Overblog Tous les blogs Top blogs Entreprises & Marques Tous les blogs Entreprises & Marques
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
MENU
12 décembre 2011 1 12 /12 /décembre /2011 20:40

F22-raptor-photo-USAF.jpg

 

The US Air Force (USAF) has begun an immediate action Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO) on the F-22 Raptor's Emergency Oxygen System (EOS) to ensure full functionality in the wake of its increased usage under current operating procedures.

 

12 December 2011 airforce-technology.com

 

USAF pilots operating the F-22 experienced performance abnormalities on some of the EOS activations, which were analysed and corrective measures validated and verified.

 

The EOS is a self-contained, pilot-activated backup liquid oxygen system mounted on the jet's ejection seat and designed for use during main life-support system failure.

 

The EOS is a precautionary measure to protect pilots when they are faced with air supply problems.

 

The radar-evading F-22 Raptors have been barred from flying above 25,000ft since January 2011 following the crash of a jet in Alaska during a training flight as well as reports about pilots facing oxygen-related problems while flying the aircraft.

 

The fleet resumed flight operations in September 2011 following a four-and-a-half month grounding after mitigating the risk factors associated with the aircraft's oxygen system.

 

The F-22A Raptor is a supersonic, advanced tactical jet powered by dual F119-100 Pratt & Whitney engines, and is designed for stealth and greater cruise speed and agility. The aircraft has been used by the USAF since December 2005.

 

It features a radar warning receiver, information and electronic warfare systems, intra-flight data link, joint tactical information distribution system (JTIDS) link, and an identification friend system.

 

The aircraft, designed to replace the F-15, is armed with AIM-120A and AIM-120C AMRAAM missiles and two 1,000lb GBU-32 joint direct attack munitions (JDAM).

 

The USAF currently operates about 175 Raptors and is scheduled to receive new F-22s from Lockheed Martin.

 

Image Caption:The F-22A Raptor is a supersonic, advanced tactical fighter jet designed for stealth and greater cruise speed and agility.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 décembre 2011 1 12 /12 /décembre /2011 20:00

http://www.defenceweb.co.za/images/stories/RG-31_400.JPG

 

12 December 2011 defenseWeb (Reuters)

 

The defense budget is shrinking, but General Dynamics Corp still sees growing demand for its combat vehicles and warships, coupled with unprecedented opportunities to sell its popular Gulfstream business jets in China and other emerging markets.

 

Chief Executive Jay Johnson, a former F-14 fighter pilot and chief of naval operations, shies away from phrases like "off the charts," but his steep hand gesture depicts a bright future for the commercial aerospace sector, and he's not too worried about the defense outlook, at least for now.

 

In fact, tighter U.S. defense budgets will generate good acquisition opportunities for General Dynamics in coming years, Johnson told Reuters in a rare interview at the company's headquarters in Falls Church, Virginia, Reuters reports.

 

"We don't have time to wring our hands. For us it's all about performing for the customer and delivering to the shareholder," says Johnson, who said the company remained committed to paying strong dividends, but would also keep enough cash on hand to take advantage of possible acquisitions.

 

The company's strategy seems to be paying off, with Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway recently making a significant investment in GD after selling its stake 10 years ago.

 

"It's the Warren Buffett seal of approval, which I think counts for a lot," he said. Buffett has not disclosed the size of his holding, he said.

 

U.S. defense companies are scrambling to cut costs and find alternate revenue sources as they brace for a big decline in spending after a decade of double digit growth.

 

Many analysts consider GD the best-positioned company in the sector, given the mix of its weapons expertise and red-hot prospects for its Gulfstream business, which already has 200 orders for the new GS650 jet entering service next year.

 

STILL GENERATING "CONSIDERABLE" CASH AND EARNINGS

 

Analysts expect General Dynamics, one of the five largest U.S. arms makers, to boost revenues by about $1 billion to over $33 billion in 2011, with sales growing modestly over the next two years. Revenues will be buoyed by an order backlog of over $58 billion and rising international sales.

 

"We still will generate considerable earnings and cash in the defense space," said Johnson, noting GD would benefit from continued demand for upgrades to tanks and other ground combat vehicles, even as U.S. forces withdrew from Iraq.

 

Demand from military commanders would ensure continued shipbuilding sales "as far as the eye can see," said Johnson, who met with top Navy officials in Hawaii last month on the sideline of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation meeting.

 

GD is one of two builders of Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines, and recently won praise from Defense Secretary Leon Panetta for building the latest submarine, the USS Mississippi for $50 million below target and a year ahead of schedule.

 

The company is also "very excited" about the prospects for its commercial aerospace division, Johnson said, adding that demand from emerging markets was fueling growth "in a way that I don't think we've ever seen before."

 

In time, the division could generate about 30 percent of revenues, up from 20 percent now, Johnson said.

 

Analysts say GD's earnings potential is excellent, given growing demand from China and other emerging markets for its Gulfstream jets, which Morgan Stanley analyst Heidi Wood calls "one of the world's sexiest and most respected brands."

 

GD has forecast that operating earnings from commercial aerospace could grow to over 35 to 40 percent of company-wide operating earnings in the next five years, from 20 percent now. Wood says they could reach as high as 50 percent.

 

Not surprisingly, Johnson said he has no plans to sell Gulfstream, despite repeated suggestions from outsiders that the company should sell the unit to monetize its success.

 

In fact, GD plans to invest about $500 million in the Savannah, Georgia plant where it builds the jets, and just opened a new business office in Beijing on December 7.

 

Although Johnson says analysts are "just gaga" about Gulfstream's prospects, he prefers a more measured approach, especially since GD still has to establish relationships in new countries for long-term maintenance of the business jets. "I don't like overdriving our headlights," he says.

 

APPETITE FOR ACQUISITIONS

 

At the same time, Johnson says declining defense spending could generate interesting acquisition opportunities for GD, and the company is keeping sufficient cash on hand to pounce if it sees good prospects in cyber security, health care information technology (IT), intelligence or aerospace.

 

GD in August acquired Vangent, a health care IT company that together with an existing unit, will make the company a top tier provider in that sector, Johnson said.

 

Johnson said GD would use its cash reserves to find companies like Vangent that fit with or enhance an existing business area, or allow it to more into an adjacent area.

 

He declined to give details on how large of a deal might be considered, but said he did not expect mergers and acquisition activity to involve top tier companies, at least for now.

 

At the same time, GD is continually looking for ways to restructure, divest and save money in other ways, Johnson said. Already lean and decentralized, the company has fewer than 200 people at its leased corporate headquarters site.

 

For now, Johnson said he was happy with that structure, and the 13 separate business units GD has, but he said there could those structures could change in the future, if it made sense.

 

As GD braces for defense cuts, Johnson is drawing on his experiences overseeing the last downturn in defense spending while serving as chief of naval operations from 1996 to 2000.

 

Back then, Johnson strongly backed the E/F variant of the Boeing Co (BA.N) F/A-18 fighter jet to ensure that the Navy had sufficient fighters for its carriers, rather than waiting for the development of the Joint Strike Fighter, a new fighter being developed by Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT.N).

 

Johnson says he expects Pentagon officials to pursue a similar approach this time around, with more money to flow into upgrades and incremental improvements than into new programs.

 

The Pentagon has already canceled one big GD program to develop a new amphibious vehicle, the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle or EFV, for the Marine Corps, and it may delay work on two new Army vehicle programs that GD had hoped to bid for.

 

There has been some talk of the Navy slowing work on development of a replacement for the strategic Ohio-class of nuclear submarines, but Johnson said he expects that program to continue, albeit possibly at a slower pace.

 

He said Panetta understands how devastating wholesale program cuts would be for the industrial base, and will keep those issues in mind. "Mr. Panetta gets it," he said. 

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 décembre 2011 1 12 /12 /décembre /2011 18:20

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/base/util/131148_1.jpg

 

Computer-generated imagery of one of several configurations that the US Army is looking at as part of the initial development work on its next-generation helicopters. (US Army imagery)

 

Dec. 12, 2011 defense-aerospace.com

(Source: US Army; issued Dec. 9, 2011)

 

WASHINGTON --- The Pentagon and the U.S. Army are in the early stages of a far-reaching Science & Technology effort designed to engineer, build and deliver a next-generation helicopter with vastly improved avionics, electronics, range, speed, propulsion, survivability, operating density altitudes and payload capacity, service officials said.

 

The Army-led Joint Multi-Role, or JMR program is a broadly-scoped Pentagon effort, including input, officials and working group members from the Office of the Secretary of Defense, other military services, Coast Guard, Special Operations Command and NASA, among others.

 

"Our overall philosophy from a program perspective is to leverage what we are learning from the user communities and establish what technologies will provide the desired new capability. Right now the Future Vertical Lift community is working on developing the capabilities document," said Ned Chase, chief, Platform Technology Division, Aviation Applied Technology Directorate, and science and technology lead for the JMR Technology Demonstrator Program.

 

VISION OF CAPABILITIES

 

Building a helicopter able to sustain speeds in excess of 170 knots, achieve an overall combat range greater than 800 kilometers (combat radius of 424 kilometers) and hover with a full combat load under high/hot conditions (altitudes of 6,000 feet and 95 degrees F) are among the many capabilities sought after for the JMR. Plans for the next-generation aircraft also include having a degree of autonomous flight capability or being "optionally manned," successful weapons integration and compatibility, a core common architecture in terms of next-generation electronics, sensors and on-board avionics, manned-unmanned teaming ability and shipboard compatibility.

 

"We're trying to create a vision," Chase said, referring to the effort to harness technological innovation with a mind to looking beyond current force technology and identifying possible next-generation solutions in a range of areas such as propulsion, airframe materials, rotor systems, engine technology, survivability equipment and Mission Systems, among others.

 

The JMR program, which seeks to begin designing several "demonstrator" aircraft by 2013 and conduct a first flight in 2017 as a series of first steps toward developing a next-generation fleet of helicopters, is a subset of the Pentagon's Joint Future Vertical Lift effort squarely aimed at exploring emerging technologies and best identifying the realm of the possible with respect to future aircraft and helicopter capabilities. The DOD plans to begin fielding a new fleet of next-generation helicopters by 2030.

 

TECHNOLOGY TO YIELD SAVINGS

 

"The JMR Program is a key part of our strategy to modernize vertical-lift capability long term. With current budget pressures, it is critical that a strong industry-government-academia team be fleshing out the technology enablers in integrated relevant contexts to establish a solid case for both the operational and fiscal benefits of these advanced aircraft," said Army Chief Scientist Dr. Scott Fish.

 

"This team will be leveraging not only lessons learned from recent conflicts, but a broad spectrum of Army and DOD basic and applied research investments made in areas which include: engine and driveline efficiency and cost reduction, advanced materials including polymeric and metal matrix composites, sensor/weapon/other payload integration cost reduction, and very high-performance aerodynamic and reliability modeling and simulation. These investments position us well for risk and cost reduction in our vertical-lift endeavors," Fish said.

 

JMR CONFIGURATIONS

 

Planned mission sets for the JMR include cargo, utility, armed scout, attack, humanitarian assistance, MEDEVAC, anti-submarine warfare, anti-surface warfare, land/sea search and rescue, special warfare support, vertical replenishment, airborne mine countermeasures, and others, according a Nov. 9 Joint Multi-Role Technology Demonstrator Phase 2 Mission Systems Demonstration Request for Information, or RFI.

 

The over-arching JFVL efforts span a range of four classes of future aircraft, ranging from light helicopters to medium and heavy-lift variants and an ultra-class category designed to build a new fleet of super-heavy-lift aircraft. The ultra-class aircraft will be designed to lift, transport and maneuver large vehicles around the battlefield such as Strykers and Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles known as MRAPs. The ultra-class variant, described as a C-130 type of transport aircraft, is part of an Air Force led, Army-Air Force collaborative S&T effort called Joint Future Theater Lift, or JFTL.

 

TWO PHASES

 

The JMR Technology Demonstrator effort is broken down into two distinct, measurable phases; phase one includes an 18-month Configuration and Trades Analysis, or CT&A, designed to explore technological possibilities for a new platform or Air Vehicle. Phase one also includes the design, fabrication and test of several demonstrator aircraft, Chase explained.

 

Phase two will be focused on trade studies and the development of mission systems. The idea is to build several "Technology Demonstrator" helicopters as a method of refining and informing the requirements for the new aircraft, requirements which will likely evolve and change as technologies mature and emerge over time, officials said.

 

The JFVL effort, which includes both the JMR acquisition program as well as the JMR Technology Demonstrator effort, is designed to incorporate findings from a series of OSD-led studies and analyses on Future Vertical Lift directed by the secretary of Defense in 2009, including a Rotorcraft Survivability Study, a capabilities-based assessment, an S&T plan and a strategic plan.

 

FOUR INDUSTRY TEAMS

 

The JMR S&T effort, led by the Army's Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center, or AMRDEC, at Redstone Arsenal, Ala., has awarded "concept trade and analysis" deals with four industry teams tasked with examining the set of attributes, designs and technologies needed to build a new, more capable attack or utility helicopter, said Dave Weller, science and technology nanager, Program Executive Office - Aviation.

 

"The real focus of JMR is to get at the three major tenets: improve the performance, improve the survivability and significantly reduce the operating cost. The next-generation aircraft will have to be a whole lot less expensive to operate than the current fleet," Weller added. "Also, a big issue is increasing reliability and shortening the supply chain to get the logistical benefits of commonality of parts. When we did an adjunct capability-based assessment done to identify gaps - we came up with some 55 gap areas. The number one gap was reliability."

 

While the JMR program includes the exploration of light, medium and heavy-lift helicopter variants, the effort will initially focus on medium-lift options.

 

The Army' s Aviation Applied Technology Directorate, or AATD, at Fort Eustis, Va., which leads the execution of the tech-demo effort on behalf of AMRDEC, awarded 18-month Technology Investment Agreements to Boeing, a Bell-Boeing team, Sikorsky and a 15-month contract to the AVX Corporation. The first phase of the process will be for the government and its industry partners to conduct analytical studies and trade assessments designed to articulate the scope of what might be technically possible. These initial findings will help inform the specifications to describe the rotorcraft demonstrator vehicles which will then be built.

 

TWO DEMO AIRCRAFT

 

"Right now the plan is to go through the first phase to define what the state of the possible would be, followed by a down-select to build two demonstrators. The idea is to identify, develop and demonstrate the best trade solution that covers the attribute matrix. The government is doing the same kind of analysis that industry is doing, so we plan to compare our results," Weller explained.

 

Initial results from these efforts are due by the end of next year, Weller said.

 

"We're doing these trade studies to figure out the best way to optimize aircraft. We are working very closely with our user committees who have identified the types of capabilities they would like these future aircraft to have," Chase added.

 

Building a new aircraft from the ground up is part of an overall strategic effort to harness the best new technologies, allow for the platform to be upgraded as new technologies emerge, integrate systems into a common architecture and, perhaps most of all, drive down costs.

 

AFFORDABILITY IMPORTANT

 

Affordability is the utmost priority with the JMR effort, Chase and Weller emphasized. "It is envisioned that some of these novel ideas may not only drive down the acquisition cost, but also allow much easier and cheaper incorporation of upgrades to the aircraft and its systems," the JMR RFI documents state.

 

With these Configuration Trades and Analysis studies, Army S&T has taken the lead in exploring the operational benefit and technical feasibility of advanced vertical lift air vehicles, working in concert with the Army's acquisition and requirements communities, said Mac Dinning, AMRDEC aviation liaison for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology).

 

"While this program is currently wholly funded by the Army, other services are actively participating to define and develop a Joint Service Air Vehicle system that might replace the existing Black Hawk/Seahawk and Apache medium fleet aircraft," Dinning said.

 

PHASE I - Air Vehicle

 

The goal of the JMR S&T program is to leverage the S&T needed to successfully influence the development of a program of record, Weller explained. The program plans to have an approved initial capabilities document by April 2013.

 

The areas of S&T focus on the JMR Technology Demonstrator program span a wide spectrum of emerging technologies from composite materials to electronics and various rotor configurations designed to increase speed without compromising hover ability, Weller said.

 

For example, one of several existing "compound helicopter" technologies under examination is the potential use of a coaxial rotor system. With this technology, the idea is to place auxiliary propulsion technologies or "thrusting" devices at the back end of the aircraft to provide extra speed, Weller explained.

 

Another example of these so-called configurations is to build a helicopter which uses two turbo-shaft engines and two small fixed wings on each side of the aircraft fitted with a pusher-propeller for extra propulsion.

 

TILT-ROTOR TECHNOLOGY

 

Also under examination is the potential use of tilt-rotor aircraft technology such as that currently used for the V-22 Osprey; with this design, the aircraft can reach high speeds in airplane mode and then maintain its ability to hover successfully in helicopter mode.

 

"When you develop capability like these, however, you give up some hover ability. A main focus of the research is to look at ways of increasing speed without sacrificing the ability to hover," Weller said. "Part of the Science and Technology program is to look at different configurations."

 

One of the options being taken up through this effort is the exploration of multi-speed transmission capability, a unique configuration designed to increase speed while avoiding the aerodynamic phenomenon of transonic shock, Dinning explained.

 

"All of the helicopters we develop now are built with a single-speed transmission. We are looking at how we can leverage technology and put in a multi-speed capability," he said.

 

NEW MATERIALS

 

In addition, the new Air Vehicle may contain composite materials and or items now in development, Chase explained.

 

"We are exploring how to get the most efficiency out of the new structure that we can. One way to do that may be by using composite materials," he added.

 

Increasing Air Vehicle speed can shorten the response time for these extended missions or combat radius, a critical necessity for saving lives through MEDEVAC operations, and getting supplies such as food, water and ammo to forward-positioned forces, Dinning explained.

 

"Current helicopter systems are designed to operate for about two hours without refueling. Typical cruise speeds of 140 knots limit the range that these aircraft can operate in," Dinning said.

 

Short of off-loading payload (troops, weapons, cargo) to add extra fuel bladders, extended-range operations must rely on Forward Arming and Refueling Points, or FARPs, where fuel and armaments are pre-positioned. "The Army recognizes the need to reduce the manned footprint of these forward operation positions," Dinning said.

 

Non-linear, asymmetric or counterinsurgency-type environments, such as the current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, underscore the need to reduce the risks associated with having deployed units travel to potentially hostile pre-positioned locations to set up FARPs, he said.

 

Phase 1 will be followed by a Phase 2 extensive Mission Systems and Aircraft Survivability Equipment, or ASE S&T developmental effort.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 décembre 2011 1 12 /12 /décembre /2011 18:00

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/fd/Leopard_2_Evolution.jpg

photo armyrecognition.com

 

December 12, 2011. David Pugliese - Defence Watch

 

This is from Agence France Press:

 

VIENNA — Austria is in talks to sell 40 second-hand Leopard 2A4 tanks back to their German manufacturer after Vienna balked at the Canadian military buying them, a report said Monday.

 

Austrian defence ministry spokesman Michael Bauer confirmed only that talks with the firm, Krauss-Maffei Wegmann, were “going well, although nothing has been signed yet.”

 

The Austrian daily Kronen-Zeitung said the Canadian military had also expressed interest in buying the 15-year-old tanks, which Krauss-Maffei will buy back for $545,280 Cda each and then modernize.

 

 “But that would have meant so much red tape, since the Canadians are fighting in Afghanistan, meaning that the sale would not have been approved,” the paper cited an unnamed army insider as saying.

 

This created consternation among some partners in the NATO military alliance, although “as luck would have it” Canada decided it was no longer interested, the daily added.

 

The paper said Austria bought the tanks for 1.3 million euros each in 1996.

 

Read MORE

 

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 décembre 2011 1 12 /12 /décembre /2011 13:35

http://images.lpcdn.ca/435x290/201112/11/449770-militaires-utilisent-principalement-appareils-type.jpg

photo Presse Canadienne

 

Les militaires utilisent principalement des appareils de type CP-140 Aurora dans le cadre de leurs missions de surveillance, mais l'avenir de ces avions demeure couronné d'un point d'interrogation.

 

11 décembre 2011 La Presse Canadienne Kingston

 

Les forces spéciales du Canada se tournent vers le secteur privé afin qu'il les prévienne de toute éventuelle menace de terrorisme en provenance de la mer.

 

L'organisation ultrasecrète compte tirer profit d'un contrat de surveillance et d'application des règlements de pêche accordé à Provincial Airlines, filiale de Provincial Aerospace, à Saint-Jean de Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador, afin d'avoir à l'oeil les mouvements des bâtiments jugés d'un intérêt particulier, au large de des côtes canadiennes.

 

Dans une note d'information préparée à l'intention de l'ancien commandant des forces d'élite, il est expliqué que le gouvernement compte de nombreux appareils, incluant des hélicoptères militaires et de la Gendarmerie royale du Canada (GRC) utilisés en cas d'urgence au sol, mais que les «options sont considérablement réduites» lorsqu'il est question de menaces maritimes.

 

Les militaires utilisent principalement des appareils de type CP-140 Aurora dans le cadre de leurs missions de surveillance, mais l'avenir de ces avions qui datent d'une trentaine d'années demeure couronné d'un point d'interrogation, malgré les récentes modifications apportées à leur système électronique.

 

D'éventuelles améliorations supplémentaires à ces quadrimoteurs sont matière à débat, selon des sources au sein du ministère fédéral de la Défense nationale.

 

Le ministère des Pêches et Océans confie ses tâches de surveillance au secteur privé du transport aérien, et les militaires financent déjà en partie cette entente, payant pour des heures de vol d'appareils Super King Air 200 basés à Saint-Jean, à Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador, Halifax, en Nouvelle-Écosse, et Comox, en Colombie-Britannique.

 

Provincial Airlines «pourrait combler le vide à un coût minimal» pour le commandement des forces spéciales, peut-on lire dans la note datée du 8 juillet 2010, préparée pour le brigadier-général Mike Day, qui assume aujourd'hui un poste de commandement au sein des troupes assurant la formation de l'armée afghane.

 

Les forces spéciales, largement indépendantes de l'armée régulière, ont depuis fait appel aux services du secteur privé à au moins deux reprises, dans chaque cas pour des missions de formation.

 

Cela reflète une tendance croissante dans les Forces canadiennes. L'aviation a loué des véhicules aériens sans pilote dans le cadre de la mission afghane et a confié à une partie extérieure l'entretien à long terme de certains de ses nouveaux appareils.

 

L'actuel commandant des forces spéciales, le brigadier-général Denis Thompson, a assuré que le recours au secteur privé n'avait rien de préoccupant en ce qui a trait à la sécurité. Il a ajouté que son expertise était utile.

 

«Il s'agit de la plus complexe des opérations quand on y pense», a-t-il affirmé lors d'une entrevue avec La Presse Canadienne.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 décembre 2011 1 12 /12 /décembre /2011 13:20

F35

photo US Navy

 

December 12, 2011: STRATEGY PAGE

 

U.S. Department of Defense officials are trying to slow down production of the new F-35 fighter, because testing is revealing more design problems than anticipated. If the current production schedule remains in place, there is a high risk that very expensive modifications will be needed for F-35s that have entered service. The air force has already ordered 58 F-35s to be produced before all testing is completed, and plans to produce 472 F-35s this way. The Department of Defense is more concerned about the additional costs than the air force, which just wants to get the aircraft into production as quickly as possible. The air force fears that the production orders will be cut even further if the F-35 does not enter service quickly.

 

There are more disputes between the Department of Defense and the air force. For example, the two are trying to agree on what the F-35 will cost. The air force insists that it is $65 million each, while the Department of Defense says when all costs are included; it will be more like $111 million each. Another number being debated is how many F-35s will actually be produced. The air force assumes 2,443 for the air force, navy and marines, but the Department of Defense is not so sure that many will eventually be built. Total development cost is now put at $65 billion, which comes to over $25 million per aircraft if 2,443 are built. Development costs for the new U.S. F-35 fighter-bomber has grown by more than a third over the last few years. The additional development costs are accompanied by additional delays. Current estimates are that the F-35 will enter service in another 6-7 years. The Department of Defense believes production and development costs will continue to rise, and that the number to be built will decline. Both trends increase the average aircraft cost. Based on past experience, the higher Department of Defense estimates are more likely to be accurate.

 

And then there are operating costs. Earlier this year, after months of contentious disagreement, the U.S. Air Force came around to agreeing with U.S. Navy claims that the F-35 will cost much more to maintain, rather than (as the F-35 promoters assert) less. It was over a year ago that the U.S. Navy, after nervously watching as the manufacturing costs of the new F-35C and F-35B carrier aircraft increase, concluded that these aircraft would also be a lot more expensive to maintain. It comes down to this. Currently, it costs the navy, on average, $19,000 an hour to operate its AV-8 vertical takeoff or F-18C fighter aircraft. The navy calculated that it would cost 63 percent more to operate the F-35C (which will replace the F-18C) and the F-35B (which will replace the AV-8). These costs include buying the aircraft, training and maintaining the pilots, the aircraft and purchasing expendable items (fuel, spare parts, munitions.) The navy concluded that maintenance alone would be about a third more.

 

The differences between air force and navy cost estimates came down to different methods of doing maintenance and calculating costs. The two services have, over the decades, developed different approaches to the use of civilian maintenance services and stockpiling spare parts. Most navy warplanes operate from carriers, which is more difficult and expensive than from a land base. In effect, the navy was forced to become more efficient in order to afford operating expensive warplanes at all. But now the air force and navy have resolved a lot of these differences, and agreed that the costs of the "cheaper" F-35 are actually higher.

 

Like the F-22, which had production capped at less than 200 aircraft, the capabilities, as superior as they are, may not justify the much higher costs. The F-35, at least for the navy, is headed in the same direction. The navy can go ahead with the more recent F-18E, and keep refurbishing, or even building, the AV-8. The navy recently began examining the possibility of buying fewer F-35s, in the long run, and replacing them with combat UAVs, like the X-47B. Politics, and lobbying by the F-35 manufacturer, will probably keep the F-35 headed for fleet service, no matter what the cost.

 

The 31 ton F-35 is armed with an internal 25mm cannon and four internal air-to-air missiles (or two missiles and two smart bombs), plus four external smart bombs and two missiles. All sensors are carried internally, and max weapon load is 6.8 tons. The aircraft is very stealthy when just carrying internal weapons.

 

Like the F-22 fighter, the F-35 is stealthy, and is stuffed with lots of new technology. Many of the F-35s built will be used by foreign nations. The rising cost of the F-35 brings with it reluctance to buy as many aircraft as currently planned. The success of smart bombs in Iraq and Afghanistan has also made it clear that fewer aircraft will be needed in the future. In any event, it's likely that F-35s will end up costing more than $100 million each.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 décembre 2011 1 12 /12 /décembre /2011 12:35

http://info-aviation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/super-tucano.jpg

 

12 décembre 2011 par info-aviation

 

L’US Air Force a finalement exprimé sa préférence pour l’Embraer 314 Super Tucano au détriment du Hawker Beechraft AT-6 Texan II dans le cadre du programme d’avions légers de soutien (LAS).

 

L’US Air Force (USAF) a rejeté de son appel d’offres pour son programme LAS (Light Air Support) l’avion d’entraînement militaire présenté par Hawker Beechcraft et quelques partenaires, dont les sociétés québécoises Pratt & Whitney Canada (P&WC), CAE et CMC Esterline.

 

Hawker Beechcraft a dénoncé cette décision et a demandé au Government Accountability Office, l’équivalent américain du Vérificateur général, de la réviser.

 

Les partenaires québécois se sont cependant montrés philosophes.

 

« Évidemment, cette nouvelle nous déçoit, mais il y a d’autres occasions d’affaires pour cet appareil sur la scène mondiale », a déclaré la directrice des relations publiques de CMC, Janka Dvornik.

 

L’USAF avit lancé un appel d’offres pour 35 avions légers de soutien (des appareils turbopropulsés), un contrat évalué à près de 1 milliard de dollars US. Les 20 premiers appareils doivent servir aux forces afghanes alors que les 15 autres doivent être utilisés comme appareils d’entraînement pour les pilotes de l’USAF. Des commandes subséquentes pourraient faire grimper le nombre total d’appareils à 55.

 

Hawker Beechcraft a fait équipe avec CMC, CAE, P&WC, L-3 WESCAM et Lockheed Martin pour présenter l’AT-6, un appareil qui devait être construit à Wichita, au Kansas. Hawker faisait face à un seul autre concurrent : le Super Tucano d’Embraer, présenté par l’avionneur brésilien et la société américaine Sierra Nevada. Embraer a fait savoir qu’elle assemblerait les appareils à Jacksonville, en Floride.

 

À la mi-novembre 2011, l’USAF a informé Hawker Beechcraft qu’elle excluait l’AT-6 du processus d’appel d’offres. L’USAF n’a toutefois pas fourni de motifs et a refusé de rencontrer Hawker Beechcraft pour discuter de la question.

 

« Cette décision nous déconcerte, a fait savoir Hawker Beechcraft dans un communiqué. Cela fait deux ans que nous travaillons de près avec l’USAF. Nos partenaires et nous avons investi plus de 100 millions de dollars pour pouvoir répondre aux critères de l’USAF. »

 

Mme Dvornik a reconnu que CMC avait investi du temps et des ressources, mais elle n’a pas voulu préciser la valeur de cet investissement. CMC doit fournir de l’équipement avionique pour l’appareil.

 

CAE a également refusé de révéler la valeur de son investissement, mais la porte-parole du fabricant de simulateurs de vol, Pascale Alpha, a affirmé qu’il ne s’agissait pas d’une somme significative. Comme Mme Dvornik, elle a fait valoir que cet investissement ne visait pas spécifiquement le contrat de l’USAF, mais l’ensemble des occasions qui se présenteront pour l’AT-6.

 

« Nous continuons à travailler sur ces autres possibilités, a-t-elle déclaré. Nous avons un très bon produit. »

 

CAE est responsable du volet de formation pour l’AT-6. Le motoriste de l’avion d’Hawker Beechcraft, P&WC, a également investi dans le projet d’AT-6.

 

« Nous avons comme politique de ne pas révéler ce genre d’investissement, mais pour P&WC, il s’agit d’un montant non matériel », a déclaré la vice-présidente aux communications de l’entreprise, Nancy Germa.

 

L’entreprise de Longueuil occupe cependant une position particulièrement confortable dans le cadre de l’appel d’offres de l’USAF. En effet, P&WC propulse le concurrent de l’AT-6, le Super Tucano, avec le même moteur, le légendaire PT6A. P&WC a fabriqué plus de 36 000 de ces moteurs depuis le lancement d’une première version, dans les années 60.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 décembre 2011 1 12 /12 /décembre /2011 08:30

http://lignesdedefense.blogs.ouest-france.fr/media/00/02/1475072645.png

 

11.12.2011 par P. CHAPLEAU Lignes de Défense

 

Comme le dit la pre-solicitation n° W560MY12R0001 dans sa version du 9 décembre (cliquer ici pour accéder aux 64 pages de ce document qui détaille la demande), c'est une première pour l'USMC: "This is the first such requirement recognized at a Marine Corps installation that requires a higher force-protection standard. These guards are to perform static security services for the protection of personnel and property on the installation".

 

Le Corps des marines vient de lancer une RFP (request for proposal) au profit de la MEF II (Marine Expeditionary Force). Il s'agit de la protection statique du camp Leatherneck (province du Helmand) et de son dépôt de munitions (Permanent Amnution Supply Point). Puisque, je cite le texte, "les forces armées n'ont pas les ressources humaines suffisantes pour assurer la sécurité des installations", il a été décidé de faire appel à une société de sécurité privée.

 

Quelques points notables repérés dans le document cité plus haut:


- le contrat initial est d'un an, reconductible 4 fois, ce qui le porte jusqu'en 2017,
- la société doit être accréditée auprès des autorités afghanes,
- les effectifs sont des 166 gardes, 10 supervisors et 5 cadres de management,
- l'armement individuel et collectif, les radios, casques et gilets pare-balles sont fournis par les autorités fédérales américaines,
- les gardes doivent être titulaires d'une US Secret Facility Clearance,
- le niveau exigé (formation, expérience, habilitation) fait que seuls les citoyens américains, britanniques, australiens canadiens et néo-zélandais pourront être employés.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 décembre 2011 1 12 /12 /décembre /2011 08:25

USMC

 

December 11, 2011: STRATEGY PAGE

 

After nearly a decade in Afghanistan and Iraq the U.S. Marine Corps wants to get away from being a U.S. Army auxiliary and back to being an amphibious strike force. Talk in Congress about "what do we need two ground combat forces for?" adds to the urgency. The marines have always been sensitive about criticism that they are a second army, a second ground combat force that simply duplicates what the U.S. Army does. In terms of active duty forces the marines are about 40 percent the size of the army. Add in organized reserves and the marines are closer to 30 percent the size of the army.

 

The marines can perform the same jobs as the army but consider themselves mainly an amphibious force trained for assaults and other difficult special operations. These are things the army has also done but the marines invented modern amphibious operations during the 1930s and 40s and continue to specialize in it. The marines noted how the British Royal Marines went on to help develop the modern concept of commandos and went in that direction as well.

 

With all this in mind, in the last decade, the navy and marines have sought to reorganize into 12 ESGs (Expeditionary Strike Groups; i.e., a reinforced battalion of marines and their amphibious ships, including a smaller amphibious aircraft carrier). While not a new concept, the ESG was meant to add some new twists to an old idea. This has been difficult because of the need to send marines to Iraq and Afghanistan. September 11, 2001 came as a surprise to the marines as well and they had to adapt. The marines like to consider themselves good at adapting.

 

The main fighting element of the ESG is a battalion of Marines. In support are a Marine Medium Helicopter Squadron and a Service Support Group. All of these travel on three amphibious ships (an LHA, LPD, and LSD). The rest of the ESG consists of warships (usually a cruiser, a destroyer, a frigate, and an attack submarine.) Supporting firepower will come from cruise missiles and some 127mm (five inch) guns on the cruiser and destroyer, plus attack helicopters. The ESG is also supported by land based P-3 patrol aircraft. The first ESG went to sea in 2003. But because of the need for marines in Iraq and Afghanistan there were not enough marines to keep all twelve ESGs going. To keep the ESGs operational marines follow a cycle with infantry battalions spending nine months ashore, with six months devoted to training, followed by six months at sea with an ESG.

 

There are 27 marine infantry battalion and each ESG is built around a battalion landing team. This consists of one marine infantry battalion, an artillery battery (six guns), an armored car company, a platoon of M-1 tanks, an amphibious assault platoon (operating armored amphibious vehicles), an engineer platoon, and a recon platoon. In all, over 1,200 troops plus helicopters and landing craft from the amphibious ships, along with their troops.

 

With so many marines needed in Iraq and Afghanistan there were not enough trained (in amphibious operations) battalions for ESGs. Now, with fewer marines needed for land operations (Afghanistan), the marines want to train all their infantry battalions to handle amphibious assault and special operations chores. This would allow more ESGs to be at sea. The marines see the Pacific as their main area of concentration. China, and smaller crises in Asia, the Persian Gulf, and Africa, is now the future of the marines. This will kill all that talk of a "second, unneeded, army."

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 décembre 2011 1 12 /12 /décembre /2011 07:55

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/5792431.bin?size=620x400s

 

photograph by: MCpl Danielle Bernier, DGPA/J5PA Combat Camera

 

December 11, 2011. By David Pugliese Defence Watch

 

Around two weeks ago Defence Watch asked Public Works about issues on the Canadian Forces Standard Military Pattern truck program. However, it is still silent about the exact reasons why the program to buy new trucks for the Canadian Forces, already years behind schedule, is back to square one with the government announcement that it intends on reopening the bidding process.

 

The estimated $800-million project to replace rusting 1980s-era military transport trucks was announced in 2006 by then defence minister Gordon O’Connor.

 

The SMP trucks were supposed to be delivered in 2008. The project was considered a priority because the vehicles they were to replace had become a safety hazard, with faulty brakes and excessive rust.

 

But the government has now told companies that the process is being restarted and eight types of trucks that had been qualified for the program are now out. The process is being re-opened for competition.

 

Companies were told that there has been “further refinements in the technical specification” that has “prompted the decision to rescind” the original decision to approve the eight trucks for potential bidding.

 

“This refined approach will ensure maximum competition,” Public Works added in a message to the firms.

 

But why the need for further refinements? And what refinements? There have been a number of refinements over the years, delaying the program each time but what’s with this latest one?

 

The program has now fallen at least six years behind schedule with the first truck to be delivered in the spring of 2014, according to information posted on the internet by DND.

 

The companies are ready to bid….they have been since the early 2000s. But the process has been jammed up for years so there’s not much they can do. Some in industry that Defence Watch has consulted with say the real problem is that there is not enough money for what DND wants. Specifications may have to be watered down, they add.

 

But Julian Fantino – who oversees defence procurement for the Harper government – has a different take on the ongoing delays in SMP, Close Combat Vehicles and TAPV. He blames the companies themselves.

 

“Everything’s moving forward but there’s only so much you can do, there’s only so much the industry can accommodate,” Fantino told Frontline magazine in an interview published in September.”We don’t have the factories ourselves, we have to cooperate with industry and sometimes we are not the only ones on the production line, we have to wait our turn, but we are doing the best we can to expedite some of these assets coming to us as quickly as possible.”

 

Defence company representatives find such claims laughable and question Fantino’s knowledge on the procurement process. On CCV, TAPV and the SMP programs the firms have been ready to go, in some cases, for years. Their production lines are hot – meaning they are already producing vehicles.

 

Any delays have been with government, not industry they say.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 décembre 2011 1 12 /12 /décembre /2011 07:45

http://www.meretmarine.com/objets/500/39332.jpg

 

Le porte-avions américain George H.W. Bush (CVN 77)

crédits : US NAVY

 

12/12/2011 MER et MARINE

 

Le dernier-né des porte-avions américains a retrouvé samedi la base de Norfolk, en Virginie, sur la côte Est des Etats-Unis. L'USS George H.W. Bush achève, ainsi, son premier déploiement opérationnel. Une mission de 7 mois au cours de laquelle il a manoeuvré en Atlantique, Méditerranée, mer Rouge et océan Indien. Le porte-avions est rentré à sa base en compagnie de son escorte, composée du croiseur lance-missiles USS Anzio, ainsi que des destroyers lance-missiles USS Truxtun, USS Mitsher et USS. Le croiseur USS Gettysburg, qui appartenait également au George H.W. Carrier Strike Group (GHWB CSG) a, quant à lui, regagné sa base de Mayport (Floride).


Le George H.W. Bush rentrant à Norfolk (© : US NAVY)

Dixième et dernière unité du type Nimitz/Theodore Roosevelt, le CVN 77 a été mis sur cale en 2003 aux chantiers Huntington Ingalls Industries de Newport News et remis à l'US Navy en janvier 2009. S'en est suivie une longue période d'essais, 7 mois d'arrêt technique et une montée en puissance progressive de l'équipage et du groupe aérien embarqué, sans compter la capacité du navire à s'intégrer dans un groupe aéronaval. Une fois opérationnel, le bâtiment avait quitté Norfolk le 11 mai dernier pour son premier grand déploiement, dans les zones de responsabilité des 5ème et 6ème flottes.


Long de 333 mètres pour un déplacement de 98.000 tonnes en charge, le navire, armé par 5600 marins, peut embarquer 68 avions et hélicoptères. Il dispose de deux réacteurs à eau pressurisée fournissant une puissance de 205 MW et assurant une vitesse maximale de 31 noeuds. Pour son autodéfense, le CVN 77 compte, en plus de sa chasse embarquée, deux lanceurs verticaux (24 missiles ESSM) et deux systèmes surface-air à courte portée RAM.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 décembre 2011 1 12 /12 /décembre /2011 07:20

http://cdnpullz.defencetalk.com/wp-content/themes/dtstyle/scripts/timthumb.php?src=http://www.defencetalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/F-35-JSF-eglin-afb.jpg&w=375&h=245&zc=1

 

December 12th, 2011 By POGO, DEFENCE TALK

 

Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta has some explaining to do on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, according to Senators Carl Levin (D-MI) and John McCain (R-AZ), respectively, the chair and ranking member of the powerful Senate Armed Services Committee. Both those Senators sent a letter to Panetta on December 6, one day after McCain called the JSF "both a scandal and a tragedy" on the Senate floor.

 

The Senators ask Panetta to personally “ensure the safety and adequacy” of F-35 operational training, according to a letter by the Senators obtained by POGO. The letter also chastises the Air Force for dismissing a warning from the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation that the current plan for unmonitored flight training of the F-35 “risks the occurrence of a serious mishap.”

 

The Air Force and JSF Joint Program Office justified their dismissal of Gilmore’s concerns by arguing that they adequately conducted “risk acceptance and mitigation in the context of planned training scope and limitations, while also considering the seniority of the initial cadre of pilots.”

 

Dismayed by this response to Gilmore’s concerns, the Senators write that “A viable response must do more than assert that experienced pilots and limited training goals mitigate risk.”

 

The Senators stressed that it was still unclear if the safety concerns raised by Gilmore would be resolved before operational training begins, and, most importantly, asked for Panetta’s assurance that this was the case. The letter specifically asks Panetta to answer five questions related to training and safety.

 

Gilmore, Levin, and McCain’s concerns also got major validation this week as well when the Air Force did an about face on whether the F-35 was ready for flight training. As Inside Defense reported on Monday, the Air Force now agrees that there are still “outstanding risks associated with the Joint Strike Fighter flight training” and “there is no pressure to initiate training prematurely.”

 

Nonetheless, Panetta’s response to these questions will reveal much about his ability to objectively evaluate the agency he commands. Given the F-35’s history of technical problems and cost-overruns, why take more risks by putting the cart before the horse? Panetta has an excellent opportunity to show that he can push back against JSF proponents that would have the plane fly straight into training regardless of cost or safety consequences.

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 décembre 2011 6 10 /12 /décembre /2011 17:45

http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2011/12/C130%20slide-thumb-560x421-148608.jpg

 

December 2, 2011 By Stephen Trimble - The DEW Line

 

Lockheed Martin has quietly launched two new variants of the 57-year-old (and counting!) C-130 Hercules. The C-130XJ and the C-130NG both appeared in a presentation by Ralph Heath, executive vice president of Lockheed's Aeronautics division, on 1 December at the Credit Suisse aerospace and defense conference in New York.

 

Few details of both configurations have been made available so far. The C-130XJ is aimed at the export market, and is designed to make the aircraft affordable to a broader set of foreign buyers, Heath said. The "X" in the designation stands for "expandable", Heath added, and buyers can upgrade to the C-130J's full capability.

 

It appears the C-130NG, which includes winglets and a redesigned nose and tail, will be offered after 2020 to replace the C-130H fleet. See a comparison between the old and new versions of the C-130J and C-130NG below.

 

http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2011/12/02/C130%20old%20and%20new.jpg

 

Nearly 60 years has passed since Lockheed designer Willis Hawkins first unveiled the C-130 design. His legendary boss, Clarence L. "Kelly" Johnson, instantly hated the aircraft, warning Lockheed chief engineer Hal Hibbard the C-130 would "ruin" the company. Johnson was right about many things, such as his designs for the U-2 and SR-71, but he was completely wrong about the C-130. Rather than ruining the company, the C-130 series will be produced for at least 65 years, and possibly longer.

 

In the last several years, the C-130's reign over the tactical airlift market has been challenged like never before. The Airbus Military A400M and Kawasaki C-2 offer a larger platform as airlift demand increases, although the latter is forbidden to be sold outside of Japan. Meanwhile, the Embraer KC-390 and the Antonov An-178 are designed to compete directly against the C-130, albeit with a jet-powered aircraft.

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 décembre 2011 6 10 /12 /décembre /2011 17:35

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f0/USSChafeeDDG-90.jpg

photo US Navy

 

December 9, 2011 Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility Public Affairs - defpro.com

 

PEARL HARBOR | More than 600 new light emitting diode (LED) lighting fixtures were installed on USS Chafee (DDG 90) during the ship's recently completed availability, providing the ship with longer-lasting lights that use less electric power than the replaced incandescent and fluorescent light fixtures.

 

The new fixtures have a minimum 50,000-hour lifespan compared to the 1,000-hour incandescent globes and 7,500-hour fluorescents. The ship is expected to save more than $50,000 per year using the new lights.

 

"The longer lifespan also results in a huge amount of savings in regards to maintenance," said Ben Hatch, electrical engineer at the Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division - Ship Systems Engineering Station in Philadelphia, who oversaw the installation. "LEDs last 50 times longer than the incandescent meaning the lights only need to be replaced every six years compared to what was every other month."

 

USS Chafee is the first ship to receive all new lighting fixtures. In early 2012, USS Preble (DDG 88) is expected to receive the same fixtures, as well as LED bulb replacements for the ship's two-foot fluorescent fixtures, which are the most common lighting on DDG 51 class ships.

 

"The T12 fluorescent fixtures will just be a bulb replacement instead of the entire fixture," said Hatch. "The cost savings will be even greater because the entire fixture does not need to be replaced."

 

Savings are expected to exceed $100,000 per ship per year when the scope is expanded to include the T12 fluorescent fixtures in the backfit program.

 

The Naval Sea Systems Command will continue installing the fixtures aboard in combatant and amphibious ships over the next several years as part of the Navy's maritime energy strategy.

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 décembre 2011 6 10 /12 /décembre /2011 14:11

http://www.defensenews.com/pgf/stories89/120811-f35a-lightning-315.JPG

 

The Pentagon awarded Lockheed Martin a $4 billion contract to produce 30 more F-35 Joint Strike Fighters for the U.S. Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps. (Lockheed Martin)

 

9 Dec 2011 By CHRISTOPHER P. CAVAS Defensenews

 

Lockheed Martin has been awarded a $4 billion contract to produce 30 more F-35 Joint Strike Fighters for the U.S. Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps, the Pentagon announced Dec. 9.

 

The fixed-price-incentive (firm target) contract provides for 21 F-35A conventional take off and landing (CTOL) Lightning IIs for the Air Force, three F-35B short-take off and vertical landing (STOVL) aircraft for the Marines, and six F-35C carrier variants for the Navy.

 

All the aircraft are being procured under low-rate initial production Lot V.

 

Broken down by service, two-thirds of the value of the contract - $2.65 billion - is for the Air Force; $937 million, or 23 percent, for the Navy; and $426 million, or nearly 11 percent, for the Marine Corps.

 

The contract also provides for "associated ancillary mission equipment and flight test instrumentation" for the planes, and flight test instrumentation for the United Kingdom.

 

The contract was awarded through the Naval Air Systems Command.

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 décembre 2011 6 10 /12 /décembre /2011 14:10

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ab/Army_General_Martin_E._Dempsey%2C_CJCS%2C_official_portrait_2011.jpg/480px-Army_General_Martin_E._Dempsey%2C_CJCS%2C_official_portrait_2011.jpg

photo US DoD

 

9 Dec 2011 By MARCUS WEISGERBER and ZACHARY FRYER-BIGGS Defensenews

 

The defense industrial base needs to become flexible, open to change and create versatile weapons, particularly as planned defense spending reductions near, the top U.S. military officer said.

 

At a Dec. 9 Atlantic Council event in Washington, Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, expressed concern whether the defense industrial base would be able to adapt to the military's changing needs.

 

"But it's … part of the force that is least likely to be open to change," he said of the defense industry. "There's a fact of life that I'm sorry I had to confront you all with, but that is the challenge."

 

Instead, Dempsey called for weapon manufacturers to develop multi-mission equipment.

 

"What you really want coming down the assembly line is something that can turn out and be a Swiss Army knife, not a stiletto," he said.

 

In response to Dempsey's comments, Fred Downey, vice president for national security at the Aerospace Industries Association, said the Pentagon needs to present industry with a strategy.

 

"It's absolutely crucial that the Pentagon have a defense industrial base strategy," he said, noting industry is taking steps to become more efficient and flexible in the manufacturing process. "The idea that you can, in fact, have this kind of turn-on-a-dime flexibility is just not compatible with the requirements of industry, nor of the private sector.

 

"At least 50 percent of the problem that the general has raised, I don't want to be defensive about it, is back on the Pentagon," he said. "They have to have a strategy."

 

Although the DoD is facing a more-than $450 billion cut to planned spending over the next decade, Dempsey said he is pleased with unrelated comprehensive military strategy work being done inside the Pentagon to inform those cuts.

 

"I'm actually quite encouraged that we've got strategy slightly in the lead of our budget decisions," he said, noting spending decisions will not be locked until early February.

 

The strategy decisions being made now "can aspire to something that's bold" in the 2020 timeframe, Dempsey said. This could include changes to the Pentagon's Unified Command Plan.

 

But future cuts might be coming. Last month, a bipartisan congressional panel was unable to find areas to cut government spending by $1.2 trillion over the next decade, prompting sequestration. DoD's share of these cuts are about $600 billion over 10 years.

 

The cuts do not go into effect until January 2013, meaning Congress could write legislation reducing or eliminating them. That said, DoD has yet to begin planning for such cuts.

 

"We just literally have not had the intellectual bandwidth to think about and to do any of the analytics related to sequester," Dempsey said, noting the Pentagon is focused on the mandatory $450 billion in defense spending reductions.

 

"We're not overly concerned to start the work yet on sequestration because I want make sure that we get this particular effort right … and then we'll have time to deal with it if it becomes a reality," he said.

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 décembre 2011 6 10 /12 /décembre /2011 14:05

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/fr/thumb/7/78/Francfort_BCE_Euro.jpg/457px-Francfort_BCE_Euro.jpg

photo khardan

 

9 Dec 2011 Defensenews (AFP)

 

WASHINGTON - Top U.S. military officer Gen. Martin Dempsey said Dec. 9 he was "extraordinarily concerned" about the euro's viability due to the potential for civil unrest and the breakup of the European Union.

 

"The eurozone is at great risk," the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff told reporters, saying it was unclear whether measures taken so far "will be the glue that holds it together."

 

"We are extraordinarily concerned by the health and viability of the euro because in some ways we're exposed literally to contracts but also because of the potential of civil unrest and breakup of the union that has been forged over there," Dempsey added.

 

 

His comments came as EU leaders banded together to back tighter budget enforcement with 26 of the 27 members signaling their willingness to join a" new fiscal compact" to resolve the crisis. But a Franco-German drive to enshrine new budget rules in a modified EU treaty failed, when non-euro Britain refused to go along.

 

The U.S. military is revising its strategy to adapt to budgetary cuts designed to reduce the ballooning U.S. deficit. Dempsey, the president's top military adviser, spoke about his concerns for the euro as he discussed the strategic risks posed in different parts of the world.

 

In a study published Thursday, the Council on Foreign Relations ranked the eurozone among the main threats facing the United States. It pointed to a risk of "intensification of the European sovereign debt crisis that leads to the collapse of the euro, triggering a double-dip U.S. recession and further limiting budgetary resources."

 

Other countries identified as priorities for U.S. national interests included China, Iran, North Korea, Mexico, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 décembre 2011 6 10 /12 /décembre /2011 14:03

http://www.defensenews.com/pgf/stories28/120911-f22-raptor-315.JPG

 

An F-22 Raptor awaits release from a hangar at Holloman Air Force Base, N.M., in September.

(Senior Airman DeAndre Curtiss / U.S. Air Force)

 

9 Dec 2011 By DAVE MAJUMDAR Defensenews

 

The U.S. Air Force is inspecting the emergency oxygen system on its F-22 Raptor air-superiority fighters.

 

Colloquially referred to as the "green apple" by pilots, the system is a self-contained supply of liquid oxygen mounted on the jet's ejection seat and is used in case there is a failure of the main life-support system. By necessity, it is separate from the aircraft's main oxygen systems, which have been under investigation for much of the year due to a string of airborne incidents where pilots have experienced symptoms resembling hypoxia.

 

"The Air Force is implementing an immediate action time compliance technical order (TCTO) on the F-22 backup oxygen system," a Dec. 8 Air Combat Command (ACC) release said. "This system is known as the Emergency Oxygen System (EOS) and is designed to be used on rare occasions when pilots experience indications or physiological symptoms that suggest there may be a problem with their air supply."

 

Air Force spokesman Scott Knuteson said that since the Raptor fleet returned to the air in September after a four-month grounding, pilots has been using the backup system more often than usual.

 

"We have adapted procedures to use the EOS as a precautionary measure to further protect pilots when they receive indications that physiological incidents may occur," the release reads.

 

However, even then the emergency oxygen system has not been used that often since the jets started flying again, Knuteson said. The pilots only use the system if a problem is detected, he said.

 

"We have used the EOS on less than one percent of the flights since we returned to flying status and experienced performance anomalies on a small number of EOS activations," the ACC statement reads. "These anomalies have been analyzed by technicians, and corrective measures have been validated and verified."

 

The inspection was ordered "simply as a prudent step to ensure the full functionality of the EOS given increased usage under current operating procedures," the ACC statement reads.

 

"As of Dec. 7, approximately 85 percent of the F-22s' EOS bottles had been inspected," Knuteson said. "The main focus of the TCTO is inspecting the EOS bottles and returning them to service."

 

In the meantime, Lockheed Martin is still delivering new Raptors to the Air Force. One of the newest jets was supposed to arrive at Langley on Dec. 8, but was delayed and will now arrive next week, said Lockheed Martin spokeswoman Alison Orne.

 

The service currently has 175 Raptors. Of the remaining aircraft to be delivered to the service, tail numbers 4186, 4187, 4189, 4191, 4192 and 4194 will be delivered to Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Va., tail 4188 will be delivered to Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada, while tails 4190, 4193 and 4195 - the last Raptor to be built - will be delivered to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska.

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 décembre 2011 6 10 /12 /décembre /2011 13:40

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/28/SM-3-launch-USS_Shiloh-20060622.jpg

SM-3 launch from the USS Shiloh, 2006 - photo USNavy

 

December 9, 2011 defense-aerospace.com

(Source: U.S Department of Defense; issued December 8, 2011)

 

The Missile Defense Agency is announcing the award of a sole-source modification to its cost-plus-incentive-fee contract (N00027-07-C-6119) with Raytheon Missile Systems Co., Tucson, Ariz.

 

The modification will exercise an option to procure material for the Standard Missile-3 Block IB missiles.

 

The total value for this modification is $35,000,000, increasing the total contract value from $1,569,089,651 to $1,604,089,651.

 

The period of performance for this contract action is from December 2011 through May 2012. The work will be performed in Tucson, Ariz. Fiscal 2011 Research, Development, Test and Evaluation funds will be used to fully fund this effort. Contract funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year.

 

The Missile Defense Agency, Dahlgren, Virginia, is the contracting activity.

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 décembre 2011 6 10 /12 /décembre /2011 13:36

http://alliancegeostrategique.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/rapport-CSIS.png

 

Décembre 9, 2011 – par JPG - Chronique industrie

 

Alors que le Pentagone pourrait avoir à réduire son budget de près de 450 milliards de dollars dans les dix prochaines années, les industriels de défense américains s’inquiètent pour leurs débouchés. Et certains anticipent une phase de consolidation après une décennie d’explosion du nombre des fournisseurs américains dans le domaine des services.


L’heure est grave. Les defense contractors n’apprécient pas les nouvelles orientations de l’administration américaine en ce qui concerne les achats d’armements, et ils le font savoir.

 

 

Dans une lettre commune à Leon Panetta, patron du DoD, une centaine d’entreprises, sous la coordination de l’Aerospace Industries Association, le pressent de renoncer aux changements qu’il promeut dans les pratiques de contractualisation : transfert de risques sur elles dans le cadre de développement d’armes, pression sur les marges, suspension de certains programmes si le fournisseur de se soumet pas à la nouvelle politique. En cette période de budget très contraint, même pour les Etats-Unis, certains analystes affirment que les pouvoirs publics de l’Oncle Sam se sont lancés dans la « guerre du profit ».

 

Les industriels insistent sur le fait que le modèle actuel de répartition du risque financier est pour beaucoup dans le leadership technologique des Etats-Unis, et se montrent pessimistes (pour eux) sur les impacts des changements proposés :

The department’s proposed changes to this model will have significant competitive, financial, and employment implications (especially for small- and medium-sized suppliers) that we do not believe have been fully considered by the government or by the Congress

En face, Shay Assad, responsable de la politique achat et pricing du DoD, nie toute mauvaise intention ou changement radical, en précisant qu’il ne s’agit que de favoriser la concurrence et de motiver les industriels à diminuer leur structure de coûts, mais en maintenant un niveau de profit acceptable pour eux. Il se veut rassurant face aux investisseurs :

We don’t want situations where we’re asking companies to take an unreasonable risk. The idea that there is a new policy going on here, it’s just not true.

Il reconnaît cependant que la Defense Contract Management Agency connait une petite révolution, notamment au travers de l’embauche de 350 experts des achats. Ceci a permis la mise en œuvre d’une base de données assez complète destinée aux responsables de programmes, et leur donnant une vision précise de a structure des coûts de l’ensemble des fournisseurs du Pentagone. Et donc de ce que devrait être le « coût réel » d’un programme. Ce qui finalement n’est qu’une remise à niveau par rapport aux standards en vigueur dans la plupart des directions achats du secteur privé… et la base de toute négociation sérieuse.

 

Ceci ne suffit pas à rassurer une industrie, habituée à un client public fort dispendieux, qui s’inquiète pour son avenir à moyen terme. Si les débouchés immédiats sont sécurisés (les budgets étant largement calés à aujourd’hui), ce n’est pas le cas au-delà de quelques années :

With the current budget set and next year’s “largely established,” contractors are “about 21 / 2 years away from any real impact,” said Mark DeYoung, president and chief executive of ATK, which specializes in producing ammunition and rockets. “Beyond that, there’s a lot of uncertainty. . . so I won’t try to predict what happens 21 / 2 years from now.”

D’autant que le Pentagone (sacrilège !) veut injecter plus de concurrence parmi ses fournisseurs, qui selon Mark Skinner, adjoint militaire du patron des achats de l’US Navy, est le principal levier d’optimisation des coûts :

We have a big hammer, which is competition, and then we have a teeny-weeny screwdriver, which is award fees

Face à cet état de fait, certains (mais c’est le cas dans tous les secteurs, donc pas vraiment un scoop !) ont commencé à réduire leurs frais de structure et leurs fonctions support. Mais la recherche de nouveaux marchés se fait également pressante. Le mois dernier j’évoquais dans ces colonnes l’attrait (plus vraiment nouveau) pour le cyberespace (Le cyberespace, nouvel Eldorado des industriels de défense ?), domaine très prometteur, même s’il n’est pas a priori à lui seul à même de compenser des réductions de coûts annoncées.

 

Les analystes de Booz Allen Hamilton estiment qu’une part importante de la base industrielle de défense pourrait disparaître, car une part importante des dépenses se déplacent des investissements en R&D vers des services et du soutien pour des systèmes et plateformes existants.

Military investment spending on new acquisitions and R&D is expected to decline from a high of US$253 billion in 2008 to a projected $125 billion in 2016. With backlogs continuing to erode, underinvestment in R&D threatens to create a hollow industrial base lacking the essential capabilities to develop innovative technologies and build new weapons systems

Ce qui déplace les cibles potentielles vers les petits fournisseurs de services. Le rapport «Structure and Dynamics of the U.S. Federal Services Industrial Base 2000-2010 » du Center for Strategic and International Studies publié en novembre 2011 montre clairement que les services ont prospéré depuis le début des années 2000, aidés en cela par les budgets dédiés aux opérations en Afghanistan et en Irak. Ainsi les fournisseurs de services du Pentagone sont passés de 60 000 à 157 000 (dont 115 000 PME) entre 2000 et 2010. Sachant que le Top 5 (Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, Raytheon, General Dynamics) pesait environ 20% des quelques 200 milliards du gâteau global en 2010. Il est intéressant de noter que les 3 premiers, tels que nous les connaissons aujourd’hui, sont issus de rapprochements post Guerre Froide, d’ailleurs sur la chaude recommandation du  DoD, qui à l’époque (mais ils étaient alors surtout des constructeurs et équipementiers) leur prédisait une alternative simple, la consolidation ou la mort :

  • Northrop a fusionné avec Grumman
  • MCDonnell Douglas a intégré Boeing
  • GE Aerospace est devenu une partie de Martin Marietta, plus tard intégré à Lockheed Martin

Le paysage dans le domaine des services est aujourd’hui très éclaté, avec un très grand nombre de tous petits contrats, conclus et réalisés localement. Et la tentation est forte aujourd’hui, pour les contractors de rang 1, de récupérer en interne tout ce pan du marché qui leur échappe. Hors du fait de leurs frais de structure, ils ont du mal à être compétitifs sur les tous petits engagements : 75% des fournisseurs sur les contrats à moins de 25k$ sont des PME. D’où la tentation des géants de procéder à une concentration capitalistique, moyen pour eux d’éviter la concurrence…

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 décembre 2011 6 10 /12 /décembre /2011 13:32

http://www.aviationweek.com/media/images/defense_images/Fighters/F-35-AF-3-stealth-coatings-LockMart.jpg

Lockheed file photo

 

Dec 9, 2011 By Jen DiMascio - AviationWeek.com

 

WASHINGTON - While the nation’s top uniformed officer says the U.S. military is committed to developing a fifth-generation fighter jet, he indicates that the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter may be on a path to a slowdown.

 

“There are some fact-of-life changes that we’ll probably have to make based on the ability to procure on the time lines that we’d like to have,” Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said during a Dec. 9 event sponsored by the Atlantic Council.

 

U.S. funding problems could be exacerbated by economic woes across the Atlantic Ocean, he adds. If the euro zone collapses, “they’d have to make some national decisions about reallocation of resources that could potentially have to affect the JSF,” he says.

 

Dempsey, who has been studying up on economic policy at West Point and the U.S. Federal Reserve, says he is still knee-deep in planning current and future Pentagon budgets.

 

In the near term, strategic changes are “not incremental, nor are they something I’d describe as bold,” he says; rather, he called the changes “significant.”

 

He is building toward bolder changes by 2020 that will not be rolled out during this budget cycle, posing hypothetical overhauls, such as making Special Operations Command the global combatant command.

 

Dempsey stopped short of describing details of either the Pentagon’s ongoing strategic review or the potential effects of steep, congressionally directed budget cuts on the military.

 

To that end, the military, he says, received notice of more than $450 billion in long-term reductions only eight or nine weeks ago. “We just literally have not had the intellectual bandwidth to think about it and to do any of the analytics related to sequester.”

 

He says the military is looking at rebalancing and how to remain capable on many fronts in an era of lower budgets. “Everything we do is in the context of understanding the economic condition of our nation and understanding that our national power is the sum of military, economic and diplomatic power. You can’t ignore that fact,” Dempsey says. “We’re looking at what we can afford to do.”

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 décembre 2011 6 10 /12 /décembre /2011 09:00

JSF-F35-photo-USAF.jpg

photo USAF

 

December 8, 2011 defense-aerospace.com

(Source: Project On Government Oversight; issued December 8, 2011)

 

Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta has some explaining to do on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, according to Senators Carl Levin (D-MI) and John McCain (R-AZ), respectively, the chair and ranking member of the powerful Senate Armed Services Committee. Both those Senators sent a letter to Panetta on December 6, one day after McCain called the JSF "both a scandal and a tragedy" on the Senate floor.


The Senators ask Panetta to personally “ensure the safety and adequacy” of F-35 operational training, according to a letter by the Senators obtained by POGO. The letter also chastises the Air Force for dismissing a warning from the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation that the current plan for unmonitored flight training of the F-35 “risks the occurrence of a serious mishap.”

The Air Force and JSF Joint Program Office justified their dismissal of Gilmore’s concerns by arguing that they adequately conducted “risk acceptance and mitigation in the context of planned training scope and limitations, while also considering the seniority of the initial cadre of pilots.”

Dismayed by this response to Gilmore’s concerns, the Senators write that “A viable response must do more than assert that experienced pilots and limited training goals mitigate risk.”

The Senators stressed that it was still unclear if the safety concerns raised by Gilmore would be resolved before operational training begins, and, most importantly, asked for Panetta’s assurance that this was the case. The letter specifically asks Panetta to answer five questions related to training and safety.

Gilmore, Levin, and McCain’s concerns also got major validation this week as well when the Air Force did an about face on whether the F-35 was ready for flight training. As Inside Defense reported on Monday, the Air Force now agrees that there are still “outstanding risks associated with the Joint Strike Fighter flight training” and “there is no pressure to initiate training prematurely.”

Nonetheless, Panetta’s response to these questions will reveal much about his ability to objectively evaluate the agency he commands. Given the F-35’s history of technical problems and cost-overruns, why take more risks by putting the cart before the horse? Panetta has an excellent opportunity to show that he can push back against JSF proponents that would have the plane fly straight into training regardless of cost or safety consequences.

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 décembre 2011 6 10 /12 /décembre /2011 08:55

predator-drone-mq9-reaper-photo-USAF.jpg

photo USAF

 

December 8, 2011 defense-aerospace.com

(Source: U.S Department of Defense; issued December 8, 2011)

 

General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Poway, Calif., is being awarded a $319,236,484 firm-fixed-price contract for 40 MQ-9 Block 1 aircraft, and 40 aircraft containers.

 

The location of the performance is Poway, Calif. Work is expected to be completed September 2013. This was a sole-source acquisition; one proposal was received.

 

ASC/WIIK, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, is the contracting activity (FA8620-10-G-3038 0017).

Partager cet article
Repost0
9 décembre 2011 5 09 /12 /décembre /2011 21:45

MissDefAgcy-US.jpg

 

December 8, 2011 defense-aerospace.com

(Source: U.S Department of Defense; issued December 8, 2011)

 

The Missile Defense Agency is awarding Lockheed Martin Mission Systems and Sensors, Moorestown, N.J., a cost-plus-award-fee modification for a total increased value of $184,023,258 under Missile Defense Agency contract HQ0276-10-C-0001.

 

The modification will increase the level of effort to allow for continued performance of future weapon system concept exploration.

 

The initial award will be in the amount of $20,000,000 to contract line item number (CLIN) 0025. The remaining $164,023,258 will be divided into seven $20,000,000 option periods, and one $24,023,258 option period.

 

The work will be performed in Moorestown, N.J. The performance period for CLIN 0025 is through Dec. 31, 2012. Fiscal 2011 Research, Development, Test and Evaluation funds will be used to fund this effort.

 

The Missile Defense Agency is the contracting activity (HQ0276).

Partager cet article
Repost0
9 décembre 2011 5 09 /12 /décembre /2011 19:50

http://www.shephardmedia.com/static/images/article/RQ-170OriginalImage.jpg

 

09 December 2011 - by Andrew White and Tony Osborne – Shepard Group

 

Images of an alleged US Air Force RQ-170 Sentinel UAV have been aired on television following claims that Iran has captured the ‘low-observable’ and highly-secretive ISR airframe.

 

Shown on 8 December, footage showed Iranian military officials examining what appeared to be the fuselage of the UAV. Unofficial reports suggest the UAV had flown across Afghanistan’s western border into Iranian airspace.

 

The US Office of the Secretary of the Air Force refused to comment, telling Unmanned Vehicles that there was no official statement regarding the incident.

 

In an address to the media, a Pentagon spokesperson admitted that a UAV had gone missing but refused to comment on specifics, instead referring to the sensitive nature of reconnaissance missions.

 

However, on 4 December an official statement from NATO’s International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) confirmed a UAV ‘to which the Iranians are referring may be a US unarmed reconnaissance aircraft that had been flying a mission over western Afghanistan late last week’.

 

‘The operators of the UAV lost control of the aircraft and had been working to determine its status,’ the statement continued.

 

The manufacturer of the UAV in question, Lockheed Martin, could only add: ‘The US Air Force acknowledged in December 2009 that it had developed the RQ-170 Sentinel as a low-observable unmanned aircraft system with a primary mission of ISR.’

 

However, according to a Tehran-based website purporting to represent the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, the UAV was ‘ambushed’ by electronic means and landed with ‘minimal damage’.

 

The report then went on to quote dimensions of the airframe –figures which have yet to be publically released by the USAF. However, some industry sources have questioned the validity of the UAV paraded on television.

 

According to USAF literature, the RQ-170 is a ‘low-observable UAS being developed, tested and fielded by the Air Force. It will provide reconnaissance and surveillance in support of the joint forces commander.

 

‘The RQ-170 will directly support combatant commander needs for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance to locate targets,’ it continued.

 

The RQ-170 is flown by Air Combat Command's 432nd Wing at Creech Air Force Base and the 30th Reconnaissance Squadron at Tonopah Test Range, both located in Nevada.

Partager cet article
Repost0

Présentation

  • : RP Defense
  • : Web review defence industry - Revue du web industrie de défense - company information - news in France, Europe and elsewhere ...
  • Contact

Recherche

Articles Récents

Categories