Overblog Tous les blogs Top blogs Entreprises & Marques Tous les blogs Entreprises & Marques
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
MENU
2 novembre 2011 3 02 /11 /novembre /2011 07:20

http://www.strategypage.com/gallery/images/uss-new-york-10-2011.jpg

 

10/31/2011 STRATEGY PAGE

 

ATLANTIC OCEAN (Oct. 26, 2011) An MV-22 Osprey assigned to Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron (VMM) 261, 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit (24th MEU), lands aboard the amphibious transport dock ship USS New York (LPD 21). New York is participating in an integrated training exercise with Amphibious Squadron (PHIBRON) 8 and the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit (24th MEU). (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Michael J. Petersheim)

Partager cet article
Repost0
2 novembre 2011 3 02 /11 /novembre /2011 06:50

http://www.meretmarine.com/objets/500/38027.jpg

 

crédits : US NAVY

 

31/10/2011 MER et MARINE

 

Huitième sous-marin nucléaire d'attaque du type Virginia, l'USS California (SSN 781) a été officiellement intégré à l'US Navy lors d'une cérémonie qui s'est déroulée le 29 octobre à la base navale de Norfolk. Construit par les chantiers Huntington Ingalls Industries de Newport News, le bâtiment mesure 114.9 mètres de long et affiche un déplacement de 7800 tonnes en plongée. Capable d'atteindre la vitesse de 34 noeuds, il dispose de 12 tubes pour missiles de croisière Tomahawk et 4 tubes pour le lancement de 26 torpilles Mk48.


Le dernier navire de l'US Navy a avoir porté le nom de California était un croiseur lance-missiles à propulsion nucléaire, le CGN 36, admis au service actif en 1974 et désarmé en 1999.


L'USS California à Norfolk (© : US NAVY)

Partager cet article
Repost0
1 novembre 2011 2 01 /11 /novembre /2011 09:05

http://images.lpcdn.ca/435x290/201008/05/190485-analyste-benoit-poirier-valeurs-mobilieres.jpg

 

31 octobre 2011 Marie Tison - lapresseaffaires.cyberpresse.ca

 

L'analyste Benoît Poirier, de Valeurs mobilières Desjardins, indique que plusieurs entreprises pourraient être touchées par des compressions budgétaires aux États-Unis, comme CAE et, surtout, Héroux-Devtek. Photo fournie par Héroux-Devtek

 

(Montréal) Dans la guerre qui oppose les démocrates et les républicains au sujet des compressions budgétaires aux États-Unis, des entreprises québécoises du secteur de la défense pourraient se retrouver sur la ligne de tir.

 

«Le Canada et les États-Unis partagent une base industrielle de la défense, rappelle le président de l'Association des industries canadiennes de défense et de sécurité, Tim Page, dans une entrevue téléphonique avec La Presse Affaires. Tout ce qui a un impact sur le marché américain aura un impact sur l'industrie canadienne.»

 

L'analyste Benoît Poirier, de Valeurs mobilières Desjardins, indique que plusieurs entreprises pourraient être touchées, comme CAE (CAE) et, surtout, Héroux-Devtek (HRX).

 

«Cette entreprise tire 59% de ses revenus du domaine de la défense, et une partie de ces revenus est liée au Joint Strike Fighter (JSF), écrit-il dans un rapport de recherche. Nous demeurons circonspects au sujet du JSF parce qu'il est devenu une cible pour les politiciens qui cherchent à contrôler les dépassements de coûts dans les programmes de la défense.»

 

Depuis deux mois, un comité du Congrès américain composé de six démocrates et de six républicains tente de s'entendre sur un plan de réduction du déficit. Ce super comité, comme on le surnomme à Washington, a jusqu'au 23 novembre pour proposer un plan qui permettrait de réduire le budget américain de 1200 milliards US au cours des 10 prochaines années. Ce plan pourrait comprendre des réductions de dépenses, mais aussi des augmentations de taxes. Si le super comité rate l'objectif, le couperet tombera automatiquement sur les dépenses discrétionnaires du gouvernement américain.

 

Des compressions de 1200 milliards US s'effectueront tant du côté du budget de la défense que du côté des dépenses civiles, comme l'éducation, les services sociaux et l'environnement.

 

Loin d'une entente


Cette disposition visait à forcer les républicains et les démocrates à s'entendre sur un plan de réduction du déficit. Or, les congressistes sont encore loin d'une entente. Selon Reuters, les démocrates veulent que le plan comprenne une augmentation de taxes alors que les républicains sont totalement opposés à cette idée.

 

Benoît Poirier estime que le couperet automatique entraînerait des compressions de 600 milliards US dans le budget américain de la défense, qui s'additionneraient à des coupes de 350 milliards US déjà planifiées. On parlerait donc d'une réduction de près de 1000 milliards US.

 

Selon le secrétaire américain de la Défense, Leon Panetta, une telle réduction reviendrait à «se tirer dans le pied».

M. Page soutient de son côté que les menaces qui pèsent sur le monde industrialisé demeurent bien présentes.

«Les gouvernements doivent continuer à faire preuve de vigilance et à assurer la sécurité des populations, affirme-t-il. Cela implique des investissements dans la défense et la sécurité.»

 

Quels impacts?


Selon Benoît Poirier, le programme du JSF pourrait être touché. Or, chaque appareil génère des revenus d'environ 750 000$US pour Héroux-Devtek, qui fournit notamment des éléments de structures.

 

M. Poirier indique que le gouvernement pourrait annuler une des versions du JSF et retarder la livraison d'un certain nombre d'appareils.

 

«Sur une note plus positive, Héroux-Devtek est bien positionnée sur d'autres programmes comme le C-130, qui est en grande demande et qui ne risque pas d'être annulé, ajoute-t-il. Les affaires d'Héroux-Devtek avec le département américain de la Défense se concentrent également du côté du soutien après-vente, qui devrait demeurer plus solide que la fabrication.»

 

M. Poirier ne croit pas que la perspective d'importantes compressions dans le budget américain de la défense ait des impacts dramatiques sur CAE. Essentiellement, l'entreprise ferait face à des délais dans l'attribution de contrats.

«À moyen terme, CAE devrait être relativement protégée des compressions budgétaires en raison des économies offertes par la formation basée sur la simulation, écrit-il. À long terme, nous croyons toujours qu'il y aura une utilisation accrue de la simulation, mais nous ne verrons cela que lorsque les gouvernements auront décidé quels programmes supprimer.»

 

La vice-présidente aux communications de CAE, Nathalie Bourque, note que la formation basée sur la simulation représente environ 10% des coûts de la formation à bord d'appareils.

 

«Nous faisons partie de la solution», lance-t-elle.

Partager cet article
Repost0
31 octobre 2011 1 31 /10 /octobre /2011 09:25

http://www.aviationweek.com/media/images/defense_images/Wheels/M1A1-USMC.jpg

Photo: USMC

 

Oct 28, 2011 By Michael Fabey - aerospace daily and defense report

 

The wheels are about to fall off the vehicle-buying bonanza that has been driving Pentagon procurement in recent years.

 

“We have 40,000 vehicles in the Marine Corps,” said Gen. James Amos, U.S. Marine Corps Commandant, during an event hosted by the Council on Foreign Relations on Oct. 26. “We need about 30,000. We’re not going to recapitalize all of those vehicles.”

 

The Marines, he says, are going to buy “what’s good enough” to get through the next several years.

 

Combined, 2010 contracts and modifications for tracked and wheeled vehicles total $12.8 billion, more than any other single expense that year for the Defense Department, according to an Aviation Week Intelligence Network (AWIN) analysis of a database created by AWIN with information aggregated by the National Institute for Computer-Assisted Reporting (See charts, pages 7-8).

 

Individually, tracked combat, assault and tactical vehicle procurement rank eighth among Pentagon expenses, with $5 billion in transactions; wheeled truck, tractor and similar transactions rank ninth, with $4.7 billion in transactions; and wheeled combat, assault and tactical vehicle deals rank 14th, with $3.1 billion, the AWIN analysis shows.

 

Wheeled-vehicle procurement will likely see the most immediate effect of the Marine Corps acquisition reversal. Leading contractors for those vehicles include Oshkosh Corp., Canadian Commercial Corp. and Textron. Oshkosh ranked fourth among all Pentagon contractors in 2010, with $5.4 billion in transactions, the analysis finds.

 

While up-armored, high-mobility, multipurpose wheeled vehicles — usually called Humvees — have served their purpose protecting passengers against improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in Iraq, Amos says the vehicles are clearly outmatched in Afghanistan.

 

Calling the Afghanistan IEDs “huge,” Amos said, “They will take a Humvee – I don’t care how much armored up – and destroy it.”

 

He estimates that the Marine Corps will settle for about a quarter of the Humvee fleet it now has and invest more money in the joint light tactical vehicle (JLTV) program. That is where the investment is needed, he says.

 

Meant to replace Humvees, JLTVs are supposed to feature scalable armor, defensive measures, networked communications and enhanced mobility and agility. But the JLTV program has its own issues, according to a U.S. Government Accountability Office report released Oct. 26.

 

The U.S. Army also is counting on the JLTV and has started to rework its plans to develop and acquire the vehicles. “These efforts have just begun, however, and their results are not yet assured,” the GAO notes.

 

“To reduce risk in the JLTV program, the services relied on multiple vendors during technology development to increase their knowledge of the needed technologies, determine the technology maturity level, and determine which requirements were achievable,” the GAO reports. “As a result, the services identified trades in requirements to drive down the cost of the vehicle. For example, the services found that JLTV could not achieve both protection level and transportability goals, so the services are accepting a heavier vehicle. A potential risk for the services in allowing industry to build vehicles for testing is that the prototypes may not be mature.”

 

The fiscal 2012 budget includes $243.9 million for JLTV research and development.

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 octobre 2011 5 28 /10 /octobre /2011 18:35

http://www.army-technology.com/contractor_images/airborne-systems/logo.gif

 

October 28, 2011 by Airborne Systems - army-technology.com

 

Airborne Systems, a subsidiary of HDT Global (HDT) and a provider of highly-engineered mobile military and emergency response solutions, announced today it has been awarded a $27m contract by the US Army's Research, Development, and Engineering Command (RDECOM).

 

The contract will include the production and delivery of an estimated 3,600 Military Free Fall Advanced Ram Air Parachute Systems (MFF ARAPS) utilising the Airborne System's Intruder parachute system.

 

The contract win reaffirms Airborne Systems' role as a major supplier to the US military. All major military personnel parachute systems currently in use by US Forces have been designed by Airborne Systems, including the T-11, MC-6, Hi-Glide, MC-4, MC-5 and Intruder. The FireFly and DragonFly precision guided aerial delivery systems have also been selected by the US Army for the Joint Precision Air Drop System (JPADS) program, and the FireFly is being used extensively in Afghanistan.

 

"We are honored the US Army has selected Airborne Systems to support our war fighters with the best parachute technology available," said Brad Pedersen, president of Airborne Systems. "Our solution is the best value for soldiers, offering increased safety and cutting edge technology. The Intruder system has been exclusively designed for the military jumper and is not an adaptation. Its versatility allows day or night and high or low altitude capabilities in a range of challenging environments to fully meet mission requirements."

 

"Airborne Systems has made major historical contributions to military ram-air parachute systems development," added JC Berland, chief technology officer at Airborne Systems. "These include the invention of the ram-air reserve parachute and the first military ram air parachute system, the MT-1. Airborne Systems also designed and produced the MC-4 and MC-5 parachute systems, the most popular military parachute systems in the world. The T-11 is also an excellent example of our technology lead in the parachute world."

 

The firm fixed-price IDIQ contract is anticipated to include an 18-month base ordering period and a 42-month optional ordering period. The acquisition was conducted on a full and open basis and incorporated a best value source selection, based upon technical, management, past performance, cost and price assessments.

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 octobre 2011 5 28 /10 /octobre /2011 17:55

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EQycEPiP4B8/Tqq56SePAEI/AAAAAAAAIos/BtVuxZKRpGg/s1600/la_class.jpg

 

October 28, 2011

 

CBC News is reporting that the Harper Government is at least pondering the idea of cutting their losses with the Victoria class submarines and replacing them with nuclear submarines. The Victoria class submarines have been plagued with problems since being acquired from the UK, and despite being described as the "military bargain of the century" when purchased for $750 million in 1998, they have become anything but.

The submarines are currently all out of service, with HMCS Victoria the soonest to potentially return to service by late next year. The article describes the issues.

One of the subs, HMCS Chicoutimi, has been in active service of the Royal Canadian Navy exactly two days in the 13 years since it was purchased from the Brits.

The Chicoutimi caught fire on its maiden voyage from the U.K. to Canada, killing one sailor and injuring a number of others.

It has been in the repair shop ever since, and isn’t expected back in service for at least another two years and $400 million more in repairs and retrofits.

The article goes on:

The other three would remain out of service until at least 2013. One may not be out of the repair shop until 2016.

By that time, the submarines will have cost taxpayers an estimated $3 billion, almost enough to have bought all new subs in the first place.

But the real problem is that by the time the whole fleet is in active service for the first time in 2016, the submarines will already be almost 30 years old with only perhaps 10 years of life left in them.

High-ranking sources tell CBC News the government is actively considering cutting its losses on the dud subs, and mothballing some if not all of them.

Defence Minister Peter MacKay is hinting they might be replaced with nuclear submarines that could patrol under the Arctic ice, something the existing diesel-electric subs cannot do.

I'm not sure how the costs break out over a single budget year, but based on the article it sounds like Canada has already spent $1 billion and will spend $2 billion more by 2016, which suggests costs that average around $500 million over the next 4 years. That's a lot of money just to get 10 years out of four SSKs.

If we do the math, basically the Harper government is faced with the very real problem. The repair costs will earn Canada 4 Victoria class SSKs that are already old for an investment cost of at least $75 million annually per submarine, and at the same time India is leasing the significantly more capable and new Russian SSN K-152 Nurpa for $900 million over 10 years - $90 million annually.

Something tells me Rep. Joe Courtney (Conn) could come up with a few ideas here - just saying. What would it cost to refuel and refit a Los Angeles class submarine for a second time to add 15 or so more years to the submarine? In 2005 the cost was slightly over $200 million, so even if we estimate the total refit per submarine to be around $350 million (serious modernization), Canada would only be spending $1.4 billion for four SSNs with a service life of 15 years vs $2 billion for four SSKs with a service life of 10 years. Another big advantage for Canada would be they could use the rest of the money to put their sailors through existing US Navy submarine training schools and use existing US contractor services for upkeep, both of which would allow Canada to save a bunch of money.

The cost difference for the hardware would be $25 million per sub per year for SSNs vs $75 million per sub per year for SSKs. While it is true the operational, maintenance, and personnel costs will be higher for SSNs than it would be for SSKs, there are likely enough cost savings to be gained through existing US infrastructure that it's hard to believe the SSNs would be so much more expensive as to make it a bad deal.

I'm just floating this idea, but really trying to highlight that leasing Los Angeles class SSNs would likely be cost neutral (or perhaps even cost saving) for the Harper government given the big problems Canada is facing with the Victoria class.

I don't know if the US Navy even has four 688s that they would be willing to sell to Canada (although in a time of short term budget cuts impacting the Navy, now is the time to talk about this type of thing). I also don't know if the US and Canada can work out a realistic agreement that would give Canada the ability to utilize US Navy infrastructure for training and other services related to 688s. I do know that going down the road of supporting foreign SSNs would be good for either/both Electric Boat and Newport News, because when one looks at the trends they are having in Australia with their submarine industry - a deal with SSNs with Canada now would go a long way towards getting process and framework for this type of high end military deals in place so when our next very close ally comes along - we have a system and experience in place to support such agreements. 

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 octobre 2011 5 28 /10 /octobre /2011 17:00

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/43/First_F-35_headed_for_USAF_service.jpg/800px-First_F-35_headed_for_USAF_service.jpg

photo USAF

 

28 October 2011 airforce-technology.com

 

The US Air Force (USAF) has cut three F-35 jet fighters from its next contract with Lockheed Martin, Pentagon F-35 spokesman Joe DellaVedova revealed.

 

The decision to reduce the number of aircraft is to help fund cost overruns associated with retrofits on the first three orders after the Senate Armed Services Committee denied $264m in funding.

 

The original order was for a total of 34 jets for the USAF and Navy and the latest cut, including one from the navy, brings the order down to 30 aircraft.

 

The first 28 aircraft are estimated to cost $918m, of which $283m will be paid by Lockheed and engine subcontractor Pratt & Whitney, while the remaining $635m will be paid by the government.

 

Bloomberg reported that the value of the four deleted aircraft was not disclosed.

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 octobre 2011 5 28 /10 /octobre /2011 16:50

cyber warfare

 

October 28, 2011 Donna Miles / American Forces Press Service – defpro.com

 

WASHINGTON | The commander of U.S. Cyber Command called for increased collaboration among the government, industry and America’s allies in developing more defensible networks to confront escalating global cyber threats.

 

Current network security protections aren’t nimble enough to defend against the exploding number of threats, Army Gen. Keith B. Alexander told government, academic and private-sector professionals on Oct. 26 at the Security Innovation Network’s Showcase 2011 conference here.

 

Firewalls, routers, antivirus software and intrusion detection systems are designed to identify and block specific cyber-intruder signatures, Alexander said. The problem, he noted, is that adversaries have the ability to scan the networks, exploit vulnerabilities and use them to gain access.

 

“It’s like the Maginot Line,” Alexander explained, referring to the fortifications France built along its border with Germany after World War I with hopes of preventing another cross-border attack. Germany responded during World War II by doing the unexpected: attacking instead through the Ardennes Forest.

 

“That’s the same thing that happens in your network,” Alexander said, noting in cyberspace adversaries have “all the advantages.” They can scan networks, he said, and identify what software is being run, and pounce when they identify a vulnerability.

 

“That’s the dynamic we have to change,” Alexander said.

“We are the guys who helped create the Internet. We are the ones that built that. We ought to be the first ones to secure it.”

 

The White House’s International Strategy for Cyberspace and Defense Department strategy represent a start in that direction, Alexander said. But he emphasized that developing more defensible systems isn’t something the Defense Department or any other entity can do alone.

 

It requires government agencies working as a team, he said, while also working with industry and U.S. allies and partners.

 

“When we talk cyber, we talk a team sport,” Alexander said. “It’s all of us operating as a team to defend the country in cyberspace, with the right legal authorities.”

 

Alexander cited the explosion of network communications around the world. As of March 31, 30 percent of the world population had access to the Internet. During 2010, 107 trillion emails were sent -- that’s 294 billion per day. By 2015, he said, it’s predicted that there will be twice as many Internet devices as people on the planet.

 

Such growth, the general said, has created vulnerabilities which leave no sector immune -- from hackings at well-respected companies such as Nasdaq, RSA Security and Booz Allen Hamilton to denial-of-service attacks in Estonia, Georgia and elsewhere.

 

For every company that recognizes it has been hacked, Alexander said, hundreds more don’t.

 

Among the costs is a huge loss of intellectual property through what Alexander called “the greatest transfer of wealth in history.” But the bigger fear, he said, is that disruptive attacks will turn destructive.

 

Alexander noted initiatives under way that show promise in countering these growing threats. For example, he said, “cloud” computing delivers shared resources and software through virtual routers, machines and networks [and] enables faster server updates and more agile responses than legacy databases.

 

Meanwhile, a pilot program in which the Defense Department shares classified threat intelligence with industry is helping to increase military cyber defenses and preventing enemy intrusions into other sensitive government networks.

 

Alexander called the Defense Industrial Base Cyber Pilot, launched in partnership with the Homeland Security Department, “a huge step” that’s blocked intrusions and identified signatures that hadn’t been previously seen.

 

“The intent is to push signatures to the Internet service providers and protect vulnerabilities,” he said. “We are having success with that.”

 

Lauding progress in network protections, Alexander emphasized that they can’t come at the cost of civil liberties and privacy rights.

 

“We should demand that we get both,” he said. “In my opinion, we can do that. We can protect civil liberties and privacy and come up with a defensive program that we can defend this country and our companies in cyberspace.”

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 octobre 2011 5 28 /10 /octobre /2011 12:40

http://www.asdnews.com/data_news/ID39193_600.jpg

 

Oct 28, 2011 ASDNews Source : Naval Air Systems Command

 

Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Md. - F-35 integrated test force personnel and F-35C test aircraft CF-3 returned to NAS Patuxent River last week after completing two major catapult test events.

 

Starting this past summer, the test team put the carrier variant of the Joint Strike Fighter through its first set of catapult launches. The goal was to complete an initial structural survey of the aircraft to withstand launch stresses and the impact of steam ingestion into the engine.

 

"The testing went very well," said Tom Chaillou, lead government ship suitability engineer. "The aircraft completed the structural survey, and the steam ingestion was a non-factor. The team spent a lot of time up at Lakehurst [N.J.] away from home, and just did a tremendous job."

 

The team completed more than 50 launches to collect the needed data. The steam ingestion data produced robust results, allowing the team to reduce the number of test launches by four.

 

"[The F-35C] did really well from the cockpit perspective," said Cmdr. Eric Buus, F-35 test pilot. "The aircraft actually flew away after launch a bit better than was predicted."

 

Catapult testing will continue at Lakehurst and Patuxent River to include launches at varying weights and stores, and with increased mission system functionality.

 

The F-35C carrier variant of the Joint Strike Fighter is distinct from the F-35A and F-35B variants with its larger wing surfaces and reinforced landing gear to withstand catapult launches and deck landing impacts associated with the demanding aircraft carrier environment. Initial carrier trials for the F-35C are scheduled for 2013. The F-35C is undergoing test and evaluation at NAS Patuxent River before delivery to the fleet.

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 octobre 2011 5 28 /10 /octobre /2011 12:25

http://www.defpro.com/data/gfx/news/0953be60dcdb64e1e64f82359f1658fe1be6d4ef_big.jpg

 

USS Freedom (LCS 1) departs for maiden deployment. (Photo: U.S. Navy)

 

October 28, 2011 defpro.com

 

MARINETTE, Wisc. | A Lockheed Martin-led industry team held a keel-laying ceremony at Marinette Marine’s shipyard for the future USS Milwaukee, the U.S. Navy’s fifth Littoral Combat Ship (LCS).

 

The term, lay the keel, in shipbuilding language, means the beginning of a significant undertaking, which is the start of the module erection process that reflects the ship coming to life. Modern warships are now largely built in a series of pre-fabricated, complete hull sections rather than a single keel, so the actual start of the shipbuilding process is now considered to be when the first sheet of steel is cut. It is often marked with a ceremonial event.

 

“It’s a great honor to participate in this event for the future USS Milwaukee,” said Herb Kohl, senior Senator for the State of Wisconsin. “The keel laying ceremony is a great milestone for the LCS program, which is so vital to our military and to the people of Wisconsin and our economy. We’re proud of our state’s long history in shipbuilding and our contribution to the nation’s naval defense.”

 

During the ceremony, Senator Kohl authenticated the keel by having his signature welded into it. He was assisted by Executive Director of the Navy’s Program Executive Office – Littoral Combat Ships Anne Sandel and Marinette Marine Corporation’s Director of LCS programs, Jim LaCosse.

 

“We are committed to providing the Navy with littoral combat ships affordably and on time,” said Joe North, vice president of littoral ship systems at Lockheed Martin's Mission Systems & Sensors business. “LCS 5’s construction will benefit from production of the first and second Freedom-variant ships as we continue to drive cost out of the program.”

 

The Navy’s naming of the future USS Milwaukee continues the practice of designating LCSs after mid-sized American cities, small towns and communities.

 

The Lockheed Martin-led LCS team includes ship builder Marinette Marine Corporation, a Fincantieri company, naval architect Gibbs & Cox, as well as domestic and international teammates.

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 octobre 2011 5 28 /10 /octobre /2011 12:20

http://cdnpullz.defencetalk.com/wp-content/themes/dtstyle/scripts/timthumb.php?src=http://www.defencetalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/gray-eagle-UAV-army-systems-integration.jpg&w=375&h=245&zc=1

 

October 28th, 2011 By Army News Service, DEFENCETALK

 

The Army's Program Executive Office for Aviation's offices Project Manager's Unmanned Aircraft Systems, PM Armed Scout Helicopter and PM Apache have worked together with the goal to make the most capable, automated, lethal and interoperable systems available to our forward deployed Soldiers and our allies.

 

On Sept. 16, Program Executive Office for Aviation, or PEO, AVN sponsored the first ever Manned-Unmanned Systems Integration Capability, or MUSIC, Exercise. The exercise was the largest demonstration of manned-unmanned interoperability ever attempted.

 

The exercise has been in the works for over one and one half years. The integrations and evaluations culminated with a live demonstration before an audience of leaders from across the Department of Defense as well as civilian onlookers.

 

Tim Owings, deputy program manager for Unmanned Aircraft Systems, or UAS, was a great proponent in bringing this exercise to realization, and had this to say.

 

"I am most proud of the teamwork and selfless attitudes demonstrated by our industry and government partners," he said. "You can't make MUSIC without an orchestra and everyone playing their instruments. This really is an amazing story of teamwork and perseverance."

 

There were many objectives to this exercise including: demonstrating advancements made in manned-to-unmanned teaming, or MUM-T; demonstrating interoperability among unmanned systems through the Universal Ground Control Station, known as UGCS, Mini-UGCS, or M-UGCS, and the One System Remote Video Terminal, or OSRVT; and highlighting PEO Aviation's open architectural approach that allows multiple control nodes and information access points via the Tactical Common Data Link, or TCDL.

 

The combination of M-UGCS, UGCS and OSRVT serves as the catalyst for interoperability amongst the Army's manned and unmanned aviation fleet. Interoperability translates into cost savings and increased efficiency through common hardware and software. Interoperability is also helping to mitigate the ever-increasing threat to our Soldiers, due to advancements in enemy technologies, and increasing our Army's overall combat edge.

 

"In my short tenure here as the PM, the work I witnessed, day in and day out was brought together and displayed in the first ever MUSIC Exercise," explained Col. Tim Baxter, with PM-UAS. "Although I had been briefed about this thing called MUSIC, I couldn't fathom the amount of effort given by each member of PM's UAS, Apache and Attack Scout Helicopter. The heavy lifting done by a workforce comprised mostly of civilians, and for the good of our Soldiers, is heartfelt and makes a positive impact every day to the lives of those operational folks we send into harm's way."

 

The event established seamless integration of Apache Block II and Kiowa Warrior helicopters, along with the Army's complete fleet of Unmanned Aircraft Systems, which is comprised of the Raven, Puma, Hunter, Shadow and Gray Eagle.

 

Video was exchanged flawlessly among all the systems. Additionally, the ability to control the UAS payloads of the larger aircraft from both the M-UGCS and the -OSRVT were demonstrated.

 

The demonstration clearly illustrated the remarkable capability and synergy that the combination of tightly integrated manned-unmanned systems provides. Furthermore, the demonstration showed clearly how this information could be rapidly provided to individual Soldiers on the ground.

 

Here is a breakdown of operating systems and technologies explaining desired effects and actual recorded accomplishments.

 

UNIVERSAL GROUND CONTROL STATION

For the first time the UGCS demonstrated its ability to control the larger unmanned aircraft consecutively from a single ground station through common hardware and software. The results were seen immediately as handoffs occurred between the Shadow Portable GCS, or PGCS, to the UGCS, the Gray Eagle ground station to the UGCS, and finally the Hunter legacy ground station to the UGCS.

 

This new capability has also paved the way for the universal operator concept. This is a single operator with the ability to fly multiple unmanned aircraft. During the demonstration the same aircraft operator and payload operator flew all three aircraft consecutively marking a huge milestone for UAS.

 

ONE SYSTEM REMOTE VIDEO TERMINAL

The role of OSRVT was showcased throughout the MUSIC Exercise by demonstrating interoperability with all the participating platforms. OSRVT received the video from the small unmanned aircraft via the Digital Data Link, or DDL. Video from the large platforms was received via TCDL.

 

The new bi-directional capability in which the OSRVT operator controlled the payloads of the Shadow, Hunter and Gray Eagle platforms demonstrating the ability to receive the video and simultaneously transmit commands back to the aircraft to guide the camera to the point of interest. The combination of the OSRVT and manned aircraft were shown to be able to share targeting data and insure a common operating environment.

 

All of these capabilities are based on a standard approach so when the OSRVT understands the language of one platform it understands it for all the platforms; enabling efficient use of the available development time. The success demonstrated in the exercise is a direct result of the years of effort spent developing the standards and the hardware and software that implement those standards.

 

In the coming months these capabilities will be refined to give the Soldier unprecedented situational awareness through an impressive array of tools on the battlefield.

 

MINI-UNIVERSAL GROUND CONTROL STATION AND GRAY EAGLE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT WITH TRICLOPS PAYLOAD CONFIGURATION

 

For the Army's fleet of Small UAS the Army continues to move toward a M-UGCS. For the MUSIC exercise, the M-UGCS Block 0 demonstrated the first step toward that goal. The M-UGCS Block 0 is a software upgrade to the existing Raven GCS, which is currently being fielded by the Army in the thousands.

 

While this GCS already has the ability to control the Raven and Puma UAS currently being fielded, a software upgrade to the system now allows the GCS to control the wing-mounted sensors on the TRICLOPS configuration of the Gray Eagle. The TRICLOPS configuration adds two additional payloads to the wings of the Gray Eagle in addition to its main payload on the fuselage.

 

These payloads can be accessed independently of the main payload thus providing the ability to track three geologically separate targets with one air vehicle asset.

 

The M-UGCS will provide front-line soldiers with Level of Interoperability-, or LOI-, 3 control of highly capable sensors using hardware that is already in place. And in keeping with the nature of true interoperability, the interface follows the same Standardization Agreement 4586 standard as the UGCS for the messaging protocol.

 

Additionally the audience was able to see the M-UGCS Block 1 on display, which provides the functionality of a Raven GCS in a single, consolidated package. The handheld M-UGCS Block 1 combines the Windows-based functionality of FalconView and video/data logging with the highly-reliable Real-Time Operating System functionality required for real-time UAV control.

 

Touch screens for ease of use, hot-swap batteries, and a mini-DDL radio also combine to provide a stand-alone package. While still in prototype form, this system is fully functional, and has been evaluated by Raven and Puma operators with a good deal of positive feedback.

 

MANNED-TO-UNMANNED

 

AH-64D LONGBOW APACHE

The Apache Block II demonstrated video transmission to the OSRVT via the Efficient TCDL. The TCDL link allows the Apache to send and receive video and metadata. The Apache is currently using the Visual User Interface Tool-, or VUIT-, 2 system in theater with outstanding results. The VUIT-2 system can transmit both Apache and UAS video to the Soldiers on the ground equipped with OSRVT. VUIT-2 provides positive target identification for the Soldier on the ground. Once the target is confirmed, Apache aircrew can engage the target with its weapon systems.

 

Manned-Unmanned Teaming-2, or MUMT-2, is the next step for Apache. MUMT-2 is a fully compliant TCDL system. MUMT-2 is currently being fielded and provides the Apache an integrated system within the Apache systems architecture. MUMT-2 reduces the weight of the Apache by over 40 LBS while providing all the functionality of the VUIT-2 system.

 

With MUMT-2 the Apache has the enhanced capability of transmitting both Apache and UAS video to the Soldiers on the ground as well as ship-to-ship. The future for the Apache is Block III. MUMT is a bridging strategy to provide this capability until Block III is fielded. Block III will roll out its first production aircraft in Nov 2011. Block III goes beyond MUMT-2 and VUIT-2 by fully integrating LOI - 4 into the next generation of Apache.

 

OH-58D - KIOWA

The Kiowa Level 2 Manned-Unmanned, or L2MUM, system succeeded in demonstrating three of its major capabilities that are inherent to this system; a system that is currently in the process of being fielded. The Kiowa Warrior equipped with L2MUM carried out its portion of the MUSIC exercise at a range of 22KM from the OSRVT ground station. The Kiowa L2MUM system successfully received Hunter unmanned aircraft TCDL video and displayed it in the cockpit on the co-pilots multi-function display.

 

Second, the Kiowa L2MUM system retransmitted the received Hunter video to an OSRVT ground station 22KM away using TCDL. Thus proving out its capabilities to share what the Kiowa pilot is viewing with what the ground OSRVT user is viewing in real-time.

 

Lastly, the L2MUM system demonstrated its capability to transmit its on-board mast mounted sight video and own-ship metadata to an OSRVT user or other teammates capable of pulling this data into their prevue. Kiowa closed out the demonstration with a live fire of hydra rockets, demonstrating the lethality of these systems when they work together.

 

Baxter now turns his attention to incorporating the positives discovered during this exercise and refining those areas needing attention.

 

"As we turn the page on the first ever MUSIC Exercise, I along with the Training and Doctrine Command Capabilities Manager for UAS, must continue to keep pace with combatant commanders increased demands in developing and fielding advanced UAS and personnel to operate these apparatus that change how we fight and win on today's and tomorrow's battlefields," he said.

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 octobre 2011 5 28 /10 /octobre /2011 11:55
Government Considering Mothballing All Victoria-class Submarines. Peter MacKay Hints At Buying Nuclear Submarines?

 

October 27, 2011. By David Pugliese Defence Watch

 

The federal government is considering mothballing some or all of its four British-made submarines, CBC News reported Thursday night.

 

But the news story by Greg Weston also quoted Defence Minister Peter MacKay suggesting that nuclear submarines may be the way to go for Canada.

 

So will the Harper government go out and buy nukes?

 

How will the public react, particularly about the cost of a fleet of nuclear submarines that could run four, five or six billion dollars depending on?

 

As well, get ready for more submarine news in the coming weeks.

 

CTV has a piece in an upcoming segment on W5 which will look at the value of the Victoria-class submarines. It is hosted by Lloyd Robertson. A number of sources have told Defence Watch that they don’t expect the W5 segment to cause the Navy too much grief.

 

As you know, the Victoria-class submarines have been the subject of much debate.

 

HMCS Corner Brook, damaged when it hit the ocean floor during a training accident in June on the west coast, is now dockside. It will be repaired and overhauled during a planned maintenance period now underway.

 

But it is not scheduled to return to sea until 2016, the navy confirmed in an email to the Citizen.

 

HMCS Chicoutimi, damaged by a fire in 2004 that killed one officer, still remains sidelined. That leaves HMCS Windsor and HMCS Victoria, which are also not available for duty at sea.

 

“The navy is focused on HMCS Victoria and HMCS Windsor and returning both to sea in early 2012,” stated navy spokesman Lt.-Cmdr. Brian Owens in an email.

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 octobre 2011 5 28 /10 /octobre /2011 07:25

http://defencesummits.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/800px-e-2c_hawkeye.jpg

 

10/27/2011  Neil Waghorn - defenceiq.com

 

As you’ve probably read before on Defence IQ, the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has exploded over the last decade and, according to the 2011 US Aircraft Procurement Plan, the number of platform types is set to almost double by 2021. These platforms have evolved from being additional pieces of equipment to an essential tool in today’s military operations, and in keeping with this evolution, the mission capabilities of these machines have gradually expanded.

 

The Predator, for example, has evolved from being a surveillance vehicle, to gaining a laser targeting ability, before finally having an offensive capability in the form of Hellfire missiles. With the advance of the UAV role, especially within the surveillance field, it is worth assessing the potential impact of unmanned platforms on airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) capabilities.

 

Among the most easily recognisable aircraft in the world, due to its large rotating radar dome attached to the top of its airframe, the E-3 Sentry  has been the airborne warning and control system (AWACS) of choice for a variety of nations since 1977. Over the course of this long history, the E-3 has undergone multiple upgrades to ensure that it remains at the forefront of technical capabilities. As UAV technology progresses, however, the E-3 may not be able to keep up.

 

One proposed upgrade to the E-3 is the Mission Crew to Ground programme. This programme would transfer the control capabilities out of the E-3, and, according to the Federation of American Scientists, ‘allow more sensor growth in volume and weight on-board the E-3 for enhanced surveillance task’. It would also allow command and control to be centralised, allowing for the faster, more efficient sharing of information and control. The reduction of the crew of an E-3 from around 18 (mission dependent) down to ‘Communications Technician, Airborne Radar Technician, and the flight crew’ will significantly reduce the exposure of highly trained servicemen to potential danger. This removal of command capability will convert the E-3 into a solely AEW aircraft, such as the E-2 Hawkeye (albeit one with vastly increased range and variety of sensors).

 

If this programme were to progress, with the E-3s becoming sensor platforms, it would be necessary to weigh the advantages to the continued use of the E-3, as apposed to multiple smaller platforms such as UAVs or other manned aircraft.

 

The former USAF state secretary, Michael W. Wynne, raised several import questions about the survivability of large ISR assets such as AWACS aircraft in his article for ‘Second Line of Defence’. Wynne stresses that in a combat scenario against enemy aircraft, large assets ‘won’t last the first 10 minutes of the exchange’. Wynne argues that large assets should be replaced by smaller manned aircraft such as F-22s or 35s, commenting on the fiscal investment necessary to keep the larger aircraft in use. From his perspective, smaller, more survivable, multi-role aircraft would be a better investment of limited funds. There are several problem with using F-22s or 35s to perform AEW. One of which, is the large number of aircraft required to cover the area that an E-3 could monitor (an E-3 has a range in excess of 300nm). Fighter aircraft have a shorter fuel capacity than the 11 plus hours of an E-3 and would require inflight re-fuelling.

 

An alternative to Wynee’s suggestion of using F-22s would be the use of UAVs such as the Global Hawk. These unmanned platforms would allow the collection of ISR from assets with endurance that surpasses the E-3, (according to Northrop Grumman, the Global Hawk ‘can fly 1,200 miles to an area of interest and remain on station for 24 hours’). The use of UAVs would also, as mentioned, neutralise the risk to pilots. If fighter aircraft were used to replace E-3s then there would potentially be a number of pilots flying over enemy territory exposed to ground threats. UAVs could conduct these operations without endangering their lives.

 

The survivability of a UAV is arguably higher than an E-3, due to its relatively smaller radar profile (the E-3 is 46.6 meters long, as opposed to a 13.5 meter long Global Hawk) and higher ceiling (Global Hawk can fly at 65,000 feet, while the E-3 is 29,000 feet). As UAV technology advances, and the concept of Combat UAVs become a practical reality, it may be that a UAV ISR platform may be able to defend itself, increasing its survivability further still.

 

A US Congressional Budget Office paper, ‘Policy Options for Unmanned Aircraft Systems’, suggests that, although large AEW aircraft can ‘provide surveillance of large areas of sky or ground, their sensors have typically not been appropriate for the type of surveillance and targeting needed in counterinsurgency operations, which focus on individuals or small groups’.  Although a decade of insurgency in Afghanistan has made COIN highly topical, it is prudent to remember that conventional warfare still exists. UAVs may provide an option to provide ISR for COIN and conventional operations. Due to the relative low cost compared to large ISR aircraft it may be possible to assemble a variety of UAVs, configured to operate different mission types. Indeed, with the current focus on open architecture and the modular nature of equipment, this may be a practical way to retain a capability to cover both regular and irregular conflicts.

 

It has been proven that an E-3 could control multiple UAVs. Not long ago, an E-3 successfully took control of three ScanEagle UAVs. The control of UAVs from airborne vehicles has successfully been achieved by a variety of vehicles including the Apache helicopter and Tornado. If the E-3 retains its C2 capabilities, then the E-2 can potentially use UAVs to extend their range, covering a region that would have previously required several manned aircraft. While this reduction in number of aircraft will offer advantages such as exposing less crew to danger, the advantages do come with a large risk.

 

If the entire AEW scope is delegated from three AWACS platforms to a solitary manned aircraft and a host of UAVs, and the AWACS encounters difficulties which results in it not being operational – an electronic failure, enemy action or a catastrophic engine failure – then a wide area will be forced to rely on other early warning systems. If the UAVs are dependent on the AWACS, then the solitary AWACS platform aloft has become a critical node for the enemy to target. By having several AWACS aircraft in theatre, there is the capability to provide coverage if one aircraft is lost, albeit less efficiently.

 

As UAV technology rumbles forward, it may well be that UAVs eventually replace manned aircraft altogether. Science fact or science fiction, it is certain that UAVs will continue to be integrated into all levels of aerial operations, just as the rise of the unmanned machine continues to carve its domineering presence into all aspects of military service.

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 octobre 2011 5 28 /10 /octobre /2011 07:00

http://www.defensenews.com/pgf/stories71/102711-zumwalt-315.JPG

 

The Zumwalt's wave-piercing hull is starting to take shape.

The ship's bow will be at right. (General Dynamics Bath Iron Works)

 

Oct 2011 By CHRISTOPHER P. CAVAS DefenseNews

 

A big chunk of what will become the largest destroyer ever built has been moved into the open, shipbuilder General Dynamics Bath Iron Works announced Thursday.

 

The 180-foot long, 60-foot high hull section of the Zumwalt (DDG 1000) contains both of the ship's 155mm advanced gun systems and weighs more than 4,000 tons - bigger than a guided-missile frigate. The mid-forebody section itself is made up of several smaller sections.

 

Shipbuilders moved the hull section 900 feet from its assembly position inside the ship's Ultra Hall construction facility to the largest of the company's three shipbuilding ways, Bath said in a press release. The move was completed Oct. 22.

 

Other hull sections will be joined with the mid-forebody section to make up the ship, which when complete will be 600 feet long and displace more than 14,500 tons.

 

The Zumwalt is the first of a class of three ships under construction at Bath. A private keel-laying ceremony for the Zumwalt is scheduled to be held Nov. 17.

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 octobre 2011 5 28 /10 /octobre /2011 06:45

http://www.suasnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/aerosondesharkteeth.jpg

 

October 27, 2011 defense-unmanned.com

(Source: Textron Systems; issued October 26, 2011)

 

HUNT VALLEY, Md. --- AAI Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) announced today that it has delivered an Aerosonde Mark 4.7 Small Unmanned Aircraft System and an Orbiter Miniature Unmanned Aircraft System to the U.S. Army Communications-Electronics Research, Development and Engineering Center (CERDEC).

 

The systems will support the five-year cooperative research and development agreement (CRADA) into which the organizations recently entered, enabling AAI UAS and CERDEC to work together on various payloads for three classes of UAS — tactical, small and miniature, also known as Groups 3, 2 and 1.

 

AAI UAS and CERDEC’s Flight Activity, Lakehurst, N.J., completed a technical interchange meeting to review plans for payload integration onto the Aerosonde (Group 2) and Orbiter (Group 1) systems. Many payload varieties are being considered for integration, including signals intelligence, sensor and communications. AAI’s UAS flight crews conducted Aerosonde and Orbiter aircraft check flights prior to their delivery at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey.

 

Upon CERDEC Flight Activity’s successful payload integration onto either aircraft, AAI UAS operators will take the lead on a capability demonstration flight. To date, AAI UAS already has integrated more than two dozen payloads onto the Aerosonde UAS, including scientific, meteorological, electronic warfare, signals intelligence and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.

 

“Our experienced UAS operators understand both the aircraft and the unique characteristics of the mission based on each payload,” says AAI UAS Vice President, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Stephen Flach. “In research and development exercises like this one, the result is reliable, comprehensive performance data to improve the user’s end product.”

 

The Aerosonde Mark 4.7 is an expeditionary system featuring a large payload capacity and modular design. It is ideally suited to accommodate a multitude of payload options. The Orbiter Miniature Unmanned Aircraft System uses electric power to deliver a minimal acoustic signature. It is being offered to various military and law enforcement customers through a teaming agreement between AAI and Israel-based Aeronautics Ltd. In addition, AAI’s renowned Shadow Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System, a Group 3-sized aircraft, is available to CERDEC through this CRADA. Together, the three classes of UAS can accommodate a large spectrum of mission profiles.

 

AAI Unmanned Aircraft Systems has designed, manufactured and fielded combat-proven unmanned aircraft systems for more than 25 years. AAI’s multi-mission capable unmanned aircraft and interoperable command and control technologies provide critical situational awareness and actionable intelligence for users worldwide. Its Australia-based strategic business, Aerosonde Pty Ltd, is a manufacturer of small unmanned aircraft systems. AAI Unmanned Aircraft Systems is an operating unit of Textron Systems.

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 octobre 2011 5 28 /10 /octobre /2011 06:15

http://www.asdnews.com/data_news/ID39160_600.jpg

 

Oct 27, 2011 ASDNews Source : Embraer - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.

 

São Paulo - The Super Tucano light attack and advanced training turboprop was certified by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), last week. This specific certification by the U.S.'s principal aviation regulatory authority allows the beginning of a demo tour to American military bases, and it will open new business opportunities for Embraer Defense and Security in the world's largest defense market.

 

"This certification of the Super Tucano by the FAA could have a very positive impact on the market development of this proven aircraft in the United States, and is a highly relevant triumph for Embraer Defense and Security," said Luiz Carlos Aguiar, President of Embraer Defense and Security. "The Super Tucano is the technologically most advanced airplane in its category, with proven experience in all of the countries where it already operates, and we have seen growing interest expressed by armed forces."

 

One Super Tucano is in operation in the United States with Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc., a defense and aerospace contractor, specialized in providing military training, aerial refueling operations, and aircraft maintenance for the U.S. Armed Forces. The aircraft was acquired from Tactical Air Support, Inc. (TacAir), via a leasing contract. TacAir was founded in 2005 by veteran instructors from the U. S. Weapons Schools of the Navy, Marines, and Air Force, test pilots, and maintenance professionals, offers consulting services for tactical military training, and has provided a number of services for the U.S. Department of Defense.

 

The Super Tucano has been in operation for over seven years, is used by the armed forces of five nations, and will soon go into action in Indonesia. Currently, there are more than 150 of these aircraft flying with excellent performance records: over 130,000 flight hours, and more than 18,000 combat hours, without a single loss.

 

Designed to operate in harsh environments, under rigorous conditions, with little support infrastructure, the Super Tucano is the ideal aircraft for performing advanced training and counter-insurgency missions. It is capable of flying over operational theaters for more than four hours, while performing reconnaissance and support missions for troops on the ground, and offers more than 130 proven and operational weapons configurations. In the United States, the Super Tucano will be used for training teams specialized in providing Close Air Support for ground troops.

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 octobre 2011 5 28 /10 /octobre /2011 05:55

GAO-US-GovernmentAccountabilityOffice-Logo.svg.png

 

Oct. 26, 2011 defense-aerospace.com

(Source: Government Accountability Office; issued Oct. 26, 2011)

 

 (Testimony by Belva M. Martin, GAO director, acquisition and sourcing management, before the Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces, House Committee on Armed Services.)

 

Why GAO Did This Study

 

After the Army canceled the Future Combat System in June of 2009, it began developing modernization plans, including developing a new Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) and additional network capability. At the same time, the Army was considering options on how to improve its light tactical vehicles.

 

This statement addresses potential issues related to developing (1) the new GCV, (2) a common information network, and (3) the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) in a constrained budget environment. The statement is based largely on previous GAO work conducted over the last year in response to congressional requests and results of other reviews of Army modernization.

 

To conduct this work, GAO analyzed program documentation, strategies, and test results; interviewed independent experts and Army and Department of Defense (DOD) officials; and witnessed demonstrations of current and emerging network technologies.

 

What GAO Found

 

Delivering a feasible, cost-effective, and executable GCV solution presents a major challenge to the Army, with key questions about the robustness of the analysis of alternatives, the plausibility of its 7-year schedule, and cost and affordability. DOD and the Army have taken steps to increase oversight of the program, but resolving these issues during technology development will remain a challenge.

 

For example, the Army has already reduced some requirements and encouraged contractors to use mature technologies in their proposals, but the 7-year schedule remains ambitious, and delays would increase development costs. Independent cost estimates have suggested that 9 to 10 years is a more realistic schedule. Over the next 2 years during the technology development phase, the Army faces major challenges in deciding which capabilities to pursue and include in a GCV vehicle design and determine whether the best option is a new vehicle or modifications to a current vehicle.

 

The Army’s new information network strategy moves away from a single network development program to an incremental approach with which feasible technologies can be developed, tested, and fielded. The new strategy has noteworthy aspects, such as using periodic field evaluations to assess systems that may provide potential benefit and getting soldier feedback on the equipment being tested.

 

However, the Army has not articulated requirements, incremental objectives, or cost and schedule projections for its new network. It is important that the Army proceed in defining requirements and expected capabilities for the network to avoid the risk of developing individual capabilities that may not work together as a network. With the cancellation last week of its ground mobile radio and continuing problems in developing technology to provide advanced networking capability, the Army will still need to find foundational pieces for its network.

 

The Army is reworking earlier plans to develop and acquire the JLTV and is planning to recapitalize some of its High Mobility, Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles (HMWWV). These efforts have just begun, however, and their results are not yet assured. To reduce risk in the JLTV program, the services relied on multiple vendors during technology development to increase their knowledge of the needed technologies, determine the technology maturity level, and determine which requirements were achievable.

 

As a result, the services identified trades in requirements to drive down the cost of the vehicle. For example, the services found that JLTV could not achieve both protection level and transportability goals, so the services are accepting a heavier vehicle. A potential risk for the services in allowing industry to build vehicles for testing is that the prototypes may not be mature; the Army will need to keep its options open to changes that may result from these tests. Both the Army and the Marine Corps have articulated a significant future role for their Up-Armored HMMWV fleets, yet the fleets are experiencing reduced automotive performance, the need for better protection as threats have evolved, and other issues.

 

The Army is planning to recapitalize a portion of its Up-Armored HMMWV fleet to increase automotive performance and improve blast protection. The Marine Corps’ plans to extend the service life of some of its HMMWVs used in light tactical missions are not yet known.

 

Click here for the full report (18 pages in PDF format) on the GAO website.

Partager cet article
Repost0
27 octobre 2011 4 27 /10 /octobre /2011 17:10

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ee/B-52H_static_display_arms_06.jpg/800px-B-52H_static_display_arms_06.jpg

photo USAF

 

Oct 26, 2011 ASDNews Source : Radant Technologies, Inc.

 

STOW, MA - October 26, 2011 --[ASDWire]-- Radant Technologies, Inc. has been awarded the B-52 Radomes Replacement Program by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA). This acquisition, through a Firm-Fixed Price Contract valued at $45M, is a first increment representing two-thirds of the total change out of radomes on each B-52 aircraft within the United Sates Air Force fleet. The total program is expected to be executed over the next 7 years.

 

The new radomes will replace aged and unsupportable existing radomes, and will begin flying on the Air Force B-52s within the next eighteen months. The B-52 Stratofortress long range heavy bombers have been in the Air Force inventory for more than 50 years, and are being used in the Middle East and other theaters of operation. The B-52 has been a workhorse for the Air Force and has been through a Service Life Extension Program and is projected to remain a key Air Force asset through 2040. Benefits of the new radomes include improved overall performance, durability and supportability.

 

Dr. Jean-Claude Sureau, President and CEO of Radant Technologies stated, "This award will allow us the opportunity to not only grow our employment levels in Stow, but in our recently added facilities in both Hudson and Berlin, Massachusetts as well." Sureau also commented that "30 - 35 new manufacturing jobs will be created as a result of this new program alone."

Partager cet article
Repost0
27 octobre 2011 4 27 /10 /octobre /2011 16:30

http://www.defpro.com/data/gfx/news/c60d9e1aa487aed5c043e58937ade14f8b71a90d_big.jpg

 

October 27, 2011 defpro.com

 

After the U.S. Army canceled the Future Combat System in June of 2009, it began developing modernization plans, including developing a new Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) and additional network capability. At the same time, the Army was considering options on how to improve its light tactical vehicles.

 

This statement addresses potential issues related to developing (1) the new GCV, (2) a common information network, and (3) the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) in a constrained budget environment. The statement is based largely on previous GAO work conducted over the last year in response to congressional requests and results of other reviews of Army modernization.

 

To conduct this work, GAO analyzed program documentation, strategies, and test results; interviewed independent experts and Army and Department of Defense (DOD) officials; and witnessed demonstrations of current and emerging network technologies.

 

DOD reviewed the facts contained in this statement and provided technical comments, which were incorporated as appropriate.

 

GAO is not making any recommendations with this statement; however, consistent with previous work, this statement underscores the importance of developing sound requirements and focusing up front on what modernization efforts will deliver and at what cost.

 

WHAT GAO FOUND

 

Delivering a feasible, cost-effective, and executable GCV solution presents a major challenge to the Army, with key questions about the robustness of the analysis of alternatives, the plausibility of its 7-year schedule, and cost and affordability. DOD and the Army have taken steps to increase oversight of the program, but resolving these issues during technology development will remain a challenge. For example, the Army has already reduced some requirements and encouraged contractors to use mature technologies in their proposals, but the 7-year schedule remains ambitious, and delays would increase development costs. Independent cost estimates have suggested that 9 to 10 years is a more realistic schedule. Over the next 2 years during the technology development phase, the Army faces major challenges in deciding which capabilities to pursue and include in a GCV vehicle design and determine whether the best option is a new vehicle or modifications to a current vehicle.

 

The Army’s new information network strategy moves away from a single network development program to an incremental approach with which feasible technologies can be developed, tested, and fielded. The new strategy has noteworthy aspects, such as using periodic field evaluations to assess systems that may provide potential benefit and getting soldier feedback on the equipment being tested. However, the Army has not articulated requirements, incremental objectives, or cost and schedule projections for its new network. It is important that the Army proceed in defining requirements and expected capabilities for the network to avoid the risk of developing individual capabilities that may not work together as a network. With the cancellation last week of its ground mobile radio and continuing problems in developing technology to provide advanced networking capability, the Army will still need to find foundational pieces for its network.

 

The Army is reworking earlier plans to develop and acquire the JLTV and is planning to recapitalize some of its High Mobility, Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles (HMWWV). These efforts have just begun, however, and their results are not yet assured. To reduce risk in the JLTV program, the services relied on multiple vendors during technology development to increase their knowledge of the needed technologies, determine the technology maturity level, and determine which requirements were achievable. As a result, the services identified trades in requirements to drive down the cost of the vehicle. For example, the services found that JLTV could not achieve both protection level and transportability goals, so the services are accepting a heavier vehicle. A potential risk for the services in allowing industry to build vehicles for testing is that the prototypes may not be mature; the Army will need to keep its options open to changes that may result from these tests. Both the Army and the Marine Corps have articulated a significant future role for their Up-Armored HMMWV fleets, yet the fleets are experiencing reduced automotive performance, the need for better protection as threats have evolved, and other issues. The Army is planning to recapitalize a portion of its Up-Armored HMMWV fleet to increase automotive performance and improve blast protection. The Marine Corps’ plans to extend the service life of some of its HMMWVs used in light tactical missions are not yet known.

 

The full report (GAO-12-181T) can be viewed at http://goo.gl/W19HG (PDF 526KB, 18 pages)

Partager cet article
Repost0
27 octobre 2011 4 27 /10 /octobre /2011 12:15

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6d/3rd_ID_M1A1_Abrams_TC_and_Gunner_2008.jpg/800px-3rd_ID_M1A1_Abrams_TC_and_Gunner_2008.jpg

photo US DoD

 

October 27, 2011 defpro.com

 

RICHARDSON, Texas | Optex Systems, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Optex Systems Holdings, Inc., and a leading manufacturer of optical sighting systems and assemblies for domestic and foreign military and related applications, announced that it has received a $1.15 million award from the Defense Logistics Agency for a Gunner's Head Assembly on the M1 Abrams Tank.

 

The award to Optex Systems calls for the delivery of 82 units in the next 12 months.

 

"This is an excellent win for Optex. It fits squarely within our core competencies of electro-mechanical and optical manufacturing technologies and it expands our footprint on the M1 Abrams Tank Platform," said Danny Schoening, General Manager and Chief Operating Officer of Optex Systems Holdings, Inc.

 

Optex Systems currently supplies various laser protected periscopes and weapon subsystems on the M1A1 and M1A2 Abrams Tank Platform.

Partager cet article
Repost0
27 octobre 2011 4 27 /10 /octobre /2011 12:10

http://www.asdnews.com/data_news/ID34895_600.jpg

source asdnews.com

 

 

October 27, 2011 defpro.com

 

MIDDLETOWN, R.I. | KVH Industries, Inc., announced that it has received an $8.6 million order for its TACNAV tactical navigation systems for use by an international military customer. Revenue from this order is expected to begin late in the fourth quarter of 2011 and conclude in the fourth quarter of 2014.

 

"KVH's TACNAV tactical navigation solution is an important tool for U.S. and allied warfighters, providing precision navigation as well as coordination of vehicles in critical situations," explains Dan Conway, KVH's vice president of business development. "The system serves as a crucial resource for navigation and battle management, and even as a backup in GPS-denied environments, keeping soldiers safe and out of harm's way wherever they travel. This new order reaffirms the value of KVH's TACNAV products for international militaries, and adds to our steady foundation of revenue for the coming years."

 

KVH's TACNAV military vehicle navigation systems provide unjammable, precision navigation, heading, and pointing data for vehicle drivers, crews, and commanders. TACNAV can also serve as a source of heading and position for situational awareness. The TACNAV systems ordered today will include KVH's TACNAV T•FOG Upgrade, which facilitates accurate mobile integration of direct fire weapons and fire zone coordination for improved pointing accuracy, target location, and overall operational effectiveness.

 

TACNAV systems are currently in use on U.S. and allied vehicles participating in ongoing operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere. Military forces fielding TACNAV systems include the U.S. Army and Marine Corps, as well as many allied customers, among them Canada, Sweden, Great Britain, Germany, Spain, Australia, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Malaysia, Switzerland, and Italy.

Partager cet article
Repost0
27 octobre 2011 4 27 /10 /octobre /2011 07:05

cyber warfare

 

October 26, 2011 Loren B. Thompson, Ph.D. / Early Warning Blog, Lexington Institute – defpro.com

 

The U.S. Navy is developing a much-needed airborne jamming system to replace its Vietnam-era jammers. It's called the Next Generation Jammer, and if all goes as planned then U.S. aviators will soon have an electronic warfare tool with greater power, precision and agility than any previous jammer. That's a good thing, because hostile emitters are proliferating like bunnies in the springtime.

 

However, one thing aviators will not be getting is a new tool for conducting cyber warfare against enemy information networks. Contrary to what trade-press stories keep reporting about the new jammer, it will not have the capability to insert viruses into enemy networks. There is no formal requirement for such a capability -- which is just as well, since it will be hard enough to meet the requirements that actually have been specified for more radiated power, greater spectral precision, and the like.

 

It's not that the Next Generation Jammer couldn't be used as a cyber weapon or shouldn't be used, but simply that it won't be. No requirement, hence no capability. Maybe someday the cyber warfare features will be added, but right now they would just complicate the task of developing a new jamming system. So forget all those gee-whiz stories about using the Next Generation Jammer to penetrate enemy nerve centers. It isn't going to happen anytime soon.

Partager cet article
Repost0
27 octobre 2011 4 27 /10 /octobre /2011 07:05

http://www.shephardmedia.com/static/images/article/Oshkosh_TerraMax-MTVR_-_Cargo_UGV_2_small.JPG

 

26 October 2011 by Andrew White - shephardmedia.com

 

The US Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory (MCWL) has completed a second Limited Technical Assessment (LTA) of Oshkosh’s Medium Tactical Vehicle Replacement (MTVR) unmanned system.

 

The nine-day assessment, part of MCWL’s Cargo UGV programme, was conducted at Oshkosh’s Gascola test centre near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It involved six marines and the operation of a single operator control unit (OCU) and MTVR UGV.

 

According to Oshkosh’s chief engineer for unmanned systems, John Beck, the LTA went ‘extremely well’, with all marines taking to the system ‘quite readily’.

 

Tests involved a series of scenarios ranging from 30 to 90 minutes in duration as well as having the MTVR UGV lead, and follow, a convoy of manned vehicles. Tests started with basic applications and rolled into more complex scenarios as the week progressed, Beck told Shephard.

 

Following the LTA, Capt Warren Watts of the Cargo UGV project office, described a requirement to improve the night driving capability of the vehicle. ‘We could use improvements in situational cameras and for tele-operation. Basically, today we use daytime cameras but some can be changed [to night vision] to improve operation at night.’

 

Describing how all but one of the participating marines were Afghanistan or Iraq veterans, Watts added that troops were still ‘thinking of new and different ways to use the system and how they would field the technology if they had it in theatre’.

 

Referring again to current operations, Watts said the marines believed the MTVR UGV would be ‘of value as technology progresses’, but stressed that there were currently no plans to deploy the system. However, he added: ‘They think it should be fielded eventually.’

 

Meanwhile, parts have already been ordered to manufacture a second MTVR which could be operational by May next year. This, according to Beck, would allow two vehicles to be operated from a single OCU.

 

Looking ahead, a third LTA is schedule for Q3 in 2012 followed by a Limited Objective Experiment by the end of the year at Camp Lejeune in North Carolina.

 

Currently, MTVR UGV comprises one or two LIDAR systems; six EO/IR cameras for 180-degree coverage of obstacle classification; as well as short, medium and long range radars. The US Navy is looking for a Cargo UGV to be able to deliver approximately six tonnes of supplies including water, ammunition and food.

Partager cet article
Repost0
27 octobre 2011 4 27 /10 /octobre /2011 07:00

http://images.defensetech.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/combatcaravan1.jpg

 

26.10.2011 by John Reed DEFENSETECH

 

No, it’s not brand new but it’s still cool. This little model on display at ATK’s booth during the Association of the U.S. Army’s annual convention in DC a couple of years ago represents the company’s AC-208 Combat Caravan. Now, air force’s around the world use the already use the Cessna Caravan for light cargo and ISR duties. Two years ago, ATK began turning the Iraqi air force’s caravans into very light gunships (well, missile ships to be specific) by arming them with Hellfire missiles, electro-optical/IR sensors, laser target designators, datalinks and countermeasures. This turned the little cargo planes into cheap counter-insurgency (COIN) aircraft.

 

As you all know, the U.S. military has been trying to field (high performance) prop-driven COIN planes, for years. While this plane would likely be based on a trainer aircraft, it would receive significant upgrades — making it almost purpose built for the role. Congress keeps fighting the idea, saying the military needs to justify the expense of such aircraft.

Adding weapons to the Air Force’s MC-12 Liberty ISR birds could be a fast and cheap way around this. The planes are already in service downrange with trained pilots who are used to working closely with ground troops — adding weapons wouldn’t be a huge stretch. (Heck, Hawker Beechcraft has already modified the MC-12’s wings to accept weapons). Critics of the COIN plane idea claim that even the relatively quick and nimble AT-6 and Super Tucano already being considered may be too vulnerable to ground fire. You can imagine what they’d say about a modified cargo plane performing this role.

 

Check out the specs on ATK’s Combat Caravan, after the jump:

 

http://images.defensetech.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/AC-208BIraqiFiresHellfire.jpg

 

Armed Caravan — AC-208 Combat Caravan



Partager cet article
Repost0
27 octobre 2011 4 27 /10 /octobre /2011 07:00

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1e/F-22_Raptor_edit1_%28cropped%29.jpg/800px-F-22_Raptor_edit1_%28cropped%29.jpg

photo USAF

 

26 Oct 2011 By DAVE MAJUMDAR DefenseNews

 

Lockheed Martin has been awarded an F-22 Raptor sustainment contract for $24 million to find the root cause of the fifth generation air superiority fighter's oxygen system among other things.

 

The company "is being awarded a $24,363,993 cost-plus-fixed-fee contract modification for the F-22 Program to provide sustaining engineering and depot partnering task associated with non-destructive inspection organic capability, hypoxia root cause analysis, titanium crack growth, site activation, slider seals, and radar cross section turntable," reads a Defense Department contract announcement posted on defense-aerospace.com.

Partager cet article
Repost0

Présentation

  • : RP Defense
  • : Web review defence industry - Revue du web industrie de défense - company information - news in France, Europe and elsewhere ...
  • Contact

Recherche

Articles Récents

Categories