally China to avoid provocative moves at a time of soaring military tensions.

 

The South Korea-US Combined Forces Command has raised its "Watchcon" status from 3 to 2 to reflect indications of a "vital threat", while the South's national police force has also been placed on heightened terror alert.

 

Some media reports have quoted Seoul government and military sources as saying Pyongyang might be preparing "multiple" launches, involving shorter-range SCUD and Rodong missiles.

 

The crisis on the Korean peninsula has intensified almost daily since the North carried out its third nuclear test in February and was promptly slapped with toughened UN sanctions.

 

Incensed by ongoing South Korean-US military exercises, Pyongyang has accused Washington and Seoul of preparing an invasion and threatened dire retaliation ranging from artillery barrages to nuclear strikes.

 

The North last week told foreign diplomats in Pyongyang they had until April 10 to consider evacuation, and followed that with a similar warning to foreigners in South Korea to get out ahead of a possible "thermo-nuclear" war.

 

The European Union said the seven EU countries with embassies in North Korea saw no need to leave, and added that it saw no risk to EU citizens in the South.

 

Although those warnings were largely shrugged off, there is growing global concern that sky-high tensions might trigger an incident that could swiftly escalate.

 

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned against heating up the crisis, and stressed that Moscow and Washington were cooperating closely.

 

"On North Korea we have no differences with the United States," Lavrov told journalists after meeting John Kerry on the sidelines of a G8 foreign minister's meeting in London.

 

"One just shouldn't scare anyone with military manoeuvres and there's a chance that everything will calm down," Lavrov said.

 

Kerry also discussed North Korea with Japan Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida and emphasised the importance of putting pressure on Pyongyang with economic sanctions, a senior US State Department official said.

 

The mid-range missiles mobilised by the North are reported to be untested Musudan models with an estimated range of anywhere up to 4,000 kilometres (2,485 miles).

 

That would cover any target in South Korea and Japan, and possibly even US military bases on the Pacific island of Guam.

 

Japan, whose armed forces have been authorised to shoot down any North Korean missile headed towards its territory, has deployed Patriot missiles in its capital as a pre-emptive defence measure.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 07:35

China Armed Forces source Brahmand.com

 

April 10, 2013 china-defense-mashup.com

 

2013-04-09 — The United States needs to watch “very carefully” the rise of the Chinese military and how it integrates into the regional security environment, a top American military commander told lawmakers amid apprehensions over its military build-up and increase in defence spending.

 

“I think we do have to watch very carefully how the China military rises, what they do with that military, and how that military is integrated into the security environment,” Admiral Samuel Locklear, the Commander of the US Pacific Command (PACOM), told lawmakers during a Congressional hearing.

 

One of the aspects of the US re-balance to the Asia-Pacific region is to ensure that it has the “right force posture” and the “right force mixture” for the future so that they can reassure their allies, and the American people that their interests are protected over there, Locklear said.

 

China, he said, is neither a friend nor a foe at this time. “I consider them at this point in time in the terms of those two terms, neither,” Locklear said in reply to a question of Senator Lindsay Graham.

 

Graham alleged that the Chinese behaviour is not only provocative, but also it is “obscene”. “They’re stealing American intellectual property. They’re attacking us every day through cyberspace. They’re propping up one of the most dangerous regimes in the world that directly threaten our interests,” the senator said.

 

“I just wish you would share with the Chinese that there’s a growing frustration here in Congress with the way they behave and we would like to have a more matured China as part of the international community, a China that would bring out the best in the world, not reinforce what’s dangerous about it,” Graham told the PACOM Commander.

 

Meanwhile, Senator James Inhofe, expressed his concern over the increasing Chinese defence budget, which he said would jump by 10.7 per cent in 2013.

 

“In the 1990s when they increased their defence spending during that decade by 300 per cent, at the same time that we reduced ours by about 30 per cent. This is not a partisan thing. This is after the Cold War. A lot of people felt that we could afford to reduce it and we did. We went down 30 per cent in that decade. They went up 300 per cent. Now we’re facing the same thing,” he said.

 

China’s continued rise in regional and global influence, coupled with its military modernisation and growth, has drawn justifiable attention from the Department of Defence, said Senator Carl Levin.

 

“China’s pursuit of capabilities that extend the reach of its military raises concerns about their intentions, particularly in the context of that country’s increasing willingness to assert its controversial claims of sovereignty in areas of the South China Sea and the East China Sea,” he said.

 

“In addition, China’s lack of regard for the intellectual property rights of the United States and other nations remains a huge problem for the global community. China remains the leading source of counterfeit parts, both in military systems and in the commercial sector,” he said.

 

Locklear said with the rise of China, the US is looking to a future where the US interests and those of its allies are protected in Asia- Pacific.”But we have to also expect that China will integrate into that security environment. They have to. There’s really not another good option,” the PACOM Commander added.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 07:35

cyber warfare

 

April 10, 2013: Strategy Page

 

Chinese theft of Western technology includes cracking the security on high-end CAD (computer aided design) software and selling the stuff to Western users. Recently one of those American users (Wronald Best) was convicted and sentenced to 366 days in prison for buying 60 of these powerful and complex software programs from a Chinese man (Xiang Li) who specialized in finding people who could crack software security, as well as finding customers for the software packages that were illegally cracked.  Li sold Best software worth $2.3 million for $6,000. That’s a discount of over 99 percent on 60 software packages that, on average, sell for $38,300 each. Li faces 25 years in prison. Best used his cut-rate software for work on American warplanes and missiles.

 

Two other Chinese are being prosecuted for taking part in this effort to crack and sell high-end technical software. The government has also found the identities of some of the Chinese and Russian hackers who actually hacked the security aspects of this software. This design software has made engineers and scientists much more productive. But this software is enormously complex and very expensive to develop. Selling pirated copies discourages developers from creating new software of this type, as well as forcing the developers to raise prices.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 07:35

Nuclear north korea

 

10.04.2013 par P. CHAPLEAU Lignes de Défense

 

Le commandement intégré des forces américaines et sud-coréennes a relevé son niveau d’alerte, signalant une « menace vitale ». Il est passé du niveau 3 au niveau 2 et se situe désormais à seulement un cran du niveau 1, synonyme de guerre.

 

Inquiétant ?

-Oui, parce que cette décision témoigne de l’état de tension croissante dans la péninsule et de l’inquiétude des Américains.

- Non, parce que ce relèvement de niveau ne concerne que les dispositifs de surveillance et non pas le niveau d’alerte générale des armées.

 

Ce niveau d’alerte, appelé le WATCHCON (pour Watch Condition), ne concerne que les forces US et coréennes de Corée et non pas l’ensemble des forces américaines. En outre, il s’applique aux services de renseignement et aux écoutes et non pas à la mise en état d’alerte des forces de combat.

 

Les 4 niveaux du WATCHON sont les suivants :

- WATCHCON 4 pour le niveau de paix

- WATCHCON 3 en cas de menace

- WATCHCON 2 en cas de menace imminente (comme en mai 2010)

- WATCHCON 1 en cas de guerre (atteint en février-mars 1982)

 

Les forces américaines et sud-coréennes surveillent près de 200 « indicateurs » pour évaluer la menace nord-coréenne : communications radio, mouvements de troupes, de navires et d’aéronefs, mouvements de dirigeants, activités sur des sites sensibles… En passant au niveau 2, ces forces vont intensifier la surveillance du Nord que l’on craint quand même capable d’une provocation comme en 2010 et 2011.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 07:35

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-IQ81Ai7miNw/US7hui-I7OI/AAAAAAAAHCU/_AdaQbqWl_8/s1600/USS_Freedom_%2528LCS+1%2529.jpg

 

10 April 2013 By Cheryl Pellerin / American Forces Press Service – Pacific Sentinel

 

WASHINGTON, April 9, 2013 – U.S. allies and partners in the Asia-Pacific are seeing more Army, Marine Corps and special operations forces as they “come home to the Pacific” from Afghanistan and as the Defense Department enhances its forward presence across the region, Deputy Defense Secretary Ash Carter said here yesterday.
 
 
In remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the deputy secretary said the Defense Department is focused on delivering capacity, managing resources and following through on its investments in the region.
 
 
“We're watching every dollar, every ship and every aircraft to implement the rebalance successfully,” Carter said. “We also recognize that as the world is changing quickly, our operational plans need to change, and we're changing them accordingly. We are therefore taking into account new capabilities and operational concepts, advanced capabilities of potential adversaries and global threat assessments.”
 
 
Carter described the rebalance in terms of initial force structure decisions, presence and posture, investments, and innovations in operational plans and tactics. 
 

“As we draw down from Afghanistan, the Navy will release naval surface combatants and eventually carriers,” he said, “as well as naval intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, [or] ISR, and their associated processing capabilities.”
 
EP-3 signals reconnaissance aircraft already have moved from U.S. Central Command’s area of responsibility to that of U.S. Pacific Command, Carter said. The Navy also will release Fire Scout unmanned aerial vehicles from Afghanistan, and several electronic surveillance aircraft are available for redeployment.
 
 
Navy P-3 maritime patrol aircraft that have conducted surveillance missions in the Middle East for a decade will return to Pacom, he noted, and the Navy is adding a fourth forward-deployed fast-attack submarine to Guam in fiscal year 2014.
 
By 2020, 60 percent of naval assets will be assigned to the Asia-Pacific region -- “a substantial and historic shift,” Carter said, which the Navy is accomplishing in three main ways:
 
 
-- The Navy will permanently base four destroyers in Rota, Spain, to provide ballistic missile defense to European allies. This mission had been performed by 10 destroyers that rotated from the United States to the Mediterranean Sea, and now six will be released to shift their deployments to the Asia-Pacific region.
 
 
-- Destroyers and amphibious ships that have conducted security cooperation and humanitarian assistance missions in Africa, South America and Europe will be replaced for the missions by new joint high-speed vessels and littoral combat ships under construction. The destroyers and amphibious ships will deploy to the Asia-Pacific region.
 
 
-- The Navy will generate more forward presence by fielding ships such as the joint high-speed vessel and littoral combat ships, along with new mobile landing platforms and float-forward staging bases that use rotating military or civilian crews.
 
 
The Navy also is fielding the broad-area maritime surveillance sensor called BAMS aboard the Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle to expand the range and capacity for ISR in the region, Carter said, and the EA-18G carrier-based next-generation jammer aircraft will boost electronic warfare capability.
 
 
The first of four Navy littoral combat ships will arrive in Singapore later this month, he added, providing a key capability to work bilaterally and multilaterally with partners in the region.
 
 
New investments will help the Navy sustain undersea dominance in the region and elsewhere, Carter said. These include a Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarine, including the submarine itself and a new payload module for cruise missiles, as well as the P-8 maritime surveillance aircraft and the anti-submarine MH-60 helicopter.
 
 
For its part, the Air Force will capitalize on its inherent speed, range and flexibility in the region and shift capacity from Afghanistan to the Asia-Pacific region, including ISR assets such as the MQ-9 Reaper, the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft and the Global Hawk, Carter said.
 
 
The Air Force also will allocate space, cyber, tactical aircraft and bomber forces from the United States to the Asia-Pacific region with little new investment, because 60 percent of its overseas-based forces are already stationed there, he added, including 60 percent of combat-coded F-22 fighter jets.
 
 
“Our ability to strengthen the ongoing continuous-bomber-presence missions in the region will also benefit from reduced presence in Afghanistan,” the deputy secretary said. “As operations in Afghanistan end, for example, more B-1 [bombers] will become available, augmenting the B-52 continuous rotational presence in the Asia-Pacific region. The ability to provide forward strategic presence with round-trip missions by the stealthy B-2 will remain a valuable option.”
 
 
Some reductions have been made in tactical air squadrons worldwide by removing older or single-purpose aircraft to make way for newer aircraft, the deputy secretary said, “but we have made no changes in our tactical air posture for the Asia-Pacific region.”
 
 
“We have continued to invest in the fifth-generation joint strike fighter, a new stealth bomber, the KC-46 tanker replacement and a host of ISR platforms,” he added.
 
 
The Army and Marine Corps also have important roles in the Asia-Pacific rebalance, Carter said.
 
 
The Army has about 91,000 soldiers and civilians assigned to the region and maintains a forward presence of eight active-component brigade combat teams, 12 batteries of Patriot missiles and many theater-enabling units, Carter said.
 
 
“The Army is ensuring that after a decade of using Pacom assets in the Centcom area, the Pacom commander regains
command control of the other 60,000 soldiers assigned to the broader Asia-Pacific region,” he said.
 
 
As part of the regionally aligned rotational concept, Army units assigned to Pacom will focus during their training cycle on specific Pacom mission areas, Carter said, including participating in bilateral and trilateral training exercises and building partnership capacity.
 
 
“I should add that during the months of [severe budget cuts represented by] sequestration and beyond, the Army is preferentially protecting the readiness and modernization of more than 19,000 soldiers we have in South Korea so they are able to decisively respond to any North Korean provocation,” the deputy secretary said.
 
 
Carter said the Army also continues to invest in ballistic missile defense capabilities that are being deployed and improved.
 
 
“And at the DOD-wide level, we are protecting investments in future-focused capabilities that are so important to this region, such as cyber, certain science and technology investments, and space,” he added.
 
 
Also in the region, roughly 18,000 Marines are forward deployed, Carter said, split among Air Station Iwakuni, where a fighter squadron is based; Okinawa, from which the 3rd Marine Expeditionary Force operates; and Darwin, Australia, which has a new rifle company. Another 5,000 Marines are on Oahu in Hawaii, he added.
 
 
The Marines have three infantry battalions on the ground in Okinawa and will put another there later this year, he said.
 
“These are rotational battalions that will move in and out of the Western Pacific every six months,” the deputy secretary explained. “All of this will be accompanied by an EA-6 Prowler squadron in Iwakuni this fall, along with more heavy-lift and attack helicopters in Okinawa.”
 
 
In Australia, he added, the first company of Marines rotated through Darwin last year, a key first step toward using their presence to engage in bilateral and multilateral exercises as partners in the region.
 
 
“With regard to our military installations, we are making critical investments in training ranges and infrastructure, including in Guam, which we're developing as a strategic hub, as well as in Marianas, Saipan and Tinian,” Carter said.
 
 
“In addition to investing in technical capabilities,” the deputy secretary added, “we are also investing in our people, in language and culture skills and regional and strategic affairs to ensure that we cultivate the intellectual capital that will be required to make good on our rebalance.”
 
Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 07:35

Nuclear north korea

 

Apr. 10, 2013 - By JOHN T. BENNETT  - Defense News

 

WASHINGTON — U.S. House Armed Services Committee Chairman Rep. Howard “Buck” McKeon on Wednesday applauded the White House for its handling of North Korean threats of nuclear war.

 

The California Republican told Defense News he is satisfied Obama administration officials have made all the military and diplomatic moves “that they can do” as North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has grown increasingly bellicose in recent weeks.

 

Kim and his regime have warned of a nuclear war with South Korea and threatened to fire missiles at the United States.

 

In response, the Obama administration has moved ships designed to carry out missile-defense missions closer to the region and flown nuclear-capable bombers over South Korea.

 

Rhetorically, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has called Kim’s regime a “real and clear danger” to the United States and its allies in the region, such as South Korea and Japan.

 

Secretary of State John Kerry and Senate Republicans have called on the North’s lone ally, China, to help talk the young leader down from the perch of nuclear war.

 

Kerry says Beijing “has such an important role to play and which has always maintained a closer relationship to the North than any other country.”

 

Asked if he is satisfied with the moves taken by the Obama administration, of whom he has been highly critical over the years, McKeon nodded and said, “Yes, I’m happy that they’ve done everything that they can do.

 

“Nobody knows what that young leader is up to or what he might do,” McKeon said during a brief interview, referring to North Korea’s 29-year-old supreme leader.

 

However, McKeon expressed frustration that the first tranche — $46 billion in 2013 — of the $500 billion defense sequestration budget cut means the U.S. military cannot do more.

 

“I talk to guys in the Pentagon, and I know they are watching this very closely,” McKeon said, referring to Adm. Samuel Locklear, U.S. Pacific Command chief. “Adm. Locklear says usually they would send an aircraft carrier. But due to cutbacks, they can’t this time.”

 

Instead, Locklear has told McKeon “that they’ll keep using the B-2s and the F-22s that are already over there.”

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 07:35

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/5a/GCSB_logo.png

 

Apr. 10, 2013 - By Nick Lee-Frampton – Defense News

 

Wellington, New Zealand — Following a hiatus last year over possible abuses by New Zealand’s foreign intelligence agency, a review of the Government Communications Security Bureau’s (GCSB) compliance with the law has noted problems with its structure and internal operations.

 

The review, by Cabinet Secretary Rebecca Kitteridge, stressed that the GCSB’s 300 staff plays a vital role in national security by obtaining, providing and protecting sensitive information and that “New Zealand needs this organization now more than ever.”

 

However, the review noted underlying problems within GCSB, concerning its structure, management of its information, capability and capacity, and concluded that “legislative clarification would be desirable.”

 

Recommendations include reorganizing GCSB “in a simpler, less fragmented way,” reducing the number of small units, centralizing some key roles and giving them bureau-wide reach, and appointing a “professional Information Manager.”

 

The lawfulness of some of the bureau’s past assistance to other agencies, especially to the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service (NZSIS), is now called into question, says the review, noting that such assistance ceased last September.

 

The person who for some years was the bureau’s sole legal adviser was not well connected with the public law community and “therefore not well placed to keep in touch with legal developments.”

 

No less disturbing, the decade-old legislation governing the GCSB has “not kept pace with developments, especially in relation to information assurance and cyber security,” according to the report.

 

It appears the bureau has not even kept pace with its own paperwork because even with the assistance of GCSB staff, Ketteridge could not locate all the documents she expected to “find easily.”

 

GCSB staff expressed a wish for a centralized database to access compliance precedents, examples and frequently asked questions. Such detail, the review found, is scattered throughout the bureau.

 

Similarly, the review found there was no uniform process by which domestic agencies, such as the NZSIS and the New Zealand police, could request information or assistance from GCSB, although a new system is being tested.

 

Acknowledging that a lack of perfect information is “inherent” to intelligence work, the review says that does not mean “that one is entitled to make assumptions without applying one’s mind and judgment to the issue.”

 

Several new organizations have been created to assist with the bureau’s cyber security role, including the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) and, last year, the National Cyber Policy Office (NCPO).

 

There is no mention of the NCPO in the review, which states that the NCSC “does not seem to have made the process more systematic, and in some ways appears to have added to the difficulties.”

 

With regard to the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS), the review notes that IGIS has lacked staff, has “waited for complaints to which to respond.” and notes that GCSB’s supposedly quarterly reports to IGIS have not always been provided, “although nobody asked where the missing quarterly reports were.”

 

The review estimates this process will take a year.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 07:35

le-rafale photo source india-defence

 

Apr 09, 2013 brahmand.com

 

NEW DELHI (PTI): India and French firm Dassault Aviation on Monday decided to keep aside their sharp differences over contractual obligations and move ahead on the other aspects of the deal to procure 126 multirole combat aircraft for the IAF.

 

During the contract negotiation committee meeting on Monday, the two sides agreed to keep their discussions pending on the issue of having separate contracts and the role of HAL in the deal and move ahead on other things such as pricing and support services, sources told PTI here on Monday.

 

Serious differences have cropped up in the contract negotiations between the Defence Ministry and the French firm, threatening to delay the country's single largest dose military acquisition.

 

Rafale point-de-situation-du-15-janvier-2012-1

 

The French firm has already agreed with the Defence Ministry's demand for having one contract with the four major firms involved in the deal, including MBDA, for the weapons package for the aircraft instead of four separate contracts, they said.

 

The firm is understood to have agreed to the Defence Ministry's demand on the issue after the involvement of French government.

 

Dassault has made it clear that it was "technically and practically not feasible to stick to the present obligations" as it is wary of encountering the fate of British telecom company Vodafone, which is facing problems over taxation issues.

 

In the contract, Dassault wants to be held responsible for only the first 18 aircraft to be supplied by it along with the kits to be supplied by it for the remaining 108 aircraft to be produced by HAL in India but the Defence Ministry wants it to take responsibility for delivery of all the 126 aircraft.

 

The French firm also does not want to be held responsible for delay in the delivery of the aircraft to be manufactured by HAL and has told the Ministry that it cannot be held responsible for paying the liquidity damages in case there is delay by HAL, they said.

 

Dassault fears it may land up in a Vodafone-like situation in terms of taxation for transfer pricing if it agrees with present obligations and such a thing can impact it adversely in a big way, sources said.

Partager cet article
Repost0

Présentation

  • : RP Defense
  • : Web review defence industry - Revue du web industrie de défense - company information - news in France, Europe and elsewhere ...
  • Contact

Recherche

Articles Récents

Categories