Overblog Tous les blogs Top blogs Entreprises & Marques Tous les blogs Entreprises & Marques
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
MENU
1 avril 2014 2 01 /04 /avril /2014 16:35
U.S. Closes 290 Bases In Afghanistan, Less Than 33,000 Troops Left

 

April 1, 2014. David Pugliese - Defence Watch

 

Michelle Tan of Army Times has this:

 

The U.S. has closed nearly 290 bases across Afghanistan as of March 1 and fewer than 80 bases remain.

When it comes to personnel, there are still about 33,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, but there’s also “a steady path to reduce throughout the year,” said Marine Brig. Gen. Daniel O’Donohue, the chief operations officer for the International Security Assistance Force Joint Command.

O’Donohue provided an overview of U.S. troops still serving downrange during a March 18 phone interview with Army Times.

“We’ve reduced our forces from about 100,000, by about 67 percent,” said he said. “We are truly in a support role.”

 

Read more

 

Partager cet article
Repost0
1 avril 2014 2 01 /04 /avril /2014 15:20
U.S. Army M1A2 Abrams Main Battle Tank, Company C, 1st Battalion, 67th Armor Regiment, 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division

U.S. Army M1A2 Abrams Main Battle Tank, Company C, 1st Battalion, 67th Armor Regiment, 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division

 

April 1, 2014 Strategy Page

 

Although the United States Army still owns 7,000 M1 tanks, less than 20 percent of them are actually in service. That’s the 1,288 M1 tanks in 92 M1 companies with 14 tanks per company. There are no more tank battalions. Instead there are Combined Arms battalions in Heavy Brigades. Each of these battalions have two tank companies (and two infantry companies). Meanwhile the army is continuing its downsizing, going from 16 armored brigades (64 M1 companies) to ten (40 companies). The Army National Guard still has seven armored brigades (28 M1 companies). The reduction will remove 24 M1 companies leaving 952 M1 tanks in service.

 

Each crew has four men, giving the U.S. 3,808 M1 tank crewmen. The army is hustling to retrain all these tank crews for conventional combat. During the last decade many tank companies were used as infantry or to operate MRAP vehicles. The army is using lots of simulators to retrain the tank crews and this cuts costs a lot. These simulators have become more common since the 1990s and have proved to be very effective in quickly and cheaply teaching useful skills to tank crews. After lots of simulator time, the crews perform very effectively when they take the tanks out and do all the moving and firing under realistic (or even combat) conditions.

 

All those additional M1 tanks are there if there is a major war. With all the simulators it is easier and quicker to train more crews than it is to build more M1 tanks.

Partager cet article
Repost0
30 mars 2014 7 30 /03 /mars /2014 11:20
U.S. Army’s Artillery Branch Preparing For Future Wars By Returning To Cold War-Era Tactics


March 26, 2014. David Pugliese - Defence Watch

 

The Stars and Stripes is reporting that the U.S. Army’s field artillery is preparing for future wars by returning to Cold War-era tactics supplemented by modern, mobile technology.

 

More from Stars and Stripes:

Though counterinsurgency has been at the center of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the recent past might not be the best guide to new threats, participants at the Future Artillery conference in London, hosted by Defense iQ, said earlier this week.

Maj. Gen. Mark McDonald, commander of the Fires Center of Excellence at Ft. Sill, Okla., told Stars and Stripes on the margins of the conference that U.S. artillery has to regain the capability to fight in more traditional, force-on-force style conflicts.

His vision of artillery training re-emphasizes 20th-century-style tactics but with 21st-century equipment. Soldiers would focus less on training to fire guns manually, by doing calculations themselves, and would instead rely more on the digital tools.

“We’ve got most of the pieces in place to be able to train the digital system. What we have to do is get everybody really comfortable with it, train with it more often, so that’s their go-to system,” McDonald said.

 

Full story here

Partager cet article
Repost0
28 mars 2014 5 28 /03 /mars /2014 08:20
4th Stryker Brigade Combat Team - photo US Army

4th Stryker Brigade Combat Team - photo US Army

 

March 27, 2014: Strategy Page

 

The U.S. Army is disbanding one of its nine Stryker brigades. This is part of a post-war reduction that will see ten combat brigades eliminated and army strength reduced by 80,000 personnel. The disbanded unit is the 4th Brigade of the 2nd Infantry Division. The brigade was formed in 2005 from the 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment, a unit that has been in service since 1836. During its nine years the 4th Brigade served in Iraq and Afghanistan and suffered some 600 casualties, including 58 dead during 39 months of combat. Most of the casualties were suffered during the 2007 tour (of 15 months) in Iraq.

 

Another Stryker brigade is being formed in 2014, from the 1st Brigade of the 4th Infantry Division. Not only does the army want to hang onto nine Stryker Brigades but it also wants to buy enough of the new Double-V Hull (DVH) wheeled armored vehicles to equip all nine of the brigades with the new vehicle. But because of budget problems it looks like there will only be enough money to equip three brigades with the DVH model.

 

Stryker acquired a good reputation in Iraq and there has been a lot of foreign interest in that, and wheeled armored vehicles in general. But money is short and likely to continue to be tight for a decade or more.  So the 600 older Strykers replaced by DVH models in the DVH brigades will be put into storage along with the specialized production equipment for Stryker in the hope that eventually the money will be available. Before that some older Strykers were converted to DVH models to provide enough DVH Strykers for the third DVH brigade.

 

Stryker production is supposed to end in 2014, with 4,466 vehicles delivered since 2002. Most (96 percent) were actually delivered by 2012.

 

The DVH design is intended to improve resistance to mines (more common in Afghanistan than Iraq) by adding a V shaped bottom. This is one of the key elements of the MRAP (Mine Resistant Ambush Protected) design, but the DVH is cheaper to operate and better suited to a wider array of missions. Some of the DVH prototypes were run (via remote control), over mines and roadside bombs. These tests demonstrated that the V shaped hull made the vehicles much safer. Developing the new prototype design cost about $58 million. There are 762 DVH Strykers in service with the last of them delivered in 2013. The DVH models cost about $2.1 million each and first experienced combat in 2011. They performed as expected.

 

The army initially bought enough DVH models to equip two Stryker brigades. Each Stryker brigade has 332 Stryker vehicles. There are ten different models, but most are the infantry carrier version. The original Stryker cost about a million dollars each, plus the costs of weapons and equipment. The DVH version is 6.95 meters (22.92 feet) long, 2.72 meters (8.97 feet) high, and 2.64 meters (8.72 feet) wide. Weighing 17 tons, it has a top speed of 100 kilometers per hour and a range (on roads) of 500 kilometers. Stryker has a crew of two, a turret with a remotely controlled 12.7mm machine-gun, and can carry nine troops. A 7.62mm machine-gun is also carried and often another 12.7mm one as well.

 

The army is planning on incorporating the V shaped hull into the new Stryker 2.0 design, which makes DVH models Stryker 1.5 (unofficially). The Stryker 2 will weigh about a ton more than current models and have a more powerful engine (450 horsepower versus the current 350), plus a suspension system and other mechanical components upgraded to support up to 27 tons, larger tires, improved brakes, and improved sensors (so that troops inside the vehicle will have better awareness of what's outside). These are the major modifications, there will be several more minor ones (better air conditioning, a sniper detector, more electricity generation, and so on). Outwards appearance won't change much, other than the V shape hull.

 

Stryker 2 provides for "growth" (more armor and equipment) as well as making the vehicle more agile and reliable. The changes are based on user feedback and are considered a modernization project, not, strictly speaking, a new version of Stryker. Most of the 3,300 Strykers the army has in service have been in combat, and units headed for Afghanistan were the first to get the modernized ones. With all the budget cuts Stryker 2.0 may never see service.

Partager cet article
Repost0
26 mars 2014 3 26 /03 /mars /2014 08:20
Unmanned Vehicle Demo Showcases Leap-Ahead Technology

 

 

25.03.2014 US Army - army-guide.com

 

Working closely with Lockheed Martin and a conglomeration of Army technology, acquisition and user community stakeholders, the U.S. Army Tank Automotive Research Development and Engineering Center successfully demonstrated an unmanned military convoy Jan. 14 at Fort Hood, Texas.

 

From a rooftop in the Fort Hood training area, military and industry VIPs saw firsthand how the Autonomous Mobility Appliqué System, or AMAS, enabled two driverless Palletized Loading System prime movers and an M915 tractor trailer truck to seamlessly interact with a manned Humvee gun truck escort. The convoy negotiated oncoming traffic, followed rules of the road, recognized and avoided pedestrians and various obstacles, and then used intelligence and decision-making abilities to re-route their direction through a maze of test areas to complete both complex urban and rural line haul missions.

 

As the ground systems expert within the U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command, TARDEC develops, integrates and sustains the right technology solutions to address ever-changing threats and shifts in strategic, technological and fiscal environments. Flexibility and adaptability are vital to future systems, and AMAS is designed to provide a wide range of military vehicle platforms with optionally-manned capabilities that will increase safety and provide the warfighter with additional flexibility.

 

"We're not looking to replace Soldiers with robots. It's about augmenting and increasing capability," said Col. Chris Cross, chief of Science and Technology at the Army Capabilities Integration Center.

 

Equipped with GPS, Light Detecting and Ranging systems, known as LIDAR, Automotive radar, a host of sensors and other high-tech hardware and software components, the common appliqué kit's intelligence and autonomous decision-making abilities can be installed in practically any military vehicle, transforming an ordinary vehicle into an optionally manned version.

 

AMAS can also keep personnel out of harm's way and provide Soldiers on manned missions with increased situational awareness and other safety benefits. For instance, AMAS also features collision mitigation braking, lane-keeping assist and a roll-over warning system, electronic stability control and adaptive cruise control. During manned missions, these additional safety features could theoretically increase Soldier performance. The robotic mode frees up the vehicle crew to more closely watch for enemy threats, while still leaving them the option of manually taking control of the vehicle when necessary.

 

"The AMAS hardware and software performed exactly as designed and dealt successfully with all of the real-world obstacles that a real-world convoy would encounter," said AMAS Program Manager David Simon, with Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control.

 

AMAS development aligns with Army goals for the Future Force. At an Association of the United States Army breakfast in Arlington, Va., Jan. 23, Army Chief of Staff Gen. Raymond Odierno talked about the Army Modernization Strategy and the difficult decisions ahead.

 

"What is that leap-ahead technology that we need that could make a real difference for our Soldiers on the ground?" Odierno asked. "What is the technology that allows us to decrease the weight so we can be more expeditionary? I need tactical mobility for the future. We need to move towards mobility and try to determine how we sustain survivability while increasing mobility."

 

In his just-released CSA Strategic Priorities, Odierno added that we must prioritize Soldier-centered modernization and procurement of proven technologies so that Soldiers have the best weapons, equipment and protection to accomplish the mission.

 

Another AMAS demonstration with more vehicles and more complex notional scenarios is scheduled for later this year.

 

"We are very happy with the results, but the AMAS must undergo more testing before it becomes deployable," said TARDEC AMAS Lead Engineer Bernard Theisen.

 

"The vehicles and systems are replaceable, but nothing can replace the life of a Soldier. These systems keep Soldiers safe and make them more efficient," he said.

 

TARDEC is the ground systems expert within RDECOM. It provides engineering and scientific expertise for Department of Defense manned and autonomy-enabled ground systems and ground support systems; serves as the nation's laboratory for advanced military automotive technology; and provides leadership for the Army's advanced Science and Technology research, demonstration, development and full life cycle engineering efforts.

 

ABOUT TARDEC

 

TARDEC is part of the U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command, which has the mission to develop technology and engineering solutions for America's Soldiers.

 

TARDEC is also a TACOM Life Cycle Management Command partner. In this capacity, it is responsible for critical technology functions within the "acquisition -- logistics -- technology" system life-cycle model, including: technology maturation and integration; technology subject-matter expertise; systems-level engineering analysis; and systems engineering.

 

TARDEC provides engineering support for more than 2,800 Army systems and many of the Army's and DoD's top joint development programs. The organization is responsible for maximizing the research, development, transition and sustainment of technologies and integration across ground systems.

 

RDECOM is a major subordinate command of the U.S. Army Materiel Command. AMC is the Army's premier provider of materiel readiness -- technology, acquisition support, materiel development, logistics power projection, and sustainment -- to the total force, across the spectrum of joint military operations. If a Soldier shoots it, drives it, flies it, wears it, eats it or communicates with it, AMC delivers it.

Partager cet article
Repost0
25 mars 2014 2 25 /03 /mars /2014 08:20
US Army opens acquisition for counter-UAS weapon system

 

Mar. 24, 2014 By Erik Schechter  - FG

 

New York - Concerned about the emerging threat of unmanned aircraft, the US Army is canvassing American defence contractors for information on systems that can detect, classify and destroy drones of varying sizes.

 

According to the request for information (RFI), the army’s Aviation and Missile Research, Development, and Engineering Center (AMRDEC) is open to both “kinetic and non-kinetic options” – the latter referring to lasers.

 

The US Navy has already placed a laser weapon system demonstrator aboard the destroyer USS Dewey and tested the weapon against target drones in June 2012. The Army has likewise tested a vehicle-mounted Boeing high energy laser mobile demonstrator against mortar rounds and drones. However, there is no programme of record among the services to develop such a directed energy weapon.

 

Another interest of ARMDEC is that proposed systems be able to operate at both at the brigade-and-above and brigade-and-below echelons, which have their own network connectivity issues and levels of situational awareness.

 

The RFI, for example, notes that those at the tip of the spear resemble those homeland security operators in terms of the ad hoc nature of their deployment and size of their area of operation.

 

Indeed, the systems proposed should be designed for both overseas and domestic operations, the RFI states.

 

Contractors have until April 1 to answer the RFI, with selected respondents invited to two-day workshop starting April 30 at Redstone Arsenal, Ala.

 

The RFI opens the acquisition phase of the army’s pursuit of a capability to defeat unmanned aircraft.

 

Last year, the army’s armaments research, development and engineering center (ARDEC) at Picatinny Arsenal staged an experiment.

 

The center integrated a fire control radar with existing weapon systems. Using a “novel warhead design”, a gun-launched munition destroyed a small-class unmanned aircraft, according to army documents.

 

One challenge in the fight against unmanned aircraft is the cost. The army has highly capable air defence batteries, but their cost may seem excessive if used against a small unmanned aircraft.

 

The ARDEC experiment focused on a “low-cost-per-kill weapon system”, the army says.

Partager cet article
Repost0
23 mars 2014 7 23 /03 /mars /2014 12:20
Lockheed Martin's DAGR Missile Scores a Perfect 16 of 16 in Flight Tests for US Army

 

 

Mar 21, 2014 (SPX)

 

Orlando FL - Lockheed Martin recently demonstrated the ability of its DAGR missile to launch from an Apache AH-64D helicopter and repeatedly hit the target during a series of Air Worthiness Release (AWR) live firing flight tests at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla.

 

The AWR tests demonstrated DAGR's capability as an air-launched weapon. In each of the 16 flight tests, a DAGR missile locked onto the laser spot illuminating the target before launch. Upon launch, each missile flew between 1.5 and 5.1 kilometers and hit the target within one meter of the laser spot.

 

"These flight tests confirm DAGR's ability to safely launch and separate from a moving, diving platform without degrading aircraft or weapon performance," said Kevin Fitzpatrick, close combat systems development program manager at Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control.

 

"These tests also validate DAGR production readiness at our Ocala Operations facility."

 

Prior to AWR testing, Lockheed Martin completed DAGR System Qualification testing, validating the missile and rail-mounted canister for use in aircraft captive carry, storage and transportation operations.

 

The 30 System Qualification guided flights demonstrated DAGR's ability to hit moving targets, devastate tactical targets such as structures and trucks, and achieve high accuracy when launched with a 7-degree offset, up to six kilometers away from the target.

 

DAGR incorporates proven HELLFIRE II technology into a 2.75-inch/70 millimeter guidance kit that integrates seamlessly with legacy Hydra-70 rockets. Its lock-on-before-launch mode ensures the missile identifies the correct target prior to launch. Multiple DAGRs can be fired in rapid succession at different targets using different laser codes from multiple designators.

 

The result is a laser-guided missile that puts a 10-pound warhead within one meter of the laser spot, defeating high-value, non-armored or lightly-armored targets while minimizing collateral damage.

 

Lockheed Martin has conducted more than 40 DAGR guided flights from ranges of 1 to 6 kilometers. DAGR has been launched from multiple HELLFIRE-equipped rotary-wing platforms, including the AH-64D Apache, AH-6 Little Bird and OH-58 Kiowa Warrior, as well as the ground-based HELLFIRE/DAGR pedestal launcher.

Partager cet article
Repost0
20 mars 2014 4 20 /03 /mars /2014 08:20
US Army At ‘Tipping Point’ of Unmanned Aircraft System Capabilities

 

March 20th, 2014 By Army News Service - defencetalk.com

 

“We’re on the tipping point of unmanned aerial systems’ ability to deliver capability to the Soldier,” said Col. Thomas von Eschenbach.

 

The unmanned aerial/aircraft system, or UAS, is no longer seen by Soldiers as a new system and as the months and years pass, it will “not just be used by a few, but will become integral to the Army fabric and how it fights and is used and understood,” said Eschenbach, who is the UAS capability manager for U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command.

 

Eschenbach and others spoke today at a media roundtable at Redstone Arsenal, Ala., where a celebration was held marking the Army’s milestone of 2 million UAS flight hours.

 

Col. Timothy Baxter, project manager, UAS, noted that it took 20 years for Army unmanned aircraft systems to reach 1 million flight hours. That milestone came in 2010. With increased use of those systems, it took just a few more years to reach the 2 million flight-hours milestone.

 

He said what is most impressive is that 90 percent of total UAS flight hours were logged in direct support of combat operations. “Every one of those hours has meant something to a commander on the ground overseas engaged in combat,” Baxter said.

 

Baxter noted that of the total two million flight hours, Shadow UAS logged 900,000 of those. However, as more Gray Eagles are fielded, he said he expects it to be the system with the most impressive mileage.

 

Rich Kretzschmar, deputy project manager, UAS, said that reaching three million flight hours may take longer than it did to get from one to two million because the operations tempo in theater has now leveled off.

 

And, as more UAS systems return to the U.S. from overseas, there could be fewer opportunities to fly them because of restricted airspace flight rules, Baxter added.

 

But, the UAS will play a crucial part of the Army’s aviation restructure initiative, Eschenbach said.

 

As brigade combat teams, or BCTs, shrink from four to three per division and as maneuver battalions are reinvested back into other BCTs, three Shadow UAS platoons will be put inside of each attack reconnaissance squadron, he said. That would add a total of 30 platoons of Shadows into the combat aviation brigade structure. Those squadrons will also contain AH-64E Apache helicopters.

 

FUTURE UAS FLIGHT PATH

 

Don’t expect to see a lot of new UAS models, Baxter cautioned.

“Our platforms are the platforms we’re going to have for the foreseeable future in the Army,” he explained.

 

Instead, he said future efforts will be in the area of new technologies for advanced payloads and improvements in man-to-unmanned teaming.

 

As to unmanned vs manned, Kretzschmar pointed out that UASs are not replacing pilots.

 

Rather, he said, they are the “extension of the commander’s ability to do things, extend reach, reduce risk and get better situational awareness on the battlefield.”

 

Also in the cards for UAS is something not too sexy, but important nonetheless to a budget-challenged Army: sustainment costs.

 

Baxter said the UAS community has moved away from contractor logistics support to “green-suiter” maintainers, as Soldiers get their own military occupational specialty and become more proficient. In the next war, the Army may not have the luxury of setting up forward operating bases teeming with contract support.

 

Another cost savings, he pointed out, is through applying “performance-based logistics” to contracts, so as to “incorporate better buying power.”

 

Since Eschenbach is with TRADOC it’s not surprising he sees doctrine as well as the operational environment dictating the vision of where UASs are headed.

 

Eschenbach thinks UASs have capabilities that go far beyond the current state of reconnaissance, surveillance, security and precision strikes.

 

His team of planners is already looking at UAS employment in “Force 2025,” where UAS will vastly extend the network, meaning the reach that commanders have on the ground.

 

As this takes place over the coming years, he said Army leaders will need to better understand the capabilities of UASs and what they can do for them.

 

“We’re asking warfighters in a smaller, leaner Army to be more expeditionary, lethal and survivable, focused on the next thing our nation asks us to do,” Eschenbach concluded. In that environment, there’s “plenty of future for UAS.”

Partager cet article
Repost0
14 mars 2014 5 14 /03 /mars /2014 17:20
LM Receives $255 M US Army Contract For Guided MLRS Rocket Production

 

Mar 13, 2014 ASDNews Source : Lockheed Martin Corporation

 

Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT ) received a $255 million contract in late 2013 from the U.S. Army for Lot 9 production of the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) Unitary rocket.

 

The new allotment of rockets will be delivered to the U.S. Army, Marine Corps and Republic of Italy.  Delivery will begin in April 2015 . Work will be performed at the Lockheed Martin facilities in Camden, Ark. , and Dallas, Texas .

 

Read more

Partager cet article
Repost0
13 mars 2014 4 13 /03 /mars /2014 08:20
K-MAX And SMSS In Unmanned Air/Ground Trials

 

 

24/02/2014 by Paul Fiddian - Armed Forces International's Lead Reporter

 

Unmanned air and ground technologies will be paired in combined autonomous trials involving Lockheed Martin and the US Army.

 

In these, the US aerospace/defence firm's K-MAX unmanned helicopter and SMSS (Squad Mission Support System) will work together in the RSTA (reconnaissance, surveillance and target acquisition) role. According to officials, it's a first-time pairing that could expand the future battlefield roles of unmanned systems.

 

Two years ago, a Squad Mission Support System fitted with a multi-camera Gyrocam network carried out remotely-operated reconnaissance over a 200+ mile control radius. The new trials will build on this work, integrating the unmanned helicopter.

 

K-MAX And SMSS Trials

 

"This level of mission cooperation between unmanned air and ground vehicles of this size, controlled beyond line-of-sight, is an industry first", said Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control's Joe Zinecker, in the firm's K-MAX UAS /SMSS UGV trials press release. "This demonstration could lead to expanded missions, such as remote sensing and monitoring of suspected chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive threats or events."

 

The K-MAX UAS was developed by Lockheed Martin and Kaman Aerospace Corporation. Tasked with resupplying deployed US warfighters with battlefield cargo, it can transport payloads weighing up to 6,000 pounds. The Squad Mission Support System previously achieved another unmanned systems first, working alongside deployed US forces in Afghanistan.

 

Unmanned Air And Ground Systems

 

The unmanned air and ground systems trial will be carried out in coming months. As it unfolds, the K-MAX will carry an SMSS as an underslung load and position it in a simulated frontline environment. With the SMSS surveying the area, the K-MAX will fly back to its base.

 

'In this new scenario, the reconnaissance, surveillance, target acquisition sensor onboard the SMSS will be used to locate, observe and obtain coordinates of targets and other objects of interest', Lockheed Martin explains. 'The coordinates and sensor imagery will be passed back through a satellite communications system to a remote operations center hundreds of miles away for analysis.'

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 mars 2014 3 12 /03 /mars /2014 17:20
Tobyhanna lands Gray Eagle Ground Control Station repairs

 

Mar 12, 2014 ASDNews By  Justin Eimers, CECOM US Army

 

The Army, Marine Corps, Air Force and Navy have named Tobyhanna Army Depot as the Depot Source of Repair for the Gray Eagle (MQ-1C) Unmanned Aircraft System Ground Control Stations.

 

The decision by the four services' Maintenance Inter-service Support Management Offices recognizes the depot as the installation best suited for these repairs.

 

"Through the acquisition process, there is a lot of assessment that takes place, including core logistics analyses that look at our capabilities," said Nick Caprioli, chief of the Business Development Division. "Tobyhanna was selected based on infrastructure, training and technical expertise for this type of work."

 

Repairs for the new workload will begin in fiscal year 2016, with 19 Ground Control Stations, or GCSs, scheduled per year, totaling more than 75 systems through fiscal year 2018.

 

The Gray Eagle system is a long-range, high-altitude Unmanned Aircraft System, or UAS, that provides the capability to perform wide-area reconnaissance, surveillance and target acquisition. It is also capable of relaying communications and can be equipped for attack missions. The system consists of the aircraft, GCS, data terminals and data links. Each GCS controls one Gray Eagle aircraft and is used by the operator to perform command and control, payload control and weapon launch operations.

 

Due to their complexity, Gray Eagle systems and components are currently replaced rather than repaired, exhausting money and resources. Depot personnel are developing cost-effective solutions to repair GCSs and increase capability. Tobyhanna recognizes that the assignment of this Depot Source of Repair, or DSOR, will enable the depot to be selected for additional DSORs for UAS equipment.

 

Katlin Edmunds, business development specialist, noted that revamping the DSOR decision process will also help substantially reduce costs and bring more UAS work to the depot.

 

"DSOR selection helps ensure effective use of commercial and organic depot maintenance resources," she said. "We have been aggressively trying to streamline processes, find inefficiencies and figure out the best way to accommodate new UAS workloads."

 

Based on trends in the market, business management analysts anticipate that UAS will be the depot's largest commodity in the future. As the only Army depot involved in the Integrated Product Team, or IPT, for Air Force and Army UAS, Tobyhanna is well positioned to receive workloads for additional UAS component repairs. The IPT is working with Tobyhanna to identify the need for any new test equipment, facilitation or training necessary for additional UAS work.

 

"Part of the planning process to bring in this workload is to have our engineers work with the program offices to make sure our capabilities are sufficient to provide the best solution for everybody involved," said Caprioli. "The depot's all-hands-on-deck approach to secure this DSOR selection has helped increase our marketability and should open doors for future UAS workloads."

 

Tobyhanna Army Depot is a recognized leader in providing world-class logistics support for Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance, also known as C4ISR, Systems across the Department of Defense. Tobyhanna's Corporate Philosophy, dedicated work force and electronics expertise ensure the depot is the Joint C4ISR provider of choice for all branches of the Armed Forces and industry partners. Tobyhanna's unparalleled capabilities include full-spectrum support for sustainment, overhaul and repair, fabrication and manufacturing, engineering design and development, systems integration, technology insertion, modification, and global field support to warfighters.

 

About 3,500 personnel are employed at Tobyhanna, which is located in the Pocono Mountains of northeastern Pennsylvania. Tobyhanna Army Depot is part of the U.S. Army Communications-Electronics Command. Headquartered at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md., the command's mission is to research, develop, acquire, field and sustain communications, command, control computer, intelligence, electronic warfare and sensors capabilities for the Armed Forces.

Partager cet article
Repost0
9 mars 2014 7 09 /03 /mars /2014 12:20
UH-72 Lakota photo US Army

UH-72 Lakota photo US Army

 

07/03/2014 Par Guillaume Steuer  - air-cosmos.com

 

En ces temps de disette budgétaire, les bonnes nouvelles sont rares pour les industriels de défense européens sur le marché américain. La proposition de budget pour l'année fiscale 2015 dévoilée par le Pentagone en début de semaine sourit pourtant à la filiale américaine d'Airbus Helicopters : afin de rationaliser ses flottes d'hélicoptères, l'US Army prévoit d'acquérir 424 UH-72 Lakota, un dérivé "américain" de l'EC145, alors qu'il n'en était jusqu'alors prévu que 345.

 

Le Lakota revient donc de loin : "le budget final pour l'année 2014 ne prévoyait que 20 machines au lieu de 31, et ne précisait aucun quantité au-delà", souligne un porte-parole d'Airbus Group Inc. L'an dernier encore, la crainte était donc grande de voir le programme arrêté avant même d'avoir été mené à terme.

 

Mais un vaste chantier de rationalisation des voilures tournantes dans l'US Army sourit finalement au Lakota : l'armée de terre américaine a en effet décidé de faire de cet appareil son principal hélicoptère d'entraînement initial pour ses personnels navigants, en commandant 79 machines de plus qu'initialement prévu.

 

La proposition de budget pour l'année fiscale 2015, qui devra toutefois être validée par le Congrès, prévoit donc la commande de 55 Lakota l'an prochain, et 45 l'année suivante. "A ce jour, nous avons livré 296 machines au client américain", souligne le porte-parole de la filiale américaine. Des livraisons que l'industriel se félicite d'avoir honoré dans le respect des coûts et des budgets. Les Lakota sont produits à Columbus, dans le Mississippi.

Partager cet article
Repost0
5 mars 2014 3 05 /03 /mars /2014 18:20
US Army Plans to Cut 3 of 13 Aviation Brigades by 2019

The US Army plans on cutting three of its 13 combat aviation brigades by 2019. (US Army)

 

Mar. 4, 2014 - By PAUL McLEARY – Defense news

 

WASHINGTON — US Army officials said Tuesday that as part of its wide-ranging aviation restructuring, the service is preparing to cut three of the service’s 13 combat aviation brigades (CAB) by 2019.

 

The service’s active component currently fields four heavy CABs, 8 medium, and 1 with “Full-Spectrum” capabilities, but Davis Welch, deputy director of the Army budget office told reporters at the Pentagon today that “the restructure will reduce the number of aviation brigades by three in the active component while restructuring aviation brigades to optimize their efficiency and quality.”

 

He added that under the plan, the Army’s Reserve component will be able maintain its 12 aviation brigades but they “will be restructured and optimized for assault, lift and medavac missions.”

 

The announcement comes on the heels of the Army’s proposal to take all of the National Guard’s Apache attack helicopters to fulfill the active army’s aerial scout mission after it divests itself of the Kiowa helicopters currently fulfilling that mission.

 

At the time of this posting, requests for further comment from the Army were unanswered.

 

Overall, the Army’s fiscal year 2015 request sees the budget for its aircraft fleet tick slightly upward from $4.6 billion ($5 billion requested) in 2014 to $5.1 billion, while the Apache helicopter’s budget will fall from $884 million — $1 billion with Overseas Contingency Operations in 2014 — to $775 million in 2015 so it can upgrade 25 birds to the latest configuration.

 

There is another $416 million for 55 new Lakota helicopters, with sources saying that the service will request funding to buy 45 more Lakotas in 2016.

 

The Army is also slated to receive $7.5 billion of the $26 billion for the Opportunity Growth and Security Initiative, 54 percent of which will go toward operations, maintenance and training accounts, while the rest will be pointed to equipment modernization, including $500 million for Black Hawk helicopter upgrades, and more than $600 million for Apache work.

 

Overall however, the year-by-year budget graph that accompanied the Army’s budget request showed a significant cascade down from the 2010 budget onward.

 

The Army is asking for $121 billion in its base budget in ’15, down only $4 billion from the $125 billion enacted for 2014 — but down significantly from the $144 billion granted in ’10 during the height of the fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

 

But the big cuts aren’t in the base. The biggest drop is in the wartime spending accounts, which for the Army has dropped by more than half from 2011 to 2014 — going from $99 billion to $43 billion.

 

That said, the requested budget remains largely flat form 2014, with about $1.3 billion less in research, development and acquisition and $1.8 billion in operations and maintenance. Personnel costs remained flat at $56 billion.

 

Personnel costs continue to be the albatross hanging around the Army’s neck, eating up 46 percent of the service’s budget overall even as the service continues to shed 20,000 soldiers a year in its effort to reach 490,000 by the end of 2015. It’s current end strength is about 510,000.

 

But those troops will have to get by with much less training than Army leadership has advocated for.

 

Training is expected to reach only to company level and, in some cases, battalion level in 2015, with the National Guard performing mostly company level and below training exercises due to lack of funding. The Army will only send those brigades through a full National Training Center rotation that are planning to deploy to Afghanistan or South Korea, or that are part of the 82nd Airborne’s global response force

Partager cet article
Repost0
4 mars 2014 2 04 /03 /mars /2014 17:20
Camel Standoff

 

3/4/2014 Strategy Page

 

A U.S. Army M1A2 Abrams Main Battle Tank, Company C, 1st Battalion, 67th Armor Regiment, 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division stares off a camel during a bilateral exercise in the US Central Command area of responsibility, Feb. 19, 2014. The week-long military-to-military exercise fostered partnership and interoperability. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Marcus Fichtl, 2nd ABCT PAO, 4th Inf. Div.)

Partager cet article
Repost0
19 février 2014 3 19 /02 /février /2014 17:35

18 févr. 2014 FUNKER530 - Veteran Community & Combat Footage


Paktika Province, Afghanistan - After spotting Taliban forces on a distant ridge line, U.S. Army mortar teams engage with 60mm mortars. A simultaneous airstrike is called in which accidentally drops a 500 pound bomb on a U.S. Army infantry outpost, mistaking the position for Taliban fighters.

Luckily there were no friendly casualties in this rare incident, due to the First Sergeant's decision to bring everyone to "stand to" before the drop. It is still unclear what caused the pilot to target the wrong position.

"If it wasn't for the decision of our First Sergeant, three of our guys would have died in that wooden building which was shredded by shrapnel."

Click here for my full interview with the cameraman - http://bit.ly/BombInterview

This footage is part of an ongoing documentary of the war in Afghanistan through raw combat footage.

 

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 février 2014 1 10 /02 /février /2014 18:45
USARAF training helping African nations

 

 

06 February 2014 defenceweb

 

The training US Army Africa (USARAF) is providing to different African nations is helping them secure their own borders as well as own regions, in line with the US policy of helping Africans solve their own problems.

 

This is according to Major Albert Conley III, USARAF's Counter Terrorism Desk Officer for International Military Engagements. He said that this means the US doesn't need to get involved and whatever American interests are in that region or country will, as a secondary effect, be secure because USARAF is helping them with internal and external security.

 

“If Africans are solving African problems the US government won't need to use the United States Army to solve African problems. For example, by having a conglomerate of nations in the African Union going into Somalia to help fix that nation's problems means American servicemen don't have to go into Somalia to help fix that problem,” he said.

 

USARAF is currently partnering with the French government to train and equip in Guinea and will be in Chad and Malawi this month to train more than 4 000 African troops for peace enforcement missions in Mali and the DRC.

 

“We are ready to begin training in Chad for about 1 300 soldiers - an 850 man battalion plus another 450 man battalion. While we are not partnering with the government of France, we are partnering with a private French security firm the government of Chad has contracted. They are providing some training and we are also providing some,” said Colonel John Ruffing, USARAF Security Co-operation Director.

 

USARAF is planning more training and equipping iterations -- probably a total of about 15 between now and the end of the fiscal year, with various countries on the African continent.

 

“We are looking at partnering with some of our non-traditional partners as well and would like to partner with an African nation to train other countries. We'd also like to work with an international, non-traditional partner to train a third-party African nation in a particular skill set, as well as provide us with training because we don't know how to operate in that environment very well, and are learning each and every time we put people on the continent," he said.

 

USARAF only started training and equipping African nations about 18 months ago.

 

“A lot of this is coming on-line now with the Regionally Aligned Forces. An example would be how the US Army Africa worked during Shared Accord 13 (SA13).

 

“It was a sophisticated exercise where we did air field seizure, forcible entry operations, an amphibious assault and the environment was difficult with high sea states, low visibility, high winds and we were able to conduct this operation through mission command in a C-130 where you had a South African general officer and a US colonel sitting side-by-side with the South African general making decisions to conduct this operation. There were two forces --the US and South Africa, conducting this event. Not only conventional forces were involved, but there were Special Forces from both countries involved in this exercise,” he said.

 

Because of lessons learned from that Shared Accord 13 the impact was seen almost immediately.

 

“I believe the training received during SA 13 helped 1/18th Infantry when they were sent to South Sudan to reinforce the US Embassy there as part of the East Africa Response Force operations. Had that force just been sitting at a location doing training and not understanding the environment or working with a foreign military, it might have been a little more difficult. But because they were able to work in the environment with South Africa during Shared Accord, I think that helped them and prepared them for that operation in South Sudan.”

 

Conley offered additional examples.

 

“We trained in Niger and then Niger went into Mali. We are now working with the French to actually get the assessment of that since we're not working with them in Mali. So, now the French get to see this unit we trained and equipped to go in and fight in Mali and secure the area. The French are actually giving us the assessment and evaluation of that unit and then whatever lessons are learned, we will implement them in the next training mission,” he said.

 

Another and perhaps better example, Conley said, is from training in East Africa.

 

“The US government has been training in Uganda, Kenya, Djibouti and Burundi to conduct peacekeeping missions in Somalia. For the longest time they were restricted to the city of Mogadishu. Because of all the training we've been doing with them, building up different units with reconnaissance capabilities so they can push out of Mogadishu and into the countryside while pushing the terrorist group El Shabaab out speaks of success. I don't need to be on the ground to see the success of that - it's evident."

Partager cet article
Repost0
5 février 2014 3 05 /02 /février /2014 19:20
Le scandale des bonus de l'armée américaine

04.02.2014 JDD

Plus de 800 soldats sont sous le coup d'une enquête pour avoir détourné plusieurs millions de dollars, en profitant d'un programme d'aide au recrutement, révèle USA Today. Des bonus auraient été octroyés pour les soldats qui persuaderaient des amis de s'engager en Irak ou en Afghanistan. L'un des soldats auraient touché près de 275.000 dollars. Au moins quatre autres auraient reçu près de 100.000 dollars chacun, selon des documents consultés par le quotidien américain.

Cette affaire est "décourageante et déprimante", a réagi la sénatrice Claire McCaskill. "De toute évidence, nous parlons de l’une des plus grandes enquêtes de l’histoire de l’armée", a-t-elle affirmé. Au total, près de 1.200 recruteurs et 2.000 assistants recruteurs seraient impliqués dans ce scandale.

 

Le programme arrêté en 2012. L'armée avait lancé des programmes de recrutement en 2005 afin de renforcer ses rangs qui avaient été largement mis à contribution lors des récents théâtres d'opérations. Ce programme avait été étendu à la réserve et aux soldats actifs. Ceux-ci auraient perçu de l'argent dès lors qu'ils parrainaient une recrue. "Personne n'est plus scandalisé que la direction de l'armée des Etats-Unis", a assuré de son côté le porte-parole de l'armée George Wright. "Après des enquêtes internes de l'armée qui ont identifié des cas de fraudes dans les programmes d'aide au recrutement, le secrétaire de l'armée y a mis fin immédiatement", a-t-il ajouté. Ce programme a effectivement été arrêté en 2012.

Plus de 106.000 personnes auraient touchées des primes, précise USA Today. Il faudra attendre 2016 pour que l'enquête aboutisse.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 janvier 2014 3 29 /01 /janvier /2014 17:20
source geekologie.com

source geekologie.com

 

 

January 29, 2014: Strategy page

 

The U.S. Army recently bought six XS1 computerized rifles. These usually go for up to $27,000 each and are expensive because they are sensor equipped and computerized to the extent that over 70 percent of first time users can hit a target over 900 meters distant with the first shot. For a professional sniper, first shot success averages about 25 percent and 70 percent on the second shot. Second shots are not always possible as the target tends to duck after the first one.

 

The XS1 with the bipod, loaded and with the scope, weighs 9.25 kg (20.4 pounds). It is bolt action with a five round magazine and fires the .338 Lapua Magnum. It has a folding stock and is 1.26 meters unfolded and 1.12 folded. The fire control system on the rifle collects much information (target imagery, atmospheric conditions, cant, inclination, Coriolis Effect) but the shooter still has to estimate wind velocity and direction. The scope incorporates a display that tells the shooter how to move the rifle to hit the distant target that has been selected and when to pull the trigger. The rifle actually fires only when it is properly lined up. The manufacturer has sold about 500 of these rifles so far, mainly to wealthy hunters who don’t like to miss.

 

The army found that soldiers who had gone through standard military rifle training would get hits on the first shot 90 percent of the time when using the XS1. In the hands of trained snipers it’s closer to 100 percent of the time.

 

Trained snipers are very effective, but the XS1 and its technology could provide snipers and regular troops the ability to get that all-important first shot on target over 90 percent of the times. Sometimes there are targets that require that because, as any sniper knows, if the target notices the first shot he will often duck fast enough to avoid the more accurate second shot following several seconds after the first.

Partager cet article
Repost0
29 janvier 2014 3 29 /01 /janvier /2014 12:20
US, Canada partner to upgrade Canadian howitzer

 

 

29.01.2014 US Army - army-guide.com

 

The Canadian Royal Army has enlisted the help of Picatinny engineers to evaluate the life-span of their World War II-era C3 Howitzer.

 

"We are looking for engineering data that, unfortunately, we're missing right now," said Canadian Army Maj. David Lebel, Equipment Management team leader for Field Artillery Systems.

 

The C3 Howitzer is a 1950's technology that the Canadian Army is trying to keep in service for ten or 11 more years.

 

"The fleet is now about 60 years old, and after it was modified to fit Canadian needs, we didn't think at that time to have the contractor provide engineering data -- to check the rail forces or validate the forces that are applied to the structure, either while it's firing or while it's being towed," Lebel explained.

 

"Now that it's been around for 60 years, we're starting to experience a few cracks here and there, but we can't explain how these cracks are being made. We need to be able to find solutions without having to ground the fleet for a long amount of time."

 

The Canadian Army uses the C3 howitzers for training, although they use the 155 mm M777 in combat. The operation procedures for towed howitzers are similar, but 105 mm ammunition is cheaper than 155 mm ammunition.

 

"We take a lot of time to train before going into operations, so this reduces cost," Lebel said.

 

AVALANCHE CONTROL

 

In addition to training purposes, the C3 is also used for avalanche control in the snow-covered Canadian mountains.

 

"There's a stretch of highway in the (Canadian) Rockies called Rogers Pass, which is in Glacier National Park," Lebel explained.

 

"Because of the mountains' elevation, there's about 300 inches of snow during winter, and it's very prone to avalanches," Lebel said. "We've got a detachment from the Royal Canadian Artillery with [C3 Howitzers] ready to support Parks Canada in managing the dangers on the main road of Roger's pass. Once Parks Canada gives us the go ahead, we shoot to stabilize the area, which means sometimes we do create an avalanche so that we can shovel the snow out."

 

DISCOVERING DEFICIENCIES

 

Picatinny's Program Executive Office Ammunition, known as PEO Ammo, employees, with help from Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center, or ARDEC, engineers, is conducting an analysis of the stresses of the C3 Howitzer in order to support the howitzer's life cycle, said Luke Helsel, ARDEC's C3 Evaluation team lead.

 

The team will conduct a series of tests over the next year to determine potential problems that could occur throughout the system.

 

"We're going to do analysis to help the Canadian Army find those problems in advance," said Helsel. "It helps them better predict areas to target for inspections or to perform upgrades. Sometimes that can be a challenge when looking at a design that was done years ago, and has no support from the original contractor."

 

The data packages for the howitzer are from the 1940s, and they have been updated through the 1980s, but there's no subject matter expert to refer to for questions.

 

"It's fascinating to look at the older style of design, and to see what we can do to support them maintain their fleet for the next couple of years," said Helsel. "Some of these slick things they did back then are good to look at now. The old design can inspire us for modern work and working on this project we can discover new analysis techniques that we can use here for the M119 or M777."

 

A gun was recently shipped to Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md., for mobility trials. In April, it will be transferred to Yuma Proving Ground, Ariz., for firing trials.

 

At Aberdeen, engineers will instrument the gun with strain gauges to measure the amount the metal is being pulled while towing the gun. The gun will also be towed around a series of courses over hills and other terrain while recording data from the gauges.

 

"Then, using that data, we can predict virtually what the strain is throughout the whole carriage," said Hesel. "After that, we can come back and figure out where we think the other high strain areas are and perform another test to confirm our analysis."

 

At Yuma, engineers will do similar testing while firing the howitzers at different elevations and azimuths.

 

"This will give us the engineering technical argument to pursue the direction we need to," Lebel said. "Hopefully, we'll be able to find a few simple, small fixes to extend the lifecycle without having to re-engineering big assemblies on the gun."

 

The Canadian Army currently has almost 100 deployed across Canada, and the process for replacing the howitzers with newer models could take up to two decades.

 

"We can't stop every unit from training six months while we're scratching our heads trying to decide how to solve the problem. So by giving us the technical data that we're looking for, ARDEC is really making our job that much more easy either to do preventive maintenance that's much more accurate on potential failure locations. And should there be a failure, they'll be enough engineering data to put together a solution that won't take us four or five months to get to."

 

"At this point, we know there are problems, but I don't think there's going to be one solution to fix them all. We're gonna have to choose the problem that's the most risky and go about it in a deliberate fashion. But there could be many conclusions," Lebel said.

 

FRIENDLY RELATIONS

 

"The reason Canada came to us is that we have a great working relationship," said David Wong, Foreign Military Sales manager for PEO Ammo's Project Manager Towed Artillery Systems.

 

"Canada purchased 37 of our M777 155mm howitzers, so they know us and the capabilities and resources we have. This project extends the good working relationship we've had for seven years," Wong said.

 

In addition, the Department of National Defence, especially the Director of Armament Sustainment Program Management, has benefited on several aspects of howitzer maintenance and support from both Project Manager Towed Artillery Systems expertise and Picatinny's resources, Lebel added.

 

Picatinny also recently updated their M119 Howitzer fleet, which required similar data collection and engineering processes.

Partager cet article
Repost0
22 janvier 2014 3 22 /01 /janvier /2014 08:20
Enhanced Missile Warning System to Protect U.S. Army Troops

The CMWS (AAR-57A(V) Gen3 missile warning system features a modular, customizable design that allows for seamless integration with other aircraft and survivability systems. According to BAE Systems, beyond the provision of missile warning and hostile fire indication it can also serve as a centralized processing system for Integrated Aircraft Survivability Equipment. Photo: BAE Systems.

 

January 20, 2014 defense-update.com

 

The U.S. Army has awarded BAE Systems a $39 million contract for more than 300 third-generation (Gen3) Common Missile Warning System (CMWS), a key element in helicopter and aircraft countermeasures  systems protecting US aviators in combat theatres; The Army has already acquired 2,100 such systems and has operated them in combat, accumulating more than 2,000,000 combat flight hours. Based on the accumulated experience the Army is upgrading the CMWS into the AN/AAR-57A(V) standard, enabling systems to better respond to evolving threats, a wider range of countermeasures and decoys including laser-based Directed InfraRed Countermeasures (DIRCM). By providing Hostile Fire Indication (HFI) capability, the system combines warning cue and situational awareness for guided and unguided threats to host platform. Furthermore, the system effectively protects against surface and air launched missile threats. Besides providing warning and triggering countermeasures against missile attacks the CMWS Gen3 system also indicates when small arms fire is directed at the protected platform. The system can also record the data throughout the mission for post mission debriefing and threat signal processing.

 

Enhanced Missile Warning System to Protect U.S. Army Troops

Besides providing warning and triggering countermeasures against missile attacks the CMWS Gen3 system also indicates when small arms fire is directed at the protected platform. Photo: BAE Systems

 

“The Gen3 enhancements allow us to provide a missile warning, hostile fire indication, and data recording system all in one box. This can immediately make a difference for our troops by improving survivability and increasing situational awareness,” said Bill Staib, director of Threat Management Solutions at BAE Systems.

 

As a highly automated and tightly integrated infrared countermeasures suite, CMWS locates threats and dispenses countermeasures without requiring pilot intervention. The system features a modular, customizable design that allows for seamless integration with other aircraft and survivability systems. To that end, CMWS has demonstrated its ability to serve as a centralized processing system for Integrated Aircraft Survivability Equipment.

 

The $39 million order is the first under a proposed $496 million indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract and increases the total U.S. Army Gen3 procurement to more than 1,300 units. The current contract includes unit spares and engineering and technical services. The Gen3 systems will be fielded to more than 1,000 U.S. Army platforms over the next two years, and has already begun with in-theater installations on the Apache, Kiowa, and Blackhawk aircraft in Afghanistan.

Partager cet article
Repost0
21 janvier 2014 2 21 /01 /janvier /2014 08:20
US Army Studying Replacing Thousands of Grunts with Robots

A US soldier drops an unmanned ground vehicle over a wall during an exercise at White Sands Missile Range, N.M., in 2010. (US Army)

 

Jan. 20, 2014 - By PAUL McLEARY – Defense News

 

WASHINGTON — The postwar, sequestration-era US Army is working on becoming “a smaller, more lethal, deployable and agile force,” according to Gen. Robert Cone, head of the service’s Training and Doctrine Command.

 

But just how much smaller might come as a surprise.

 

During remarks at the Army Aviation Symposium in Arlington, Va., on Jan. 15, Cone quietly dropped a bomb. The Army, he said, is considering the feasibility of shrinking the size of the brigade combat team from about 4,000 soldiers to 3,000 over the coming years, and replacing the lost soldiers with robots and unmanned platforms.

 

“I’ve got clear guidance to think about what if you could robotically perform some of the tasks in terms of maneuverability, in terms of the future of the force,” he said, adding that he also has “clear guidance to rethink” the size of the nine-man infantry squad.

 

He mentioned using unmanned ground vehicles that would follow manned platforms, which would require less armor and protection, thereby reducing the weight of a brigade combat team.

 

Over the past 12 years of war, “in favor of force protection we’ve sacrificed a lot of things,” he said. “I think we’ve also lost a lot in lethality.” And the Army wants that maneuverability, deployability and firepower back.

 

The Army is already on a path to shrink from 540,000 soldiers to about 490,000 by the end of 2015, and will likely slide further to 420,000 by 2019, according to reports.

 

Cone said his staff is putting together an advisory panel to look at those issues, including fielding a smaller brigade.

 

“Don’t you think 3,000 people is probably enough probably to get by” with increased technological capabilities, he asked.

 

It’s hard to see such a radical change to the makeup of the brigage combat team as anything else than a budget move, borne out of the necessity of cutting the personnel costs that eat up almost half of the service’s total budget.

 

Cone used the Navy as an example of what the Army is trying to do.

 

“When you see the success, frankly, that the Navy has had in terms of lowering the numbers of people on ships, are there functions in the brigade that we could automate — robots or manned/unmanned teaming — and lower the number of people that are involved given the fact that people are our major cost,” he said.

 

Some of Cone’s blue-sky thinking was echoed by Lt. Gen. Keith Walker in a Jan. 6 interview with Defense News.

 

In what Walker called the “deep future” — about the 2030 to 2040 time frame — he said that “we’ll need to fundamentally change the nature of the force, and that would require a breakthrough in science and technology.”

 

While Walker, the commander of the Army Capabilities Integration Center, which oversees much of the Army’s modernization and doctrinal changes, didn’t talk about replacing soldiers with robots, he did say the Army wants to revamp its “tooth-to-tail” ratio, or the number of soldiers performing support functions versus those who actually pull triggers.

 

“Right now our force is roughly two-third tooth and one-third tail, so as we decrease the size of the Army you may end up reducing one-third tooth and two-third tail, but what if you could slide that fulcrum? Maybe it’s one-half to one-half. The point is you get to keep more tooth, more folks that actually conduct operations on the ground and less supporting structure.”

 

The Army is already heading down that path in the structure of its brigade combat teams, announcing last year that it was adding a third maneuver battalion to each brigade, along with engineering and fires capabilities. It is adding more punch to its brigade combat teams while reducing the number of teams it fields from 45 to 33 by the end of fiscal 2017, while transferring some of those soldiers to the existing brigades.

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 janvier 2014 5 10 /01 /janvier /2014 08:20
GATR Technologies awarded USD 440M Contract with US Army for Inflatable Satellite Communications Antennas

 

Jan 8, 2014 ASDNews Source : GATR Technologies

 

GATR Technologies ® announced today that it has been awarded a 5 year Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract by the U.S. Army Project Manager, Warfighter Information Network-Tactical (PM WIN-T), Product Manager Satellite Communications (PdM SATCOM), Commercial SATCOM Terminal Program (CSTP) Office. This contract ceiling value of $440,045,436 will enable the United States Army, the United States Marine Corps, and other Commands and Services to procure GATR’s WGS certified Inflatable Satellite Antennas (ISA) and associated hardware, services and support. GATR President Paul Gierow remarked, “This contract validates the sustained adoption of GATR’s technology by the Warfighter and signifies our evolution as provider of integrated solutions.”

 

The key innovation of GATR’s antenna is a flexible parabolic dish mounted within an inflatable sphere, reducing weight and packaged volume by as much as 80 percent and thereby improving the agility of deployed military and disaster response personnel. The GATR ISA also costs less to procure than conventional deployable systems, and dramatically cuts transportation expenses due to its lightweight design. Finally, the larger dish size enables more efficient use of satellite bandwidth capacity, increasing bandwidth for users and allowing more users to communicate simultaneously. U.S. and Allied militaries have fielded over 300 GATR ISA terminals since 2008, proving the technology’s strength and reliability.

 

Read more

Partager cet article
Repost0
23 décembre 2013 1 23 /12 /décembre /2013 15:45
Trois appareils CV-22 Osprey touchés par des tirs au Sud Soudan

 

22.12.2013 journal-aviation.com (reuters)

 

Trois appareils américains Osprey CV-22 ont été atteints par des tirs samedi alors qu'ils tentaient d'évacuer des ressortissants américains pris dans les combats au Soudan du Sud, a annoncé l'US Army. Quatre militaires américains ont été blessés par ces tirs.

 

L'Osprey CV-22 est un appareil de transport hybride, qui tient de l'avion et de l'hélicoptère puisque ses rotors basculants lui permettent de décoller et atterrir verticalement.

 

Les trois appareils ont été atteints par des tirs alors qu'ils s'approchaient de la zone d'évacuation dans l’État du Jonglei, au nord de la capitale Juba, a précisé dans un communiqué le commandement militaire américain pour l'Afrique (Africa Command).

 

Endommagés par ces tirs, ils ont gagné un terrain d'aviation dans un pays voisin et la mission a été annulée.

 

Les Nations unies ont par ailleurs annoncé qu'un de leurs hélicoptères, sur les quatre envoyés à Youai, également dans l’État de Jonglei, a aussi essuyé des tirs d'armes légères vendredi. Il n'y a pas eu de blessé.

 

L'armée allemande a annoncé samedi avoir évacué du Soudan du Sud 98 personnes, des Allemands et d'autres ressortissants étrangers, qui ont été conduits en Ouganda. Parmi les personnes évacuées figurait l'ambassadeur d'Allemagne à Juba, a précisé le ministère allemand des Affaires étrangères.

 

Un autre avion a ramené à Berlin le général Hans-Werner Fritz, chef des opérations de l'armée allemande, ses adjoints et cinq autres personnes, précise la Bundeswehr.

 

Le président sud-soudanais Salva Kiir, qui appartient à l'ethnie Dinka, accuse son ancien vice-président Riek Machar, un Nuer qu'il a limogé en juillet dernier, de vouloir s'emparer du pouvoir par la force. Après avoir fait rage à Juba, les combats se sont étendus à d'autres régions du pays.

 

(Carl Odera, avec George Obulutsa à Nairobi, Elias Biryabarema à Kampala, Aaron Maasho à Addis-Abeba, Phil Stewart et Missy Ryan à Washington, Andreas Kenner à Berlin; Eric Faye, Danielle Rouquié et Guy Kerivel pour le service français)

Partager cet article
Repost0
18 décembre 2013 3 18 /12 /décembre /2013 13:35
Un Blackhawk de l'US Army en vol dans la province du Wardak

Un Blackhawk de l'US Army en vol dans la province du Wardak

 

 

18.12.2013 Frédéric Lert (FOB)

 

L’écrasement d’un hélicoptère survenu avant hier dans le sud de l’Afghanistan Afghanistan a fait six morts parmi le contingent américain de l’ISAF.  Malgré la revendication des insurgés, selon lesquels il s’agirait d’une perte au combat, des sources américaines évoquent quant à elle un accident, aucune activité ennemie n’ayant été détectée dans la zone au moment de la tragédie. Il s’agit en l’espèce du deuxième accident d’hélicoptère de l’année pour les forces américaines : le premier avait eu lieu en avril dernier dans la région de Kandahar et s’était soldé par la mort de quatre hommes.

 

Ce dernier accident porte à 125 le nombre de tués américains en Afghanistan pour la seule année 2013. C’est déjà beaucoup plus que l’ensemble des pertes françaises dans  le pays, mais cela reste une année « calme » selon les critères américains. Les Etats-Unis ont perdu en moyenne chaque année dans le pays un peu plus de 300 combattants entre 2009 et 2012. Depuis 2001, les pertes totales se montent pour eux à 2150 hommes et femmes, auxquels s’ajoutent plusieurs milliers de blessés graves.

 

Un peu plus de 50.000 soldats américains restent présents à ce jour en Afghanistan, mais les opérations de retrait en cours devraient réduire ce chiffre à environ 30.000 d’ici février 2014. Le retrait des troupes combattantes, exception faite de certaines forces spéciales, de conseillers et formateurs de l’armée afghane (plusieurs milliers d’hommes au total tout de même…), devrait être terminé à la fin 2014.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 décembre 2013 4 12 /12 /décembre /2013 17:20
Lockheed Martin JLTV Completes Successful Manufacturing Review

 

 

Dec 12, 2013 ASDNews Source : Lockheed Martin Corporation

 

The Lockheed Martin [NYSE: LMT] Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) team successfully completed the government’s Manufacturing Readiness Assessment (MRA), an important milestone on the path to vehicle production at the company’s Camden, Ark., manufacturing complex.

 

The MRA, which measures manufacturing maturity and assesses technical risk, took place at Lockheed Martin’s Camden Operations on Nov. 18 and 19. In October, the company announced plans to produce the JLTV at the award-winning Camden facility, where program officials expect to gain significant production efficiencies and cost reductions.

 

Read more

Partager cet article
Repost0

Présentation

  • : RP Defense
  • : Web review defence industry - Revue du web industrie de défense - company information - news in France, Europe and elsewhere ...
  • Contact

Recherche

Articles Récents

Categories