Overblog
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 11:35
India developing E-bomb to paralyze networks

28 August 2013 by nayeem sheikh - Indian Defence Goal

 

The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) is developing an E-bomb which will emit electromagnetic shock waves that destroy electronic circuits and communication networks of enemy forces, its chief and scientific advisor to the defence minister Avinash Chander said.

 

So next time there is a Kargil or a LoC violation, you may not hear gunshots or mortar shells, because the electromagnetic bomb will throw life out of gear.

 

"It will be a weapon that would explore the strong electromagnetic field generating a brief but intense or high power pulse of electromagnetic energy," Chander told TOI at the Missile Complex in Hyderabad. He said the spectrum of targets will be broad and in times to come, E-bombs would form the core of tactical warfare and electronic combat operations to damage the command, control and communications of enemy forces.

 

The director general of DRDO said that the electromagnetic shock wave from the bomb will destroy electronic circuits and communication network "while paralyzing them in terms of radars, communication networking, information gathering sensors, controls and other electronic equipment." Work is in full swing at the Research Centre Imarat, the Hyderabad-based laboratory of DRDO, to build the new bomb which will be ready for operational deployment within a few years.

 

Chander said the E-bomb would give an option to the military as the bomb can target the enemy's mobile targets, air defence systems, mobile or static radars, naval vessels with communication systems and even ill-shielded communication or electronic systems at a military base. The GPS-guided E-bombs would precede the conventional munitions for strategic air attacks and can cripple military units as weapons of electric destruction by releasing high voltage pulses. Other DRDO officials said the E-bomb warheads can be delivered by combat aircraft equipped to deliver guided munitions and cruise missiles.

 

Chander also said DRDO was developing the next generation of smart bombs or guided bombs, which would have a longer range of upto 100 km (starting from 10s of kms) and higher accuracy. "Smart bombs are basically precision guided munition equipped with electronic sensors, control system and adjustable flight fins for providing steering or gliding capacity to hit a designated target with much more accuracy," the DRDO chief said.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 11:30
Gen. Nicholas Houghton British Chief Defence of Staff with Gen. Jean Kahwaji Lebanese Army Commander

Gen. Nicholas Houghton British Chief Defence of Staff with Gen. Jean Kahwaji Lebanese Army Commander

29 August 2013 Ministry of Defence and Foreign & Commonwealth Office

 

British Chief of Defence Staff held his first meeting with Lebanese Army Commander Gen. Kahwaji

 

On his first foreign tour as Chief of Defence Staff, General Sir Nicholas Houghton visited Lebanon to meet Army Commander General Kahwaji on 27 August.

 

The two Generals discussed their shared intention to continue the current high level of engagement between their Armed Forces. Speaking during his visit, General Houghton said:

 

“I commend the Lebanese Armed Forces for their commitment to maintaining Lebanon’s stability, under difficult conditions. On my watch, the UK will continue its staunch support to Lebanese stability. We are helping the LAF to keep the Lebanese people safe, maintain stability and protect Lebanon’s borders, through a £10 million ($15 million) programme in support of the LAF’s five-year Capabilities Development Plan, as my predecessor General Richards announced in July. In my new role as Chief of Defence Staff, I look forward to deepening the enduring defence partnership between our nations.”

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 11:20
Raytheon built joint stand off weapon (JSOW) C-1 photo USAF

Raytheon built joint stand off weapon (JSOW) C-1 photo USAF

August 29, 2013: Strategy Page

 

It appears than a NATO air campaign against Syria is imminent. The attack will apparently be led by the United States and the biggest risk here is the Syrian Air Defense system. While long touted as formidable, Israeli aircraft have attacked Syria five times this year without any loss. This was apparently accomplished by using long range missiles fired from Israeli warplanes outside of Syrian air space. This, it would appear, is what the U.S. is going to do, or certainly could do.

 

The U.S. has several long range guided bombs as well as cruise missiles for this sort of thing. The long range bombs include the JASSM and JSOW which are both basically GPS guided smart bombs. The original JDAM bomb kit (added to 500, 1,000 and 2,000 pound bombs) cost $26,000 each. The longer range JSOW (JDAM with wings and more powerful guidance system), cost $460,000 each. The even longer range JASSM cost $500,000 (the 400 kilometer version) to $930,000 (the 900 kilometer JASSM ER) each. Then there is the SDB (Small Diameter Bomb), a 130 kg (285 pound) JDAM that can also punch through concrete bunkers and other structures. These cost $75,000 each. The AGM-158 JASSM missiles are 1,045 kg (2,300 pound) weapons that are basically 455 kg (1,000 pound) JDAMS (GPS guided bombs) with a motor added. JASSM was designed to go after enemy air defense systems, or targets deep in heavily defended (against air attack) enemy territory. The reason for buying these is to have something to deal air defenses of a nation like China.

 

Then there is the 130 kg (285 pound) Small Diameter Bomb (SDB, also known as the GBU-39/B). These carry only 17 kg (38 pounds) of explosives, compared to 127 kg (280 pounds) in the 500 pound bomb. The SDB is basically an unpowered missile which can glide long distances. This makes the SDB even more compact, capable, and expensive (about $70,000 for SDB I and four times that for SDB II). The small wings allow the SDB to glide up to 70-80 kilometers (from high altitude). SDB also has a hard front end that can punch through nearly three meters (eight feet) of rock or concrete and a warhead that does less damage than the usual dumb bomb (explosives in a metal casing). The SDB is thus the next generation of smart bombs and the more compact design allows more to be carried. Thus F-15/16/18 type aircraft can carry 24 or more SDBs. The SDBs are carried on a special carriage which holds four of them. The carriage is mounted on a bomber just like a single larger (500, 1,000, or 2,000) pound bomb would be. However, this feature was rarely needed in combat situations. The most recent model, the SDB II, has an encrypted data link that enables the SDB to hit moving targets. This communications capability enables the SDB movement to be controlled via the air force's airborne Internet (Link 16).

 

Tomahawk Block IV cruise missile undergoing flight test. Photo US Navy

Tomahawk Block IV cruise missile undergoing flight test. Photo US Navy

 

Finally there’s the new Tomahawk. The RGM-109E Block IV Surface Ship Vertical Launched Tomahawk Land Attack Missile weighs 1.2 ton, is six meters (18 feet) long, has a range of 1,600 kilometers, getting there at a speed of 600-900 kilometers an hour, flying at an altitude of 17-32 meters (50-100 feet) and propelled by a jet engine generating only 600 pounds of thrust. Accuracy is on a par with JDAM (10 meters/ 31 feet). The Block IV Tomahawk can be reprogrammed in flight to hit another target and carries a vidcam to allow a missile to check on prospective targets. There’s also the new JMEW (Joint Multi-Effects Warhead System) warhead for the Tomahawk. This is a 450 kg (1,000 pound) warhead designed mainly for penetrating underground bunkers, but it will also provide excellent blast effect for less robust targets. Exact penetration was not revealed. JMEW uses laser terminal guidance, enabling it to hit within a few meters (ten feet) of its aiming point. JMEW can also hit moving targets.

 

Most major American and British (and several allied navies) warships are armed with Tomahawks. Many nuclear subs also have them. Four American Ohio class ballistic missile submarines (SSBN) were converted to cruise missile submarines (SSGN) and entered service over the last seven years. One fired its missiles in combat for the first time two years ago off Libya. Each of these Ohio class boats carry 154 Tomahawk cruise missiles along with space for 66 commandos (usually SEALs) and their equipment.

 

Between the long range smart bombs and the cruise missiles the U.S. has the firepower to destroy the Syrian Air Force and air defenses within a few days (at most). Simultaneously the known chemical weapons storage sites can be hit along with the rocket and missile launchers that are used to deliver these chemical weapons. Targets, and damage, can be confirmed using satellite and high-altitude (above Syrian missile range) reconnaissance aircraft (like Global Hawks or U-2s).

 

Because of the Syrian threat (recently repeated) to launch missile attacks on Israel if air attacks are made on Syria there is a certain urgency to any attack plans. The U.S. might attempt an attack that would go after the Syrian “retaliation” capability first, then shut down the air force and air defenses and destroy remaining chemical weapons. Whatever the exact tactical plan is, the United States does have the resources to launch thousands of precision weapons against Syria without any American military personnel entering Syria. There’s not much Syria can do to defend against such an attack. Even the use of GPS jammers is problematic because many American GPS guided weapons are equipped with anti-jamming gear and even if that does not work there’s a backup (INS) guidance system which, while not as accurate as GPS, cannot be jammed. It’s not a good time to be in charge of defending Syrian air space.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 11:20
F-35 team makes headway with helmet-mounted display

29 August 2013 by Dave Majumdar – FG

 

Washington DC - Lockheed Martin, Vision Systems International and the F-35 Joint Program Office (JPO) are making progress with solving night vision acuity problems on the F-35's helmet-mounted display, says a senior test pilot assigned to the programme.

 

Test pilots recently tested a modified second-generation helmet fitted with a new 1600x1200 resolution ISIE-11 night vision camera coupled with a new display management computer/helmet, says Lt Col Matt Kelly, an F-35 test pilot assigned to the JPO.

 

Kelly says the ISIE-11 immensely improves the helmet's night vision capabilities.

 

"The ISIE-11 has great potential for tactical operations," Kelly says of the new system. However, there is still a lot of work to do before the helmet is ready for fleet release - the system will have to be demonstrated in the air before test pilots give it a green light.

 

Meanwhile, the F-35 JPO is still funding parallel development work on a BAE Systems-developed helmet into the third quarter of 2014.

 

F-35B test pilots on the USS Wasp are using the existing helmet with the current ISIE-10 camera, which has been judged to have deficient night-vision performance.

 

The ISIE-10 has inferior night vision capability compared with the ANVIS-9 night vision goggles (NVGs) used in the Boeing AV-8B and F/A-18. However, pilots say it is easier to land the F-35B unaided by the night vision camera on a ship than a AV-8B with NVGs.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 11:20
An F-35B Lightning II aircraft lands aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Wasp (LHD 1) during the second at-sea F-35 developmental test event.

An F-35B Lightning II aircraft lands aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Wasp (LHD 1) during the second at-sea F-35 developmental test event.

29 August 2013 by Dave Majumdar – FG

 

Washington DC - The Pentagon's F-35 Joint Program Office (JPO) and the US Marine Corps are well into a second set of sea trials for the Lockheed Martin F-35B Joint Strike Fighter. Having completed 17 of 19 days of testing, the USMC and the JPO were set to demonstrate the stealth short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) jet on board the amphibious assault ship USS Wasp on 28 August, but then fate intervened. Aircraft BF-1, which was set to fly that morning's test, suffered from a malfunctioning engine nacelle cooling fan that had to be fixed before the jet could fly. Meanwhile, BF-5 - the other aircraft deployed to the Wasp - had a problem with its power thermal management system computer the night before, says US Navy Capt Erik Etz, the programme's test and evaluation director for naval F-35 variants.

 

Etz says the two events interrupted what had been a better than average reliability rate for the F-35 during the shipboard deployment. Until the night of 27 August, the F-35B had 90% sortie completion rate on board the Wasp, he says.

 

Despite the setback, the F-35B's sea trial period has been remarkably successful, says Capt Michael Kingen, a USMC F-35 test pilot assigned to the VMX-22 operational test squadron but seconded to the JSF test effort. Thus far, pilots have flown 90 short take-offs and made 92 vertical landings on board the Wasp during this detachment. Nineteen of those vertical landing were made at night.

 

The goal of this second set of sea trials is to expand the operating envelope of the F-35B in preparation for the jet's initial operational capability date in July 2015. The F-35B has been tested to 40kt (74km/h) of headwind and 10kt of tailwind, Kingen says. Particular attention has been paid to landing with starboard crosswinds, where a lot of turbulence originates due to the ship's superstructure, says Lt Col Matt Kelley, a senior USMC F-35 test pilot assigned to the JPO.

 

Additionally, the F-35B's short take-off capability was tested with its maximum internal weight, Kingen says. Pilots are also determining the jet's minimum short take-off distance, he says. Those trials involve letting the aircraft "settle" toward the sea as it leaves the deck.

 

Thus far, Kingen says he is pleased with the aircraft's performance during the sea trials. Ironically, BF-1 flew its test sortie shortly after reporters departed the ship.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 10:21
Syrie : la Russie envoie deux navires de guerre en Méditerranée

29/08/2013 à 10h31 RTL.fr (AFP)

 

La Russie va envoyer un bateau anti-sous-marin et un lance-missiles en Méditerranée.

 

Alors qu'une attaque des forces occidentales semble imminente en Syrie, son allié russe a annoncé ce jeudi 29 août envoyer "dans les prochains jours" un bateau anti-sous-marin et un lance-missiles en Méditerranée selon une source militaire russe.

 

"La situation qui se complique dans l'est de la Méditerranée exige de notre part une certaine adaptation des forces navales" a déclaré à l'agence Interfax une source au sein de l'état-major des forces armées.

 

Dans les prochains jours, un bateau de lutte anti-sous-marine va rejoindre" les forces navales russes déjà présentes dans cette région, a-t-elle ajouté. "Plus tard, il sera rejoint par le croiseur lance-missiles de la flotte de la mer Noire Moskva, qui est en train d'achever sa mission dans l'Atlantique Nord et va bientôt entamer une traversée transatlantique en direction du détroit de Gibraltar", selon la même source.

 

Toutefois, une source à l'état-major des forces navales russes a indiqué à l'agence officielle Ria Novosti que ces changements dans la Méditerranée n'étaient pas liés aux tensions concernant la Syrie et a affirmé qu'il s'agissait d'une "rotation prévue".

 

Les puissances occidentales, Etats-Unis en tête, temporisaient ce jeudi 29 août sur une possible attaque militaire contre la Syrie. Ils affichaient pourtant, comme le président américain Barack Obama, leur volonté de donner "un coup de semonce" à Damas pour l'usage d'armes chimiques.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 10:18
Les forces occidentales disponibles pour une intervention en Syrie - le Monde 28.08.2013

Les forces occidentales disponibles pour une intervention en Syrie - le Monde 28.08.2013

BRUXELLES, 29 août - RIA Novosti

 

Les pays occidentaux ne veulent pas entrer en guerre en Syrie, mais sanctionner l'emploi d'armes chimiques lors d'une opération limitée dans le temps, a déclaré mercredi le vice-premier ministre et ministre belge des Affaires étrangères, Didier Reynders, sur les ondes de la radio Bel.RTL.

 

"On sait bien qu'aujourd'hui en Syrie la situation est d'une complexité telle, que mettre le pied en Syrie, c'est bien sûr savoir quand on y entre, mais pas du tout quand on en sort et dans quelles conditions (…). Ni les Etats-Unis, ni la Grande-Bretagne, ni la France, qui a utilisé un langage très martial, ne veulent partir en guerre. Ce qu'on nous dit aujourd'hui - on veut sanctionner, ça je le comprends. On veut sanctionner, à un moment donné, l'utilisation d'armes chimiques. Mais cela veut dire qu'on va agir pendant quelques heures ou quelques jours, et puis on se retire", a indiqué le ministre.

 

"Le président Obama a déjà dit qu'il ne veut pas participer à une opération militaire pour faire changer de régime. Il privilégie toujours la piste politique", a-t-il ajouté.

 

Dans le même temps, M.Reynders a estimé qu'il fallait "réagir avec le Conseil de sécurité", trouver un consensus pour relancer un processus politique de négociations entre le régime et l'opposition en Syrie.

 

La situation en Syrie est entrée dans une phase critique le 21 août, date à laquelle certains médias ont fait état de l'utilisation d'armes chimiques par les troupes gouvernementales dans la région de Damas. Selon les rebelles, cette attaque présumée pourrait avoir fait jusqu'à 1.300 morts. Damas a démenti avoir mené l'attaque et dénoncé une manipulation visant à déclencher une intervention étrangère dans le conflit syrien, qui dure depuis mars 2011.

 

Le 27 août, un porte-parole de la Maison Blanche a annoncé que le président Barack Obama réfléchissait aux mesures de riposte à cette attaque. Certains pays occidentaux, dont les Etats-Unis, la Grande-Bretagne et la France, appellent à une intervention militaire en Syrie.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 10:04
Russian Med Fleet Redeployment ‘Not Linked’ to Syria - Navy

MOSCOW, August 29 (RIA Novosti)

 

The redeployment of Russian Naval vessels in the Mediterranean Sea is part of a planned rotation and is not linked with the worsening situation in Syria, a Russian Naval spokesperson said Thursday.

The statement comes after media reports had suggested that the grouping of Russian vessels in the Mediterranean Sea was to be changed in direct connection with events in Syria. Admiral Viktor Chirkov, commander of the Russian Navy, told Zvezda TV channel Sunday that Russia "should have five or six vessels permanently deployed in the Mediterranean," but did not say how many were already there.

“The vessels in the Mediterranean, like those in other parts of the world, act under plans by the Russian Naval Command and General Staff, and fulfil tasks set,” the Naval spokesperson said.

“On completion of these tasks, the vessels then either return to their bases, or are replaced by other vessels to complete the tasks set,” the spokesperson said, adding “This does not amount to a renewal of any grouping or groupings, it is a planned rotation.”

The spokesperson for the Russian Navy did not share any further details with RIA Novosti regarding the ships involved, and said Navy General Staff decides what class of vessel to send.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 09:50
Londres repousse son intervention en Syrie

MOSCOU, 29 août - RIA Novosti

 

Hier soir, Londres a pris la décision inattendue de reporter son intervention en Syrie, écrit jeudi 29 août le quotidien Rossiïskaïa gazeta.

 

Ce coup de théâtre fait suite à l'avertissement du parti travailliste d'opposition, qui a annoncé vouloir s’opposer la décision d'intervenir en Syrie lors du vote d’aujourd'hui à la Chambre des communes du parlement britannique. Cet ultimatum a été notifié mercredi soir au premier ministre David Cameron par Ed Miliband, chef du parti travailliste. Ce dernier a exigé du premier ministre des garanties selon lesquelles la décision d'intervenir serait prise par le Royaume-Uni uniquement à l'issue de l'enquête des inspecteurs de l'Onu en Syrie et seulement quand, en tenant compte des conclusions de l'Onu, la Chambre des communes organisera un deuxième vote.

 

La chaîne britannique BBC a annoncé mercredi soir que la première réaction de Cameron fut de refuser les conditions avancées par Miliband mais moins de deux heures plus tard le bon sens a pris le dessus et le gouvernement a proposé un plan d'action précis. A savoir : le Royaume-Uni est prêt à attendre jusqu'à ce que les experts de l'Onu présentent leurs conclusions concernant l'utilisation de l'arme chimique en Syrie. Seulement après l'adoption d’une résolution à l'Onu, le gouvernement britannique demandera alors l'approbation des députés pour une intervention en Syrie. A la suite de quoi Westminster votera pour la deuxième fois concernant la question fatidique : faut-il intervenir ou non ? Tout cela ne devrait pas arriver avant la semaine prochaine. Quant à la réunion du parlement prévue aujourd'hui, elle n'est pas annulée pour autant. Cependant les députés ne voteront pas sur l'intervention en Syrie et évoqueront une question plus large : la "réaction humanitaire".

 

Les travaillistes ne sont pas seuls à avoir poussé Cameron à faire marche-arrière : l'opinion publique a également joué son rôle. Les généraux britanniques ont exprimé des doutes quant à l'idée de débarquer en Syrie avec des missiles. L'opinion publique d'Albion est tout aussi découragée. Un sondage auprès de 2 000 Britanniques réalisé par le centre YouGov a montré que seulement 25% étaient favorables à une frappe en Syrie, contre 50% d’opposants. Pour cette raison, les mœurs du public ont été considérées comme "profondément sceptiques".

 

La concession de Cameron est perçu par certains commentateurs comme dégradante pour le premier ministre. Cela reste discutable. Savoir écouter l'opinion du public lui fait honneur. Notamment sachant que cette décision met une distance entre Londres et son "cousin" transatlantique. Selon des sources bien informées, l'intervention militaire en Syrie était prévue ce week-end. De cette manière, si les USA proclamaient la nécessité d'une attaque militaire pour samedi ou dimanche, ils devraient commencer sans le soutien de la Grande-Bretagne qui pourrait (rien n'est encore sûr) rejoindre l'aventure plus tard. Ou déciderait de ne pas s'y joindre du tout.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 09:32
UK Sets Out Options for Syria Action

August 29th, 2013 By British Forces Broadcasting Service - defencetalk.com

 

British military officers will join the Prime Minister for talks later, to discuss the UK’s response to last week’s chemical weapons attack in Syria.

 

The National Security Council, which also includes the Defence Secretary and intelligence chiefs, will meet at 12.

 

David Cameron set out the options he is considering for action against Syria in a telephone call to United States president Barack Obama last night, ahead of a meeting with military chiefs.

 

In the last hour he said Britain will ask the UN security council for backing.

 

US forces “are ready to go” and the UK’s National Security Council (NSC) will today consider military plans drawn up in response to last week’s chemical weapons attack that is claimed to have killed more than 350 Syrians.

 

The Prime Minister warned yesterday that the world cannot stand idly by and announced he was recalling Parliament to vote on Britain’s response.

 

But he faces opposition to intervention from a number of his own backbenchers and polling shows the public is deeply reluctant for the UK to become embroiled in military action. Former military chiefs have also issued stark warnings about the direction Mr Cameron is taking, warning that even a “surgical” missile strike could end up dragging the UK into deeper action. The Archbishop of Canterbury has urged MPs not to rush their decision, warning of the “unforeseeable ramifications”.

 

Mr Cameron and Mr Obama are in no doubt that Bashar Assad’s regime was responsible for the toxic assault on the outskirts of Damascus, Downing Street said.

 

A No 10 spokesman said: “The PM spoke to President Obama last night to further discuss the serious response to last week’s chemical weapons attack in Syria. Ahead of today’s NSC, it was an opportunity for the PM to hear the latest US thinking on the issue and to set out the options being considered by the Government. Both leaders agreed that all the information available confirmed a chemical weapons attack had taken place, noting that even the Iranian president and Syrian regime had conceded this. And they both agreed they were in no doubt that the Assad regime was responsible.

 

“Regime forces were carrying out a military operation to regain that area from the opposition at the time, and there is no evidence that the opposition has the capability to deliver such a chemical weapons attack. The PM confirmed that the Government had not yet taken a decision on the specific nature of our response, but that it would be legal and specific to the chemical weapons attack.”

 

Mr Cameron has insisted that any intervention in Syria would not be about the conflict itself, but preventing the use of chemical weapons by any regime and would be “proportionate, have to be legal, would have to specifically be about deterring the use of chemical weapons”. He said: “Let me stress to people, this is not about getting involved in a Middle Eastern war or changing our stance in Syria, or going further into that conflict. It’s about chemical weapons. Their use is wrong and the world should not stand idly by.”

 

The NSC includes Defence Secretary Philip Hammond, Home Secretary Theresa May and Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg among its members. Foreign Secretary William Hague has warned that Britain cannot let the use of chemical weapons to go unchallenged, saying Britain “cannot allow diplomatic paralysis to be a shield” for Assad.

 

Labour leader Ed Miliband indicated yesterday that his party would consider supporting international action, “but only on the basis that it was legal, that it was specifically limited to deterring the future use of chemical weapons, and that any actions contemplated had clear and achievable goals”. The Opposition has made clear to Mr Cameron that its support depends on assurances that fresh efforts will be made to secure United Nations backing. A senior source said: “As part of that legal justification, Labour is seeking the direct involvement of the UN through evidence from the weapons inspectors and consideration by the security council.”

 

While political momentum towards intervention mounts, the British public has yet to be persuaded. A YouGov survey for The Sun revealed that nearly three-quarters of people oppose the deployment of British troops to Syria, and a majority of 3-1 believe the Government should be bound by Parliament’s vote tomorrow.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 09:17
RAF Akrotiri base - photo UK MoD

RAF Akrotiri base - photo UK MoD

29 août 2013 à 07:36 Par RFI

 

Les préparatifs s'accélèrent en vue d'une attaque contre les infrastructures militaires du régime de Damas. Les frappes aériennes pourraient occuper une place importante dans le dispositif militaire et la base aérienne britannique d'Akrotiri, à Chypre, est idéalement située.

 

Les bases aériennes qui sont citées en premier, lorsqu'on évoque d'éventuelles frappes en Syrie, sont celles d'Incirlik et d'Izmir en Turquie, ainsi qu'une autre située en Jordanie. Mais des articles de la presse britannique ont fait également mention de la base aérienne britannique d'Akrotiri, située sur l'île de Chypre, à seulement 160 kilomètres de la Syrie.

 

Des pilotes d'un vol commercial auraient ainsi observé la présence d'avions de transport militaire C-130 sur la base, et le voisinage a relevé à son tour qu'une activité supérieure à la normale s'y déroule depuis trois jours.

 

Mais tous les spécialistes des questions de défense ne confirment pas qu'il s'agit là des signes avant-coureurs d'une opération militaire imminente. Ils font remarquer que la base d'Akrotiri sert surtout de point d'appui et de ravitaillement, notamment pour le rapatriement du matériel militaire d'Afghanistan.

 

Elle accueille également de nombreuses installations électroniques d'écoute. Il faut dire aussi que les autorités chypriotes ont déclaré qu'elles n'avaient reçu aucune information concernant une éventuelle utilisation de la base d'Akrotiri pour une attaque contre la Syrie.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 09:08
Launch of a Tomahawk Land Attack Missile missile. (Photo Lockheed Martin)

Launch of a Tomahawk Land Attack Missile missile. (Photo Lockheed Martin)

Missile de croisière Tomahawk -  Ce missile tiré de navires de surface ou de sous-marins est l’arme de prédilection des forces américaines. Précis et rapide, il peut détruire toutes sortes de cibles avec une grande chance de succès.

 

28 août 2013 Aezrobuzz.fr

 

C’est désormais acté, des frappes militaires [pourraient avoir] lieu en Syrie, sous peu. La coalition qui réunit les USA, la France et la Grande-Bretagne dispose d’un arsenal pour frapper le régime en place. Etat des moyens qui pourraient être mis en œuvre.

 

C’est désormais inéluctable. Le veto Russe à l’ONU n’y pourra rien changer, des frappes sont en préparation contre la Syrie. Les services de renseignement français, anglais et américains planchent fiévreusement sur la définition des dossiers d’objectifs à soumettre aux autorités politiques. En parallèle, les moyens d’une coalition se mettent peu à peu en place et certains sont déjà pré-positionnés, à l’instar des navires de guerre de la 6ème flotte américaine, lesquels croisent à proximité des côtes syriennes et des avions de combat, présents en Jordanie et en Turquie.

 

Echaudés par les guerres d’Irak et d’Afghanistan, il est clair que les USA ne veulent pas s’engager dans un conflit qui risque, une nouvelle fois, de se transformer en bourbier. D’un autre côté, le président Obama ne plus rester impassible après l’utilisation en Syrie d’armes chimiques. Dans ces conditions, il est probable que les frappes seront rapides et limitées dans le temps, et qu’elles viseront des objectifs militaires précis. Il pourra s’agir, en premier lieu, de centres de commandement et de communication, de dépôts d’armement et de moyens logistiques militaires (carburant, moyens de transport). A ceux-ci s’ajouteront des centres de décision politiques et probablement des bases aériennes et des radars de défense.

 

Pour ce faire la 6ème flotte lancera au moins une centaine de missiles de croisière conventionnels Tomahawk. Chacun est propulsé par un petit réacteur et est programmé. Il peut être tiré de sous-marins ou de navires de surface. Il affiche, suivant les versions, une portée de plus de 1.400 km. Son profil de vol typique comprend une vitesse de 800 km/h environ à très basse altitude. Il se guide grâce à une centrale inertielle hybridée GPS. Il dispose en outre d’un système de reconnaissance du terrain survolé. Sur certaines versions, en phase finale, un autodirecteur infrarouge « reconnaît » la cible à frapper. Ces missiles emportent, soit une très forte charge d’explosif, soit des sous-munitions. Ces sous-munitions à explosion immédiate ou différée sont pratiques pour rendre hors service une piste d’atterrissage par exemple.

 

Ces moyens, relativement économiques en vies humaines et en coût (on parle de 800.000 euros le missile), n’exposent aucun soldat américain aux défenses syriennes.

De par leur profil de vol, ces missiles sont également très difficiles à intercepter. Même si certains peuvent néanmoins être contrés par des systèmes sol-air syriens, il est probable que la grande majorité d’entre eux atteindront leurs objectifs.

Bombardier américain furtif B2 - Cet avion invisible aux radars est en théorie capable de traverser impunément la Syrie. photo USAF

Bombardier américain furtif B2 - Cet avion invisible aux radars est en théorie capable de traverser impunément la Syrie. photo USAF

 

L’autre option la plus probable pour une action immédiate repose sur le bombardier furtif B2. Cet avion invisible aux radars qui est aussi le plus couteux de l’histoire de l’aviation est en théorie capable de traverser impunément la Syrie.

Dans ses soutes, il peut emporter des dizaines de bombes à guidage GPS ou des missiles de croisière. De quoi achever les dernières défenses anti-aériennes en place dans le pays ou détruire une cible très importante comme un bunker présidentiel.

F/A 18 Hornet - C’est l’appareil polyvalent tout à fait adapté aux opérations en Syrie ; il est aussi à l’aise pour les missions d’attaque que de combat aérien. photo US Navy

F/A 18 Hornet - C’est l’appareil polyvalent tout à fait adapté aux opérations en Syrie ; il est aussi à l’aise pour les missions d’attaque que de combat aérien. photo US Navy

 

Une autre option consiste à utiliser les avions du groupe aéronaval américain.

On pense alors à un raid combiné impliquant des avions de surveillance radar E2 Hawkeye, des avions de brouillage EA6B Prowler pour aveugler les défenses adverses et des F/A 18 E/F pour effectuer les frappes au sol et détruire, au besoin, en vol les chasseurs adverses.

La panoplie du Super Hornet est probablement la plus complète qui soit. Ces avions disposent dans leur nez d’un puissant radar à antenne active. Ils sont prévus pour embarquer des missiles anti radar supersoniques AGM88, des bombes guidées et des missiles largués à plusieurs dizaines de kilomètres, des défenses anti aériennes de l’adversaire le tout, en conservant la capacité de se défendre avec des missiles anti aériens AIM-120 Amraam de 100km de portée.

Reste que ces avions lourdement chargés seront lents, et facilement détectables par la défense adverse pendant leur phase d’approche, d’ou la nécessité de disposer d’une couverture de brouillage assurée par les EA6B Prowler.

 

Un autre scénario prévoit également une participation britannique par le biais de missiles Tomahawk tirés de sous-marins, ainsi que des frappes de F-16 par plusieurs pays alliés à partir de la Jordanie et de la Turquie.

Israël pour sa part semble déjà avoir fait sa part du travail en détruisant au cours des dernières semaines plusieurs dépôts de munitions syriens lors de frappes aériennes ciblées de nuit.

Ces raids qui ont permis de détruire le stock de missiles antinavires supersoniques dernier cri « Yakhont » démontrent la capacité de l’Etat hébreu à pénétrer les moyens de défense syriens en tout impunité. Tel Aviv qui nie toute implication pourrait avoir employé des F-16 équipés de pods de brouillage de forte puissance, le tout avec l’assistance d’avions G550 « spéciaux » capables d’introduire de fausses informations dans les centres de défense adverses.

Rafale - La France pourrait envoyer en Syrie des Rafale armés de missiles de croisière SCALP ou de bombes AASM. photo Marine Nationale

Rafale - La France pourrait envoyer en Syrie des Rafale armés de missiles de croisière SCALP ou de bombes AASM. photo Marine Nationale

 

La grande inconnue est la capacité de réaction de la France. Pour l’heure la Marine Nationale ne dispose pas encore de l’équivalent du Tomahawk, le missile de croisière naval MDCN.

Rafale & AASM - 31 mars 2011 - Photo Ph Wodka-Gallien

Rafale & AASM - 31 mars 2011 - Photo Ph Wodka-Gallien

Il faudra donc acheminer des Rafale Marine armés de bombes AASM et de missiles Scalp avec le porte-avions Charles de Gaulle, une opération qui prendra plusieurs jours. A moins que l’Armée de l’air ne décide d’opérer à partir de bases aux Emirats Arabes Unis, en Turquie ou en Jordanie…

 

 

En théorie, la Syrie est bien armé. Mais ses moyens ne sont pas de toute première jeunesse et l’état de préparation des défenseurs est sujet à caution. Les moyens les plus modernes de défense sont tous de conception russe. Le plus redoutable d’entre eux est le S300 PMU, plus communément surnommé SA-10 par l’OTAN. En théorie ce système, qui est l’équivalent du « Patriot » américain en mieux est capable de détruire tout appareil ennemi dans un rayon de 120 km ou un missile dans un rayon de 40 km. Il repose sur un radar de veille longue portée, un centre commandement et de coordination, un radar de poursuite et plusieurs lance missiles très mobiles. Ces systèmes de conception ancienne sont néanmoins difficiles à contrer par les systèmes d’autoprotection classiques des avions de combat.

S-300 missiles

S-300 missiles

Pantsir

Pantsir

Vient ensuite le SA-11. Ce bouclier d’une portée de 40 km environ est capable de contrer des avions, des hélicoptères ou des missiles avec un taux de réussite théorique voisin de 95%. A plus courte portée, les systèmes Pantsir, associent des canons à tir rapide et des missiles très courte portée. Ce système se veut très résistant au brouillage. Il est donc redoutable pour tout aéronef évoluant en vol tactique. N’oublions pas non plus les missiles à guidage infrarouge SA-18 mis en œuvre par les fantassins. D’une portée de 4 km environ, ils s’avèrent redoutablement efficaces contre des avions lents ou des hélicoptères mal protégés.

Mig-29 - Redoutable en combat rapproché, il est comparable aux premiers F/A18 ou aux F16 de première génération. Il n’a pas été modernisé récemment. Ses capacités de combat à grande portée sont son point faible.

Mig-29 - Redoutable en combat rapproché, il est comparable aux premiers F/A18 ou aux F16 de première génération. Il n’a pas été modernisé récemment. Ses capacités de combat à grande portée sont son point faible.

 

En l’air, la Syrie peut mettre en en œuvre des avions d’attaque supersoniques SU-24, et des chasseurs MIG-29 et MIG23. Des appareils performants sur le papier mais qui, s’ils n’ont pas fait l’objet d’un programme de remise à niveau, ne risquent pas de peser très lourd face aux moyens de la coalition. A cela s’ajoute une inconnue, l’état de préparation des pilotes et des matériels.

SU-24 - Cet avion d’attaque supersonique peut s’avérer redoutable pour les navires américains à condition qu’il puisse décoller.

SU-24 - Cet avion d’attaque supersonique peut s’avérer redoutable pour les navires américains à condition qu’il puisse décoller.

La dernière inconnue de cette équation complexe est l’importance de l’assistance russe. En effet, la chute d’un avion furtif F117 en Serbie a prouvé qu’un moyen de défense russe obsolète, moyennant un minimum de remise à niveau, pouvait contrer efficacement les moyens les plus modernes « made in USA ».

 

Quelque soit l’état des forces en présence, l’Histoire contemporaine nous a appris qu’une guerre n’est jamais gagnée d’avance.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 07:50
The UK's Response Force Task Group deployed on Cougar 13 [Picture: Leading Airman (Photographer) Arron Hoare, Crown Copyright]

The UK's Response Force Task Group deployed on Cougar 13 [Picture: Leading Airman (Photographer) Arron Hoare, Crown Copyright]

28 August 2013 Ministry of Defence

 

A large-scale exercise which will see more than 600 Royal Marines hone their skills alongside their Albanian counterparts is now underway.

Exercise Albanian Lion is the first major outing for the Response Force Task Group (RFTG) – a Royal Naval force comprising 4 warships and 5 support vessels which are exercising in the Mediterranean and Gulf over the next 3 months under the name Cougar 13.

The exercise will see the Lead Commando Group of 42 Commando, the Royal Marines unit that stands ready to react to events anywhere in the world, carry out a series of mock assaults on enemy positions near Bise designed to improve their core amphibious warfare skills.

This will be the third time the 2 forces have worked together since the RFTG was formed after the 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review.

Royal Marines from 42 Commando
Royal Marines from 42 Commando carry out a mock assault on an enemy position [Picture: Petty Officer (Photographer) Sean Clee, Crown copyright]

Ahead of the exercise, Colonel Kevin Oliver, Deputy Commander of 3 Commando Brigade Royal Marines, met with Major General Xhemal Gjunkshi, Chief of General Staff of the Albanian Armed Forces, at Tirana International Airport.

Colonel Oliver said:

Building on from last year’s exercise we have enhanced our contribution by providing a larger force comprising fast jets, helicopters, assault boats and armoured personnel carriers for ground manoeuvre and force protection.

We already have reconnaissance teams in place, as we would in a real-life scenario, who will guide in the landing force.

Badges of the Royal Marines and their Albanian counterparts
Royal Marines are training alongside their Albanian counterparts [Picture: Petty Officer (Photographer) Sean Clee, Crown copyright]

Once the forces have landed they will push forward through enemy terrain while being supported by the RFTG ships which can sustain them logistically and cover their progress with firepower should that be required:

Albania has some of the best training areas ever used by our Task Group,” added Colonel Oliver. “We are extremely grateful for their use and for the chance to work alongside Albanian forces, sharing the experience of operations.

The Cougar 13 deployment will operate in and around the Mediterranean, the Red Sea, the Gulf and the Horn of Africa. It involves exercising with partner nations and will demonstrate the capacity of UK Armed Forces to project an effective maritime component anywhere in the world as part of the RFTG.

Royal Marines from 42 Commando taking part in a river crossing
Royal Marines from 42 Commando taking part in a river crossing [Picture: Petty Officer (Photographer) Sean Clee, Crown copyright]

The RFTG is commanded by Commodore Paddy McAlpine from the fleet flagship, HMS Bulwark, and is the UK’s high readiness maritime force at 5 days’ notice to respond to any contingency tasking including humanitarian disaster relief or international military intervention.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 07:50
UK-Polish Group Unveils New Vehicle Demonstrator

An artist's rendering of a concept vehicle being developed by Obrum, part of the Polish Defence Holding group. The demonstrator will be unveiled at the upcoming MSPO exhibition in Poland next month. (Polish Defence Holding)

 

Aug. 28, 2013 - By ANDREW CHUTER – Defense News

 

LONDON — The BAE Systems-Polish Defence Holding’s team competing for an upcoming requirement from the Polish Army for a family of light tanks and infantry fighting vehicles has released a sneak preview of a concept demonstrator they plan to unveil at the upcoming MSPO defense equipment show.

 

The concept vehicle — developed by Obrum, part of the Polish Defence Holding group — features an unmanned turret sporting a 120mm gun mounted on a chassis, drawing heavily on CV90 mobility and protection technology provided by BAE’s Hagglunds operation in Sweden.

 

The vehicle will be a centerpiece of Polish Defence Holding’s stand at the MSPO exhibition, which opens in Keilce, Poland, on Sept 2.

 

BAE and the state-owned Polish Defence Holding, formerly known as the Bulmar Group, announced a teaming deal in late May to compete for a Polish Army requirement for hundreds of light tanks and infantry fighting vehicles using a universal tracked platform.

 

Formal specifications for the tracked vehicle requirement are expected to be released by the Polish Defense Ministry toward the end of the year, with a requirement for the first delivery sometime in 2018.

 

BAE officials said the modular design of the demonstrator is intended to be flexible and help stimulate debate as Poland heads toward issuing a formal specification.

 

Despite unexpected Polish government revenue shortfalls this year, which could result in some trimming of the defense budget spending on the military, funding remains robust with the portion of cash going to equipment increasing.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 07:50
HMS Vigilant fires an unarmed Trident II ballistic missile photo UK MoD

HMS Vigilant fires an unarmed Trident II ballistic missile photo UK MoD

08/28/2013  Steve Coltman - defenceiq.com

 

Recently the MoD published its long-awaited Review of Alternatives to Trident, written at the behest of the Liberal Democrats. It says that cruise missiles might have been a viable alternative but for two things – the existing Trident warheads are not suitable for use in cruise missiles and that it would take 24 years to develop a new warhead.

 

This is such a long timescale that the Vanguard-class subs would have been retired before the new system was available, necessitating the purchase of two new Trident SSNBNs as a stop-gap and therefore wiping out any cost-savings. 

 

I find the point about it taking 24 years to develop a new warhead to be particularly astonishing, but reading between the lines of the report perhaps one might  wonder if the UK hasn’t lost the ability to design new warheads altogether.

 

So far as the suitability of existing warheads to go in cruise missiles is concerned, the case rests on two points.

  1. In the case of horizontally-launched missiles, these would have to be stored in the torpedo room in close proximity to the crew, and this would necessitate the development of a low-radiation warhead. I don’t suppose we can argue with that point. Developing a low-radiation warhead would take even longer than 24 years.
  2. The report also says that the existing Trident warheads are too delicate and would not stand up to the manhandling that cruise-missiles are subjected to. One can imagine that horizontally-launched cruise-missiles manhandled down into the torpedo room might be subject to a few knocks but in the case of vertically-launched cruise missiles, why should the handling of the warheads be any different to what they experience in vertically-launched Trident missiles?

 

What the report did not say was that the warheads are too big to fit inside a 21” diameter cruise missile. Considering 12 warheads plus decoys have to fit inside a Trident, I suppose it is reasonable to assume the warheads are not that large. Had the Trident warheads been too large for a cruise missile I am sure the report would have said so.

 

Comparing vertically-launched cruise-missiles with Trident, the only difference in what shocks the warhead would experience post-launch, when the cruise-missile cants over to follow a horizontal course to its target while the Trident missile continues onwards, upwards and then downwards on a ballistic trajectory. The report is quite adamant that the Trident warhead would not be suitable for cruise-missile use, but how do we know that? If Aldermaston has lost the people who can design warheads, they might also lack the people who can make an informed judgement on this issue too. It should be easy enough to put some sensors in a Tomahawk and measure the acceleration, g-forces and shocks that a cruise-missile warhead might be subject to in a real launch, then take an existing warhead and subject it to the same (or worse) shocks to see what, if anything, breaks? Has the MoD ever done this? If not, how can it be so sure the Trident warhead would not be suitable?

 

Let us suppose that Trident warheads are indeed suitable for use in vertically-launched cruise missiles – what then? The main capital cost of the like-for-like replacement of Trident is in the four big submarines, with a quoted coast of £11-14 billion. At an guesstimate, we would have to reserve around £2-3 billion to develop a new indigenous cruise missile, which would still leave us with £10 billion.

 

Here are some important points to consider:

  • How many of the seven planned Astute-class boats can be fitted with vertical launch tubes, and why were they not part of the original design anyway? The keel has already been laid for the sixth boat so it may now be too late to change its design and incorporate vertical tubes. The worst case scenario is that only the seventh boat onwards could have vertical tubes fitted and I presume it is too much to contemplate chopping existing subs in two and inserting a new section – although the Spanish are contemplating something similar for their new subs.
  • We will need more Astutes beyond the planned seven, which may need to be supplemented by cheaper conventional boats. Astutes currently cost £1.2 billion each, while the biggest and best conventional boats are about £500 million each. So, three extra Astutes, with the seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth having vertical tubes, would be £3.6 billion.
  • Half a dozen big conventional boats, which would also be fitted with vertical tubes, at £500 million each is £3 billion. We now have a submarine fleet of 16 boats, much better than at present.
  • A dozen frigate-sized OPV / patrol frigates, like the French ‘Floreal’ class or the Dutch ‘Holland’ class – would be about £1.5 billion. This would quickly and dramatically ease the Navy’s surface ship numbers problem.
  • And what about two more Type 45s? Six isn’t very many as only two are on operations at any given time. At £700 million each, that’s another £1.4 billion.
  • With the remaining £500 million, perhaps we could buy another big amphibious ship? Or more MARS replenishment ships?

 

This is just the author’s preference of course. Many other shopping lists are possible but it is clear from this ‘fantasy navy’ exercise that the opportunity cost of Trident is pretty high. And the case for the like-for-like replacement of Trident rests on the assertion that Trident warheads are too delicate to be used in cruise missiles, and that it would take 24 years to develop a warhead suitable for cruise missiles (despite France and Israel already having such warheads). It is very difficult for politicians to argue with such assertions, however sceptical we may be.

 

Finally - do we really need a deterrent in this day and age anyway? A good question, but probably a redundant one, I doubt if anyone could get unilateral disarmament through parliament before 2016.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 07:50
Belgians Begin NH90 NFH Training

Belgian Defense photo by Jürgen Braekevelt

 

Aug 28, 2013 by Nicholas Fiorenza – Ares, A Defense Technology Blog

 

The first Belgian NH90 Nato Frigate Helicopter (NFH) has flown to Eurocopter France in Marignane, southern France, after being rolled out at Eurocopter Germany in Donauwörth at the beginning of August. The helicopter will be used to train Belgian pilots and technicians.

 

The NH90 NFH will replace Belgium's Sea King in the search and rescue role and be used to support its navy. After some delays, the first NH90 NFH90 will be delivered to Coxyde, where its Sea Kings are currently based, at the end of the year. It will become operational in 2014. Belgian NH90 NFH pilots will receive training in simulators in Germany and Italy.

 

Belgium has ordered four NH90 NFHs and four NH90 troop transport helicopters. It will jointly manage spare parts with other NH90 NFH nations under the EU's pooling and sharing initiative.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 07:50
Czechs, Swiss Boost Hopes for Sweden’s Gripen

Aug 28, 2013 defense-aerospace.com

(Source: The Local; published Aug 28, 2013)

 

Czechs and Swiss Boost Hope for Swedish Gripen

 

The interim Czech government said it plans to renew its lease of JAS Gripen fighter jets, while a parliamentary committee in Switzerland said yes to a proposed 23 billion kronor ($3.5 billion) purchase of the Swedish-made warplanes.

 

Following two days of discussions of the deal that would see the Swiss military purchase 22 JAS Gripen jets, the security and defence committee of the Swiss parliament voted 14-9 in favour of the deal. The deal now moves for a vote in front of the full parliament on September 11th.

 

The committee had previously given the deal a thumbs up in the spring, but some politicians expressed concerns, prompting the government to review and clarify the deal.

 

As the new Gripen E is still in development, there remains uncertainty as to whether Saab and Sweden can deliver what they've promised and that Switzerland may end up with what some called an "Ikea-plane" instead of a "Super-JAS".

 

Meanwhile, outgoing Czech prime minister Jiri Rusnok said this week that the government expects to renew its lease on 14 Swedish fighter jets beyond 2015.

 

"The negotiations are at an advanced stage. The ball is actually in our court. The Swedes are awaiting our final answer to their recent offer," he told reporters on Monday.

 

The new contract with Stockholm over the supersonic JAS-39 Gripen combat jets could be inked at the end of the year or in early 2014 by the new government, he added. Snap elections are scheduled for late October.

 

The Czech military paid nearly $1 billion to lease the Gripens for a decade starting 2005. The aircraft include 12 one-seater JAS-39 Cs and two two-seater training JAS-39 Ds.

 

In July of last year, former Czech Prime Minister Petr Necas said Stockholm was being "uncooperative" regarding the renewal. According to press reports, the Swedes had been refusing to lower the lease price.

 

Necas stepped down in June amid a spy and bribery scandal. The president appointed a new technocratic government led by Rusnok, but that cabinet lost a confidence vote this month.

 

"The next government will make the final decision on the Gripens, but this (Rusnok) cabinet will do its utmost to facilitate it," Defence Minister Vlastimil Picek said Monday. He added that the new contract will be a better deal for the Czech Republic and valid for "a period longer than ten years".

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 07:45
L’Algeria International Air Show reporté à 2014

27.08.2013 Sarah El Caïdi - journal-aviation.com

 

Alors que le premier salon de l’aéronautique et de l’espace en Algérie, baptisé Algeria International Air Show (ALIAS), devait se tenir à l’aéroport d’Oran du 8 au 10 octobre 2013, l’événement est reporté à une date ultérieure en 2014.

 

La date précise de la manifestation devrait être annoncée au cours du dernier trimestre 2013, a indiqué l'organisateur dans un communiqué publié le mois dernier.

 

Selon ALIAS, la tenue du salon est « soumise à un contexte qui ne permet pas aux organisateurs, dans les conditions actuelles, de maintenir cette date sans courir le risque de ne pas atteindre les objectifs souhaités, ce qui serait préjudiciable à tous ».

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 07:40
Le chasseur Sukhoi Su-30SM

Le chasseur Sukhoi Su-30SM

JOUKOVSKI (région de Moscou), 28 août - RIA Novosti

 

La Russie a dévoilé mardi le missile sol-air S-350E Vitiaz, le chasseur Sukhoi Su-30SM et un vaisseau spatial habité de nouvelle génération lors de la 1ère journée du 11e Salon aérospatial international MAKS à Joukovski, dans la région de Moscou.

 

Le missile sol-air à moyenne portée S-350E Vitiaz (Preux) est censé remplacer les anciennes versions des missiles S-300 actuellement en dotation dans l'armée russe. Selon le consortium russe Almaz-Anteï, qui a conçu le missile, cette arme est plus performante que ses concurrents étrangers. Le missile S-350E Vitiaz est destiné à protéger les sites administratifs, industriels et militaires contre les frappes aériennes, y compris réalisées au moyen d'avions furtifs et de missiles balistiques.

 

Le chasseur polyvalent à haute manœuvrabilité Su-30SM est un appareil de la famille des Su-30MK, adapté aux exigences de l'Armée de l'air russe. "L'avion est très maniable, il peut voler sur place comme un hélicoptère", selon Vitali Boroditch, vice-président du groupe russe Irkout. Le Su-30SM possède de nouveaux radars à antenne à balayage électronique (AESA) et des systèmes de liaison radio et d'identification. Les pilotes militaires apprécient ses capacités en matière de détection et de destruction de plusieurs cibles, à la fois dans les airs et au sol. Le groupe Irkout produit actuellement 60 chasseurs Sukhoi Su-30SM pour l'armée de l'air russe. Il a déjà remis les premiers appareils au ministère de la Défense en 2012.

 

Le nouveau vaisseau spatial habité russe, présenté mardi au salon MAKS-2013, doit remplacer les Soyouz et Progress qui desservent actuellement la Station spatiale internationale (ISS). Le vaisseau peut emporter six membres d'équipage et une charge utile de 500 kg. Une seule personne suffit pour piloter ce vaisseau.

 

Le Salon aérospatial international MAKS-2013 se déroule du 27 août au 1er septembre sur l'aérodrome de l'Institut de recherche sur les vols Gromov à Joukovski, dans la région de Moscou.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 07:40
S-350E Vityaz launcher carries 12 missiles in vertical-launch pods Photo Bill Sweetman, Aviation Week

S-350E Vityaz launcher carries 12 missiles in vertical-launch pods Photo Bill Sweetman, Aviation Week

MOSCOU, 28 août - RIA Novosti

 

La Russie est aujourd’hui capable de fabriquer des équipements électroniques pour les avions, les hélicoptères et les missiles: telle est la principale découverte du Salon aérospatial MAKS-2013. En termes de matière grise, ils commencent même à dépasser leurs concurrents étrangers, écrit mercredi le quotidien Rossiïskaïa gazeta.

 

Le salon présente des appareils très divers allant des répliques de la Grande guerre patriotique de 1941-1945 jusqu’aux tout nouveaux chasseurs de cinquième génération en passant par les bombardiers stratégiques et les transporteurs géants.

 

Les élégants avions en plastique de l'autrichien Diamond Aircraft ont également été présentés pour la première fois. Au dernier Salon du Bourget, le groupe russe des hautes technologies Rostec (ex-Rostekhnologuii) avait signé un contrat pour la production de ces appareils de diverses classes pour la Russie et en Russie.

 

Et voici que les Diamond représentent déjà l'emblème de l'usine d'aviation civile de l'Oural où ils seront construits.

 

Les avions militaires dévoilent également leurs charmes, comme le MiG-35 et le Sukhoï Su-35.

 

A proximité, un véritable scoop: le système sol-air de moyenne portée de nouvelle génération S-350E a été pour la première fois présenté publiquement. Tout le monde a entendu parler des fameux S-300, mais peu connaissent l'existence du S-350. Son système de lancement accueille 12 missiles et il est capable de détruire simultanément 16 cibles aérodynamiques et 12 missiles dans un rayon de 60 km et dans un intervalle d'altitude compris entre 10 mètres et 30 kilomètres. Cette arme a été conçue par la compagnie Almaz Anteï.

 

La compagnie "Armements missiles tactiques" a pour la première fois présenté son missile à longue portée capable d'atteindre une cible à 200 km même en cas de puissant brouillage électronique, qui est un projectile autonome après lancement. Ces missiles améliorent considérablement les capacités d'attaque du bombardier Sukhoï Su-34, des chasseurs  Su-35S et MiG-35, étant donné que les radars de ces appareils peuvent voir un ennemi à 400 km (pour les Su) et 150 km (pour les MiG).

 

Les radars, aussi sophistiqués qu'ils soient, sont efficaces uniquement s'ils sont dotés d'un "cerveau" informatique, qui a été présenté avec un effet visuel époustouflant au pavillon de la corporation Technologies radioélectroniques.

 

Les équipements électroniques et logiciels russes permettent aux avions de passer à une nouvelle ère. L'Iliouchine Il-114 présenté par la compagnie RADAR MMS en est un parfait exemple. Le cockpit de cet appareil est intégralement en verre et équipé du tout dernier système informatique de contrôle, utilisé comme laboratoire volant. A l'heure actuelle, à la demande de la Marine, on met au point sur l'appareil un système spécial de visée Kassatka pour les avions de patrouille. Ce système est capable de faire de la recherche de sous-marins, de la reconnaissance et de la surveillance d'une large superficie maritime, ainsi que de désigner un objectif pour éliminer toute cible en surface ou sous l'eau.

 

Selon le directeur exécutif de la compagnie Ivan Antsev, l'une des plus grandes entreprises industrielles italiennes est intéressée par le système Kassatka. De par ses performances, il fait partie des meilleurs au monde et a un fort potentiel en termes d'exportations. La coopération russo-italienne a donné naissance à un tout nouveau radar à balayage circulaire Kassatka-I – un élément-clé du système. Le radar russo-italien a largement augmenté les performances du système global. Il pourra être utilisé aussi bien à des fins militaires que civiles, y compris pour les besoins du ministère russe des Situations d'urgence pour la recherche et le sauvetage de victimes.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 07:40
Moscou crée sa première base aérienne en Biélorussie

MINSK, 28 août - RIA Novosti

 

La Russie créera sa première base aérienne sur le sol biélorusse en 2013, a annoncé mercredi à Minsk le ministre biélorusse de la Défense Iouri Jadobine.

 

"Une patrouille de chasseurs russes sera déployée sur le territoire biélorusse d'ici la fin de l'année", a indiqué M.Jadobine lors d'une conférence de presse.

 

La base aérienne sera située à Lida, non loin de la frontière avec la Pologne et la Lituanie conformément à l'accord intergouvernemental bilatéral sur le renforcement de la composante militaire de l'Union Russie-Biélorussie.

 

La base sera opérationnelle dès 2013.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 07:40
lyra-10-mobile

lyra-10-mobile

BASILDON, England, Aug. 28 (UPI)

 

Britain's Selex ES has partnered with Russia's NIIDAR to promote surveillance systems produced in Russia and Italy.

 

The cooperative agreement between Selex ES, a subsidiary of Italy's Finmeccanica company, and NIIDAR (Scientific and Research Institute for Long-Distance Radio Communications), a Russian open joint stock company, was announced Tuesday.

 

The two companies have so far identified two products for international promotion: Selex ES's Lyra family and NIIDAR's Laguna over-the-horizon, integrated maritime surveillance system.

 

Selex ES said its Lyra radar line family is designed to meet requirements in the security domain, including integration into major systems for homeland protection, vessel traffic services and field deployment in a man-portable radar configuration.

 

NIIDAR's Laguna civil use radar is the second product. Its designed for law and order operations and for the surveillance of the exclusive economic zone of coastal states.

 

"The agreement will enhance the capabilities of both companies in their domestic markets as well as in the wider international marketplace," Selex ES said.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 07:35
India's first military satellite will help keep tabs on Indian Ocean region

Aug 28, 2013 Rajat Pandit, TNN

 

The 2,625kg military satellite will help the Navy keep a hawk-eye over both Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal.

 

NEW DELHI: India's first dedicated military satellite GSAT-7 or "Rukmini", which will be launched by Arianespace from French Guiana on Friday, will provide the Navy with an almost 2,000-nautical-mile-footprint over the critical Indian Ocean region (IOR).

 

Essentially a geo-stationary communication satellite to enable real-time networking of all Indian warships, submarines and aircraft with operational centres ashore, the 2,625kg Rukmini will also help the Navy keep a hawk-eye over both Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal. "From Persian Gulf to Malacca Strait, it will help cover almost 70% of the IOR," said a source.

 

The "over-the-sea use" Rukmini, with UHF, S, Ku and C-band transponders, is to be followed by GSAT-7A with the IAF and Army sharing its "over-the-land use" bandwidth. The Navy has been clamouring for such a satellite for close to a decade now to shorten its "sensor-to-shooter loop" - the ability to swiftly detect and tackle a threat — but the delay in the indigenous GSLV rocket to carry satellites and other factors have been the stumbling blocks.

 

India, of course, has been a late — and somewhat reluctant — entrant into the military space arena despite having a robust civilian programme for decades. Without dedicated satellites of their own, the armed forces were relegated to using "dual use" Cartosat satellites or the Technology Experimental Satellite launched in 2001, apart from leasing foreign satellite transponders for surveillance, navigation and communication purposes.

 

China, in sharp contrast, has taken huge strides in the military space arena, testing even ASAT (anti-satellite) weapons against "low-earth orbit" satellites since January 2007. "With counter-space being a top priority, China has been testing its 'direct-ascent kinetic kill' capabilities. It also has active programmes for kinetic and directed-energy laser weapons as well as nano-satellites. By 2020, it hopes to have a space station with military applications," said a source.

 

Incidentally, around 300 dedicated or dual-use military satellites are orbiting around the earth, with the US owning 50% of them, followed by Russia and China. But India has lagged far behind in utilization of the final frontier of space for military purposes, refusing to even approve the long-standing demand of the armed forces for a full-fledged Aerospace Command, as earlier reported by TOI.

 

Though officially against " any offensive space capabilities or weaponization of space", the defence ministry in 2010 had come out with a 15-year "Technology Perspective and Capability Roadmap" that dwelt on the need to develop ASAT weapons "for electronic or physical destruction of satellites in both LEO (2,000km altitude above earth's surface) and GEO-synchronous orbits". These portions were quietly deleted in the roadmap released earlier this year.

 

DRDO contends it can develop ASAT weapons if required by marrying the propulsion system of the over 5,000-km Agni-V missile with the "kill vehicle" of its two-tier BMD (ballistic missile system) system.

 

Apart from working on "directed energy weapons" at its Laser Science &Technology Centre, DRDO also has futuristic programmes for launching "mini-satellites on demand" for use in the battlefield as well as "EMP (electromagnetic pulse) hardening" of satellites and sensors to protect them against ASAT weapons.

 

But all that is in the future. Dedicated military satellites like Rukmini will help India keep real-time tabs over the rapidly-militarizing IOR, where China is increasingly expanding its strategic footprint, as well as on troop movements, missile silos, military installations and airbases across land borders.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 07:35
Northrop Grumman Australia Agrees to Acquire Qantas Group's Defence Services Business

August 28, 2013 GLOBE NEWSWIRE

 

FALLS CHURCH, Va. – Aug. 28, 2013 – Northrop Grumman Australia Pty Limited, a subsidiary of Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC), announced that it has signed a definitive agreement with Qantas Airways Limited (ASX:QAN) to acquire Australia-based Qantas Defence Services Pty Limited (QDS). QDS provides integrated logistics, sustainment and modernization support to Australian government and military customers. The acquisition is subject to various conditions and is expected to close in 2014. Terms of the transactions were not disclosed.

 

"QDS complements our current integrated logistics and modernization efforts and advances our international strategy. We expect QDS will provide an important platform for international growth in our key focus areas of unmanned, C4ISR, cyber, and logistics and modernization," said Wes Bush, Northrop Grumman chairman, chief executive officer and president.

 

"Northrop Grumman's in-country revenue and footprint are significantly enhanced by the QDS acquisition, underscoring our commitment to the Australian and regional defence markets," said Ian Irving, Northrop Grumman chief executive for Australia.

 

With more than 300 employees in facilities throughout Australia, QDS provides through life support for the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) Multi Role Tanker Transport fleet, turn-key operational logistics services for the Australian Government's VIP aircraft, and engine overhaul services for the Orion P-3 and Hawk Lead-in Fighter. In addition, Indonesia recently awarded QDS a contract to refurbish C-130H aircraft. QDS also provides engineering consultancy services to the Royal Australian Navy and other maritime customers.

 

Northrop Grumman is a leading global security company providing innovative systems, products and solutions in unmanned systems, cyber, C4ISR, and logistics and modernization to government and commercial customers worldwide. Please visit www.northropgrumman.com for more information.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 août 2013 4 29 /08 /août /2013 07:35
USA: Hagel Meets with ASEAN Defense Ministers in Brunei

29 August 2013 By Cheryl Pellerin / American Forces Press Service – Pacific Sentinel

 

BANDAR SERI BEGAWAN, Brunei, Aug. 28, 2013 – On the first day of Southeast Asia’s most important annual defense ministerial conference, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel met here with his counterparts from the 10 nations that make up the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
 
On the sidelines, the secretary also took time for bilateral talks on the region and broader topics with his counterparts from Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Brunei, Burma and China.
 
The ASEAN member states are Burma, Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. During lunch today and a meeting afterward, Hagel and the members discussed the need to advance practical cooperation to build trust and lower tensions throughout the region.
 
When Hagel was in Singapore in June attending the Shangri-La Dialogue meeting, he invited the ASEAN defense ministers to Hawaii in 2014 for an informal meeting -- their first in the United States. During the luncheon, all 10 ministers accepted his invitation.
 

 

“I’m obviously very pleased about that,” Hagel said today. “It will give us another opportunity to strengthen and deepen the relationship with our partners here in the Asia-Pacific.”
 
Hagel noted the need to continue progress toward peacefully resolving territorial disputes, and committed to continued U.S. support for ASEAN, including its Defense Ministers’ Meeting, or ADMM, as a strong organization for achieving shared goals and upholding the common good, Pentagon Press Secretary George Little said.
 
During the meeting, a senior defense official said, each country expressed strong support for the steady U.S. presence in the Asia-Pacific and viewed U.S. engagement in the region as a key contributor to peace and stability.
 
The representatives also expressed their support for continued active engagement by the United States in this part of the world, he said. “They see it’s essential for a peaceful stable environment and a prosperous environment around them,” the official added.
 
Brunei has served as chair of ASEAN this year, and yesterday Hagel met with Brunei’s energy minister, Pehin Dato Seri Setia Awang Haji Mohammad Yasmin. Little said the secretary recognized Brunei’s strong leadership as ASEAN chair and organizer of the June joint exercise involving humanitarian assistance, disaster relief and military medicine. Burma will take over next year as ASEAN chair.
 
Tomorrow morning, Hagel will attend the ADMM-Plus ministerial conference, hosted by Yasmin and made up of the 10 ASEAN defense ministers and eight dialogue partners: the United States, China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, New Zealand and Russia.
 
Senior defense officials said today that Hagel’s bilateral meetings were positive and productive.
 
During a meeting this morning with Japanese Defense Minister Itsunori Onodera, Hagel was pleased to accept an invitation to visit Japan next year, and the two militaries agreed to establish a cyber defense effort together, a senior defense official said today.
 
“There’s a recognition that with both state and nonstate actors, cyber threats and thefts of intellectual property as well as penetrations of government and industrial networks are an increasing concern and there’s a need to cooperate and share information to deal with that,” the official said.
 
In other discussions, Little said, Hagel and Onodera exchanged views on the regional security environment, including North Korea's continued nuclear and ballistic missile developments.
 
Hagel said he looks forward during a visit to Tokyo in October to continued bilateral discussion on strengthening the alliance, and both men reaffirmed the importance of the U.S.-Japan alliance in defending Japan and contributing to regional peace and security, Little added.
 
Both also expressed interest in continuing to modernize the alliance by enhancing their already strong security cooperation initiatives, the press secretary said.
 
“The U.S. very much appreciates Japan’s important role as a contributor to peace and stability in this region and the rest of the world,” Hagel told Onodera through a translator as the meeting began, “and I’m very much looking forward to my upcoming visit to Japan.”
 
Hagel also met today with South Korean Defense Minister Kim Kwan-jin, thanking him for his friendship and reaffirming the United States’ enduring defense and extended deterrence commitments to South Korea. Little said Hagel told Kim it is a mutual duty to remain vigilant during this time of heightened tension on the Korean Peninsula.
 
The leaders discussed the importance of recent U.N. Security Council resolutions designed to limit North Korea’s progress on nuclear and missile programs, the press secretary said. The Defense Department is focused on fulfilling security commitments but Hagel said diplomatic efforts are fundamental to encouraging North Korea to pursue the path of peace, Little added.
 
Hagel will travel to the South Korean capital of Seoul in October to attend the annual Security Consultive Meeting, a senior defense official said, and as part of that trip will be able to help commemorate the 60th anniversary of the Korean War with the country’s leaders.
 
Later today, during bilateral discussions with Vietnamese Defense Minister Gen. Phung Quang Thanh, Hagel accepted with appreciation an invitation to visit Vietnam in 2014 and through a translator wished the general a happy National Day, which the Vietnamese celebrate on Sept. 2.
 
Hagel expressed his commitment to growing the bilateral defense relationship with Vietnam and working on issues like maritime security, humanitarian assistance and disaster relief, and recovering the remains of U.S. personnel missing in action, Little said.
 
The secretary also conveyed his commitment to continuing to implement the 2011 Memorandum of Understanding for Advancing Bilateral Defense Cooperation, the press secretary added.
 
On regional security, Little said, the leaders noted the importance of peacefully resolving disputes in the South China Sea and welcomed steps to develop an ASEAN Code of Conduct to guide that process.
 
This afternoon, Hagel met briefly with Burma’s defense minister, Lt. Gen. Wai Lwin, expressing his support for Burma’s upcoming ASEAN chairmanship and telling the general that the department looks forward to supporting their efforts on ASEAN defense events next year.
 
A senior defense official noted that such a bilateral meeting at the defense minister level had not happened in more than 20 years with Burma, and that the meeting today is a “a sign of changes and the Obama administration’s very positive engagement with the Burmese, [as well as] recognition of the reforms that have been underway in that country and progress that’s being made on human rights.”
 
Hagel discussed with the Burmese defense minister the importance of continued progress on reform and said it’s also important that Burma sever military ties to North Korea, Little said.
 
Hagel applauded the Burmese military’s support for the government's democratic reform efforts and encouraged that the reforms continue.
 
Hagel also held a bilateral meeting with representatives from China.
 
Partager cet article
Repost0

Présentation

  • : RP Defense
  • : Web review defence industry - Revue du web industrie de défense - company information - news in France, Europe and elsewhere ...
  • Contact

Recherche

Articles Récents

Categories