Overblog Tous les blogs Top blogs Entreprises & Marques Tous les blogs Entreprises & Marques
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
MENU
12 juin 2012 2 12 /06 /juin /2012 19:22

Exercise-European-Guardian.jpg

 

 

Brussels - 11 June 2012 EDA News

 

Today, Exercise European Guardian gets underway in Austria. One element of the European Defence Agency's highly successful counter-IED workstrand, the exercise will provide European IED disposal operatives with training in the toughest disciplines of countering IEDs. We spoke to George*, who is an instructor at the Austrian Armed Forces EOD Training Center, and who has worked in this field since 1998.

 

Why is countering IEDs so important?


The IED is the weapon of choice of insurgents - on missions abroad and the homeland. Therefore, a high probability exists that Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) will pose an increasing threat to EU Member State’s military forces on operations, civilian personnel on missions, and indigenous civilian populations. The proliferation of IEDs presents a significant threat to the EU member states’ and CSDP missions and operations. Their increased use in conflicts across the world is already significantly impacting on the number of casualties in recent conflicts; e.g. in Afghanistan more ISAF troops are killed by IEDs than by all other means combined. IEDs are also prolific in the homeland with terrorist groups operating across the European Union, and have become an international threat with European citizens being subject to attacks worldwide. The risk of increased sophistication in the construction and employment of IEDs is significant. The Internet provides the insurgent with an excellent method of spreading technical expertise. Pure self-defence is however an insufficient response to this threat, because generally part of the mission will be to prevent an adversary not only from completing his mission, but also from attacking any civilians in the mission area. A Counter-IED capability equips military operations to defeat the threat; a true capability needs to be proactive and adaptive at all levels in order to counter the asymmetry of a difficult to define and manipulative opponent.

 

Have you had much experience working with other European militaries? How have you found that experience?


Throughout my missions, courses and work in International Working Groups for EDA and NATO I have had extensive opportunities to work with most of the European countries and my impression is that they are very professional in their work and open in sharing information that assists in the fight against IEDs, both at home and abroad.

 

So there is a training exercise coming up in June named European Guardian. Please tell us a little about this. What do you hope to learn from the upcoming training exercise? What benefits do you think you will gain?

European Guardian is an exercise for a very small group of IEDD operators that are capable of dealing with highly sophisticated terrorist devices, where the use of Remote Controlled Vehicles (RCVs) or energetic weapons are considered inappropriate or impracticable. This includes IEDs posing an immediate and grave danger to life, IEDs on hostages, IEDs containing extremely sensitive explosives and where it has been deemed unacceptable for the IED to function as intended by the perpetrator.

My expectation is to learn that capability in an international environment with professional IEDD operators with the purpose of sharing lifesaving knowledge, skills, and experiences. This will also include sharing experiences of equipment, techniques and procedures with other operators, so that we can all be best prepared during circumstances where this capability is needed. It is also hoped that this exercise initiates a conduit to collaborate on joint research or equipment development projects between member states to make the most of available funding in the current economic climate.

 

European Guardian seems to be a great example of European defence cooperation. Do you agree?


Yes, in a time when most Armed Forces are facing budget reductions, the opportunity to share costs is vital when keeping the professionalism of soldiers at the needed level. The EDA is the perfect body to gain this goal inside the European nations.

 

European Guardian shows that two countries, Luxembourg and Austria, together with the EDA can organize a highly professional opportunity for European operators to train in an realistic environment.

*Full name withheld for security reasons.

 

Read more about Exercise European Guardian’s innovative funding structure here.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 juin 2012 2 12 /06 /juin /2012 19:19

The Heron UAV source israeldefense.com

 

12/06/2012 lesechos.fr

 

L'annonce pourrait être faite au moment du salon aéronautique de Farnborough. Ce drone de surveillance entre dans le cadre du traité de défense franco-britannique. Il est destiné à entrer en service à l'horizon 2020. Dassault estime qu'il lui faudrait 2-4 ans pour fournir un drone intérimaire à l'armée française. Le ministre de la Défense tranchera sur le drone intérimaire d'ici le 14 juillet

 

Le contrat sur le drone de surveillance franco-britannique de Dassault Aviation et BAE Systems devrait être signé en juillet lors du salon aéronautique de Farnborough, a-t-on appris mardi de sources industrielles.

 

Ce drone, qui entre dans le cadre de l'accord entre la France et le Royaume-Uni de Lancaster House, signé en novembre 2010, vise à équiper les armées des deux pays à l'horizon 2020.

 

Il est en concurrence avec le Talarion proposé par le groupe européen EADS.

 

"Tout a été réglé", a déclaré l'une de ces sources.

 

BAE et Dassault n'ont pas souhaité commenter ces informations, tandis que le ministère français de la Défense n'était pas immédiatement disponible.

 

Lors d'un point presse au salon Eurosatory de la défense terrestre qui se tient jusqu'à vendredi, Eric Trappier, chargé des affaires internationales chez Dassault Aviation, a seulement indiqué que tout était prêt pour la signature du contrat.

 

Le phase préparatoire du programme de drone "Male" (moyenne altitude - longue endurance), qui devrait durer 18 mois, représentera un investissement d'environ 20 millions d'euros pour chacun des deux pays.

 

La répartition des tâches avec BAE Systems ne se dessinera qu'à la mise en oeuvre du programme, a-t-il ajouté.

 

Le salon de Farnborough - qui alterne avec celui du Bourget - démarre le 9 juillet près de Londres.

 

DEUX À QUATRE ANS POUR LE "VOLTIGEUR"


Dassault est également sur les rangs pour fournir à la France un drone intérimaire destiné à remplacer le Harfang d'EADS, qui arrive en fin de vie, en attendant le drone de nouvelle génération.

 

Le français propose un drone basé sur le système Heron TP de l'israélien IAI et désormais baptisé "Voltigeur" dont il espère vendre trois systèmes de trois ou quatre unités chacun à la France.

 

L'ancien ministre de la Défense Gérard Longuet avait ouvert en juillet 2011 des négociations avec Dassault Aviation, suscitant l'ire d'EADS qui proposait une modernisation du Harfang.

 

Mais le nouveau ministre de la Défense Jean-Yves Le Drian a annoncé fin mai une remise à plat du processus d'attribution de ce contrat, promettant une décision d'ici le 14 juillet.

 

"On est serein. S'il y a un besoin, on est une force de proposition. C'est sur la table", a dit Eric Trappier.

 

Dassault Aviation, qui a créé en janvier avec IAI une coentreprise dont il détient 51%, aura besoin de deux ans pour livrer le Voltigeur dans une version non modifiée.

 

"On peut facilement doubler les délais si on change beaucoup de choses", a toutefois précisé Eric Trappier.

 

Il fait notamment référence aux systèmes de liaisons satellites pour lesquelles Zodiac Aerospace serait "un bon candidat" et aux radars qui pourraient être israéliens et/ou fournis par Thales, dont Dassault Aviation détient 26%.

 

A plus long terme, Dassault Aviation prépare un drone de combat prévu pour l'horizon 2030, participant à la nouvelle génération d'avions de combat, pilotés ou non, qui succéderont à son Rafale et à l'Eurofighter (EADS-BAE Systems-Finmeccanica ).

 

Le démonstrateur de drone de combat Neuron de Dassault Aviation effectuera son premier vol fin septembre, a dit Eric Trappier.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 juin 2012 2 12 /06 /juin /2012 11:40

G-de-Kerchove-coordinateur-de-l-UE-pour-la-lutte-contre-le-.jpg

Gilles de Kerchove, coordinateur de l'UE pour la lutte

contre le terrorisme (crédit Conseil de l'UE)

 

juin 11, 2012 Mieszko Dusautoy (BRUXELLES2)

 

L’UE n’utilise pas son potentiel au maximum contre le terrorisme. Il faut mieux utiliser les agences spécialisées mais aussi intégrer davantage cette question aux programmes de développement de l’UE. C’est l’avis de Gilles De Kerchove, le coordinateur européen de la lutte contre le terrorisme, qui a présenté aux ministres de l’Intérieur réunis en conseil jeudi dernier (7 juin) à Luxembourg.

 

Des agences sous-exploitées


L’UE dispose d’agences spécialisées compétentes dans la lutte anti-terroriste : Europol, Eurojust, Frontex, ENISA (Agence européenne chargée de la sécurité des réseaux et de l’information). Mais elles sont peu connues des services concernés dans les Etats Membres. Et leur potentiel n’est donc pas utilisé pleinement. Par exemple, se demande Gilles De Kerchove, « combien d’enquêteurs dans les États membres de l’UE réalisent-ils qu’Europol peut demander au gouvernement des États-Unis d’effectuer des recherches dans le programme de surveillance du financement du terrorisme?  »

 

Plus de coordination est nécessaire


Il faut en particulier améliorer la coopération inter-agences. Par exemple, en 2011, sur 33 équipes communes d’enquête mises en place, seule une concernait le terrorisme. De même, si la situation s’améliore, le coordinateur européen constate qu’Eurojust n’est que très rarement invité aux réunions d’Europol. Il faudrait aussi détacher des magistrats d’Eurojust « auprès d’États tiers où le terrorisme menace gravement la sécurité intérieure de l’UE  », comme prévu initialement. Il faut également surveiller les déplacements de djihadistes européennes qui partent s’entraîner à l’étranger : pour cela, une coopération entre Europol, Frontex mais aussi le SitCen (Centre de Situation, le service de renseignements européen qui est aujourd’hui intégré au service diplomatique européen) est indispensable.

 

Partager les informations : une histoire de volonté politique ?


Autre recommandation : partager les données, de manière plus systématique et plus rapide. En effet, par exemple lorsqu’Europol doit partager ses fichiers, il faut l’accord des 27 Etats Membres, ce qui entraîne des délais. Le coordinateur appelle d’ailleurs les Etats Membres a montrer un peu plus de volonté politique. En effet, selon une décision du Conseil en 2005, ils sont tenus de communiquer leurs informations sur des actions terroristes seulement si celles-ci « intéressent » deux Etats Membres ou plus. Gilles De Kerchove appelle à une interprétation plus solidaire de cette condition : selon lui, toute action terroriste en Europe concerne, dans les faits, au moins deux Etats Membres.

 

Agir en amont : prévention et développement


Enfin, il est important d’agir en amont, dans la prévention de la radicalisation. Une des pistes pour cela serait d’intégrer davantage cette dimension aux programmes de développement de l’UE. Il s’agit de s’attaquer aux conditions de développement du terrorisme : ce-dernier, en favorisant l’insécurité et l’instabilité, empêche tout essor social et économique. Le coordinateur européen recommande ainsi des études de terrain systématiques avant chaque projet de développement. Des experts de lutte anti-terroriste et de prévention de la radicalisation doivent aussi être associés, dès la programmation, aux politiques de développement. Par ailleurs, le SEAE doit allouer des ressources supplémentaires aux délégations de l’UE dans les pays prioritaires, qui doivent également s’entretenir avec les Etats Membres sur place pour éviter le double-emploi et recenser les synergies.

 

Lire également :

Rapport de Gilles de Kerchove à télécharger dans les docs de B2

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 juin 2012 2 12 /06 /juin /2012 08:00

DanjeanArnaudSourire@PE101122

 

juin 11, 2012 Nicolas Gros-Verheyde (BRUXELLES2)

 

Le Français Arnaud Danjean à la tête du Parlement européen sera-t-il encore à la tête de la sous-commission défense du Parlement européen la semaine prochaine ? Rien n’est sûr. Le jeune, et dynamique, eurodéputé se présente en effet aux élections législatives chez lui dans la Bresse, en Saone et Loire. Et il n’a pas mystère s’il était élu de regagner son terroir français. Le ballotage paraît défavorable. La concurrente socialiste Cécile Untermaier « vire en tête » à 37,78% des suffrages recueillis contre 31,55% pour Arnaud Danjean.

 

Réserves de voix variables

 

Les spécialistes de la défense vont donc suivre attentivement le 2e tour, le 17 juin, dans la 4e circonscription de Saone et Loire (dont le député était auparavant un certain Arnaud Montebourg…). Pour résumer les forces en présence, Arnaud Danjean dispose encore de certaines réserves de voix chez les divers droite comme Eric Michoux (7,70%) – un candidat dissident de l’UMP (dont il a été exclu « provisoirement), chef d’entreprise et maire d’Epervans -, ou Maxime Thiebaut (1,30%) – étudiant en droit et candidat pour « Debout la république », de Nicolas Dupont-Aignant. Le fait aussi que le Front national, particulièrement établi dans les terres rurales désormais, ne soit pas présent au 2e tour, redonne un certain espoir de l’emporter à l’eurodéputé. Le candidat du Front national, Alain Quequin, retraité de la défense, récemment arrivé au mouvement d’extrême-droite après avoir été à l’UMP, recueille en effet 14,57% mais il rate son objectif : provoquer une « triangulaire ». A gauche, le Front de gauche (4,26%) comme les Verts (2,20%) ne représentent pas, sur le papier, un même renfort de voix pour la gauche, ce qui pourrait permettre de « refaire » son retard. Le second tour sera très serré.

 

Successeur pressenti à la sous-commission

 

Si Arnaud Danjean est élu en France, ce pourrait être Jean-Marie Cavada, un transfuge du Modem à l’UMP qui prendrait la tête de la sous-commission Défense. Ancien journaliste de télévision, ancien président de la commission Libertés publiques, Jean-Marie Cavada n’aura certainement pas le même degré d’approfondissement que son prédécesseur qui connaissait particulièrement bien certains sujets, notamment la zone Balkans où il a officié durant plusieurs années…

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 juin 2012 2 12 /06 /juin /2012 07:30
Eurosatory 2012 : consolidation industrielle et baisse des budgets s’imposent

 

11 juin 2012 Par  Hassan Meddah USINE NOUVELLE

 

Du 11 au 15 juin, les industriels de l’armement et de la sécurité terrestres se donnent rendez-vous au salon Eurosatory, au parc des expositions de Villepinte. Le nouveau ministre de la Défense français, Jean-Yves le Drian, aura l’occasion de préciser les grandes lignes de sa politique industrielle et dire comment il compte favoriser une industrie de défense européenne.

 

Eurosatory, le salon de la défense et de la sécurité terrestres,  continue de faire le plein. Pendant 5 jours, 1400 exposants (grands groupes, PME, forces armées…), et 55 000 visiteurs sont attendus. Dans  les allées et entre les démonstrations dynamiques de mini-drones et de blindés, militaires et industriels devraient évoquer les baisses des budgets de défense en Europe, les  consolidations à venir ainsi que la relance d’une industrie de défense européenne.

 

"Les investissements dans la défense en France n’atteignent que 1,9% du PIB contre environ 10% pour la Chine ou l’Inde, et près de 5% pour les Etats-Unis. Ce niveau est notoirement insuffisant pour maintenir notre rôle de membre permanent du Conseil de Sécurité", indique Christian Mons, président du GICAT, le groupement des industries françaises de défense terrestre.

 

Or la situation ne risque pas de s’améliorer à court terme. Le nouveau ministre de la défense Jean-Yves Le Drian, qui sera présent lundi sur le salon, a déjà précisé que son ministère sera mis à contribution mais "ni plus ni moins" que les autres. Le ministre, lors d’une interview au journal Le Monde le 6 juin dernier, a déjà défini quelques priorités et certains types d’équipements seront privilégiés notamment les moyens de renseignement et d’ observation (satellites, et drones),  des moyens de protection et d’action des forces aéroterrestres, et les solutions de ravitaillement en vol.

 

Fin mai, il a également remis en cause certains choix de son prédécesseur Gérard Longuet. "Sur les drones, ma posture est très simple, je remets à plat, sans passion et avec pragmatisme", a-t-il  indiqué lors de sa première conférence de presse.

 

Consolidation et coopération

 

Ces coupes dans les budgets militaires français mais également européens pourraient donc favoriser la consolidation entre fabricants et une coopération européenne encore peu développée. Depuis qu’il est en poste , le ministre n’a cessé de militer pour le développement d’une industrie de défense européenne.  "La France prendra des initiatives dans ce sens", a-t-il déjà précisé. Au niveau français, le ministre a les moyens d’inciter les industriels à collaborer notamment à travers les financements de la direction générale de l’armement. En charge d’équiper les armées, elle a dépensé 10,7 milliards d’euros en crédit d’équipements et de recherche au profit des industriels.

 

Reste que tout n’est pas noir. La forte dimension internationale du salon avec près de 70% d’exposants internationaux et de nombreuses délégations étrangères, rappelle que les technologies d’armement made in France se vendent bien à l’export. En 2011, le pays a confirmé son rang de quatrième puissance exportatrice de matériel militaire en 2011 avec des ventes de 6,5 milliards d'euros aux armées étrangères.

 

Reste que tout n’est pas noir. La forte dimension internationale du salon avec près de 70% d’exposants internationaux et de nombreuses délégations étrangères, rappelle que les technologies d’armement made in France se vendent bien à l’export. En 2011, le pays a confirmé son rang de quatrième puissance exportatrice de matériel militaire en 2011 avec des ventes de 6,5 milliards d'euros aux armées étrangères.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 juin 2012 2 12 /06 /juin /2012 07:05

450px-Flag of Belgium (civil).svg

 

11/06/12 - Laura Cerrada - 7sur7.be

 

Une quinzaine de sociétés belges, dont les grands noms du secteur, participent au salon de la défense et de la sécurité Eurosatory, un des plus grands au monde, qui ouvre ses portes lundi à Paris, a-t-on appris auprès des organisateurs.

 

Eurosatory, qui se tient tous les deux ans, accueillera jusqu'à vendredi plus de 1.400 exposants, dont 69% internationaux, au parc des Expositions de Villepinte, au nord de Paris. Il se veut le plus grand salon de la défense terrestre au monde.

 

Quinze des plus de 1.400 exposants - au sens large, car certains stands sont par exemple occupés par des magazines spécialisés dans l'armement - sont des entreprises belges. Dont les "grands noms" du secteur que sont Barco (systèmes de visualisation et d'affichage), Belgian Advanced Technology Systems (BATS, senseurs de technologie avancée, dont électro-optiques), CMI (systèmes d'armes montés sur véhicules blindés), la FN Herstal et Forces de Zeebrugge (FZ, qui produit des roquettes air-sol), OIP Sensor Systems et Sabiex international (construction et modernisations de blindés), indique le site internet d'Eurosatory.

 

Mais d'autres plus petites entreprises belges sont également présentes, comme 3B-The Fibreglass Company, Acrosoma, Newtec, Procotex Corporation, Prodata Systems, Vanhulen High Precision Springs et Xenics

 

De manière assez cocasse, les organisateurs présentent l'état-major de l'Union européenne (EMUE) comme un exposant provenant "de Belgique". Il est vrai qu'il est installé avenue de Cortenberg à Bruxelles, à deux pas du rond point Schuman et des autres institutions européennes...

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juin 2012 1 11 /06 /juin /2012 11:40

Patria AMV 8x8 source army-guide

 

10.06.2012 Patria army-guide.com

 

Patria is participating in the HI Design 2012 exhibition. The exhibition involves an unprecedented display of the design work of Finnish companies in Helsinki. It will be open throughout the summer, from 8 June until 2 September 2012. Patria will showcase Patria AMV vehicles, Patria Nemo mortars and composite structured aircraft spoilers.

 

HI Design 2012 highlights the significant role played by design in the success of Finnish companies. It also reveals some surprising contexts in which design has an impact. Products are being showcased that merge high-end design with technology. The exhibition provides new perspectives on machines and equipment produced by the heavy technology industry.

 

The exhibition provides a clear picture of the importance of design – it reveals how well-managed design can be used to create durable, functional and attractive products, based on an efficient manufacturing process, no matter the industry. In addition to Patria, several other trailblazing Finnish companies are presenting their products, including Nokia, KONE, Konecranes, Rocla, Planmeca, Planmed, ABB and Link Design.

 

“Design also plays a significant role in the defence, security and aviation sector, where Patria is a forerunner in various niches. We seek a competitive edge by making use of design to bring safety, ease of use, ergonomics and energy efficiency to our products,” says Jukka Holkeri, Patria’s Chief Marketing Officer.

 

Patria AMV – Patria’s flagship

 

Patria is a provider of defence, security and aviation life-cycle support services and technology solutions. From its versatile product and service range, Patria will showcase three different products at the HI Design 2012 exhibition.

 

One of the largest items on show will be the Patria AMV 8x8, the market leader in modern armoured wheeled vehicles in its class and already an unprecedented success story. The company currently holds contracts for over 1,400 vehicles. A deal concluded in 2010 with the Swedish Defence Materiel Administration promises continued success.

 

Another Patria item on show will be the Patria Nemo, a 120mm mortar system, which has made Patria a global market leader in turreted mortar systems. Among other features, it has excellent stealth characteristics, ballistic protection and firepower. In addition, it is compact in size and light (approx. 1,700 kg). The mortar is capable not only of conventional indirect, but also of direct fire, which is unique for mortars. It is adaptable to various wheeled and tracked vehicle types, and vessels.

 

In the aviation business, Patria’s key operations include life cycle support services for aircraft and helicopters, as well as pilot training. At the exhibition, Patria will showcase one of its areas of special expertise: composite aircraft structures, represented by a spoiler for the Airbus A380.

 

Patria also makes complex system and equipment deliveries to defence forces and national security authorities. Areas of special expertise are reconnaissance, surveillance, command and control systems, as well as their integration, software and life-cycle support.

 

Exhibition is open to the public throughout the summer

 

The phenomenal HI Design 2012 exhibition will be open to the public throughout the summer, from 8 June until 2 September 2012. Entry is free of charge, and the exhibition will be open to the public from Thursdays to Sundays during the exhibition weeks. The exhibition is organised jointly by World Design Capital Helsinki 2012 and the Federation of Finnish Technology Industries and its member companies.

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 juin 2012 7 10 /06 /juin /2012 11:50

Eurosatory 2012

 

09/06/12 Angola Press

 

       Paris - L'idée d'une consolidation de l'industrie européenne de la défense terrestre refait surface alors que s'ouvre lundi près de Paris le salon de la défense et de la sécurité Eurosatory, un des plus grands au monde. Philippe Burtin, le PDG de Nexter, fabricant français de blindés et de canons, a relancé le projet dans une rencontre avec la presse spécialisée avant ce salon.

 

 

       Eurosatory, qui se tient tous les deux ans, accueillera jusqu'à vendredi plus de 1.400 exposants, dont 69% internationaux, à Villepinte, au nord de Paris. Il se veut le plus grand salon de la défense terrestre au monde. Depuis la création en 2000 du géant de l'aéronautique et de la défense EADS, par la fusion d'industries françaises, allemandes et espagnoles, la consolidation de l'industrie européenne fait du sur place. Le nouveau président français François Hollande souhaite la relancer.

 

 

       "Les esprits sont prêts à cette structuration européenne ... et les entreprises y sont prêtes", a déclaré Philippe Burtin. "Nous souhaitons créer un acteur européen" pour faire face "à la montée en puissance des acteurs des pays émergents", comme la Chine, la Turquie ou la Corée.

 

 

       En février encore, M. Burtin déclarait que si tous les industriels européens convenaient de la nécessité de se rapprocher, aucun n'était prêt à franchir le pas. "Il y a des situations qui peuvent évoluer brutalement", dit-il désormais. Il n'a pas voulu donner de détails sur les rapprochements envisagés. D'après des sources industrielles, ils pourraient concerner des entreprises allemandes et italiennes.

 

 

       Or la présence de l'Etat français au capital des industriels de la défense reste un des obstacles à la consolidation transfrontalière, notamment avec les Allemands, et l'Etat détient encore 100% de Nexter.

Partager cet article
Repost0
9 juin 2012 6 09 /06 /juin /2012 11:31

HMS_Diamond_D34-photo-Tony-Hisgett.jpg

 

09 Jun 2012 By Thomas Harding, Defence Correspondent – The Telegraph

 

The Royal Navy’s warships will be vulnerable to enemy attack after a key project that allows ships to fire each other’s weapons was dropped.

 

The revolutionary Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC), which has taken 12 years to plan and already cost £45 million, would have allowed ships tracking a low-flying jet or missile to pass the data to the targeted vessel, allowing it to launch defensive missiles, or for them to be launched by remote control.

 

The decision was criticised by a Navy commander who said it could mean placing the new billion-pound aircraft carriers in harm’s way. “The Navy knows savings have to be made, but the Forces have been asked to do more with less,” said a Navy commander.

 

“Furthermore, with the coastal environment being the one more likely to operate in during future conflicts you need to have as much reaction time as possible if you’re putting £1 billion ships in harm’s way.”

 

The system is vital because enemy warships and incoming missiles can sometimes be masked by hilly coastal areas — such as in the Falklands, where the terrain of San Carlos Water meant that an incoming Exocet would not have been seen before it was too late.

 

With CEC, a destroyer further out to sea could follow the missile’s track then fire the threatened warship’s defensive missiles by remote control. As early as January this year Peter Luff, the defence equipment minister, told Parliament that CEC would be fitted to the £1 billion Type 45 destroyers in 2018 and then the estimated 13 future Type 26 Global Combat Ships. The system would cost just £24 million to defend each ship.

 

CEC defences were also meant to mitigate the loss of reducing the Type 45 fleet from eight to just six ships.

 

“The effectiveness of such platforms would be significantly diminished if the CEC is not provided,” a report by the National Audit Office said.

 

News that the £500 million project has been dropped will also be a further blow to the ability for the Navy to operate alongside US ships.

 

“The decision to axe the CEC programme calls into question prior assumptions used to justify reductions in the Royal Navy’s surface combatant force,” said Richard Scott , the Navy expert for Jane’s Defence Weekly.

 

“CEC would also have provided a significant improvement in the Navy’s ability to undertake anti-air warfare operations in coalition with the US Navy.”

 

A MoD spokesman said following a “comprehensive assessment of CEC” it was “not necessary to commit to purchasing the capability at this stage”.

 

But he added: “As the Defence Secretary made clear earlier this week, the MoD budget has headroom of £8 billion over the next 10 years for potential new programmes.”

Partager cet article
Repost0
9 juin 2012 6 09 /06 /juin /2012 10:29

old-munitions-depot-bulgaria-jun-2012-afp-lg.jpg

 

09 Juin 2012 -  lexpressiondz.com

 

Plus de vingt ans après la fin de la Guerre froide, la Bulgarie demeure confrontée au problème de la destruction de 15.000 tonnes de munitions périmées, processus accompagné de soupçons de corruption et de graves accidents dont le dernier, le 5 juin, a fait trois morts et neuf blessés.

 

L'explosion d'au moins 10 tonnes d'explosifs dans un dépôt privé de destruction de munitions à Lozenets (est), est dû, selon le Parquet, à «des violations de la discipline technologique ». D'après le Procureur général adjoint Boïko Naydenov, l'ampleur de l'accident aurait été bien plus limitée si les munitions n'avaient pas été stockées --contrairement aux règles-- dans des locaux où des grenades étaient désamorcées.

 

Les télévisions ont montré les survivants: des villageois pauvres formés à ce travail dangereux pendant seulement quatre jours pour n'être payés que 300 leva (150 euros) par mois, soit 15 euros au-dessus du salaire minimum.

 

«Ce n'est pas que le propriétaire, Bereta Trading, ne pouvait pas embaucher des professionnels » de l'industrie militaire. « Il a cependant préféré économiser sur les salaires", écrivait vendredi le quotidien Troud.

 

«Former du personnel quatre jours pour détruire des explosifs est ridicule », s'est exclamé l'expert en sécurité Ivan Boïadjiev.

 

L'épouse d'une des victimes, Iren Kostova, s'est déclarée vexée du montant du dédommagement reçu du propriétaire: « La vie de mon mari est estimée à 1.000 leva » (500 euros), a-t-elle déclaré à la télévision bTV.

 

Les blessés ont touché la moitié de cette somme. Un scandale a parallèlement éclaté au sujet de vacances sur l'île de Bali, en Indonésie, d'une valeur de 3.200 euros et financées par Bereta Trading, d'une responsable du ministère de la Défense qui avait octroyé une licence à cette entreprise.

 

Titrant «La corruption explose et tue », Troud expliquait que la destruction de munitions est une activité lucrative, se référant à un entrepreneur qui estimait le bénéfice minimal à 300%.

 

 Si, aux temps de la dictature communiste, la Bulgarie disposait d'une armée de 150.000 hommes qui pouvait atteindre avec les réservistes 400.000, ces effectifs sont aujourd'hui réduits à 30.000. Ce processus a créé entre autres le problème des munitions superflues.

 

Ce problème est devenu pressant après l'explosion en juillet 2008 d'un dépôt de l'armée à Tchelopetchene (ouest) qui a secoué la capitale, Sofia. La cause de l'explosion n'a toujours pas été établie. Selon des médias, ces explosions pourraient cacher une juteuse affaire de détournement de métaux.

 

Afin de s'affranchir des munitions, le ministère de la Défense a confié leur destruction à des entreprises privées, la loi excluant la participation d'entreprises étrangères. Mais l'accident du 5 juin a nourri le doute sur les capacités des entrepreneurs privés bulgares à faire face.

 

Le ministre de la Défense Anu Anguelov a proposé un amendement à la législation pour confier le démantèlement de munitions à des entreprises étrangères expérimentées, notamment de l'UE.

 

Vendredi, un autre cas révélateur a témoigné de la piètre qualité du contrôle sur les armes et les munitions dans le pays. Alors que le gouvernement affirmait avoir saisi sur la route 103 missiles volés dans la base aérienne bulgaro-américaine de Bezmer (est), le directeur de la base militaire de Sopot (centre) a démenti, affirmant que le convoi transportait sa production.

Partager cet article
Repost0
8 juin 2012 5 08 /06 /juin /2012 17:30

C-Squadron-Royal-Scots-Dragoon-Guards.jpg

C Squadron Royal Scots Dragoon Guards

 

07 Jun 2012 TheTelegraph

 

The Army faces the loss or merger of whole units as its regular strength is cut by 20,000, Defence Secretary Philip Hammond warned today.

 

Mr Hammond insisted he was not abandoning the regimental system, but said "difficult decisions" could not be avoided as the Army scaled back.

 

Addressing an audience of experts at the Royal United Services Institute in London, he said in future there would be greater use of part-time reserves and private contractors.

 

It would mean "thinking innovatively about how combat service support is provided" and "using more systematically the skills available in the reserve and from our contractors".

 

The changes would involve having to "rethink the way we deliver every aspect of military effect in order to maximise capability at the frontline", he said.

 

Mr Hammond said that Britain would also have to look more to its allies to provide military support while it concentrated on the frontline.

 

That would involve "working closely with partners to operate logistics more rationally through alliance structures" and "looking to others to provide the tail, where Britain is concentrating on providing the teeth".

 

Under plans set out in the Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR), the Army is to be reduced from 102,000 soldiers to 82,000 by 2020.

 

Mr Hammond said: "A regular Army of 82,000 will have a different structure to one of 102,000. And some units inevitably will be lost or will merge."

 

He will add that "the history and the heritage" of some units deliver "tangible military benefits in the modern British Army".

 

"So there is no question of abandoning the regimental system. But that does not mean that we can avoid difficult decisions as the Army gets smaller.

 

"And in making those decisions, the military voice must prevail; ensuring that the Army remains the capable and agile force envisaged in the SDSR."

 

The changes will also "transform the role of reserve forces", he said.

 

"The Future Reserves must be structured to provide, as they do today, some niche specialists capabilities that aren't cost-effective to maintain on a full-time basis - for example in areas of cyber, medical, or intelligence."

 

Under the the integrated Army concept, light infantry battalions will be reinforced on deployment through a permanent partnership with reserve battalions.

Partager cet article
Repost0
8 juin 2012 5 08 /06 /juin /2012 17:25

M134 six barrelled 7.62mm Minigun

 

07 Jun 2012 By Gwythian Prins - TheTelegraph

 

Underlying the Defence Secretary’s vision of a British Army of only 82,000 regulars are some dangerous assumptions that threaten national security.

 

Tony Blair casts a long shadow in British politics, and nowhere more directly than on the protracted and bruising campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan to which he contentiously committed our Armed Forces. These were campaigns that morphed as they dragged on, radically so in Afghanistan; campaigns that puzzled, strained and poisoned public trust. Above all, they were campaigns where the lack of clear strategic aim and mismatch of scale to task placed our Armed Forces under extreme stress.

 

Luck, superb generalship in crisis and powers of improvisation have got us – without disaster, but without clear success – to today’s unhappy moment of transition. Finally closing that book was the main message of Philip Hammond’s speech yesterday. In describing how the regular strength of the Army will be cut from 102,000 to 82,000, the Defence Secretary’s intent was plain: to shift the focus from “campaigns to contingency”.

 

Mr Blair’s shadow was long across that speech, too. Mr Hammond did a workmanlike job of stating his case in his terms; but it is his terms that should worry us. Mr Hammond’s terms – in effect, the prevalent culture in Whitehall and the Ministry of Defence – reveal no sense of what makes the defence of the realm an activity unlike any other that governments conduct with public money; nor any sense of the trumping priority that belongs to the “nightwatchman” functions of the state. Defence from the enemy without and the enemy within, by according the monopoly of violence to the state on our behalf, was what justified the introduction of income tax by Pitt the Younger. That had consequences then and now, yet they were nowhere recognised in Mr Hammond’s speech.

 

His first premise was the first premise of the Coalition agreement: that the economic situation is perilous and that reducing the bloated deficit inherited from the Blair/Brown years is the defining driver of his defence reforms. From that follows the whole shape of the exercise, to cut the suit to fit the cloth.

 

So there are proposals to outsource logistic and other so-called support functions. Does no one read military history? Martin van Creveld’s famous study of logistics in warfare shows how very “front‑line” and war-winning these “support” functions are. Ask General Patton whether the charge of his tanks to the Rhine after D-Day would have been possible without the “Red Ball Express” of his integrated, dedicated supply train of tankers and ammunition trucks.

 

Even more contentiously, there are suggestions to rely on “allies” (meaning Europeans) for essential functions. Lord Palmerston would have views on that. Rely on allies by all means, when their interests coincide with ours, but never put yourself in a position where without them you are unable to act alone. There are proposals to place reliance on reserve formations for essential functions that hitherto would have been integral to the regular force. Can the reserve forces really be asked to do this? Should they? Is that moral? Is that safe? Many worry not.

 

There are sensible ideas of “scaleability” built into the proposals of General Nick Carter, who leads the Army 2020 planning team, for an Army able to build up (or shrink further) in response to circumstance; and the general realignment of advanced Western militaries to give weight to electronic and information warfare is rightly recognised.

 

But military professionals worry about the loss of critical mass in key skill areas where the whole is always more than the sum of the parts; and while Mr Hammond had warm words for those who will be made redundant, arguing that it is more humane to tell them now so that they can “get on with their lives”, there is and will be an undeniable impact on morale, especially if people don’t really know why they are serving, and if the country at large doesn’t understand what the point of armed forces is nowadays.

 

But maybe this doesn’t matter? Well, it doesn’t if you hold the three key submerged assumptions that, over the past 15 years especially, I have observed becoming widely absorbed into the unspoken consensus of Whitehall. They underpin the Coalition’s infamous Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR), upon which current policy still stands, yet which two select committees of Parliament (Defence and Public Administration – twice) found to be so axiomatically flawed as to be unsafe. So let’s haul them up and look at them.

 

The first assumption is that something wonderful has happened. For the first time, since the end of the long, intermittently Hot and Cold European civil war of 1914-91, peace has become the default condition of modernity. Yes, there are little wars here and there; but basically we have escaped into Immanuel Kant’s realm of perpetual peace. The rule of international law and of its agents, the great supranational institutions (EU, UN, etc), by and large prevails.

 

A vital reason for this is the second assumption: that at last “soft” power has become more powerful than “hard” power. This means that it is more cost‑effective to put defence money into the conflict prevention programmes of the Department for International Development than into regiments or frigates. It is a view I have heard privately in those terms from a serving minister (not Mr Hammond).

 

And the third assumption, which facilitates the other two, is that the purpose of strategy is principally one of management. Strategy for defence is no different from strategy for any large business, the thinking goes; it is about delivering the CEO’s top-line objective. Which takes us back to Mr Hammond’s top-line premises, because they are just of this type and executed in just that way.

 

The problem is that each of these three unspoken assumptions is dangerous and wrong. We have not escaped history. The role of all armed forces today remains to prevent bad things from happening; and they do this by projecting an aura of power that comes from a combination of capability (procured against the certainty of uncertainty) with perceived national will.

 

That was the enduring “Falklands effect” that helped keep us safe for a generation and that materially helped to persuade Gorbachev to end the Cold War. Paradoxically, it is usually cheaper to pay for this up front – because the logic of realpolitik is that those with the aura of power do not need to use it; while those who erode it, as we have, are more likely to have to do so.

 

The second fallacy is that “soft” power is autonomous. It isn’t. Without hard power behind it, soft power is just limp. But central to the failure of the SDSR, and the National Security Strategy behind it, is the loss of understanding that operational strategy is different from and subordinate to national – or what we used to call “grand” – strategy.

 

Grand strategy understands all those geopolitical factors that affect our national security, both as risks and as threats, but which it is beyond the power of any government to control; and then it is about strategies to project our enduring national interests. Its relationship to operational strategy is to inform it of the range of capabilities that should be procured against uncertainty: the opposite of the elaborate scenario-based ways that the MoD defines force requirements nowadays.

 

Grand strategy’s relationship to politicians is to inform their ignorance and to help them to choose actions wisely so that when they instruct the military to go to war, we avoid the experiences of Blair’s years.

 

Can we do this? We did once. This is exactly how the long forgotten Lord Chatfield caused the Defence Requirement subcommittee of the Committee of Imperial Defence in 1935-36 to initiate the construction of the aircraft that won the Battle of Britain, the ships that sank the Bismarck and gave Churchill the means of victory.

 

“The vast sums required to make up for previous economies… horrified the financial minds,” Chatfield wrote. He added: “Time after time the Services were told that the financial dangers to the country were greater than the military ones… the Government seemed unable to face the fact that every million spent now reduced the chance of war, and that if war came, it would not be spent in time, while the cost would be much greater.”

 

Are we certain that our world is that much different from Chatfield’s? I am not; and so I think that the defence cuts of the SDSR are an immense gamble with our future.

 

Gwythian Prins is a research professor at the London School of Economics and a visiting professor in war studies at the Humanities Research Institute, University of Buckingham

Partager cet article
Repost0
8 juin 2012 5 08 /06 /juin /2012 16:50

BOL-countermeasures-dispenser.JPG

photo Saab

 

June 8, 2012 defense-aerospace.com

(Source: Saab AB; issued June 8, 2012)

 

Successful First Flight for BOL Countermeasures Dispenser on F-18 in Finland

 

The Finnish Air Force has made a successful first flight of the BOL countermeasures dispensing system from defence- and security company Saab on the F-18 Hornet fighter.

 

The integration of the BOL countermeasures dispenser is part of Finnish Air Force Hornet Mid Life Upgrade 2 (MLU2) Program and Saab was awarded the contract for production and integration of the BOL countermeasures dispenser system in September 2009.

 

Proven Performance

 

The BOL Countermeasures Dispensing System from Saab protects the Aircraft against both heat-seeking and radar guided missiles and has proven superior performance. The BOL integration on the F-18’s dramatically increases the amount of countermeasure payload carried by each aircraft, significantly improving combat survivability.

 

The BOL system uses wingtip vortices to distribute the chaff- and IR payload, which greatly improves dispersion and the rapid formation of a protective cloud, while avoiding the need for pyrotechnics and making it quicker, easier and safer to load the system. Each BOL holds 160 chaff/IR packages, five times more than conventional pyrotechnical dispensers.

 

The BOL countermeasures dispenser system is in operational service on the Royal Australian Air Force’s F/A-18 Hornet, the UK Tornado, US Air Force/Air National Guard’s F-15 Eagle, EF-2000 Typhoon and the Gripen fighter.

 

 

Saab serves the global market with world-leading products, services and solutions ranging from military defence to civil security. Saab has operations and employees on all continents and constantly develops, adopts and improves new technology to meet customers’ changing needs.

Partager cet article
Repost0
8 juin 2012 5 08 /06 /juin /2012 14:27

LogoEDA COLOR

 

Brussels - 8 June 2012 EDA News

 

Today the European Defence Agency’s Deputy Chief Executive, Adam Sowa, and Cassidian’s Sales Director Services, Heinz Unterreiner, met at the EDA to sign a 100.000 Euro training services contract.

 

The contract covers instructors services and expertise in the area of Counter-IED, one of the top-ten priorities of the Capability Development Plan. This is for the upcoming European Guardian international exercise, taking place in Austria, which will train experts from European nations in manual neutralisation of improvised explosive devices – the most challenging aspect of bomb disposal.

 

The training has been made possible through a Joint Procurement Initiative (JPI) of Luxembourg and Austria, following the newly introduced EDA Effective Procurement Methods (EPM) model, which enables Member States to procure off-the-shelf goods and services together through the EDA in a streamlined and accelerated way.

 

On the occasion of the signature, Adam Sowa commented “The signature of this contract, constituting the successful delivery of one of our first EPM pilot cases, shows how Pooling & Sharing can be translated into real and tangible results. Two EDA Member States have joined forces to conduct a common exercise in a crucial area and opened it up for experts from all EU nations for free. For me this is effective cooperation at its best.”

 

This was echoed by Heinz Unterreiner who underlined that a streamlining of processes is in the interest of both governments and industry, and in the interests of Cassidian.

Partager cet article
Repost0
8 juin 2012 5 08 /06 /juin /2012 12:35

LogoEDA COLOR

 

Zaragoza - 8 June 2012  EDA News

 

The first European Air Transport Training is underway in Zaragoza, Spain. On 4th June, aircraft from Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, France and the Czech Republic arrived at Zaragoza Air Base, where they will train together, boosting their qualifications and gaining vital experience in multinational operations. The EDA exercise runs until 15th June, and forms part of the Agency's ongoing efforts to boost defence cooperation in the field of pilot training.

 

  

 

Partager cet article
Repost0
8 juin 2012 5 08 /06 /juin /2012 12:25

UK MOD

 

June 8, 2012 defpro3.com

 

“Smaller, More Flexible, Agile” – “Well-Trained, Well-Equipped, Fully-Funded”

 

UK Defence Secretary Philip Hammond has discussed the key considerations behind the role of the British Army in Future Force 2020. Speaking at the Land Warfare Conference at the Royal United Services Institute in London, the Defence Secretary said that, while the Strategic Defence and Security Review has set Defence on a course for a sustainable future, the implementation of this vision of a formidable, adaptable and flexible Future Force 2020 requires transformation in every corner of the Defence establishment.

Mr Hammond said: “Army 2020, as we call it, will deliver a new structure designed to meet the needs of a smaller, more flexible and agile Army. Set on a firm foundation, in terms of both men and materiel. Well-trained, well-equipped, and, crucially, fully-funded.”

The Defence Secretary said there were three key underpinnings to the structure of the force: sustainability, capability and integration. In addition, he said that continuity would also be important, ‘retaining the regimental system that has served the Army so well’.

Looking at the context in which the Future Force will operate Mr Hammond said that in future Defence ‘will need to meet threats as they evolve, upstream and at distance, rather than waiting for them to come to us’:

“That requires the UK’s Armed Forces to be intelligent, flexible and adaptable, both in approaching the fight and during the fight. With an expeditionary capability and a theatre-entry capability.”

On sustainability, Mr Hammond said that Army 2020 is led by the need to recover the Army from a decade of enduring operations and transform it to face the future:

“But all of us here recognise the reality that this process is not taking place in a vacuum. The wider national interest requires that we build for the future with strict financial discipline. Tackling the fiscal deficit and returning the economy to sustainable growth are themselves strategic imperatives.

“Efficiency and the successful application of military force are not mutually exclusive concepts. Indeed, military productivity, which binds them together, is a key concept in the future management of our Armed Forces.

“The value that our Armed Forces produces for the country is based on their capability to deliver standing military tasks and project formidable power when national security requires it.

“That, not balancing the books, is the raison d’être for the existence of our Armed Forces and the MOD.”

On capability, Mr Hammond said that there will be a focus on maintaining critical skills and capabilities that would be irrecoverable and this would include retaining the ability to scale up in the future if the threat demands it and the means permit it.

He added: “I am also determined that we rethink the way we deliver every aspect of military effect in order to maximise capability at the front line.”

He said this would mean thinking innovatively about how combat service support is provided and the increased use of the skills available in the Reserve Forces and from contractors:

“Working closely with partners to operate logistics more rationally through Alliance structures. Looking, sometimes, to others to provide the tail, where Britain is providing the teeth.”

Mr Hammond said that Future Force 2020 would embrace the ‘whole force concept’, built on three pillars: the Armed Forces, both Regular and Reserve; the civilians who work alongside them; and the contractors who support them on operations.

This took Mr Hammond on to speak about integration and in particular the integration of the Regular and Reserve Forces:

“The Future Reserves must be structured to provide, as they do today, some niche specialist capabilities that simply aren’t cost-effective to maintain on a full-time basis - for example in areas of cyber, medical or intelligence,” Mr Hammond said.

“But the Future Reserve must also be able to provide on a routine basis those capabilities across the spectrum of tasks requiring less intensive complex training.”

The Defence Secretary explained that the integrated Army concept means, for instance, that light infantry battalions will be reinforced on deployment through a permanent partnership with reserve units.

Addressing concerns about how individual units and regiments would fit into the new model, Mr Hammond said: “I also understand that people worry about how, in the midst of all this change, we will maintain a strong thread of continuity. Retaining the ethos, traditions and connections that are part of what makes the British Army so effective - particularly a regimental system and regionally-focused recruiting.

“Of course, a Regular Army of 82,000 will have a different structure to one of 102,000. And some units inevitably will be lost or will merge.

“But let me be clear, we value the history and the heritage because they deliver tangible military benefits in the modern British Army. There is no question, as some have suggested, of abandoning the regimental system in the British Army.

“But that does not mean that we can avoid difficult decisions as the Army gets smaller.”

The Defence Secretary said that while the MOD is determined to maintain an effective regimental system, it must be based on ‘the realities of today and the primacy of capability’:

“That means focusing on analysis of recruitment performance, demographic trends and future recruiting needs.”

Concluding, Mr Hammond said that the Army is embarking on a programme transformation, building the balanced, capable and adaptable force structure required to face the future: “The values of the Army have sustained it through countless previous transformations; they have sustained it over the last decade of enduring campaigns,” Mr Hammond said.

“And those same values - courage, discipline, respect, integrity, loyalty, selflessness - will sustain it through this transformation.”

To read Defence Secretary Philip Hammond’s full address to the Royal United Services Institute Land Warfare Conference on Thursday 7 June 2012, please go to http://goo.gl/2KBCe (UK MOD)

Partager cet article
Repost0
8 juin 2012 5 08 /06 /juin /2012 12:10

Europe Flag

 

08.06.2012 par P. CHAPLEAU Lignes de Défense

 

Rigueur budgétaire oblige, le nouveau ministre de la Défense va rencontrer ses homologues finlandais, danois, italien, allemand et britannique pour « faire bouger » l’Europe. On lira ci-dessous les extraits de l'entretien accordée à OF; pour voir des vidéos de l'entretien, cliquer ici.

 

Vous entamez aujourd’hui une tournée européenne. Il y a urgence ?


La donne stratégique a évolué. Il y a le Printemps arabe dont on peut se demander s’il n’est pas parfois un automne. Il y a le terrorisme, avec tous les risques qu’on identifie au Sahel. Il faut aussi prendre en compte l’évolution de la politique américaine et l’affirmation que l’effort principal de Washington portera désormais sur l’axe Asie-Pacifique. Il y a, enfin, une crise majeure économique qui n’était pas là en 2008, lors de la préparation de la loi de programmation militaire. Il nous faut donc redéfinir les engagements que prend la France pour sa défense. Seule ou avec d’autres ?

 

Avec d’autres ? Avec les Européens donc…


La question de ces engagements en matière de défense ne se pose pas que pour la France, mais pour toute l’Europe. Or, à Chicago, lors du sommet de l’Otan, ce qui m’a frappé, c’est que les préconisations finales ont bien mis l’accent sur l’Europe de la Défense et que les Américains sont devenus presque plus enthousiastes que nous sur cette question. Désormais, c’est à la France de bouger parce que nous sommes au croisement de deux types de relations. L’une, particulière, avec la Grande-Bretagne, avec qui nous sommes de tous les engagements. L’autre qui s’est nouée avec les Allemands et avec les Polonais dans le cadre du triangle de Weimar et à laquelle peuvent s’associer Italiens et Espagnols. Puisque nous sommes au centre, à nous de prendre des initiatives !

 

Comment comptez-vous procéder ?


Chaque pays se rend bien compte que, tout seul, il ne peut plus tout faire, qu’il ne peut plus se défendre. Il faut donc des partenariats. Déjà avec les Britanniques, il y a eu des amorces, comme la coopération dans le domaine nucléaire qui s’est engagée et sera poursuivie. Il existe des domaines où des possibilités concrètes existent : les forces d’intervention, les drones, l’aviation de transport et de ravitaillement. Dressons la liste de ce que l’on peut faire rapidement et faisons-le de façon pragmatique, dans un contexte de crise. C’est ce que je vais préconiser à mes homologues. C’est incontournable. Et c’est avec cette nouvelle donne et ces grandes mutations à l’esprit que nous allons préparer un nouveau Livre blanc, qui est de la responsabilité du chef de l’État, et une nouvelle loi de programmation militaire.

Partager cet article
Repost0
8 juin 2012 5 08 /06 /juin /2012 12:00

UK-Army-Combat-Dress-in-Afghanistan.jpg

 

08.06.2012 par P. CHAPLEAU Lignes de Défense

 

Le secrétaire d'Etat britannique à la Défense, Philip Hammond, était l'invité, jeudi, du Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) dans le cadre de la Land Warfare Conference. Il a prédit de profonds changements au sein de l'appareil militaire britannique.

 

La plus touchée, l'armée de terre (qui passe de 102 000 hommes à 82 000, et va perdre des régiments, alors que d'autres vont fusionner), va devoir s'adapter. Ses troupes, ainsi que l'a dit Hammond, constitueront les "crocs" de la future entité, alors que la "queue" sera fournie par les réservistes, le secteur privé (les contractors) et les alliés (France et USA, dans le cadre de structures coalisées).

 

On est loin de ce qu'avançaient certains quotidiens britanniques qui dénonçaient jeudi matin un recours à des "mercenaires étrangers" (toujours le même cliché!) mais Hammond a bien décrit une armée binaire, avec ses forces d'engagement armé composées d'unités régulières et de réservistes, et avec son soutien fourni également par des réservistes mais surtout par des sous-traitants civils (des ESOA, entreprises de soutien opérationnel aux armées).

 

On se souviendra qu'un tel système existe déjà en Australie et que l'armée britannique recourt déjà largement à l'externalisation.

 

L'annonce du secrétaire d'Etat n'a rien d'officiel mais elle pourrait préparer la voie au rapport "Army 2020" que le général Nick Carter va prochainemet présenter.

Partager cet article
Repost0
8 juin 2012 5 08 /06 /juin /2012 11:35

Swedish-Air-Force-Saab-340-Erieye-Photo-Saab.JPG

A Swedish air force's Saab 340 surveillance aircraft

during its flight. Photo Saab

 

8 June 2012 airforce-technology.com

 

The Swedish Defence Materiel Administration has awarded a contract to Saab to provide maintenance services for the Erieye airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) radar system present on the Swedish air force's 340 surveillance aircraft.

 

Under the terms of the SKr125m ($17.4m) contract, the company will provide technical support, as well as research and development for the Erieye/ASC890 sensor and command and control (C2) system.

 

According to Saab, the sensor and command and control system will provide air force personnel with access to a detailed situational awareness, which can be utilised for conducting border surveillance, rescue operations and for tackling terrorism and organised crime.

 

Based on the active phased-array pulse-Doppler radar, the Erieye is a high-performance, long-range AEW&C system designed to detect and automatically track both air and sea targets including cruise missiles and jet-skis, located at ranges of up to 450km in hostile electronic warfare environments.

 

The system is equipped with a suite of sensors, C2 and communications systems, and is capable of transmitting an onboard operator architecture or downlink data through an associated datalink subsystem to a ground-based air defence network.

 

Fully interoperable with Nato air defence command and control systems, the system has been installed aboard the variety of aircraft platforms, such as the Embraer EMB-145 aircraft, used by Brazil, Mexico and Greece and Saab 2000 aircraft, intended for Pakistan.

 

Work is scheduled to take place between 2012 and 2014.

 

The Swedish air force currently possesses three Erieye-equipped Saab 340 aircraft in operational service, as reported by Flightglobal's MiliCAS database.

Partager cet article
Repost0
8 juin 2012 5 08 /06 /juin /2012 07:40

Les futurs porte-avions britanniques de la classe Queen Eli

 

7 juin 2012 Par Rédacteur en chef. PORTAIL DES SOUS-MARINS

 

Le gouvernement britannique devrait, selon la presse, effectuer un nouveau demi-tour à propos du déroulement du programme de porte-avions.

 

Il semble que les projets du gouvernement de mettre sous cocon, dès la fin de sa construction, un des 2 porte-avions, soit en voie d’être abandonné.

 

Les 2 porte-avions, le HMS Queen Elizabeth et le HMS Prince of Wales, entreraient en service opérationnel d’ici la fin de la décennie, comme c’était prévu au départ.

 

Cette décision fait suite au changement de position du gouvernement sur le type d’appareils qui seront embarqués sur les porte-avions.

 

Ce changement, qui doit être confirmé lors d’une revue de défense en 2015, permettrait à la Royal Navy de disposer d’une capacité permanente, tout au long de l’année.

 

Le premier des 2 porte-avions devrait commencer ses essais à la mer vers 2017.

 

Référence : This is Plymouth (Grande-Bretagne)

Partager cet article
Repost0
8 juin 2012 5 08 /06 /juin /2012 07:35

British Army.svg

 

Jun. 7, 2012 By ANDREW CHUTER Defense News

 

LONDON — Britain is planning to cut its military logistics forces and rely more on contractors and allies as part of a restructuring of the Army, Defence Secretary Philip Hammond told a land warfare conference here.

 

Outlining plans for a smaller, restructured British Army by 2020, Hammond said some units would be disbanded and others have their roles supplemented by reserves, allies and defense contractors as regular Army numbers are cut by 20,000 over the next few years.

 

A major shake-up of Britain’s logistic forces is in the offing as part of a transformation plan known as Army 2020, Hammond said June 7 at the Royal United Services Institute conference on land warfare.

 

“We are determined to rethink how we deliver every aspect of military affect in order to maximize capability at the front line … Thinking innovatingly about how combat service support is provided, using more systematically the skills in the reserves and our contractors, working closely with our partners to operate logistics more rationally through alliance structures, and looking sometimes to others to provide the tail where Britain is providing the teeth,” Hammond said.

 

Speaking at the same conference, Gen. Sir Peter Wall, the chief of the Defence Staff, said further work on a program known as Total Support Force comprising regular troops, reserves, Ministry of Defence civil experts and contractors is the subject of further work, but the outcome would be reductions in the regular logistics structures.

 

Hammond is expected to announce the details of Army 2020 in the next few weeks. That plan will likely see a radical change as the Army is restructured and some units disbanded or merged as the government looks to cut the number of regular soldiers from 102,000 to 82,000.

 

Reserve forces are to be rebuilt with an investment of 1.8 billion pounds ($2.8 billion) over 10 years to fill the gap left by the reduction of regular units. Decisions on the structure of the reserve forces will be announced in tandem with the release of the Army 2020 details.

 

Filling niche capabilities in cyber, medical and intelligence fields, a greater involvement in homeland resilience duties and even fielding complete reserve units for less complex operations are among the roles a rebuilt reserve force here is expected to undertake in the future, Hammond said.

 

Army reserve forces, known as the Territorials, have been in decline and, by some measures, only have a trained strength of 15,000, he said.

 

Some 25,000 reserves have been deployed with regular forces in Afghanistan and Iraq in the past decade. The British are trying to build flexible and adaptable land forces, moving away from military campaigns to a contingency basis within tight financial controls.

 

Hammond said the focus on the war in Afghanistan had meant the brunt of the defense budget reductions imposed by the government so far had fallen on the Royal Air Force and the Royal Navy rather than the Army, particularly in terms of reducing personnel numbers.

 

“For the Army, the most difficult decisions are still to come as we move toward the end of 2014,” he said. “The transformation pace will quicken as Afghanistan comes to an end.”

 

Outlining some details of what a restructured British Army might look like, Wall said the transformation would involve removal of famous regiments and units from across the Army.

 

Most of the significant changes at the unit level would occur between 2014 and 2016, he said.

 

Reaction forces would provide an assault brigade equipped with attack helicopters. There will be three armored infantry brigades equipped with medium and heavy vehicles, including the Challenger tank.

 

In addition, there will be seven infantry brigades of various sizes made up of paired regular and reserve forces. These will be particularly suited to U.K. or enduring operations such as the Falkland Islands and Cyprus.

 

Force groups involving artillery, engineering, intelligence and logistics would provide maneuver support and logistics, Wall said.

Partager cet article
Repost0
8 juin 2012 5 08 /06 /juin /2012 07:10

Poland MoD

 

Jun. 7, 2012 By JAROSLAW ADAMOWSKI   Defense News

 

WARSAW — Poland’s Ministry of Defense has announced plans to acquire between 123 and 205 UAVs by 2018, reported local newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza, at a cost of at least 1 billion zloty ($295 million).

 

With the planned acquisition, the Polish ministry aims to establish a new military unit within the structure of the country’s Special Forces Command which oversees the activities of special operations units.

 

According to a strategy paper drafted by the Ministry of Defense, which outlines the vision of the Polish armed forces’ transformation by 2030, UAVs are to become the cornerstone of the military’s reconnaissance forces. The ministry envisages that drones will be operated by Poland’s land forces and the Air Force, the document said.

 

In addition to UAVs, the unit is also expected to operate unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs), according to the Polish newspaper.

 

“Unmanned aerial vehicles are one of our priorities,” Polish Defense Minister Tomasz Siemoniak told the daily. “First, we need to precisely define our strategic needs.”

 

“Various services ... will be interested in using the unmanned aerial vehicles,” Siemoniak said.

 

The new drones are to include 23 sets of mini UAVs, 10 sets with a range of up to 20 kilometers, six sets of UAVs with a range of up to 100 kilometers, and a further two sets of long-range drones, which will be armed.

 

In 2010, Poland bought eight Aerostar UAVs from Israel’s Aeronautics Defense Systems for about $30 million with the aim of deploying the aircraft to the country’s military mission in Afghanistan. Other drones used by the Polish armed forces include Insitu’s ScanEagle and Aeronautics’ Orbiter mini UAVs.

Partager cet article
Repost0
7 juin 2012 4 07 /06 /juin /2012 17:50

Chief Test Pilot VBS armasuisse flies Gripen EF test aircra

 

June 7, 2012 defense-aerospace.com

(Source: Swiss Ministry of Defence; issued June 6, 2012)

 

Development of Gripen: Air Force Chief Visits Sweden

(Issued in French; unofficial translation by defense-aerospace.com)

 

This past week, the Commander of the Swiss Air Force, Markus Gygax, traveled to Linköping, in Sweden, the headquarters of Saab, the maker of the Gripen, to obtain the latest information regarding the status of development of the JAS 39 Gripen.

 

He took the opportunity to sit in the cockpit of the Gripen E/F demonstrator, and was briefed by Saab’s chief pilot on the program. Development of the Swedish Gripen is proceeding as planned since the test flights carried out by pilots of the Swiss air force and the armasuisse procurement agency.

Partager cet article
Repost0
7 juin 2012 4 07 /06 /juin /2012 17:25

mercedes-zetros-1833.jpg

photo MinDefFR

 

June 7, 2012 defense-aerospace.com

(Source: German defense procurement office, BWB; issued June 6, 2012)

 

Contract Concluded On 110 Protected Transport Vehicles, Payload 5 Tons

 

On 14 May 2012, the Federal Office of Defense Technology and Procurement (BWB) and Daimler AG concluded a contract on the delivery of a total of 110 protected transport vehicles, payload 5 tons, manufacturer’s designation ZETROS.

 

The contract was signed by Mr Thomas Wardecki, Vice President of the BWB, and Mr Hans-Joachim Bayer, Daimler AG head of sales (division authorities), in the presence of BWB project group and Daimler AG representatives.

 

The ZETROS 5 t has been projected by the BWB. In comparison to the transport vehicles of the same payload used on Bundeswehr operations, it features significantly improved protection in the field of ballistics and against mines and improvised explosive devices (IED). An NBC overpressure system and the possibility to mount a remotely operated weapon station additionally increase vehicle protection and, consequently, soldier protection.

 

The capabilities of the vehicle depending on use and mission.

 

The first 25 ZETROS 5 t vehicles are to be delivered already in 2012 for soldier training and operations. Fielding of all 110 vehicles is planned to be completed by mid-2014.

Partager cet article
Repost0
7 juin 2012 4 07 /06 /juin /2012 16:50

A400M-MSN6.jpg

 

Jun. 7, 2012 by Craig Hoyle – FG

 

London - Airbus Military has launched a delayed programme of so-called function and reliability (F&R) testing of its A400M transport, with development aircraft MSN6 having begun the activity on 2 June.

 

Flown from Toulouse, France, the sortie marked the start of an intensive period of activity using the European manufacturer's production-standard "Grizzly". A further five flights had been made by 7 June.

 

MSN6 must accumulate 300 flight hours to demonstrate the reliable operation of its equipment and systems before the receipt of full civil type certification from the European Aviation Safety Agency.

 

Airbus Military had planned to begin the F&R activity earlier this year, but had to delay the programme after a vibration problem was found to be affecting one of MSN6's Europrop International TP400-D6 turboprop engines. This was replaced, causing a delay of several weeks.

 

MSN6 made its first flight in Seville, Spain, in December 2011, and by 16 May had logged only 19 flights, totalling 77h.

 

The F&R activity is expected to be complete this month, with MSN6 then due to appear at the Royal International Air Tattoo and Farnborough air show in the UK during July. It is also scheduled to undergo electromagnetic testing at EADS's site in Manching, near Munich, and to participate in September's Berlin air show.

 

Airbus Military plans to deliver its first production example of the A400M to the French air force in late 2012 or early 2013, with the aircraft targeted to make its first flight on 23 August.

Partager cet article
Repost0

Présentation

  • : RP Defense
  • : Web review defence industry - Revue du web industrie de défense - company information - news in France, Europe and elsewhere ...
  • Contact

Recherche

Articles Récents

Categories