Mise à jour par la Représentation permanente de la France auprès de l’UE
commenter cet article …
Mise à jour par la Représentation permanente de la France auprès de l’UE
September 04, 2013 by FN HERSTAL
FN Herstal will attend the DSEi Defence & Security Event, due to take place in London on 10-13 of September. Staff will be on hand at booth N3-622 in the Belgian Pavilion at the ExCeL centre to answer questions about FN Herstal's latest products and developments, which will be on display.
FN Herstal's exhibits will be:
The FN MINIMI® 5.56 light machine gun, the world's most widely deployed machine gun in 5.56mm
The FN MINIMI® 7.62 light machine gun, combining lightweight, long-range, and hitting power; the MINIMI® 5.56 and the MINIMI® 7.62 feature high parts commonality and identical ergonomics and operator handling
The famous FN MAG® machine gun, originally designed by FN Herstal, is still a leading reference in the field of 7.62x51mm NATO caliber general purpose machine gun with more than 200,000 units supplied to more than 90 countries all around the globe
The family of FN SCAR® assault rifles: designed for, tested, adopted, and used by the most demanding combat units. This highly adaptable weapon is available in 5.56mm or 7.62mm NATO caliber, easy to change between short (CQC) and standard barrels, light, modular, ergonomic, accurate and highly reliable in the harshest conditions. An additional FN40GL® 40mm LV grenade launcher mounted under the 5.56 or 7.62mm assault rifle or as a stand-alone launcher provides increased capability to the user
The FN SCAR® precision rifle in 7.62mm caliber is the latest development within the FN SCAR® family and is available with a foldable or fixed sniper-type butt; while retaining the ergonomics and reliability of the FN SCAR® assault rifle, it has been adapted for increased range and accuracy for sniper support or designated marksman roles
The FN FCU™ fire control unit is a full solution highly accurate aiming system for 40mm LV/MV grenade launchers allowing first round hits, at all ranges, in the most difficult situations, by day or by night
In addition to an extensive range of portable weapons designed, developed and manufactured for military, law enforcement and special forces operators worldwide, FN Herstal's product portfolio also includes integrated weapon systems for air, land and sea applications.
September 5, 2013: Strategy Page
Russia has gone public with fears that their ambitious new warship building program may take up to five years longer. The Navy modernization plans are underway and include new equipment and facilities. New base construction is continuing in the Black Sea (at Novorossiisk, as an alternative to the old Soviet base of Sevastopol that is rented from Ukraine), the north coast (for the new Borei and Yasen class nuclear subs), and the Pacific (for the two new Mistral class amphibious ships). Dozens of new ships are on order and the navy is on schedule to complete the current modernization plans after another decade of effort if the promised money keeps coming.
Money is not the big problem. The inability of the Russian defense industry, especially the ship yards is. This problem is not a secret, the extent of it, however, is generally unkn0wn. The public got a hint three years ago that something was very wrong. In 2010 the government announced its decision to buy four Mistral amphibious assault ships from France. This was just the beginning as the Russian Defense Minister made it clear that Russia would seek more Western weapons and military equipment. Russia was planning to spend over $600 billion in the next decade to replace aging Cold War gear. The Defense Ministry insisted that the Mistral deal was but the first of many. Russia already had a deal with Israel, to build a factory in Russia to build Israeli UAVs under license. Similar deals were made with other Western suppliers for armored vehicles from Italy and various bits of technology from other Western nations.
The problems with the Russian defense industry are many. They include a shortage of skilled workers and competent managers as well as corruption, very poor quality control and a tradition of ignoring complaints from users. Changing these Soviet era habits has proved extremely difficult. There are simply too few competent Russian managers (in general) and fewer still willing to work in the defense industries. Same deal with skilled workers. Even during the late Soviet era the defense industry was regarded as a refuge for over-paid and corrupt incompetents. Imposing Western ideas like warranties and financial controls didn't work. The warranties were not honored and the financial controls were seen as an interesting challenge, not a new tool to aid management.
MOSCOU, 4 septembre - RIA Novosti
Quatre bâtiments de guerre de l'escadre russe déployée en Méditerranée seront remplacés en septembre, a confié mercredi à RIA Novosti une source haut placée au sein du ministère de la Défense.
Selon la source, un groupe naval comprenant les grands navires de débarquement Novotcherkassk et Minsk, ainsi que le bâtiment de reconnaissance Priazovie franchira jeudi et vendredi les détroits du Bosphore et des Dardanelles pour rejoindre l'escadre russe patrouillant en Méditerranée.
Cette escadre comprend actuellement le grand navire de lutte anti-sous-marine Admiral Panteleïev rattaché à la Flotte du Pacifique, les grands navires de débarquement Admiral Nevelski (Flotte du Pacifique) et Alexandre Chabaline (Flotte de la Baltique), ainsi que le patrouilleur Neoustrachimy (Flotte de la Baltique) et des navires de ravitaillement.
"Après avoir franchi les détroits de la mer Noire, le nouveau groupe naval remplacera les bâtiments relevant des Flottes du Pacifique et de la Baltique", a déclaré l'interlocuteur de l'agence.
La source a en outre annoncé que le croiseur lance-missiles Moskva arriverait mi-septembre en Méditerranée.
"Il y a tout lieu de croire qu'il accueillera l'état-major de l'escadre méditerranéenne actuellement installé à bord de l'Admiral Panteleïev. Le croiseur Moskva sera donc le navire amiral de l'escadre russe en Méditerranée", a indiqué l'interlocuteur de RIA Novosti.
Il a également fait savoir que le commandement des forces navales russes étudiait la nécessité de dépêcher deux autres bâtiments dans cette région: le patrouilleur Smetlivy et le grand navire de débarquement Nikolaï Filtchenkov.
3 September 2013 army-technology.com
Belarus and Russian armies have started preparations for the forthcoming strategic army exercise, Zapad-2013, which is scheduled to be carried out at six firing ranges in Belarus and in Kaliningrad Oblast, Russia.
Having discussed preparations for the exercise, the armies will now conduct reconnaissance of the areas where the drill will take place, refine the order of practical actions to be performed by the troops and agree all the aspects of support for the exercise participants, Belarusin Telegraph Agency (BelTA) reports.
Scheduled to take place from 20 to 26 September, the exercise will involve participation from around 12,900 military personnel, including over 10,000 Belarusian and 2,500 Russian soldiers.
Equipment will include approximately 350 armoured vehicles, comprising of 70 main battle tanks (MBTs), more than 50 artillery units and multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS), as well as more than 50 aircraft and helicopters.
Also known as West 2013, the exercise will also feature latest defence products, some of which have already been inducted into the Belarusian army's operational service, whereas others are yet to clear final tests.
Specifically, these include Belarusian unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), communication means, radar solutions, navigation and radio warfare products.
While in Russia, the Belarusian contingent will be represented by 200 personnel from the 103rd independent mobile brigade.
Belarusian defence minister, Yuri Zhadobin, has earlier told the news agency that the two phase exercise confirms Belarus' policy aimed at building up the regional security and adherence to allied commitments with Russia.
''During the first phase, the united command of the regional military taskforce is supposed to plan the application of the troops, troops management during deployment, isolation of areas where illegal armed units operate, the build up of air force and air defence units for protecting major state and military installations,'' Zhadobin said.
''In the second phase, we plan to practice troops management during military operations designed to stabilise the situation for the sake of ensuring the military security of the union state.''
CHISINAU, 3 septembre - RIA Novosti
Moscou débloquera 500 milliards d'euros pour l'achat d'armements d'ici 2020, a annoncé mardi le vice-premier ministre et président de la commission gouvernementale russe pour l'industrie de la défense Dmitri Rogozine, en visite à Chisinau.
Comme la région Asie-Pacifique est prioritaire pour la Russie au XXIe siècle, elle doit "investir sans tarder dans le développement de l'Est du pays. Nous y transférerons des entreprises aéronautiques et de production de missiles. Nous débloquerons 500 milliards d'euros rien que pour l'achat d'armements et 100 milliards de dollars pour la modernisation des usines dans le cadre du rééquipement des forces armées russes", a indiqué M.Rogozine qui participe à une conférence consacrée à l'intégration européenne de la Moldavie.
Commentant l'intention de Chisinau de signer un accord d'association avec l'UE, M.Rogozine, représentant spécial du président russe pour la Transnistrie (république autoproclamée sur le territoire moldave), a déclaré que la Russie n'avait pas l'intention de rivaliser avec l'Union européenne pour l'influence sur la Moldavie.
Selon lui, Moscou promeut sa coopération avec l'UE, mais elle accorde aussi une grande attention à la région Asie-Pacifique. "Ce sont la Chine, l'Inde, les deux Corée. L'UE est loin d'être le thème principal de l'ordre du jour mondial. Nous investissons nos fonds et intensifions nos rapports avec les pays de la région Asie-Pacifique et nous continuerons de le faire", a noté M.Rogozine.
September 4, 2013: Strategy Page
Russia recently announced that it would not, as earlier revealed, order 37 of its new (and still in development) MiG-35D fighters. Because of development problems, this order will now be delayed until 2016. The original price was to be about $29 million per aircraft.
Described as the equivalent of the American F-35, the MiG-35D would be the low-end to the high end T-50 (the Russian F-22). The T-50 is no F-22 and the MiG-35D is no F-35. The MiG-35D is a considerably redesigned MiG-29. The 29 ton MiG-35D is armed with one 30mm autocannon and can carry over (by how much is not yet clear) five tons of bombs. The big selling point for the MiG-35D is its offensive and defensive electronics, as well as sensors for finding targets on land or sea. This stuff looks very impressive on paper but the Russians have long had problems getting performance to match promises. This is particularly the case with the advanced electronics of the MiG-35D, which are running into problems because the F-35 electronics set a very high bar.
The 27 ton American F-35 is armed with an internal 25mm cannon and four internal air-to-air missiles (or two missiles and two smart bombs), plus four external smart bombs and two missiles. All sensors are carried internally, and max weapon load is 6.8 tons. The aircraft is very stealthy when just carrying internal weapons.
The MiG-35D has little stealth capability. The MiG-35D first flew six years ago, and there are currently about ten prototypes being used for testing and development work. The MiG-35D is expected to enter service some time before the end of the decade. The MiG-35D will sell for less than half of what the F-35 goes for (currently over $120 million each).
Sep 02, 2013 brahmand.com
NEW DELHI (PTI): India is expected to take up the issues of progress made in the Admiral Gorshkov aircraft carrier project and pricing of the fifth generation fighter aircraft project during Defence Secretary R K Mathur's meeting with his Russian counterparts in Moscow today.
The Defence Secretary is leading a high-level tri-services team comprising three-star rank officers from the three services, and the status of ongoing projects such as Gorshkov, which is now rechristened as INS Vikramaditya and FGFA are expected to come up for discussion, Defence Ministry sources said here.
In the delegation-level talks scheduled to be held today, the two sides are also expected to discuss the futuristic joint development projects for the armed forces, they said.
The meeting is also expected to discuss the ammunition requirements of the artillery and the tank fleet of the Army and the upgrade of the T-90 tanks.
However, it is not clear whether the Indian side will raise the issue of mishap on its Kilo Class submarine INS Sindhurakshak, which had come back from Russia a few months ago after an extensive refurbishment in a shipyard there and is believed to under warranty till January 2014.
India is planning to involve the Russian side into the investigations in the mishap after the completion of the Board of Inquiry into the matter.
It is learnt that the two sides are also planning to discuss the upgrade of one more Kilo Class submarine INS Sindhushastra, the last of the 10 submarines procured by India from Russia.
India had procured ten Kilo class vessels from Russia in early 1980s and the deliveries were made in 14 years from 1986 to 2000.
On the Admiral Gorshkov project, the Russian shipyards are carrying out the sea trials of the warship and it is expected to be delivered to India by the end of this year.
The FGFA is a co-development project between India and Russia whose Preliminary Design Phase programme was completed on June 19 and the Research and Development contract is under negotiation between the two countries to define the total scope, the work share and responsibilities of each side, and the financial implications of the programme.
The visit by the Defence Secretary to Russia was scheduled in June but had to be postponed as Mathur had just taken over his new responsibility at that time.
The visit by the Defence Secretary is to prepare ground for Defence Minister A K Antony's visit there during the October-November timeframe this year.
05 September 2013 Vivek Kapur – Pacific Sentinel
![]() |
| CGI of INS Vikrant operational (File Photo) |
September 4, 2013: Strategy Page
India recently revealed that it had negotiated a manufacturing license to build 15,000 Russian Invar anti-tank missiles in India where they are used by T-90 tanks. India has earlier purchased 10,000 of these missiles from Russia (that were built in Russia) and with the manufacturing license the average cost will be about $2,000 per missile.
The Invar 9M119M1 (Invar-M) is fired from the 125mm gun, like a shell, but operates like a guided missile. The 17.2 kg (37.8 pound) missile is 680mm (26.7 inches) long and has pop-out fins (with a 250mm/9 inch span) that aid in guidance (laser beam riding, controlled by the tank gunner). The missile has a max range of 5,000 meters at a speed of 350 meters a second (14 seconds max flight time). The Invar enables the tank to hit targets at twice the range of the 125mm shells. The tandem warhead can penetrate up to 900mm of armor (35.4 inches). Invar has been around for two decades and India is buying the latest version, as well as the license to manufacture another 15,000 of them.
India expects to have about 1,400 T-90s by the end of the decade. The first T-90 entered service in 1993, and India is the largest user. The T-90 is basically an upgraded T-72, which India already builds under license. The T-90 weighs about 15 percent more than the 41 ton T-72. The T-90 has a better fire control system, night vision that is good out to about 1,500 meters, and electronic countermeasures against anti-tank missiles. The autoloader, which often failed in the T-72, is more reliable and that makes the three man crew (commander, gunner, driver) more effective. The T-90 has ERA (Explosive Reactive Armor) in addition to its composite armor.
The T-90 is not as lively as the T-72 and is actually slower on the battlefield than the U.S. M-1 (which has a horsepower to weight ratio of 24:1, compared to only 18:1 for the T-90). The 125mm gun of the T-90 is basically the same as the T-72. However, if you use better ammo, you stand a chance against top rated tanks like the M-1. But that is not what India expects to face. The most likely opponent is Pakistan, which is largely equipped with 1950s era T-55s (actually the Chinese T-59 copy). The Pakistanis also have 700 or so older T-72 type tanks (Chinese T-69 and Ukrainian T-80), but these would be outclassed by the T-90. India plans to have 21 tank battalions ("regiments" in the Indian army) of T-90s (with 62 tanks each) by 2020. Actually, each battalion only has 45 tanks going into combat. The other 17 are for training and replacements.
September 5, 2013: Strategy Page
For over a year now China has been testing a second stealth fighter design. This one is called the J-31 “Falcon Eagle” (from an inscription on the tail), and while it looks like the American F-22, it’s also smaller than China’s other stealth fighter (the J-20, which has been around longer). The J-31 was built by the Shenyang Aircraft Corporation (which makes the J-11, the illegal Chinese copy of the Russian Su-27). The J-31 has some characteristics of the F-35 as well and appears to be something of an “F-35” to the earlier J-20s effort to match the American F-22. It’s also possible that the F-31 is a competing (with the J-20) design that is hustling to grab sales the J-20 thought it had all locked up. The J-31 flew for the first time last October and there are at least two prototypes and the designer has talked of the J-31 being able to operate off an aircraft carrier (like the U.S. F-35 and the J-15, a J-11 variant). One advantage the J-31 has is two engines, compared to one for the F-35. This means the J-31 could carry more weapons, but this is less crucial with all the guided weapons available.
The J-31 is further evidence that China is determined to develop its own high tech military gear. While China is eager to develop advanced military technology locally, it recognizes that this takes time and more effort than nations new to this expect. Thus China is trying to avoid the mistakes Russia made in this area. That means having competing designs and developing necessary supporting industries is part of that. All this takes a lot of time and involves lots of little (and some major) failures. The Chinese are doing it right and are willing to wait until they get military tech that is truly world class.
The other stealth fighter, the J-20, was made by CAC (Chengdu Aircraft Company), which also produced the JF-17 and J-10. The J-20 made its first flight in 2011 and many more since then. There are at least two original J-20 prototypes and late last year a new prototype appeared that had several modifications and is estimated to have a max weight of 36 tons. While the J-20 looks like the American F-22 when viewed head on, it's overall shape, weight, and engine power is closer to the American F-15C. In other words, it's about 20 meters (62 feet) long, with a wing span of 13.3 meters (42 feet). J-20 has about the same wing area as the F-15C, which is about 25 percent less than the F-22 (which is a few percent larger than the F-15 in terms of length and wingspan). Worse, for the J-20, is the fact that its engine power is about the same as the F-15C, while the F-22 has 65 percent more power. With the afterburner turned on, the J-20 has more power than the F-15C and nearly as much as the F-22. But because the afterburner consumes so much fuel, you can't use more than a few minutes at a time. The new J-20 model appears to be able to supercruise, joining the F-22, Eurofighter and the Gripen as aircraft that can supercruise (go faster than the speed of sound without using the afterburner).
The J-20 has some stealthiness when it's coming at you head on. But from any other aspect, the J-20 will light up the radar screen. For this reason the J-20 is seen as a developmental aircraft, not the prototype of a new model headed for mass production. As such, it is only the fifth stealth fighter to fly, the others being the U.S. F-22 and F-35, plus the Russian T-50. The older U.S. F-117 was actually a light bomber and the B-2 was obviously a heavy bomber. Based on recent Chinese warplane development projects (J-11 in particular), the J-20 has a long development road ahead of it and will likely change size and shape before it reaches the production design. The J-31 may be an insurance policy, in case the J-20 effort goes off the rails in a big way.
While the shape of the J-20 confers a degree of stealthiness (invisibility to radar), even more electronic invisibility comes from special materials covering the aircraft. It's not known how far along the Chinese are in creating, or stealing, these materials, or the needed engines. China would most likely use the J-20 singly, or in small groups, to seek out and attack American carriers. To make this possible F-22 class engines are needed and that is still in development. Over the last few years China has admitted it has been developing the WS-15 engine (since the 1990s), a more powerful beast well suited for the J-20. No date was given as to when the WS-15 would be available for use or whether it would have the same vectoring (ability to move the hot jet exhaust in different directions in order to make the fighter more maneuverable) the F-22 uses.
For the J-20 to be a superior fighter, it would need electronics (including radars and defense systems) on a par with the F-35 and F-22. So far, the Chinese have not caught up with stuff used by current American fighters. But the gap is being closed, faster than it was during the Cold War when the Russians were creating, or stealing, their way to military tech equivalence with the West. The Russians never made it but the Chinese believe they can succeed.
Work on the J-20 began in the late 1990s, and the Chinese knew that it could be 25 years or more before they had a competitive stealth fighter-bomber. The J-20 is being tested in central China. The twin engine J-20 appears to be about the same weight class as the 30 ton F-15C. The F-35A is a 31 ton, single engine fighter, while the twin-engine F-22 is slightly larger at 38 tons. The Russian T-50 weighed in at 37 tons.
China is also developing other support technologies, like the AESA radar, highly efficient cockpit, stealth, and software to tie everything together. Developing, or even copying, this tech is not easy. But the Chinese already know that, having decades of experience adapting stolen technology to their needs. Thus it appears that China is planning on having the J-20, in some form, ready for service by the end of the decade. The key factor is their ability to develop or steal the needed technology by then. The J-20 appears to be a fighter-bomber, as this kind of aircraft would be most useful dealing with the U.S. Navy and key targets in Taiwan or Japan. In any event, the J-20 is an attempt to develop some kind of 5th generation aircraft, complete with stealth.
The only other competitor in this area is Russia, where fifth generation fighter developments were halted when the Soviet Union disintegrated in 1991. Actually, all development work on new fighters, by everyone, slowed down in the 1990s. But work on the F-22, F-35, Eurofighter, and Rafale continued, and those aircraft became, in roughly that order, the most advanced fighter aircraft available today. MiG resumed work on the I.42 in the 1990s, but had to stop after a few years because of a lack of money. Sukhoi has never stopped working on its T-50, funded by much higher sales of its Su-27/30 fighters. This fifth generation may come to be called the "last generation," after they are replaced by the second generation of pilotless combat aircraft (counting armed Predators and the like as the first).
MOSCOU, 5 septembre - RIA Novosti
La Russie évoquera les risques nucléaires liés à une possible frappe américaine contre la Syrie lors de la prochaine session du Conseil des gouverneurs de l'Agence internationale de l'énergie atomique (AIEA), a déclaré jeudi le ministère russe des Affaires étrangères.
"La Russie évoquera ce sujet dans le cadre de la session du Conseil des gouverneurs de l'AIEA qui débutera le 9 septembre prochain", a fait savoir le ministère.
Auparavant, le porte-parole de la diplomatie russe Alexandre Loukachevitch a indiqué qu'une intervention militaire occidentale en Syrie constituait une menace pour la sécurité nucléaire de la région.
Par la suite, Moscou a appelé le secrétariat de l'Agence à présenter une analyse des risques liés aux possibles frappes américaines contre le territoire syrien.
September 5, 2013: Strategy Page
Russia has shipped a billion dollars’ worth of weapons to Syria since the civil war there began in 2011. Russia insists that this is not in violation of arms embargoes against Syria and are simply deliveries of weapons ordered before 2011. In the last year Syria has delivered over $200 million in cash to Russian banks to keep these weapons coming (mainly S-300 anti-aircraft systems and anti-ship missiles) and their warranties operational. These purchases are being paid for by Iran, which flies in the cash to a Syrian financial operation in Moscow. The cash is then delivered to Russian government accounts via a Moscow bank. The Syrian Moscow operation is run by an uncle of Syrian dictator Basher Assad.
These Russian shipments are not challenged by the international community because they are, technically, defensive weapons and cannot be used to attack the rebels. Another problem that is less clear is whether the weapons are being sent to Iran. That is illegal but without any clear evidence of such transfers there’s nothing anyone can do. The cash transfers are also illegal, since Iran is banned from the international banking system for anything involving weapons, oil sales and military equipment in general. But no one is going to shut down air traffic between Iran and Russia.
Meanwhile, at least 14 Russian cargo ships arrived in Syria since 2011, plus numerous air freight flights. Recently Russia has quietly approved new shipments of small arms, which is forbidden but can be flown in and join similar weapons Syria had before 2011. Russia appears to believe that no one will challenge this either.
WASHINGTON, 5 septembre - RIA Novosti
Les pays arabes ont proposé de prendre en charge les frais d'une éventuelle intervention américaine en Syrie, a déclaré mercredi à Washington le secrétaire d'Etat US John Kerry.
"Les pays arabes nous ont effectivement proposé de couvrir les frais de l'opération militaire (...). Nous examinons cette proposition", a indiqué le chef de la diplomatie américaine s'exprimant devant le comité des Affaires étrangères de la Chambre des représentants.
La Ligue arabe a exclu la Syrie de ses rangs, tandis que certains pays arabes à majorité sunnite fournissent des armes à l'opposition syrienne combattant les forces fidèles au président Bachar el-Assad. L'Arabie saoudite et le Qatar sont considérés comme les principaux sponsors des anti-Assad.
Washington accuse le régime de Bachar el-Assad d'avoir employé le 21 août dernier des armes chimiques contre l'opposition armée et la population civile dans une banlieue de Damas. Le président américain Barack Obama a pris la décision de lancer une opération militaire contre les autorités syriennes sans mandat du Conseil de sécurité de l'Onu, mais a demandé l'aval du Congrès.
September 5, 2013: Strategy page
On August 21st the Iranian Air Force announced that it had begun “mass production” of a new jet fighter, one that was designed and manufactured in Iran. This, according to the air force commander, means that Iran does not have to rely on foreign suppliers (all of whom are intimidated by international arms sanctions imposed on Iran.) This is all a bit of dark humor because the aircraft in question is apparently the Saeqeh jet fighter. A year ago it was announced that three more of these had been produced and that fifteen had been delivered to the Iranian Air Force. In 2011 Iran announced that they had put into service their first squadron of twelve Saeqeh. It was in 2006 that Iran first displayed a modified American F-5 fighter and proclaimed the new "Saeqeh" as similar to the American F-18 jet fighter. Iran is apparently producing a clone of the half century old F-5 design, not a rival for the F-18. Their local manufacturing and international smuggling capabilities are certainly up to the task of obtaining the components needed for this. But all this is mainly a publicity stunt to reassure Iranians that, despite decades of international arms embargoes, Iran still has weapons that can defend the country.
This is not the first time Iran has run a stunt like this. But even with a redesigned tail and better electronics, the 1960s era F-5 is still a low cost, and low performance, aircraft. The Saeqeh is not the first Iranian attempt to rebuild F-5s. In the 1990s, they built a clone of the F-5E, calling it the Azarakhsh. There are apparently four of these in service, and further modifications of F-5 airframes produced the Saeqeh.
The Iranians had dozens of damaged F-5s from their war with Iraq, along with many more elderly F-5s that are un-flyable or barely so. Three decades ago Iran had nearly 300 F-5 aircraft but many were destroyed in combat with Iraq during the 1980s, or due to accidents, and most of the remainder just wore out.
The F-5E, the most recent F-5 model the Iranians had when the Islamic revolution took over in 1979, is an 11 ton aircraft, with a max speed of 1,700 kilometers an hour, and a range of some 1,400 kilometers. It was armed with two 20mm cannon and could carry about three tons of missiles and bombs. The Iranians have taken the basic F-5 frame and rebuilt it to hold two Russian engines. The Chinese did the same thing and produced the J-8 (a twin engine MiG-21) that turned out to be not worth the effort.
Although the Iranians are using Russian components (if only because these are better than Chinese ones), they probably had technical assistance (for a price) from China. The Chinese have a lot of experience reverse engineering Russian warplanes and developing variations. The Chinese are getting away from that because they finally realized that all they ended up with was a lot of crap fighters. Now they are building a new air force with expensive, and high tech, fighters imported from Russia, or built under license (or just copied illegally).
The Iranians have become obsessed with these "propaganda weapons," where they hack something together from an existing Russian or American system and proclaim it to be a breakthrough weapon "designed and manufactured in Iran." It's all rather pathetic, and it all began during the 1980s, when Iran and Iraq were fighting a nasty war. Some of the hacks worked, after a fashion. Iran created a longer range SCUD missile by the simple expedient of lengthening the missile with a larger fuel tank. This changed the flight characteristics of the missile but since these things were being fired at city size (as in Baghdad) targets, it didn't matter. Actually, the Iranians didn't really need the longer range missiles because Baghdad was pretty close to the Iranian border. Iran actually got the technology for these SCUD mods from North Korea but Iranian press releases always touted the achievement as being the work of Iranian scientists and engineers.
Iranian weapons fantasies reached their peak earlier this year with an announcement that they had developed a stealth fighter; the Qaher 313. It showed photos of a single engine fighter with some curious (to aeronautical engineers) features. The air intakes were too small, the airframe was similar to older (unsuccessful) American experimental designs, and the cockpit controls were the same used in one and two engine propeller driven aircraft. There was a video of the Qaher 313 in flight but nothing showing it landing or taking off. Engineers have concluded that the Qaher 313 is a crude fake and that the aircraft seen in flight was a small remote controlled model of the larger aircraft shown in a hangar. A deception like this is nothing new for Iran. In fact, this sort of thing has become a staple of Iranian media over the last decade.
Every year the Iranian media features several new weapons described as locally designed and produced. This is to improve morale among a population that knows the country has been under an international arms embargo since the 1980s. Some of the new wonder weapons announced in the last few years include a cruise missile with a 200 kilometer range and a submarine torpedo designed for shallow coastal waters. There was also a new 73mm missile that appeared to be a small, unguided rocket, albeit with a good press agent. All of this was stuff was fluff, with a bit of recycled reality to back it up. If you go back and look at the many Iranian announcements of newly developed, high tech weapons, all you find is a photo op for a prototype. Production versions of these weapons rarely show up. It’s all feel-good propaganda for the religious dictatorship that runs Iran and its supporters.
Iran likes to recycle 1950 military tech. For example, several years ago it announced that it had developed an armed "Karar" UAV, with a range of 1,000 kilometers. Pictures of this new weapon showed what appeared to be a copy of 1950s era American cruise missiles and target drones. These, in turn, were based on a similar weapon, the German V-1 "buzz bomb" that was used extensively in World War II to bomb London. The Iranian "Karar" UAV had the benefit of more efficient jet engines, more effective flight control hardware and software, and GPS navigation. Karar is not a wonder weapon but the Iranians are depending on a clueless international mass media, and their own citizens, to believe it is.
In the last few years Iran has announced many similar weapons, many of them originally conceived in the 1950s. There was, for example, a domestically designed and manufactured helicopter gunship and another UAV with a range of 2,000 kilometers. Recently, there have also been revelations of heavily armed speed boats, miniature submarines, new artillery rockets, and much more. Three years ago they showed off a new Iranian made jet fighter, which appeared to be a make-work project for unemployed engineers. It was a bunch of rearranged parts on an old U.S. made F-5 (which was roughly equivalent to a 1950s era MiG-21). The new fighter, like so many other Iranian weapons projects, was more for PR than for improving military power.
The Qaher 313 is the most ambitious fake so far. Stealth tech is not something you can recycle from 1950s gear, nor is it something you can easily deceive the experts with.
4 September 2013 naval-technology.com
Syria's Navy is the smallest component of the nation's armed forces. While it is relatively neglected, with a budget estimated at only £90m annually, it is still the first line of defence on its Eastern Mediterranean flank and warrants consideration. As the situation in Syria and deliberation on possible intervention in the Mediterranean country escalates, Simon Williams examines the country's naval posture.
Maritime situational awareness in Syria
Syria's Mediterranean coastline measures 183km along Latakia and Tartus provinces. Although not a party to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Syria does indeed abide by the Convention's zonal regulations, claiming a territorial sea of 12 nautical miles, contiguous zone with security jurisdiction of 24 nautical miles (which includes the territorial sea) and a 200 nautical mile Exclusive Economic Zone. The territorial sea has a total area of 3,866 km².
According the US Navy Judge Advocate General Corps, Syria still requires that foreign warships and atomic submarines obtain permission from Damascus before entering and transiting its territorial sea. The US, also a non-party to the Law of the Sea Convention, does not recognise the jurisdiction of Syria to this affect and protests these claims through regular operational assertions.
Last year, the Syrian Air Defense Force shot down a Turkish RF-4E, which, according to the Syrian military, "penetrated air space over [Syrian] territorial waters."
Not only does this incident demonstrate that the country maintains sufficient surface-to-air capabilities to carry out such rapid reaction operations, but also serves as an example that Syria may not be so passive to naval or aviation encroachment on its territorial sea (12 nautical miles). It again elucidates that the nation deviates from international norms of scrambling fighters to intercept airspace probes, and instead skips directly to unleashing the metal.
It is important to clarify, however, that this may not be a purely political stance, but a genuinely operational one. President Assad even commented on the situation to Turkish media outlet Cumhuriyet, saying: "In this environment, the coming of a plane like that is perceived as an enemy plane. Those who understand military understand these things. A country anywhere in the world would behave like this. This definitely isn't a political decision."
Should this be the case, it illuminates the Syrian military's responsive instinct of engaging with potential enemy targets entering its territorial sea or airspace without warning. Understanding this reaction, perhaps, is of vital magnitude in evaluating the initial response Syria may take to a 'hypothetical' engagement coming from the Mediterranean.
Read more
MOSCOU, 4 septembre - RIA Novosti
Deux navires de la flotte russe de la mer Noire - la vedette lance-missiles Ivanovets et le navire lance-missiles Chtil - arriveront au large de la Syrie le 29 septembre, a annoncé mercredi à Moscou un représentant haut placé de l'Etat-major général des Forces armées russes.
"Selon le commandement de la Marine et de l'Etat-major général, deux navires lance-missiles - Ivanovets et Chtil - partiront prochainement à destination de la Syrie. Ils arriveront au large de la Syrie le 29 septembre", a indiqué l'interlocuteur de l'agence RIA Novosti.
Les deux bâtiments auront pour mission de protéger les grands navires de débarquement qui se trouveront dans la région, selon lui.
Les navires Ivanovets et Chtil sont dotés de missiles antinavires Moskit et Malakhit.
Tim Blades, director of operations for the Chemical Biological Application and Risk Reduction Business Unit, talks at a June 27 demonstration of the Field Deployable Hydrolysis System at the Aberdeen Proving Ground. (Army)
Sep. 4, 2013 - by MARCUS WEISGERBER - Defense News
WASHINGTON — Should the Pentagon need to destroy stockpiles of chemical weapons, it can do so with new mobile systems that can neutralize and destroy the materials, according to defense officials.
The Field Deployable Hydrolysis System (FDHS) is designed to destroy chemical warfare agents in bulk and can be up and running within 10 days of arriving on site.
“We are acquiring some ability to deal with chemical materials should we be in a position where we have to do that,” Frank Kendall, the Defense Department’s undersecretary for acquisition, technology and logistics, said Wednesday during a presentation at the IDEEA-sponsored COMDEF conference in Washington.
Syria’s alleged use of chemical weapons against civilians has dominated the debate of whether the US should conduct a punitive strike. While there has been talk of conducting targeted strikes, the Obama administration has said it does not intend to use ground forces.
The Pentagon has been overseeing the destruction of US chemical weapons since the late 1990s. DoD destroys stockpiles of chemical materials such as mustard gas at several facilities in the US. But the new system can eradicate chemical weapon materials on site.
“The Department of Defense recently developed a transportable chemical weapons destruction system designed to fill a gap in the national capability to destroy U.S. bulk chemical agents, wherever they are found,” Jennifer Elzea, a DoD spokeswoman, wrote in an email Wednesday.
The new system was built at the U.S. Army’s Edgewood Chemical and Biological Center in Maryland. The center oversees the handling and processing of recovered munitions in the US and overseas.
The system is “designed to convert chemical agents into compounds not usable as weapons,” Elzea wrote. “Neutralization is achieved by mixing the agent with water and other chemicals and heating it.”
A crew of 15 people is needed to operate the system at any given time, according to the Army. The system can neutralize between five and 25 metric tons of chemicals per day, depending on the material.
4 September 2013 army-technology.com
Kongsberg has been awarded a contract to maintain the US Army's M153 Protector common remotely-operated weapon stations (CROWS).
Valued at NOK229m ($37.5m), the contract requires the company to repair and retrofit the systems that have already been delivered to the army.
The order forms part of a framework agreement signed with the service for production, and supply of system support and technical engineering support for M153 CROWS system in August 2012.
Awarded following a full and open competition, the agreement extends over a five year period and has a maximum potential value of up to $970m.
Valued at $1.4bn, CROWS is a joint acquisition programme for remote weapon stations (RWS) and is intended to offer improved protection capabilities, training and development support for the US army's vehicle programmes.
Based on the combat proven M151 Protector, M153 CROWS are designed to enhance military troop protection and combat capabilities by enabling target acquisition and engagement from safer distances.
Capable of mounting on a range of vehicles, the system also supports firing from the MK19 grenade machine gun, 0.50-calibre M2 machine gun, M240B machine gun and M249 squad automatic weapon from inside of a heavy armoured vehicle.
Besides army's operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, the system has also been used by the army national guard (ANG) and US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) during conflicts.
Kongsberg has to date delivered more than 10,000 M153 CROWS units to the US Army since August 2007.
The weapon is in use with more than 16 nations worldwide, including Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Switzerland and the UK.
MOSCOU, 5 septembre - RIA Novosti
Les ingénieurs d'Al-Qaïda ont reçu pour mission d'élaborer une stratégie anti-drone, comme en témoigne un rapport confidentiel du renseignement américain dévoilé au Washington Post par Edward Snowden, écrit jeudi le quotidien Nezavissimaïa gazeta.
Selon les informations de la Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), les terroristes financent des projets de recherche pour créer des stations de brouillage, qui permettraient de perturber les signaux GPS et les balises infrarouges qui servent à orienter les opérateurs de drones.
De plus, Al-Qaïda travaille sur des aérostats de surveillance et des appareils télécommandés de taille réduite qui devraient permettre aux terroristes de suivre la trajectoire des drones américains. Les terroristes se penchent sur la possibilité d'abattre les drones grâce aux lance-roquettes sol-air et travaillent sur des systèmes d'alerte d'approche de drones. Le commandement d'Al-Qaïda supervise tous les projets et sert de base de liaison pour échanger les succès entre diverses équipes d'ingénieurs.
Les terroristes recrutent des spécialistes, notamment des experts en drones et technologies balistiques. Selon le WP, en 2010, les autorités turques ont arrêté un étudiant mathématicien de 23 ans, membre d'Al-Qaïda, qui cherchait le moyen d'abattre les drones de surveillance de l'Otan en Afghanistan et effectuait des calculs balistiques. Les jihadistes qui travaillent sur les nouvelles technologies appellent, par le biais de revues anglophones en ligne, à les aider dans la guerre contre les "drones diaboliques". Il est suggéré à cet effet de partager les avis, les idées et les compétences pratiques. Sans oublier la guerre psychologique. Les terroristes cherchent à jouer sur la colère de la population en raison des nombreuses victimes civiles et à montrer la guerre de drones comme une entreprise lâche et immorale.
Les drones Predator et Reaper sont l'arme principale de la CIA et du Pentagone contre Al-Qaïda depuis la présidence de George W. Bush. En dix ans leurs attaques ont tué près de 3 000 personnes et ont poussé les terroristes à prendre des mesures d'urgence pour limiter leurs déplacements au Pakistan, en Afghanistan, au Yémen et en Somalie. D’où les tentatives d'Al-Qaïda pour trouver un moyen de lutter contre les drones. Leurs talons d'Achille sont la liaison satellite, le contrôle à distance et l'absence du cryptage pour certaines communications.
Par ailleurs, les drones perdent souvent le signal sans aide extérieure. En général, les perturbations sont réparées en quelques secondes mais dans certains cas elles ont entraîné le crash du drone, comme en décembre 2011 dans le ciel iranien (Téhéran a annoncé qu'il avait lui-même abattu l’appareil). Les méthodes bon marché pour lutter contre les drones – à l’aide de lasers et d'autres dispositifs capables d'aveugler les caméras et les capteurs des drones - ne sont plus secrètes depuis longtemps. Les chercheurs de l'université du Texas à Austin ont notamment réussi, au cours d'une expérience, à "carjacker" un drone en trompant son signal GPS avec un transmetteur terrestre et en programmant un faux itinéraire.
Sep 4, 2013 ASDNews Source : The Boeing Company
Will keep aircraft operating through 2035
Boeing [NYSE: BA] will continue improving U.S. Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt II mission readiness, and decreasing maintenance costs, through a follow-on order for 56 replacement wings for that aircraft.
Boeing is on contract to build up to 242 wings, including these, at its plant in Macon, Ga. Refitting the fleet with new wings will improve the mission availability of A-10s by an estimated 4 percent and will help save the Air Force an estimated $1.3 billion in maintenance costs during the next 30 years.
This latest order is valued at $212 million. Including this agreement, the Air Force has ordered 173 wings. The efforts of Boeing, its suppliers, and the Air Force will allow the A-10 fleet to operate into 2035.
The A-10 is a twin-engine jet designed for close air support of ground forces. It can be used against all ground targets, including tanks and other armored vehicles.
04.09.2013 Par Guillaume Belan (FOB)
Jean-Yves Le Drian s’est fait auditionné hier par la commission des affaires étrangères et des forces armées du Sénat, marquant le premier acte du débat parlementaire qui aboutira à un vote sur la LPM (présentée début août) prévu cet automne. Une séance qui s’est ouverte très en retard suite à une audition à huit clos sur la situation en Syrie.
Déclinaison du Livre Blanc, dans un cadre précis et annualisé, le ministre de la Défense a rappelé l’ambition du Président Hollande de soutenir l’effort de défense afin que la France puisse maintenir son rang stratégique et garantir la capacité d’intervention française, qu’il s’agisse simultanément des missions intérieures, de la dissuasion nucléaire ou des opérations extérieures (comme le Mali). Le Ministre a rappelé que le budget sera maintenu à son niveau actuel, c’est à dire à 30,4 milliards d’euros, pour ensuite augmenter à partir de 2016. Tout en rappelant que la Défense participe à l’effort de redressement des comptes publics, avec une diminution significative des effectifs. Outre les 10174 emplois qui restent à supprimer de la précédente réforme lancée sous l’ère Sarkozy, s’ajoute 3500 emplois. Un tiers de ces emplois sera supporté par les forces combattantes, tandis que côté encadrement, ce sont les officiers qui vont trinquer avec une perte de près de 6000 postes, soit 18% des effectifs. Chez les militaires, la pilule a du mal à passer, alors que les cadres civils (catégorie A) ne perdent que 2% de leurs effectifs. Une décision que Le Drian explique par « un souhait de rééquilibrage au profit du personnel civil dans les secteurs non opérationnels ». Une politique d’accompagnement (reconversion, mobilité, incitations…) est prévue avec un budget à hauteur de 933 millions d’euros.
Quant aux fermetures d’unités, le ministre souhaite « prendre son temps » pour le « dialogue et la concertation » et dévoilera les restructurations fin septembre/début octobre. D’ors et déjà, 150 millions sont prévus pour l’accompagnement des fermetures de sites à venir.
Le format des forces terrestres sera organisé en brigades, soit : deux brigades lourdes (équipées du char Leclerc…) ; deux brigades multirôles (VAB et VBMR) ; et deux brigades d’urgences
Pour le reste, Le Drian a détaillé les priorités de la LPM : Les opex (opérations extérieures) sont budgétées à hauteur de 450 millions par an (soit une baisse significatives de près de 200 millions), tandis qu’au-delà, un budget ad hoc interministériel assurera un éventuel surcoût. Un effort sera fait pour la préparation opérationnelle des forces, alors que celle-ci pèse de plus en plus lourdement sur les comptes (de nombreux vieux matériels coûtent chers à entretenir). Pour les deux années à venir, le budget dédié à cette « prépa-ops » est maintenu à son niveau actuel, pour augmenter à partir de 2016, gagnant 4,3% en valeur.
Autre priorité, l’équipement et la recherche, (« l’industrie de défense est au cœur de la LPM ») avec un effort sur la R&D (plus de 730 millions d’euros par an) ; le renseignement (satellites Ceres, drones, dont les deux premiers Reaper qui rentreront en service cette année depuis Niamey…) ; la cyberdéfense et la judiciarisation des opérations : « Le droit pénal ne prend pas suffisamment en compte la réalité des conflits ; il est en décalage, voire franchement inadapté »
Nouveauté, un dispositif de suivi et d’actualisation sera mis en place, afin que le conseil de défense, présidé par le Président de la République, puisse suivre l’exécution de la LPM : un rapport annuel d’exécution sera établi. Et la grande nouveauté réside dans cette clause de sauvegarde qui sera incluse dans la LPM afin de pouvoir mobiliser d’autres ressources (interministérielles) si nécessaire afin de financer les surcouts d’opex.
BRUXELLES, 4 septembre - RIA Novosti
La France et six autres pays membres de l'UE soutiennent l'idée d'effectuer une frappe militaire contre la Syrie sans l'aval du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU, a annoncé mercredi à RIA Novosti une source diplomatique européenne à Bruxelles.
Outre la France, "Le Danemark, la Croatie, la Roumanie, la Grèce, la Lettonie et Chypre se prononcent en faveur de l'opération militaire contre la Syrie sans le feu vert de l'ONU", a indiqué l'interlocuteur de l'agence.
Les chefs de la diplomatie des 28 pays de l'UE devront adopter une position commune à cet égard lors d'une rencontre informelle prévue les 6 et 7 septembre à Vilnius.
Le président américain Barack Obama a demandé le 31 août au Congrès de donner son feu vert à une opération militaire contre la Syrie. Washington accuse les autorités syriennes d'avoir utilisé des armes chimiques dans une banlieue de Damas le 21 août dernier lors d'une attaque aurait fait 1.400 morts.
Sep. 4, 2013 - By JULIAN HALE – Defense News
BRUSSELS — European Union defense ministers will meet informally in Vilnius, Lithuania, Sept. 5 and 6 to discuss two key defense policy reports ahead of a summit of EU leaders on defense in Brussels in December.
One report, by EU High Representative Catherine Ashton, focuses on the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), and the other is a European Commission report aimed at creating a more competitive and efficient European security and defense sector.
Discussions on Ashton report will home in on two proposals. The first urges increasing the effectiveness, visibility and impact of the CSDP, and enhancing the development of defense capabilities.
Ashton’s report calls for making cyber infrastructure more secure and resilient withing the EU and elsewhere. She is also pushing for the issue of more common EU funding to be addressed by member states and wants ministers to approve a new approach to the EU’s rapid response assets, including battlegroups, in November. The latter ties in with one of Lithuania’s priorities for its six-month presidency of the European Union (June to December), namely to increase the effectiveness of EU battlegroups as a crisis management tool.
The second proposal calls on EU governments to share their plans on major projects in areas such as aerial refueling, umanned aircraft, cyber operations and satellite communications. However, no update on pooling and sharing projects is planned during the defense ministers’ meeting.
During the meeting, Lithuania stress issues that are on its EU presidency agenda, such as the development of the EU’s response to emerging challenges in the energy security, cyber, maritime and space domains. Military energy efficiency also is a particular focus for Lithuania.
During a working dinner on Thursday, ministers will be briefed by the chairman of the Military Committee and the Operation Commanders on the ongoing military CSDP operations (Althea, Atalanta, EUTM Somalia, EUTM Mali) and will discuss partnerships in the context of operations. NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen will attend on Thursday and has said he will discuss EU-NATO defense cooperation.
The Syria crisis is not on the agenda but is expected to be discussed. However, Syria will also be discussed by EU foreign ministers at their informal meeting Sept. 6 and 7.
September 5, 2013 defense-aerospace.com
(Source: Rheinmetall AG; issued Sept. 4, 2013)
Rheinmetall Wins Multi-Million Euro Contract for Mortar Ammunition
Rheinmetall AG of Düsseldorf has booked a major order for mortar ammunition. A customer in the Middle East/ North Africa (MENA) region has contracted with Rheinmetall Denel Munition of South Africa to supply ammunition for a mobile 120mm mortar system. The contract, which runs for several years and will be completed in partnership with a local company in the customer land, is worth around €50 million.
Delivery of the ammunition starts in September 2014. The order encompasses tens of thousands of service, illumination and smoke/obscurant rounds. They are developed for a modern 120mm mobile mortar system, with ballistic characteristics specifically adapted to its advanced fire control unit. The ammunition’s range of over 8,000 metres and proven performance in battle underpin its leading role in the market and with it, Rheinmetall’s technological leadership.
Just awarded, the contract issued by the MENA-customer is the culmination of cooperation between the project participants from the world of vehicles, weapons and ammunition, and fire control technology. Moreover, the order is an important endorsement for the use of Rheinmetall ammunition in the mobile 120mm mortar system, and a significant sign of possible orders to come from other customers in the MENA region.
Rheinmetall also sees the order as a validation of its strategy of internationalization. A presence in the MENA region and entering into strategic partnerships could assist the Düsseldorf-based Group to further strengthen its reputation as a reliable partner of the military as well as local industry.