Overblog Tous les blogs Top blogs Entreprises & Marques Tous les blogs Entreprises & Marques
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
MENU
2 février 2012 4 02 /02 /février /2012 08:25

nato-emblem-300-dark-blue-lg

February 1, 2012 defpro.com

On 23 January 2012, Commodore Ben Bekkering took over command of the Standing NATO Maritime Group One (SNMG1) from his Italian counterpart, Rear Admiral Gualtiero Mattesi. The ceremony took place at the Taranto Naval Base, Italy.

The maritime group, also referred to as SNMG1, is an Immediate Reaction Force. It patrols regions where NATO wishes to protect its interests. In this way, SNMG1 contributes to the situational picture and also underscores the solidarity within the Alliance.

At the same time, the naval squadron maintains a high level of readiness, so it can be deployed rapidly and effectively for tasks varying from humanitarian assistance to an evacuation or ensuring security in a maritime area. The flotilla also serves as a forward command capability for the NATO Response Force.

Partager cet article
Repost0
1 février 2012 3 01 /02 /février /2012 18:15

nato-emblem-300-dark-blue-lg.jpg

Feb 1, 2012 Spacewar.com (AFP)

Brussels - NATO defence ministers begin talks Thursday facing dilemmas after France abruptly decided to end its Afghan combat mission early and a leaked report accused Pakistan of secretly aiding the Taliban.

The French move is set to dominate two days of talks meant to review progress in the Afghan military transition, discuss ways to keep strong military capabilities in times of austerity and prepare a May summit in Chicago.

But allies will now also be confronted with a NATO report, leaked to British media and based on interrogations of detainees, claiming that Islamabad, via its ISI intelligence agency, is "intimately involved" with the insurgency.

President Nicolas Sarkozy announced last week that France would end its combat role in Afghanistan in 2013, a year early, after four French toops were killed by a renegade Afghan soldier.

He also encouraged all allies to do the same, but officials indicated that NATO would maintain a carefully crafted plan to hand Afghan forces full control of the battlefield by the end of 2014.

"We stick to the roadmap that was outlined at the NATO summit in Lisbon in November 2010," NATO chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen said on Monday.

British Prime Minister David Cameron cautioned against abrupt withdrawals.

"I don't want to see some sort of cliff edge in 2014 when all of the remaining troops come out at once," Cameron told reporters after talks Saturday with Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

With 130,000 foreign troops in Afghanistan, one senior NATO military official said changing the calendar would be a logistical headache, noting that there is $30 billion (22.8 billion euros) worth of military materiel in the mountainous, landlocked nation.

"Removing all the equipment and forces we have there will take a long while," the official told AFP on condition of anonymity.

The French decision revived fears that other allies, influenced by war-weary voters, would return home earlier.

"We are concerned there might be a rush to the exit with one important ally opting out of the (transition) timeframe," said an alliance diplomat. "The end of 2014 is realistic. This is the goal we should all aim for."

The report of Pakistani collusion with the Taliban will also cast a shadow over the meeting amid already tense relations with Islamabad.

NATO ties with Pakistan plunged to a new low after US air strikes killed 24 Pakistani soldiers along the porous Afghan border on November 26. Islamabad has since closed its border to NATO supply trucks.

"Pakistan's manipulation of the Taliban senior leadership continues unabatedly," the report, based interrogations of more than 4,000 captured Taliban and Al-Qaeda operatives, was quoted as saying by the BBC.

The debate on Afghanistan will likely continue at the Munich Security Conference from Friday to Sunday, an annual gathering of top officials and military experts from around the world in the German city.

In Munich, US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta will be joined Saturday by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe for discussions on transatlantic relations and ties with Russia.

Former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger will then lead a debate on US, Europe and Asia with EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, Australian Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd and US Senator John McCain.

"We don't want to make it a Chinese-American debate. We also want to see how Europe is viewed in Asia," said veteran German diplomat Wolfgang Ischinger, the event's chairman.

President Barack Obama is shifting US military attention to Asia and the Pentagon announced last week that it would withdraw two of its four army brigades from Europe in 2014.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov will join the talks in Munich amid tension between Moscow and NATO over Russian concerns that an anti-missile system could be aimed at Russia.

Partager cet article
Repost0
1 février 2012 3 01 /02 /février /2012 08:20

Nato 03

2012-01-31 (China Military News cited from aol.com and by Colin Clark)

The People's Republic of China and NATO hold little known high-level consultations, usually twice a year.

"We have had regular exchanges with the Chinese. They are not frequent," James Appathurai, NATO's deputy assistant secretary general for political affairs and security policy said yesterday. He mentioned the Chinese meetings in passing during a briefing about NATO relations with its many partner nations.

The NATO official described the talks as semi-annual exchanges "at a high level."

One of Washington's top experts on the Chinese military was surprised by word of the regular consultations.

"VERY interesting deal. It allows back-channel communications (not necessarily a bad thing). It seems to occur with little public notice (not necessarily a bad thing)," Dean Cheng of the conservative Heritage Foundation wrote in an email. "On the other hand, five years of this going on, and no real records about it means that we don't know what HAS been discussed here."

Cheng said the NATO-China talks, which Appathurai said included discussions between the NATO Secretary General and Chinese ambassadors to Belgium, raise "an interesting question of whether the Chinese increasingly assume that any conflict with the US WILL involve Western Europe, and on the US side at that. Which makes Chinese space targeting, in particular, an interesting question."

Appathurai said the Chinese demonstrate "no desire" to escalate the level or frequency of the talks. "The phrase from the Chinese is 'step by step," he said. "We are getting to know each other. Let's put if it that way."

The deputy assistant secretary general also highlighted a little known change in policy that was driven by Australia and New Zealand. In return for joining NATO operations in Afghanistan, both countries were granted a seat the council's table regarding Afghan operations for as long as they fight alongside NATO troops. They have the right to be consulted and file objections, as well as agree to NAC decisions regarding Afghanistan. And the policy was cemented by the Libyan operations.

"As soon as countries became true contributors they got a seat at the NAC table," Appathurai told our group of American defense writers. The North Atlantic Council is, in most cases, NATO's supreme policy making body. Australia and New Zealand established the precedent that they would exercise the same powers of decision-making as the regular members of the council possess on matters concerning Afghanistan. During the Libyan operations, countries such as Qatar, were granted the same status on the NAC for the duration of NATO's involvement there. Qatar supplied several hundred troops to the Libyan rebels to train them and help them develop effective command and control. Qatar already had partner status with NATO as a result of the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative, designed to offer Middle Eastern countries "practical bilateral security cooperation" with the alliance.

Partager cet article
Repost0
26 janvier 2012 4 26 /01 /janvier /2012 21:13

nato

BRUXELLES, 26 janvier - RIA Novosti

Le système de défense antimissile de l'Otan sera terminé en Europe d'ici 8-10 ans, a annoncé jeudi aux journalistes à Bruxelles le secrétaire général de l'Alliance Anders Fogh Rasmussen.

"Ce système (de défense antimissile) de l'Otan sera achevé dans une période comprise entre huit et dix ans", a déclaré le responsable.

Selon M.Rasmussen, l'Otan devrait annoncer, lors du sommet de l'Alliance qui aura lieu à Chicago en mai 2012, une capacité "intérimaire" du bouclier antimissile européen, ce qui représentera "une étape importante" pour l'organisation.

La décision de créer un système de défense antimissile européen a été prise en novembre 2010 lors du sommet de l'Otan à Lisbonne.

L'Alliance envisage d'unifier les éléments existants des systèmes de défense antimissile des pays membres, ainsi que d'utiliser les éléments du bouclier antimissile américain déployés en Europe. Il s'agit notamment du radar en Turquie, des bases de missiles intercepteurs SM-3 en Roumanie et en Pologne, des navires anti-missiles de la Marine américaine stationnés dans le port espagnol de Rota et de radars installés sur des navires de guerre néerlandais.

La Russie et l'Otan avaient convenu lors du sommet de Lisbonne de coopérer dans le domaine de la défense antimissile européenne. Le partenariat était toutefois resté lettre morte, Washington refusant de garantir juridiquement que le futur bouclier ne menacerait pas le potentiel nucléaire russe.

En novembre 2011, le président russe Dmitri Medvedev a annoncé des mesures de riposte militaires et diplomatiques contre le déploiement du bouclier antimissile américain en Europe.

Partager cet article
Repost0
26 janvier 2012 4 26 /01 /janvier /2012 18:50

parking-de-la-base-aerienne-d-albacete-durant-un-tlp-photo-.jpg

26/01/2012 LTT Karim DJEMAI Armée de l'air

Du 16 janvier au 10 février 2012, près de 230 aviateurs participent au Tactical Leadership Program  (TLP), stage multinational formant les pilotes de chasse des pays de l'Otan au label «chef de mission».

 

  vue-aerienne-de-la-base-d-albacete-realisee-en-2009

 

Déployés sur la base aérienne d’Albacete (Espagne), les Français mettent en œuvre des moyens importants et variés : quatre Mirage 2000 D, deux Rafale C, deux Mirage 2000 C, un avion-radar E-3F et deux Alphajet. Deux Super Etendard de la marine nationale complètent les moyens aériens français.

Au sol, du personnel du groupe de télécommunications 10.800 d’Orléans réalise du brouillage radio, tandis qu’un détachement de l’escadron de défense sol-air 1/950 d’Istres déploie une cellule tactique et deux unités d’acquisition de tir de Crotale NG. L’ensemble de ces menaces simulées, rendent l’environnement opérationnel de cette formation très proche de la réalité.

« En 2012, les nations participant à TLP ont décidé de concentrer leurs moyens en organisant quatre grosses sessions , explique le commandant Sébastien Salgues, pilote de chasse français et, depuis septembre 2011, premier Français responsable de la Flying Branch  (division des activités aériennes) à Albacete. Ce premier TLP de l’année rassemble pas moins de 30 avions Blue Air (simulant les forces amies), ainsi qu’une dizaine d’avions Red Air  (plastronnant des avions agresseurs). Tous ces avions proviennent de France, des États-Unis, d’Italie, de Belgique, d’Espagne, et d’Allemagne ».

TLP permet aux pilotes de chasse participants de décrocher la qualification de «chef de mission», aussi appelée «Mission Commander » dans l’Otan. Ce label leur donne les compétences pour diriger des missions complexes sur des théâtres d’opérations de type COMAO (Composite Air Operations - dispositifs complexes d’aéronefs différents réalisant des missions à multiples objectifs). « C’est ce genre d’opérations aériennes complexes qui ont été récemment menées avec succès au-dessus de la Libye  », détaille le commandant Salgues.

Chaque jour, une importante COMAO est programmée. Cette dernière obéit à un scénario régi par de multiples facettes : missions d’interdiction aérienne, d'entraînement au combat aérien de type DACT (Dissimilar Air Combat Training ), attaques au sol de type CAS (Close Air Support – appui aérien rapproché) ou Dynamic Targeting (attaque d’opportunité).

« Les journées sont longues et éprouvantes pour les participants au TLP , détaille le commandant Salgues. Les vols ne représentent qu’une petite partie de leur travail. La préparation et la planification en amont sont très longues. Les vols se poursuivent au sol par une phase complète de débriefing au cours de laquelle les actions de chaque participant sont finement décortiquées. »

Cette année, pour la première fois, un réseau mettant en œuvre la Liaison 16 (L16) est déployé à Albacete. Ce système assure une mise en réseau des moyens offensifs et défensifs et permet de suivre en temps réel les évolutions de chaque appareil. Au sol, un centre de commandement composé d’une dizaine de personnes peut ainsi en temps réel savoir où se situe chaque appareil et lui ordonner de modifier la mission qui lui était impartie au départ. « La L16 est désormais incontournable dans les opérations modernes , explique le commandant. Elle améliore nettement l’efficacité opérationnelle dans des engagements de plus en plus complexes. Au sein de TLP, nous développons son utilisation. Toutes les fonctionnalités ne sont pas encore pleinement opérationnelles. Nous nous trouvons encore dans une phase de développement, mais les premiers avantages du recours à la L16 sont déjà perceptibles.  »

Installé sur la base aérienne d’Albacete depuis 2009, la formation TLP était auparavant dispensée à Florennes en Belgique. L'encombrement et l'exiguïté de l'espace aérien belge et des pays environnants ont grandement motivé ce choix. En effet, la plus grande taille des zones de travail en Espagne augmente la marge de manoeuvre des équipages. En outre, ils bénéficient également de conditions météorologiques clémentes, paramètre indispensable à l’activité aérienne.

Partager cet article
Repost0
25 janvier 2012 3 25 /01 /janvier /2012 18:15

Le-NSRS---photo-Royal-Navy.jpg

Le NSRS – photo Royal Navy

25 janvier 2012 Par Rédacteur en chef. PORTAIL DES SOUS-MARINS

Pendant 4 jours, 70 spécialistes des 3 pays propriétaires ont pris en main le NSRS (Nato Submarine Rescue System). Le système de sauvetage de sous-marins en détresse est l’un des équipements les plus sophistiqués au monde.

Le NATO Submarine Rescue System (NSRS) est conservé et entretenu dans un hangar géant, spécialement construit sur la base sous-marine de Faslane en Ecosse. Il peut descendre à 610 m (2.000 pieds), c’est à dire assez profondément pour opérer sur n’importe quel plateau continental dans le monde.

Propriété commune de la Grande-Bretagne, de la France et de la Norvège, il est en alerte permanente. Et heureusement, pour l’instant, il n’a jamais été utilisé en situation réelle.


chambre-de-decompression-du-NSRS---photo-Royal-Navy.jpg
Des volontaires dans la chambre de décompression du NSRS – photo Royal Navy

Pendant les essais, 25 volontaires ont été enfermés pendant 18 heures dans les 2 chambres de décompression du NSRS, afin de voir comment ils réagiraient au confinement et aux changements de pression atmosphérique qu’ils devraient subir pendant le sauvetage d’un sous-marin en détresse.

Le NSRS peut être déplacé en moins de 3 heures — sur 27 chariots. Dans le monde entier, des navires sont prévus pour embarquer la plateforme de chargement, les chambres de décompression et le sous-marin de sauvetage. Si c’est nécessaire, le navire le plus proche serait alerté.

Toute la plateforme de chargement est boulonnée sur le pont du navire et le sous-marin — sorti tout droit d’un film de science-fiction avec sa bulle de verre à l’avant — est prêt à plonger, mis à l’eau par les grues qui font parti de l’ensemble.

Mise-a-l-eau-du-NSRS---photo-Royal-Navy.jpg
Mise à l’eau du NSRS – photo Royal Navy

Si la coque d’un sous-marin est percée, elle est automatiquement scellée et le reste de la coque se pressurise. Les chambres de décompression du NSRS, qui peuvent accueillir 35 personnes à la fois, sont préparées et le sous-marin de sauvetage transfère les survivants directement dans les chambres par un sas. Si la coque du sous-marin en détresse est toujours intacte, le sous-marin de sauvetage peut travailler seul, remontant en surface 15 survivants à la fois.

Le temps est un facteur important parce qu’il peut falloir jusqu’à 4 jours pour décompresser entièrement quelqu’un. Donc les sauveteurs doivent remonter autant de survivants qu’ils le peuvent du sous-marin et aussi vite que possible.

Dans les chambres de décompression, il y a des plongeurs spécialement formés et des infirmiers, pour traiter les blessés et décontaminer ceux qui en ont besoin, et plus généralement faire fonctionner le système jusqu’à ce qu’on puisse ouvrir les portes du sas en toute sécurité.

nsrs_operateurs-du-Submarine-Rescue-System---photo-Royal-.jpg
Des spécialistes prennent en main le "Submarine

Rescue System" – photo Royal Navy

Pendant 4 jours, des plongeurs, des médecins, des infirmiers et des spécialistes de Grande-Bretagne, France et Norvège ont utilisé ensemble le système.

L’exercice, baptisé Massivex, a respecté la durée d’un sauvetage réel, depuis l’alerte initiale jusqu’aux 18 heures de décompression.

Référence : Royal Navy

Partager cet article
Repost0
24 janvier 2012 2 24 /01 /janvier /2012 08:50

comite-militaire-des-chefs-d-etat-major-de-l-OTAN-sou.jpg

photo MinDef FR

23/01/2012 Sources : EMA

Le 18 janvier 2012, l’amiral Guillaud, chef d’état-major des armées (CEMA), a participé au comité militaire des chefs d’état-major de l’OTAN à Bruxelles.

Cette réunion s’est déroulée sous la conduite du général danois Bartels qui a pris ses fonctions de président du comité militaire le 2 janvier, succédant à l’amiral Di Paola, nommé ministre de la Défense italien.

Au cours de ce comité, les chefs militaires ont évoqué notamment la situation en Afghanistan et au Kosovo, le dialogue méditerranéen, le conseil OTAN / Russie, le processus de transformation de l’OTAN et la refonte de sa structure de commandement. Ces sujets seront traités lors du prochain sommet de l’Alliance atlantique qui aura lieu à Chicago.

A cette occasion, l’amiral Guillaud a pu mener des consultations bilatérales avec plusieurs de ses homologues étrangers.

Le comité militaire des chefs d’état-major est la plus haute instance militaire de l’OTAN.

Partager cet article
Repost0
21 janvier 2012 6 21 /01 /janvier /2012 08:05
NATO and Partner Chiefs of Defence conclude two days of meetings at NATO

January 20, 2012 defpro.com

166th Military Committee in Chiefs of Defence Session

Brussels | Chiefs of Defence (CHODs) from sixty-seven NATO member and Partner countries have concluded two days of meetings at NATO Headquarters. Chaired by General Knud Bartels, Chairman of the Military Committee (CMC), NATO’s highest-level military officers gathered in Brussels to discuss key security issues, in anticipation of the Defence Ministerial on 2-3 February 2012 and in light of the Chicago Summit in May. Discussions focused on Partnerships, Smart Defence and NATO operations in Afghanistan and Kosovo.

NATO’s two Strategic Commanders, Admiral James Stavridis, Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) and General Stéphane Abrial, Supreme Allied Commander, Transformation (SACT) also participated, together with the Chairman of the European Union’s Military Committee, General Hakan Syren.

Partnership was the main theme of the first day, and the Military Committee gathered fifty CHODs to include Troop Contributing Nations to the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan. NATO’s Senior Civilian Representative in Afghanistan, Ambassador Simon Gass and Adm. Stavridis (SACEUR), together with Gen. John Allen, Commander ISAF, gave a situational briefing that also covered progress of the transition process. The Afghan National Security Force is improving in quantity and quality, although an increased effort in supporting the NATO Training Mission, NTM-A is still required. CHODs were also updated on the development of the NATO Strategic Plan for Afghanistan and discussions centred around NATO’s support to Afghanistan. post-2014. CHODs reaffirmed their commitment to the ISAF mission.

Together with the Mediterranean Dialogue countries (Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Mauritania, Morocco, Tunisia), the Military Committee discussed the implications of the recent political changes in the Mediterranean and Middle-East Region to military cooperation within the Mediterranean Dialogue framework. CHODs expressed their concerns regarding the threat of advanced weapon systems falling into the hands of non-state actors and emphasized the need for further strengthening of partnerships in the region.

During the NATO Russia Council Military Representatives (NRC-MR) meeting the twenty-nine NRC CHODs approved a series of documents related to NATO-Russia military-to-military cooperation. A Framework for NATO-Russia Military-to-Military Cooperation, the Military-to-Military Cooperation Road Map 2012-2014, and the NRC-MR Work Plan 2012 were all formally adopted. CHODs expressed a strong desire to proceed with NATO-Russia cooperation and to continue focusing on common threats and challenges. Following the meeting, Army Gen. Makarov awarded Lt.Gen. Bornemann, Director General of the International Military Staff (IMS) together with two IMS Staff Officers, Col. Hannevik and Lt.Col Van den Broeck, the medal For the Strengthening of Combat Cooperation, for their contribution to NATO-Russia cooperation.

The Euro Atlantic Partnership Council Military Representatives session concluded the first day’s meetings. It focused on Smart Defence and Partners in Operations. Finland presented the Nordic Defence Cooperation (NORDEFCO) initiative which aims to enhance defence cooperation among the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden) around five areas of cooperation: Strategic Development, Capabilities, Human Resources and Education, Training and exercises, and Operations. He was followed by Gen. Sverker Göranson, Swedish Chief of Defence, who shared his countries’ experience in Operation Unified Protector, NATO’s operation in Libya. Sweden was one of the non-NATO countries participating in the enforcement of the No Fly Zone. Partners’ participation in OUP has been considered as an overall success, a validation of the investments and efforts made in interoperability, the use of NATO standards and command and control methods.

The second day started with the KFOR session. In the presence of Lt.Gen. Erhard Drews, Commander KFOR and Mr. Xavier Bout de Marnhac, Head of Eulex, CHODs were briefed by Adm. Stavridis (SACEUR) on the current situation in the region. SACEUR assesses the situation on the ground as calm, but still volatile. He emphasized the need for further political efforts to provide sustainable peace to the region. Further reductions of troops in Kosovo will be the result of a condition based assessment.

The rest of the day’s discussions were focused on Operational Challenges, Transformation and the implementation of the new NATO military Command Structure (NCS). In his opening remarks Gen. Bartels emphasized the link between Transformation, Contingency Planning and the new NCS as forming a vital part of the security for the Euro-Atlantic zone.

NATO’s two Strategic Commanders, Gen. Abrial and Adm. Stavridis briefed the Military Committee on lessons learned from Operation Unified Protector in Libya. While NATO’s Joint Analysis and Lessons Learned Centre (JALLC) in Lisbon is still working in detail on this important area, the CHODs already discussed the strategic lessons with a view to integrating them into the new NCS and planning processes.

Gen. Abrial briefed on the way forward with Smart Defence, emphasizing the need for enhanced cooperation among NATO and NATO Partners. He underlined that Smart Defence must be seen as a way to share knowledge, capabilities and resources, rather than as a way to realize national savings, and that it should become the heart of the Alliance.

In its concluding session, the CHODs discussed the implementation of the new NATO Command Structure (NCS). The stronger link between NATO’s Command Structure and member nations’ Force Structure will require close overview by the Military Committee in order to ensure timely implementation by June 2012.

Partager cet article
Repost0
20 janvier 2012 5 20 /01 /janvier /2012 13:35
NATO to sign delayed AGS deal by May

Nato AGS – photo Northrop Grumman

January 20th, 2012 by Craig Hoyle - Flight Global

London - NATO's long-running process to order an Alliance Ground Surveillance (AGS) capability could at last achieve a contract signature within the next few months, although the scale of its programme appears to have again been revised.

"We have the contract, and it's under negotiation," said US Air Force Maj Gen Steve Schmidt, commander of the NATO Airborne Early Warning and Control Force. A 13-nation deal should be signed before the next NATO summit, in Chicago from 20-21 May, he added.

"I fully expect to see the announcement that NATO has purchased AGS by that summit," Schmidt told the AEW and Battle Management conference in London on 17 January.

Schmidt valued the pending acquisition at about €1 billion ($1.3 billion) for five Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk Block 40 unmanned air vehicles, each equipped with a Northrop/Raytheon surveillance payload. An associated 20-year operational support package is expected to total a further €2.2 billion, he added.

This assessment contrasts with a previous plan, which had called for the purchase of six Global Hawks, to be operated from NAS Sigonella in Sicily from later this decade. Northrop officials last October said a deal was expected to be signed in early November 2011.

Although NATO was able to access information from a USAF Global Hawk that flew a limited number of sorties during last year's Libya campaign, Schmidt said the availability of an Alliance-owned fleet "would have been a game-changer" during the seven months of Operation Unified Protector.

Beyond its application during such coalition operations in the future, Schmidt said additional uses for the AGS fleet would include crisis management and cooperative security tasks.

Partager cet article
Repost0
20 janvier 2012 5 20 /01 /janvier /2012 13:15

http://en.rian.ru/images/17085/69/170856946.jpg

MOSCOW, January 20 (RIA Novosti)

 

The United States and its NATO allies already have about one thousand missiles capable of intercepting Russia’s intercontinental ballistic missiles, the Russian deputy premier in charge of defense said.

 

"Along with its allies, whom the U.S. now persuades to buy ships equipped with the Aegis Combat System, the overall potential can be estimated at about 1,000 interceptor missiles,” Dmitry Rogozin, who is also the Russian president’s special representative for talks with NATO, said in an interview with the Ekho Moskvy radio station.

 

He said that the figure is currently approaching the limits established by the recently signed Russia-U.S. strategic arms reduction treaty.

 

"There are no guarantees that after the first, second, and third phases [of the U.S. missile shield project] are completed, there will be no fourth, fifth and sixth. Do you really think they will halt all their technologies after 2020? That’s nonsense! They will go ahead with developing and boosting technical parameters of their interceptor missiles and performance capabilities of their warning [missile defense] systems,” Rogozin said.

 

He said that U.S. interceptor missiles cover all European Russia to the Urals Mountains, and are capable of hitting not only small and medium-range missiles of “rogue states,” but also intercontinental ballistic missiles of Russia’s armed forces.

"The fact that the missile defense system can hit strategic missiles and the fact that those bases and fleet are deployed in northern seas demonstrate the evident… anti-Russian nature of the [U.S.] missile defense,” Rogozin said.

 

Russia-NATO missile defense talks are close to deadlock as Moscow is seeking written, legally binding guarantees that the U.S.-backed European missile defense program will not be directed against it. Washington, however, refuses to provide the guarantees, saying the shield is directed against threats from Iran and North Korea.

 

Russia and NATO agreed to cooperate on European missile defense system at the Lisbon Summit in November 2010. President Dmitry Medvedev proposed a joint system with full-scale interoperability to ensure that the alliance's system will not be directed against Moscow. The military bloc, however, favors two independent systems which exchange information.

Partager cet article
Repost0
19 janvier 2012 4 19 /01 /janvier /2012 18:25

Nato-03.jpg

January 19, 2012 defpro.com

Dutch Defence Minister Hans Hillen addressed the Atlantic Council in Washington on 12 January. He called for NATO’s high ‘triple A’ security status to be maintained, particularly in an age of austerity. During his working visit to the United States, Mr Hillen also met his new counterpart Leon Panetta.

In his address to the Atlantic Council, a think-tank which promotes trans-Atlantic cooperation, the Minister discussed matters which are crucial to the current high level of security in the Western world. Security owing to NATO, which in turn is essential for stability and prosperity.

Hillen said: “It will require political will and leadership to prove to our citizens the continuing importance of the Alliance and the necessary defence expenditures in an era of dwindling resources. There is a risk that efforts to maintain our wealth today may come at the expense of our security tomorrow. Europeans need to understand that their wealth does not only depend on the stability of the euro, but also on international stability.”

Partager cet article
Repost0
18 janvier 2012 3 18 /01 /janvier /2012 12:45
166th NATO Chiefs of Defence meeting begins today

January 18, 2012 defpro.com

Brussels | The first meeting of NATO’s Military Committee (MC) in Chiefs of Defence Staff (CHODs) session under the chairmanship of Gen. Knud Bartels (CMC) will take place on 18th and 19th January 2012. Top level military representatives of 67 countries will discuss in various formats the evolution of NATO and NATO led operations, the implementation of the new NATO Command Structure and its military consequences.

Together with NATO’s two Strategic Commanders Adm. Jim Stavridis (SACEUR) and Gen. Stéphane Abrial (SACT), CHODs will debate the situation in Afghanistan and Kosovo and other NATO operations. Regarding Afghanistan, focus will be on Transition /Inteqal and the longer-term perspective for the country. Gen. John R. Allen (COMISAF) and Amb. Simon Gass (NATO Senior Civilian Representative) will update CHODs on the key issues. For the Kosovo session the Military Committee invited Maj. Gen. Erhard Drews (COMKFOR) and Mr. Xavier Bout de Marnhac (Head of EULEX).

The Mediterranean Dialogue Partners and Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council members will exchange views on how to deepen and further military to military cooperation among NATO and its partners, in line with NATO’s new Partnership approach and its aims as described in the NATO Strategic Concept.

The MC will also meet in NATO-Russia Council (NRC) format to discuss the NRC-MR Workplan 2012 and how practical cooperation between the Russian Federation and NATO can evolve over the coming years.

More information on the NATO Military Committee can be found on: www.nato.int/ims

Partager cet article
Repost0
18 janvier 2012 3 18 /01 /janvier /2012 08:45

E-3NATO_SentryNW-source-Shepard-Group.jpg

17 January 2012 - by Beth Stevenson – Shepard Group

A NATO official has called for broader recognition of the value of AEW&C systems within the wider Joint ISR network, as the organisation's C3 agency (NC3A) works on the challenges that its system faces.

Matt Roper, principle scientist and manager NAEW for the NC3A Scientific Technical Support  programme, told the AEW and Battle Management conference in London on 17 January that the NATO airborne warning and control system (AWACS) has already proved that it can carry out an ISR mission, and therefore can be integrated into this larger network.

'System-specific solutions result in a multiplication of effort,' he warned. 'We need to find a better way of executing joint research, to work collaboratively in the future on jointly funded endeavours.'

'We're entering into that network domain now,' he continued, and explained that time has seen migration from a radar picket to a multi-mission capable system.

He highlighted key areas of importance such as training and technology, and said: 'We need to make sure that we harmonise these as we maximise capability; the training piece has to be taken seriously, and there is along way to go'.

Roper described a culture shift for those used to conducting missions of a higher security level to be able to develop into wanting to share information, and training needs to fill them with the confidence that the information being shared is going to the appropriate people.

MAGIC, a NATO capability that sees nine of the nations share data within an 'effective environment' is one path through which AWACS is a 'key area of interest'.

'It is a complex area but an important one to track. There is a way of sharing this data now if you choose to,' Roper said, and the programme is now in its second variant, MAGIC II, which has seen additional sensor data being added to the original GTMI and SAR, and now includes SIGINT and COMINT.

Roper also said that C2ISR is 'under stress' with the problem of decreased size versus increased requirements, and the challenge of emerging technologies and missions.

'We have to think about using systems differently,' he explained, because these nations cannot afford to just buy new ones.

Another challenge is the user being 'drowned in data', but at the same time 'preventing that starvation of information; when bringing that data on board, it has to relevant; you have to be able to use it'.

There is also an effort by NC3A to take 'complex ISR assets' into a non-secure environment, as well as trying to develop a standardised interface between AEW&C assets and UAVs.

Partager cet article
Repost0
17 janvier 2012 2 17 /01 /janvier /2012 13:30
Le Chef d’état-major Benny Gantz va assister à la réunion des Chefs d’état-majors de l’OTAN


17 janvier 2012 Blog Tsahal

Les défis en matière de sécurité seront présentés par le Chef d’état-major Benny Gantz à la réunion du comité militaire de l’OTAN.

Le Chef d’état-major de Tsahal, le Lieutenant-général Benny Gantz, est parti pour Bruxelles aujourd’hui (mardi 17 janvier), dans le cadre de ses fonctions, pour deux jours où il participera à une conférence avec les Chefs d’état-majors des pays membres de l’OTAN. Il assistera à des réunions de travail avec ses homologues du monde entier.

Lors de ces  réunions , le Lieutenant-général Gantz discutera des enjeux en matière de sécurité pour Tsahal et l’État d’Israël, y compris les défis que représentent les menaces régionales. Il sera aussi question de l’importance de la coopération entre Israël et les pays membres de l’OTAN, ainsi qu’entre leurs armées, en matière de lutte contre le terrorisme. Benny Gantz va également prononcer un discours face à ses homologues lors d’une réunion dans le cadre du Dialogue méditerranéen.

Plusieurs officiers israéliens accompagnent le Chef d’état-major dans son déplacement. Il s’agit du Chef du département de la coopération militaire internationale au sein de la branche de planification, le Colonel Hani Caspi, de l’attaché militaire israélien au sein de l’OTAN, le Colonel Uri Halperin ainsi que de l’aide de camp du Chef d’état-major, le Lieutenant-colonel Yaki Dolf.

Pendant son absence, Benny Gantz sera remplacé par son adjoint, le Général de Division Yaïr Naveh.

Le Chef d’état-major Benny Gantz va notamment rencontrer :

    Le Président du comité militaire de l’OTAN, le Général Knud Bartels
    Le Commandant du United States European Command (US EUCOM), l’Amiral James G. Stavridis
    Le Chef d’état-major des Forces armées britannique, le Général Sir David Richards
    Le Chef d’état-major des Forces armées de la Fédération de Russie, le Général Nikolaï Makarov
    Le Chef d’état-major des Forces armées allemandes, le Général Volker Wieker
    Le Chef d’état-major de l’armée française, l’Amiral Édouard Guillaud
    Le Chef d’état-major espagnol, l’Amiral Fernando Garcia Sanchez
    Le Chef d’état-major italien, le Général Biago Abrate
    Le Chef des Forces de défense australienne, le Général David Hurley
    Le Chef d’état-major des Forces armées canadienne, le Général Walt Natynczyk
    Le Chef de la Défense Nationale Grecque, le Général Michalis Kostarakos
    Le Chef d’état-major des Forces armées polonaise, le Général Mieczyslaw Spachowiak

Partager cet article
Repost0
17 janvier 2012 2 17 /01 /janvier /2012 13:15

X-band-AN-TPY-2-early-warning-radar.jpg

 

The X-band AN/TPY-2 early warning radar is part of the THAAD system designed to intercept medium-range missiles at very high altitudes.

MOSCOW, January 17 (RIA Novosti)

A NATO missile defense radar deployed in Turkey has been put into operation, CNN quoted a Turkish foreign ministry spokesman as saying.

The X-band AN/TPY-2 early warning radar is part of the THAAD system designed to intercept medium-range missiles at very high altitudes. It is located at a military base in the eastern province of Malatya, some 400 miles southeast of the capital Ankara, and is manned by both Turkish and U.S. personnel, the spokesman said.

He did not specify when the radar was put into operation. Earlier this month, Turkish daily Hurriyet quoted sources as saying it became operational on January 1.

Turkey is among the five countries that agreed to host parts of a U.S.-European missile defense shield. The others are Portugal, Poland, Romania and Spain.

Ankara and Washington have said the radar will help provide early warning of missile threats coming from outside Europe.

NATO members agreed to install a missile shield over Europe to protect against ballistic missiles launched by so-called rogue states, for example Iran and North Korea, at a summit in Lisbon, Portugal, in 2010.

Russia has strongly criticized NATO’s reluctance to provide written, legally binding guarantees that its European missile shield will not be directed against Moscow. President Dmitry Medvedev ordered in Novemebr a series of measures designed to strengthen the country’s missile defense capabilities in response to NATO’s shield, including the deployment of Iskander missiles in Russia's exclave of Kaliningrad on the border with Poland.

Partager cet article
Repost0
17 janvier 2012 2 17 /01 /janvier /2012 08:55
France Offers Heron for NATO Role - Will Sign Deal To Buy UAV By Year's End

 

Dassault is negotiating with Israel Aerospace Industries on the contract for the Heron TP, which the French company would then deliver to French authorities. (Israel Aerospace Industries)



16 Jan 2012 By PIERRE TRAN DefenseNews



PARIS - France is offering the Heron TP as its contribution in kind to the NATO Alliance Ground Surveillance program, but technical and financial problems related to adapting the medium-altitude, long-endurance (MALE) UAV to French standards are holding up a deal with Dassault and Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), industrial and political sources said.

French Defense Minister Gerard Longuet told the French aerospace journalists' press club that the deal would be sealed by "the end of 2012."

That's later than expected by industry and parliamentary sources, who had thought the controversial contract would be signed before the presidential elections starting in April.

Dassault is negotiating with IAI on the contract for the Heron TP, which the French company would then deliver to French authorities.

"There are many difficulties" on adapting the Heron TP, driving the cost above the 320 million euro ($408 million) budget, a parliamentary source said. An extra 150 million euros each for Dassault and Thales has been estimated for the modifications, the source said.

That would push the cost to 620 million euros, approaching the 700 million euro price tag of a previous Dassault offer of the Système de Drone MALE.

The Defense Ministry has asked Dassault to submit a technical-financial proposal on the Heron TP at the end of the month.

Among the key modifications are a satellite communications link and de-icing equipment, vital to plugging the UAV into the French - and NATO - network and fly in the northern European climate, the industry executive said.

Procurement officials are working hard to make progress on the UAV case, and one option might be to acquire the Heron TP with little or no modification, the executive said.

That might create problems of interoperability within NATO as Paris has offered the Heron TP as its asset contribution, instead of paying cash, toward maintaining the AGS system, the executive said.

Although 13 nations are acquiring AGS, based on the Northrop Grumman Global Hawk UAV, all 28 alliance members help maintain the system in return for access to AGS information.

"The AGS package is still being discussed at NATO," an alliance press officer said. "It is a topic to be discussed in the February meeting of defense ministers."

NATO has long sought to launch the AGS program, intended to provide commanders with a common operational picture.

France has had a troubled relationship with AGS, as Paris looked to gain a big technological role. The planned AGS system relies on five Global Hawks to provide radar and optical pictures of conditions the ground, and a network of transportable ground stations. The UAVs will be based at Sigonella airbase, Italy.

The choice of the Heron TP sparked resistance in the French Senate, which argued for acquisition of General Atomics' Reaper on grounds of cost, performance and interoperability with allied forces.

Longuet defended the choice of the Israeli UAV as "a compromise between capability and a long-term interest for industrial policy," he told the press club.

"We could have found a cheaper, more efficient, quicker solution, but at the [unacceptable] price of long-term dependence," he said.

Longuet denied that most of the contract value would go to IAI, saying that air vehicle is the smallest part of the system, with communication and observation more important.

The government argues that adapting the Heron TP to French needs will help develop competences among about 10 domestic companies in high-value areas, particularly in communications. Critics of the choice say there would be more work for French companies on the Reaper, pitched by EADS and General Atomics.

"No proposition was made by Reaper, which did not want to share, nor to adapt to French standards," Longuet said.

General Atomics did not make a formal offer because France did not send a letter of request, an industry executive said.

In 2010, the U.S. company signed a technical-assistance agreement with EADS detailing its offer, the executive said. The agreement listed modifications, including a communications link developed by French equipment firm Zodiac for the Harfang UAV flying in Afghanistan.

General Atomics also wrote in June 2011 to French Sens. Jacques Gautier and Daniel Reiner, setting out a $209 million offer for seven air vehicles, ground gear and service support.

The government, however, sees Dassault as holding a key position on a strategic roadmap intended to ensure interoperability in observation, surveillance, targeting and air power. That position stems from its work on the Rafale and Anglo-French cooperation, in the government's view.

Longuet said risk-reduction work on the Heron TP would start in 2013.

Dassault and DGA were unavailable for comment.

On a proposed new MALE UAV to be developed with Britain, Longuet urged a pan-European rather than a strictly bilateral approach.

The project "should accept the construction of Europe," he said. "We can't ignore countries with industrial capabilities. We'll probably have an Anglo-French project, which cannot avoid opening to other European partners."

On the Anglo-French cooperation treaty, Longuet said, a new date for a summit meeting would be set for before his birthday on Feb. 24.

"There are no doubts on defense," he said on relations between London and Paris.

EADS and Finmeccanica signed a deal in December to team on UAV development, reflecting wider discontent in Italy and Germany over the Anglo-French defense accord.

France would not develop the EADS Talarion Advanced UAV, Longuet said.

One way of bringing a European dimension into the planned Anglo-French MALE UAV would be to integrate it into the European combat aircraft environment, dominated by the Eurofighter Typhoon and Rafale aircraft, Longuet said.

"If we're intelligent, we should say, 'You British work on Eurofighter with Germany, Italy and Spain, and we'll work on Rafale,'" he said. "It would be good if the MALE UAV were to be compatible with one and the other."

Other Programs

France will buy the A330 Multi-Role Tanker Transport (MRTT) from Airbus "in 2013 for delivery four years later," Longuet said, leaving Boeing out in the cold.

Longuet dismissed previous official denials that Airbus had been chosen as "semantic elegance."

The U.S. Air Force's $35 billion pick of Boeing over Airbus for its KC-X tender effectively shut the door on a French tender.

France is expected to order five to seven A330 MRTT units in a first-batch order that could total 14.

Paris had been considering leasing part of Britain's A330 tanker fleet, but the Libyan air campaign led French authorities to decide they wanted their own aircraft.

On domestic consolidation, Thales would likely take a 10 percent to 20 percent stake in Nexter in exchange for handing over its TDA Armements mortar and munitions business to the land systems specialist, Longuet said.

Thales' holding would be significant but would not leave Nexter "dependent," he said.

Answering a question on anxiety at DCNS, where Thales is raising its stake in the naval company to 35 percent from 25 percent, Longuet said, "Thales is not the obligatory supplier of systems. DCNS can choose its systems."

DCNS makes naval combat management systems, and executives fear Thales will impose its own products, relegating the company to being a platform maker.

Nexter and DCNS had to forge European alliances to compete with companies from emerging economies such as Brazil, but first they had to consolidate their domestic base, Longuet said. Nexter had to look to German partners, as that was where the land sector was strong, he said.

Asked about the health of French defense companies, Longuet said, "Thales is a company necessarily in more peril because it is innovative on creative subjects on a world scale. It is more difficult. It has to take risks and goes through periods of uncertainty."

Regarding arms exports, the 2011 total for France would be around 6.5 billion euros, helped by an Indian contract for modernization of its Mirage 2000 fighters, Longuet said. That compared with 5.12 billion in 2010.

In October, procurement chief Laurent Collet-Billon had told lawmakers in October he expected 2011 export sales to reach 7.5 billion euros.

On export prospects for the Rafale, Longuet said a UAE decision to pick the Rafale would help sell the fighter to Kuwait and Qatar, which want to be interoperable with their neighbor's Air Force.

"They are interested" but would not be the first to commit, he said. "If they think no decision is being made [by UAE], they will look elsewhere."

Kuwait is looking at acquiring 18 to 22 jet fighters, with Qatar potentially 24, industry executives said, according to La Tribune.

The Defense Ministry appeared to harbor worries about Qatar raising its stake in Lagardère, the family-controlled company which owns 7.5 percent of EADS.

"There are fewer problems in football than in military aeronautics," Longuet said. "It's a subject."

But the decision on Qatar's shareholding in Lagardère was up to the Finance Ministry, not the Defense Ministry, he said.

A Qatari sovereign fund holds 10.07 percent of Lagardère stock, making it the largest single stockholder in the French company, and has asked for a seat on the board. Qatar bought 70 percent of the Paris Saint Germain football club for 30 million euros in May.

Julian Hale in Brussels and Tom Kington in Rome contributed to this report.

Partager cet article
Repost0
16 janvier 2012 1 16 /01 /janvier /2012 13:40

http://www.defpro.com/data/gfx/news/652e0e16b26b8ed079d8ed19b267d19d8d6805d9_big.jpg

(Photo: NATO)

January 16, 2012 Daniel Goure, Ph.D. / Early Warning Blog, Lexington Institute – defpro.com

Implementing smart and cooperative approaches needed in age of austerity

Seventy years ago almost to the day the first American military personnel, liaison officers and strategic planners arrived in Europe. They were the vanguard of the millions that would eventually follow to liberate the continent, support Europe’s reconstruction, deter Soviet aggression and win the Cold War. With the demise of the Soviet Union in 1992, the central rationale for the American military presence in Europe vanished. Since then the United States and Europe have been engaged in a “long goodbye.” Now the farewells are about over. As part of the new defense strategy, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta announced yesterday that the United States will be removing two of its remaining four Army brigades from Europe. While Panetta promised that the Pentagon will rotate units into Europe, the underlying reality is that in the future the United States, faced with its own fiscal crisis, will not be able to provide for the security of Europe as it has done in the past.

Today, the future of the NATO alliance and the defense of Europe are very much in doubt. Absent the United States, NATO is very much a shell of a military alliance. Chronic under investment by the majority of NATO nations has resulted in an alliance that, sans the United States, is unable to punch up to its weight. This was demonstrated during the recent Libyan campaign with the lack of aerial tankers, reconnaissance systems, smart weapons and even trained personnel. In a fit of despair, then outgoing Secretary of Defense Robert Gates fumed: “The mightiest military alliance in history is only 11 weeks into an operation against a poorly armed regime in a sparsely populated country, yet many allies are beginning to run short of munitions, requiring the U.S., once more, to make up the difference.” No less a figure than Norway’s Minister of Defense, Espen Barth Eide warned in a recent speech at the Europhile think tank CSIS that “Article 5 is not in such a good shape [...]. I’m not talking about political will, but the actual ability to deliver if something happens in the trans-Atlantic theater of a more classical type of aggression.” This is the reality even before the United States removes forces from Europe, further reduces military capabilities in order to save $480 billion and shifts its focus to the Asia-Pacific region.

In response to the capability deficits highlighted by the Libyan campaign and to the recognition that Europe’s parlous financial situation means there will be no additional resources for defense, NATO is pursuing a program of Smart Defense. As described by the alliance’s Secretary General, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, this is an approach that the United States might well wish to adopt. “I know that in an age of austerity, we cannot spend more. But neither should we spend less. So the answer is to spend better. And to get better value for money. To help nations to preserve capabilities and to deliver new ones. This means we must prioritize, we must specialize, and we must seek multinational solutions. Taken together, this is what I call Smart Defense.”

As the United States implements its new defense strategy and NATO works on its Smart Defense initiative, both should look for ways to harmonize their efforts. The rationalization of the two efforts should be a major theme of the NATO summit in Chicago this May. One way is to expand cooperative arms purchases. Norway’s defense minister specifically mentioned NATO members’ purchases of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter as an example of Smart Defense. NATO should look for similar opportunities in areas such as theater missile defense, unmanned aerial systems and precision weapons. NATO’s last chance to remain relevant is to implement Smart Defense smartly.

Partager cet article
Repost0
13 janvier 2012 5 13 /01 /janvier /2012 08:10

nato

12 Jan 2012 By DAVE MAJUMDAR DefenseNews

NATO's ability to defend member nations against aggression by a conventional enemy force may be atrophying, Norway's Defense Minister said Jan. 13.

"Article 5 is not in such a good shape," said Espen Barth Eide, speaking before an audience assembled at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. "I'm not talking about political will, but the actual ability to deliver if something happens in the trans-Atlantic theater of a more classical type of aggression."

Exercises have shown that NATO's ability to conduct conventional military operations has markedly declined, Barth Eide said.

Not only is NATO's ability to defend its member states questionable, it might actually deteriorate further as financial pressures in Europe and the U.S. force cuts in military spending.

"I think we're getting worse at it because of the many cuts happening in a lot of European countries," the minister said. "If we're not smart, [defense cuts] may lead to a further weakening of the core ability to defend ourselves."

If NATO's core ability to defend itself is weakened, the alliance's ability to conduct out-of-area operations like Afghanistan will also wither away, Barth Eide said.

NATO has to strongly reassert Article 5 of the treaty and the decline of conventional capabilities has to stop, he said. The focus needs to shift away from large armies conducting stability operations to the air and sea, he added.

Norway, however, is bucking the trend with a growing defense budget and modernization programs that have seen the oil-rich northern European power purchase Aegis combat system-equipped warships, new intelligence, reconnaissance and surveillance systems, and eventually new Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II stealth fighters.

"We're purchasing the F-35," Barth Eide said. "Hopefully, we'll get it."

Norway made a "complex set of simulations" which showed that while conventional non-stealthy aircraft like the Eurofighter Typhoon, Dassault Rafale, and next generation Saab Gripen are perfectly adequate for wars like Afghanistan where there is a permissive threat environment, only the F-35 was suitable to fight a high-end adversary. Barth Eide, without mentioning a country by name, said that such a high-end threat existed in Norway's vicinity.

"There was only one aircraft that would do," he said.

Norway has made a "decision in principle" to buy four initial aircraft, and plans a fleet of 48.

Barth Eide said that while such a conflict may not be likely, it is still theoretically possible, and as such, Norway needs to invest in weapons that could fight a sophisticated foe.

Norway advocates the concept of "smart defense", Barth Eide said. Under the concept, nations would pool their resources to become a larger buyer. But the idea is not new; Barth Eide cited the Europeans' F-16 fleet where Norway, Portugal, Denmark, Netherlands, and Belgium cooperate on logistics, upgrades and training together extensively.

The shared experience showed its worth over Libya, Barth Eide said, where it was apparent which allies regularly trained together. However, he said he was not optimistic that "smart defense" could be achieved in the near term.

However, the F-35 program offers the potential for a similar arrangement to be created amongst the European operators of the new stealth fighter, he said. Meetings are taking place among those would-be European F-35 nations, Barth Eide said. The problem, however, is that each nation has its own decision cycles which are not in synch with each other.

Partager cet article
Repost0
9 janvier 2012 1 09 /01 /janvier /2012 12:30

nato

9 janvier 2012 by Nicolas Gros-Verheyde (BRUXELLES2)

 

La leçon de l’inflexion stratégique américaine a été immédiatement tirée par le … ministre britannique de la Défense. Présent à Washington, le jour-même de la présentation par Barack Obama et Leon Panetta, Philip Hammond a tenu, dans un discours prononcé à l’Atlantic Council, à poser ses marques sur la réforme future de l’OTAN. Il explique aussi tout l’intérêt pour les Etats-Unis de garder un oeil sur l’Europe comme de continuer à investir dans l’Alliance Atlantique ; mais il engage aussi les Européens à faire, sans concession, leur examen de conscience, pour réformer le fonctionnement de l’OTAN. De quoi engager publiquement le débat pour le sommet de l’Alliance à Chicago.

 

Le Royaume-Uni, fille ainée de l’Alliance Atlantique


Le ministre a tout d’abord vigoureusement répété son attachement et sa croyance en l’avenir de l’Alliance atlantique. Son discours n’est pas pour rien intitulé « NATO the case for collective defence in 21st Century ». La « défense collective est la seule réponse pratique dans le monde où nous vivons » – explique-t-il – au moment où se posent des contraintes économiques et fiscales. Le fait que d’autres régions du monde voient leur puissance et leur influence augmenter est plutôt une raison de « renforcer l’Alliance Nord Atlantique que de l’affaiblir ». Et l’exemple de la Libye l’a prouvé, l’OTAN reste « le seul mécanisme de coordination réaliste » quand une action multinationale est requise. Faisant appel aux mannes de l’amitié anglo-américaine (de la Magna carta signée il y a 800 ans à Runnymede à la participation de Churchill à la conférence d’Arcadia en 1942), il a répété que la déclaration de Truman en 1949 — sur la sécurité et le bien-être de chacun (qui) dépend de la sécurité et du bien-être de tous — était toujours d’actualité « aujourd’hui » encore. Les intérêts communs l’emportent sur les quelques divergences, a-t-il affirmé. Et de citer la présence de la Royal Navy dans le Golfe d’Arabie pour garder et de l’intérêt britannique à voir sauvegarder les voies maritimes. L’occasion aussi de durcir le ton à l’égard de l’Iran – « toute tentative de fermer le détroit d’Hormuz serait illégale et condamnée à l’échec ». Mais l’essentiel n’est sans doute pas là.

 

Le problème est européen et politique, non pas américain et militaire


Le ministre britannique a reconnu sans ambages : oui il y a un problème européen dans l’Alliance. « Nous devons reconnaître que ce problème existe dans l’objectif de le résoudre ». Et toute une série de questions, soulevées déjà par Robert Gates et Leon Panetta, sur le futur de l’Alliance sont pertinentes, selon lui : « pourquoi l’Alliance doit lutter pour déployer des capacités alors qu’existent une force importante numériquement ? Voyons nous le début d’une alliance à deux vitesses avec certains alliés moins volontaires que d’autres pour participer aux opérations ? Et…  une question à 64.000 $ « combien de temps l’opinion publique de nos nations va investir proportionnellement plus dans la capacité de défense pour subventionner la défense de ceux qui investissent moins ». « C’est le problème des Européens, pas des Américains. C’est un problème politique, pas militaire » a-t-il asséné.

 

Revoir les procédures de l’Alliance


Ce n’est pas une « question d’argent », mais de « priorités », et de faire tomber des barrières. Reprenant une idée déjà développée à Gand par un de ses prédécesseurs, il défend l’idée d’un examen collectif, au sein de l’OTAN, « des réductions déjà planifiées, de leur impact sur les capacités actuelles et de voir comment ces capacités peuvent être soutenues ». Il faut aussi examiner comment les Alliés peuvent agir mieux ensemble pour les opérations hors article 5. Il semble étrange – souligne-t-il – que les nations qui ne font pas partie de l’OTAN peuvent utiliser le quartier général du Shape pour conduire des opérations de l’UE – dans un processus appellé Berlin Plus – alors que les Alliés de l’OTAN ne peuvent entreprendre de telles opérations s’il n’y a pas de consensus à 28. Enfin, il faut voir comment les non-membres peuvent contribuer aux opérations de l’OTAN. « Nous devons capitaliser les expériences de la Liby et l’Afghanistan qui ont montré combien de façon intelligente l’OTAN peut être utilisée pour incorporer les contributions extérieures ». Il défend, enfin, les différentes initiatives multilatérales : le nouveau groupe nordique des Nations – qui inclut outre le Royaume-Uni, les pays baltes et nordiques, l’Allemagne, la Pologne et les Pays-Bas – ; le traité franco-britannique ; les autres partenariats (le Royaume-Uni a signé 3 traités de défense, 26 protocoles (MoU Memorandums of Understanding) (*)

 

Le débat pour le prochain sommet de Chicago est engagé.

 

(*) On admirera l’ordre, respecté, dans lequel Philip Hammond place les différents partenariats…

Partager cet article
Repost0
6 janvier 2012 5 06 /01 /janvier /2012 21:08

nato

 

06/01/12 7s7.BE (belga)

 

Le secrétaire général de l'Otan, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, a salué jeudi l'annonce de la nouvelle stratégie américaine de défense faite par le président Barack Obama, en dépit du fait qu'elle préfigure une réduction de la présence militaire des Etats-Unis en Europe, au profit de l'Asie.

 

"J'accueille favorablement l'annonce du président Obama pour une révision de la stratégie de défense américaine. L'annonce fait suite à des consultations avec les alliés" de l'Alliance atlantique, a affirmé M. Rasmussen dans un communiqué. Il assure "apprécier" la poursuite de l'engagement des Etats-Unis en faveur de la sécurité européenne, à préserver la "force et la solidarité" de notre Alliance et à maintenir la défense collective entre alliés.

 

"Dans un monde imprévisible, l'affirmation par les Etats-Unis que le caractère indispensable de notre partenariat stratégique reste indispensable à la sécurité de tous les alliés est capitale", a ajouté M. Rasmussen. Reprenant les propos du président Obama, il a assuré que les Etats-Unis continueront à investir dans l'Otan "car l'Alliance a démontré à chaque fois - et récemment (lors de son intervention) en Libye - qu'elle représente un multiplicateur de forces".

 

Selon M. Rasmussen, la révision stratégique annoncé à Washington met l'accent sur des capacités modernes, sur davantage de souplesse et sur des partenariats efficaces. "C'est dans la ligne du concept stratégique que nous (les 28 membres de l'Otan) avons adopté au sommet de Lisbonne" en novembre 2010, a poursuivi le secrétaire général, en faisant allusion au prochain sommet atlantique, qui se tiendra les 20 et 21 mai à Chicago, la ville d'adoption du président américain.

 

L'"examen stratégique de défense" présenté par M. Obama privilégie l'arme aérienne et navale pour faire face aux défis posés par l'Iran et la montée en puissance de la Chine, tout en délaissant les longues opérations de contre-insurrection, symboles des années post-2001, comme en Irak et en Afghanistan.

Partager cet article
Repost0
6 janvier 2012 5 06 /01 /janvier /2012 08:20

http://www.lalsace.fr/fr/images/DD1F6535-231B-4195-B71D-362DB6C49DB9/ALS_03/le-general-spindler-passant-en-revue-les-troupes-de-l-eurocorps-hier-matin-a-strasbourg-dans-son-d.jpg

 

Le général Spindler passant en revue les troupes de l’Eurocorps, hier matin à Strasbourg. Dans son dos, le premier contingent qui s’envolera pour Kaboul entre cette fin de semaine et le 18 janvier.

Photos : Jean-Marc Loos

 

05/01/2012 par Hervé de Chalendar - lalsace.fr

 

Hier, à Strasbourg, l’Eurocorps a organisé une cérémonie pour le départ, dès cette semaine, de ses premiers soldats en Afghanistan. En 2012, un tiers du corps sera concerné par cette mission.

 

Sur la place d’armes du quartier général de l’Eurocorps, à Strasbourg, face à la tente des officiels, les militaires rangés au garde-à-vous occupent les trois côtés restants du grand carré de bitume : à gauche, ceux qui partent ; à droite, ceux qui vont partir ; au fond, ceux qui ne partiront pas.

 

En cette année 2012, quelque 300 soldats de l’Eurocorps seront « projetés » en Afghanistan. Ceci représente un tiers des effectifs de ce corps multinational (voir ci-contre). Ils partiront en deux vagues : la première moitié s’envolera entre cette fin de semaine et le 18 janvier ; elle sera relevée en juillet par la seconde, qui restera sur place jusqu’en janvier 2013.

 

En Afghanistan, les membres de ce corps d’état-major seront affectés à des opérations relevant de cette compétence, c’est-à-dire la conduite des opérations. Ils seront essentiellement basés àl’aéroport de Kaboul, mais seront aussi amenés à se déplacer dans le pays. Et, dans tous les cas, forcément confrontés au danger.

 

« Je vous souhaite une bonne année ! Et s’adresser ainsi à des militaires sur le point de partir est bien plus qu’une formule de politesse », lance, au centre de la place d’armes, Arnaud Danjean, président de la sous-commission Sécurité et défense du Parlement européen. « Nous sommes bien préparés, et j’espère qu’il n’y aura pas de pertes, commente en écho le général de division allemand Walter Spindler, adjoint au commandant du corps. Mais ça peut être dangereux… Ça dépendra beaucoup de la performance des forces de sécurité afghanes ».

 

Là-bas, les hommes (et les quelques femmes) de l’Eurocorps retrouveront leur commandant : le général de corps d’armée français Olivier de Bavinchove les a précédés à Kaboul. Depuis près de deux mois, il y occupe le poste de chef d’état-major de la FIAS (Force internationale d’assistance à la sécurité). Il n’est ainsi rien de moins que le numéro trois de cette coalition de l’Otan.

 

Quelques minutes avant la revue des troupes, le commandant a participé à cette cérémonie de départ par le biais d’une vidéoconférence. Il était 10 h 30 à Strasbourg, et 14 h au QG de la FIAS, à Kaboul. Le général a rappelé à ses soldats l’aspect original de cette mission : venir quand le retrait est engagé. Fin 2014, il l’a confirmé, s’achèvera la présence de la FIAS. Et dès cette année, « 26 000 à 27 000 personnes quitteront le territoire afghan ». Or, les exigences, elles, ne baissent pas : il faut plus que jamais « exercer une pression forte sur les insurgés », lesquels « ont de plus en plus recours à des modes d’action indirects ». Conclusion du commandant : « Dire que c’est facile serait mentir… »

 

Mais le général de Bavinchove a aussi mis en avant « l’atout décisif » que possèdent, dans ce contexte, les membres de l’Eurocorps : leur « culture de la multinationalité ». Ce que confirme le général Spindler : « Ici, avec cinq nations cadres au sein de l’Eurocorps, nous sommes habitués à des compromis quotidiens… »

 

Cet art du compromis multinational, c’est aussi, peut-être, la caractéristique des Alsaciens : particulièrement bien représentés au sein de l’Eurocorps, ils seront une vingtaine à se projeter dans cette opération afghane.

 

 


 
Partager cet article
Repost0
4 janvier 2012 3 04 /01 /janvier /2012 18:10

F-4F-Phantom-Luftwaffe-photo-German-MoD.jpg

photo German MoD

 

From today, F-4F Phantom fighters of Germany’s Luftwaffe will take over the NATO Baltic Air Police mission; they are based at Šiauliai AB, in Lithuania. (GE MoD photo)

 

Jan. 4, 2012 defense-aerospace.com

(Source: Ministry of National Defence Republic of Lithuania; issued January 2, 2012)

 

F-4 Phantom of the German Air Force Landed In Šiauliai

 

From today, F-4F Phantom fighters of Germany’s Luftwaffe will take over the NATO Baltic Air Police mission; they are based at Šiauliai AB, in Lithuania. (GE MoD photo)

Early in the evening of January 2 the first four F4 Phantom fighters of the German Air Force landed in the Šiauliai Air Base of the Lithuanian Air Force (LITHAF) to patrol the Baltic airspace for the oncoming four months.

 

On January 4 the official changeover ceremony of the NATO Baltic Air Policing mission will take place at the LITHAF Šiauliai Air Base. After a four-month tour of duty Danish Air Contingent will be replaced by Germans with six F-4 Phantom fighters. The ceremony will be attended by Lithuanian, German, Danish, Estonian, and Latvian military delegates and civilian representatives of the city and district of Šiauliai.

 

Germany will protect security of the Baltic skies for the fifth time.

 

German Military Will Guard Baltic Airspace For The Fifth Time

 

(Source: Ministry of National Defence Republic of Lithuania; issued January 2, 2012)

 

January 4, changeover ceremony of contingents deployed on the NATO Baltic Air Policing mission in the Šiauliai Air Base will be held.

 

Germany’s Air Contingent will replace air assets and personnel of Denmark after four months on guard of the Baltic skies, the incoming contingent will patrol the airspace with six single-seated F-4 Phantom fighters. The ceremony will be attended by Lithuanian, German, Estonian, and Lithuanian military delegates as well as representatives of the city and district of Šiauliai.

German Air Force will provide personnel and assets for the protection of the Baltic airspace for the fifth time.

 

For the preceding two times (in 2005 and 2008) Germans were patrolling with F-4F Phantom, during the third deployment in 2009 Eurofighter jets were used in the first two months and then were substituted for F-4F Phantom. The third shift (from January to April of 2011) was conducted with six F- 4F Phantom fighters.

 

The Air Contingent was delegated for the fifth mission by the Wittmund Air Force Base in Lower Saxony. The shift will include 110 members: pilots, technicians, medical personnel, logistic support groups, communications specialists. Unit of Fire Fighters Service deployed by the Guard Regiment of the German Air Force will also conduct duty during this rotation. The greater part of equipment and inventory necessary for the mission was brought to the Air Base on December 27. Personnel and commander of the regiment will rotate in the course of the four-month duty period. The first shift of military personnel will be commanded by Lt Col Werner Theisen.

 

The outgoing Air Contingent of the Danish Royal Air Force began the NATO Air Policing mission in the Baltic States in September. Denmark has been deployed on the mission for three times already.

 

NATO countries began deploying air personnel and assets to ensure security of the Baltic skies on March 29 of 2004 when the three Baltic States entered NATO. The first rotations of the mission lasted for three months and were taken up by Belgian, Danish, United Kingdom's, Norway's, Dutch, German, US, and Polish troops; in spring of 2006 a four-month duty period was introduced and implemented by Turkey, Spain, Belgium, and France. Later a Portuguese air contingent performed duty for a month and a half, Norway’s, Poland’s, Germany’s and the United States’ air personnel – for three months, and the successive Czech, German, French, Polish and US air contingents – for four months. The outgoing Danish troops have been serving for four months, and so will the German Air Contingent to take over the mission on January 4.

 

On August 31 of 2010 the North Atlantic Council adopted the decision to prolong the Baltic Air Policing mission till the end of 2014. Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia spires to the mission extended till 2018. The fighter-jets deployed in Šiauliai perform quick reaction alert (QRA) functions and maintain readiness to conduct alert take-offs to provide deterrent, combat or other kinds of actions against violators in the Baltic airspace.

Partager cet article
Repost0
2 janvier 2012 1 02 /01 /janvier /2012 18:05

nato

 

January 2, 2012 defpro.com

 

On January 2 four F-4 Phantom fighters of the German Air Force will land in the Siauliai Air Base. German air personnel will replace Danish troops currently on guard of the Baltic airspace with four F-16 Fighting Falcon fighters.

 

The Official date of transfer is January 4. The German air contingent will ensure security of the Baltic skies for the fifth time.

Partager cet article
Repost0
27 décembre 2011 2 27 /12 /décembre /2011 18:00

http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pictures/stock_2010/20100804_100730-awacs_rdax_276x184.jpg

source nato.int

 

BAKOU, 27 décembre - RIA Novosti

 

L'Azerbaïdjan n'a pas autorisé les avions radars AWACS de l'Otan à survoler son espace aérien, rapporte mardi l'agence azerbaïdjanaise APA, se référant à une source gouvernementale.

 

Selon l'interlocuteur de l'agence, l'Otan a demandé à Tbilissi et à Bakou qu'ils autorisent les avions AWACS en provenance d'Europe à survoler leur territoire en direction de l'Afghanistan.

 

"A la différence de la Géorgie, l'Azerbaïdjan n'a pas autorisé le survol de son territoire par les AWACS", lit-on dans le communiqué.

 

Bakou a argumenté son refus par le fait que les AWACS n'étaient pas des avions de transport reliant l'Afghanistan, mais des appareils de reconnaissance.

 

L'agence rappelle qu'un événement similaire s'est produit il y a un an, quand un avion AWACS allemand à destination de l'Afghanistan n'a pas été autorisé d'atterrir à Bakou.       

 

Le système de détection et de commandement aéroporté (AWCS) est un système de stations radar montées sur des avions de guet permettant à la fois de surveiller un vaste espace aérien et de postes de commandement pour les opérations aériennes ou de lutte anti-aérienne.

Partager cet article
Repost0
23 décembre 2011 5 23 /12 /décembre /2011 12:50

Arms_of_Lithuania.svg.png

 

December 22, 2011 defpro.com

 

December 22, the last rotation of personnel before Lithuania’s withdrawal from the NATO Training Mission-Iraq (NTM-I), returned to Lithuania.

 

“It was a big challenge for the Lithuanian Armed Forces and I am very happy that our troops have done their job well and earned superb evaluations by personnel of partner countries and Iraq. Naturally, in this mission our service members have also gained priceless experience which will be useful in training for national defence assignments”, R. Jukneviciene said.

 

NATO Training Mission-Iraq is closed as of December 12 of 2011 by decision of the North Atlantic Council, the supreme decision-making body in NATO, stipulating full withdrawal of all the NATO training personnel from Iraq before December 31 of 2011. The mission with was launched in 2004 involved 23 NATO members and one partner country. NATO will continue collaboration with the Iraqi Government to ensure stability in the region and peace after the termination of NTM-I.

 

Lithuania joined NTM-I in February of 2005. During the period 39 Lithuanian military rotated to train NCOs of the Iraqi Armed Forces and serve in NTM-I staffs.

 

Lithuania took part in the multinational operation in Iraq from 2003. The total of over 900 Lithuanian troops has completed duty in Iraq, the first 8 logistics specialists and 4 military medics were sent in April 2003. Lithuanian military medics provided medical care for locals in two hospitals, one installed in a Spanish warship Galicia in Umm Qasr Seaport, and a civilian city hospital.

 

Logistics specialists of the National Defence Volunteer Force were involved in humanitarian mission in Tallil Air Base, responsibility area of the United Kingdom. Lithuanian military operated special equipment for discharge work, serviced transport aircraft of the allied forces.

 

From 2003 to 2004 Lithuanian troops fulfilled duty at the NATO Combined Joint Task Force (CJTF) headquarters, headquarters of the UK-led Multinational Division in Basra, and headquarters of the Polish-led Multinational Division.

 

From early January of 2006 to the end of January of 2007 Lithuanian staff officers took part in NTM-I in Ad Diwaniyah, the responsibility region of the Polish-led Multinational Division.

 

The most numerous Lithuania’s contribution in Iraq was LITCON serving with the Danish Battalion, the sector under the UK responsibility near Basra in south Iraq, in Al Kuta in eastern Iraq (10 half-year rotations) and LITDET with the Polish Division in Poland’s responsibility area in Al Hillah and Al Kut (5 half-year rotations).

Partager cet article
Repost0

Présentation

  • : RP Defense
  • : Web review defence industry - Revue du web industrie de défense - company information - news in France, Europe and elsewhere ...
  • Contact

Recherche

Articles Récents

Categories