Overblog Tous les blogs Top blogs Entreprises & Marques Tous les blogs Entreprises & Marques
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
MENU
12 juillet 2013 5 12 /07 /juillet /2013 07:50
Where are the world's major military bases?

11 Jul 2013 By Harriet Alexander - telegraph.co.uk

 

As the British government examines whether it could maintain Trident's base in an independent Scotland, here is a look at some of the major military bases on foreign soil - excluding Afghanistan - around the world.

 

UK:

 

1) Scotland

The Faslane base, on Gare Loch, is home to the UK's Trident nuclear submarine base.

 

2) Cyprus

Two bases, at Akrotiri and Dhekelia, were retained as British sovereign territory with independence in 1960. The bases are home to army, navy and RAF personnel.

 

3) Germany

British forces will have all left Germany by 2020. However, there remains a significant presence, with the Rhine Garrison as the head quarters.

The US also has 48,000 soldiers in Germany.

 

4) Gibraltar

The army has had a presence on the Rock for over 300 years, although the last UK-based infantry battalion left in 1991. It is now home to the Royal Gibraltar Regiment, and acts as a Joint Operating Base for UK operations in the region.

 

5) Kenya

An army training unit in Nanyuki, 200km north of Nairobi, has 56 permanent staff and 110 rotating staff members, who work with the troops coming in to train.

Britain also has a peace support team in Kenya, working on security sector reform and mine removal.

 

6) Sierra Leone

Established in 2002 at the end of the civil war, Britain has a military advisory and training centre on the outskirts of Freetown.

 

7) Falklands

A combined force of army, navy and RAF is based on the islands.

 

8) Brunei

An infantry battalion and a Bell 212 helicopter flight are based in Brunei, which is used as a centre for jungle warfare training.

 

9) Canada

The training area in Alberta is equivalent in size to all the main training areas used by the British forces in the UK and Europe. Around 1000 tanks and armoured vehicles are kept there to train 7000 troops each year.

 

USA:

 

10) South Korea

There are 28,500 American troops based in Seoul, at the Yongsan Garrison. They will move to Camp Humphreys, 40 miles south of the capital, later this year.

 

11) Japan

Okinawa is home to about half of America's 50,000 troops stationed in Japan.

 

12) Guam

Andersen Air Force base is home to bomber crews, while nuclear submarines are also housed here.

 

13) UK

America operates out of six RAF bases in the UK. RAF Croughton is one of the largest military communications centres in Europe, and handles 30pc of all US military traffic within Europe.

 

14) Diego Garcia

A British overseas territory, the island was home to the Chagossians – who were expelled by the British between 1968 and 1973 to make way for the American base. It is now uninhabited, except for military personnel.

 

15) Guantánamo Bay, Cuba

Cuba granted America complete jurisdiction and control over this remote part of the island in 1903, although Cuba retains sovereignty. It is home to the Guantánamo Bay detention camp, opened in 2002 to hold prisoners from the "War on Terror".

 

16) Qatar

Approximately 5,000 troops are stationed between three bases and the US Combined Air Operations Centre. Most American troops left Saudi Arabia in 2003, at the end of the Gulf War, and Qatar is now one of their main centres. They also have troops stationed in Bahrain (home to the Fifth Fleet), Kuwait, Oman, UAE and Yemen. Overall in the Arabian Gulf region there are reportedly 40,000 American servicemen.

 

RUSSIA:

 

17) Ukraine

Sevastopol is home to Russia's Black Sea Fleet – the largest subunit of the navy.

 

18) Syria

Russia maintains a navy logistics centre in Tartus, with 16 ships. It is the only base outside of the former USSR. In January Russia was forced to deny that it was withdrawing its personnel from the base, and emphasise that the centre was staffed by civilians, not military staff.

 

19) Tajikistan

Over 7,000 Russian troops are based in Tajikistan, making it their largest base in Central Asia. The present contract between Russia and Tajikistan ends in 2014, but a new agreement has been signed which remains in force until 2042.

 

FRANCE:

 

20) Abu Dhabi

France opened its first military base in the Gulf in 2009 – the first foreign military installation built by the French for 50 years, and its first centre in a country which was not a colony. It is home to 500 troops.

 

21) Djibouti

Home to France's largest base in Africa, plus a major US base.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 juillet 2013 5 12 /07 /juillet /2013 07:30
Des avions F16 américains pour l'Egypte

11 juillet, 2013 – BBC Afrique

 

Selon de hauts responsables américains, les Etats Unis vont maintenir leurs plans de fournir à l'Egyte des avions de combats F-16, malgré l'instabilité dans le pays.

 

Washington évalue toujours les tenants et les aboutissants du renversement la semaine dernière du président islamiste Mohammed Morsi.

 

Conformément au droit américain, les Etats Unis devraient suspendre leur importante aide militaire octroyée à l'Egypte si Washington parvenait à la conclusion que les événements du 3 juillet constituent un coup d'Etat.

 

Les Frères Musulmans, le mouvement auquel est affilié Morsi, demandent que le président déchu soit rétabli dans ses fonctions.

 

Et tandis qu'ils continuent de manifester, le Procureur de la république a lancé mercredi un mandat d'arrêt contre leur guide spirituel, Mohammed Badié.

 

Au moins, neuf autres hauts responsables de la Fraternité sont également sous le coup de mandats d'arrêt.

 

Mohammed Badié est accusé d'avoir incité aux violences de lundi qui se sont soldées par la mort de plus de 50 personnes.

 

De nombreux membres des Frères Musulmans ont déjà été arrêtés et des mandats auraient été émis pour l'arrestation d'une centaine d'autres militants du mouvement.

 

Par ailleurs, un porte-parole du Ministère des affaires étrangères a déclaré que le président déchu Mohammed Morsi est 'détenu en lieu sûr'.

 

Badr Abdul Atti, le Procureur de la république, a cependant déclaré lors d'une conférence de presse qu'il ignorait où est détenu Morsi, tout en indiquant que le sexagénaire est traité avec grand égard pour sa dignité.

 

Les responsables américains qui ont donné l'information soulignent que les avions de chasse seront livrés dans les prochaines semaines.

 

La livraison des F-16 entre dans le cadre d'une commande de vingt appareils, dont huit avaient déjà été livrés en janvier. Le réliquat de la commande devrait être honnoré cette avant la fin de l'année.

 

Le porte-parole de la Maison Blanche, Jay Carney, a réitéré mercredi qu'il n'était pas de l'intérêt des Etats Unis de procéder à des modifications immédiates de leur programme d'assistance militaire à l'Egypte.

 

Il a ajouté que l'Administration Obama se donne le temps de cerner toutes les implications du renversement de Morsi.

 

Les Etats Unis apportent chaque annéeà l'Egypte une aide militaire estimée à $1,3 milliards.

 

Le président Obama a évité soigneusement d'utiliser le mot "coup d'état" pour qualifier la mise à l'écart de Mohammed Morsi, puisque reconnaître qu'il s'agit d'un putsch entraînerait la supension de l'aide.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 juillet 2013 5 12 /07 /juillet /2013 07:20
iRobot Awarded $30 M Army Contract

Jul 11, 2013 ASDNews Source : iRobot Corporation

 

    Initial order valued at $3 million

 

As previously announced by the Army, iRobot Corp. (NASDAQ: IRBT), a leader in delivering robotic technology-based solutions, has been awarded a $30 million indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract by the U.S. Army’s Robotic Systems Joint Program Office (RSJPO). The four-year contract, which replaces an expiring IDIQ, allows for the delivery of iRobot PackBot FasTac robotic systems and associated spares.

 

An initial $3 million order under the contract for spares has also been placed. Deliveries under this order will be completed by the end of Q4 2013.

 

“iRobot is proud to provide robotic capabilities that help our warfighters accomplish their mission,” said Frank Wilson, senior vice president and general manager of iRobot’s Defense & Security business unit. “The Army recognizes the value of the PackBot FasTac robotic system on the battlefield, and we look forward to continuing our work with RSJPO to ensure the Army is well equipped to maintain its fleet of PackBot FasTac robots in the years ahead.”

 

The iRobot PackBot allows military and public safety personnel to investigate dangerous objects and environments from a safe distance. The robot is used in a wide variety of operations, including neutralizing roadside bombs and other improvised explosive devices, screening vehicles, and searching buildings, bunkers, caves and tunnels.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 juillet 2013 5 12 /07 /juillet /2013 07:20
DARPA Robotics Challenge

DARPA Robotics Challenge

July 10, 2013 Source: US Department of Defense

 

WASHINGTON --- Leaps forward in simulation technology and cloud computing are making it possible for challengers from around the world to compete for support from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to create robots that can help people during natural and other kinds of disasters.

 

During a recent media roundtable, Dr. Gill Pratt, DARPA program manager, and Dr. Brian Gerkey, chief executive officer for the Open Source Robotics Foundation, told reporters about the ongoing DARPA Robotics Challenge, which launched in October 2012 and will end after the final event in December 2014.

 

The Open Source Robotics Foundation is an independent nonprofit organization in Mountain View, Calif., founded by members of the global robotics community to support open-source software development and distribution for robotics research, education and product development.

 

“DARPA is focused on the defense mission for DOD,” Pratt said. “Our primary reason for [creating the robotics challenge] is about the security of our citizens in situations of natural and manmade disasters. [But] the technology DARPA develops often finds its way into all sorts of other parts of life.”

 

The Internet is the best example, he observed, adding, “I expect that the robots we develop will be used very soon, at least in some form, … within people’s homes,” possibly as helpers for aging populations in nations like the United States and Japan.

 

The goal of DARPA’s Robotics Challenge, or DRC, is to generate groundbreaking research and development in hardware and software, according to the DRC website, helping future robots perform the most hazardous jobs in disaster-response operations, along with human supervisors, to reduce casualties and save lives.

 

Pratt calls this a way to make societies worldwide more resilient to natural and other disasters.

 

“We believe it’s important to develop robots that can go into areas that are too dangerous for people and that can be supervised by human beings despite the fact that communications might be quite difficult [during a disaster] both between human beings and between people and robots,” he added.

 

Through the DRC project, DARPA is helping create robots with three basic features. The first is that the robots should be compatible with environments engineered for people, Pratt said.

 

“That’s true even if those environments have been degraded. This gives the robots a certain size [and] it says exactly what their capabilities must be in order to interface for instance with doors and stairs and other things that human beings have engineered into the environment,” the DARPA program manager said.

 

The second feature is that the robots have to be able to use tools that were designed for people.

 

“This ranges all the way from a screwdriver to a fire truck,” he added, “so you’ll see in the different parts of the DARPA challenge that we are testing the ability of these machines to do that.”

 

Third is that the robots must be able to be supervised by people who aren’t necessarily trained to operate robots.

 

“Typically in a disaster there’s no time for training [and] there’s no time to acquire specialized tools. You have to use what you have on hand,” Pratt explained.

 

“If you want the robot to respond immediately,” he added, “the important thing is for the interface between that person and the robot to be intuitive to the people on the disaster response team who have the most expertise about what needs to be done … not the people who designed the machine.”

 

Overriding all the robot technology, though, is an assumption that communications between people -- and between people and the robot -- will be degraded by the effects of the disaster on infrastructure, Pratt said.

 

“So in the challenge itself,” he explained, “we will purposefully lower the bandwidth -- the number of bits per second -- that can go between the robot and the supervisors, and we will also increase the latency -- the amount of time delay -- in the communication between the people and the robots.”

 

The DRC has two kinds of events -- one for teams whose focus is software alone and that don’t have their own robots, and one for teams whose focus is both hardware and software and therefore have their own robots.

 

The first event, whose seven winners were announced June 27, was a software competition among 26 teams from eight countries.

 

The teams competed against each other using a virtual robot called Atlas inside the DARPA Robotics Challenge Simulator, an open-source tool created for DARPA by the Open Source Robotics Foundation.

 

A company called Boston Dynamics is using DARPA funding to build real Atlas robots that the winning teams have been awarded to use in upcoming DARPA challenges.

 

“Our reason for having this virtual challenge is that we wanted to open the contest to teams that were strong not just in building hardware for robots and programming them with software,” Pratt said, “but for a wider variety of teams, including those who had little expertise or experience with robot hardware.”

 

Pratt said work done by the Open Source Robotics Foundation with DARPA funding had advanced the simulation technology enough that the simulator could run in real time and a person could interact with the simulation to supervise the virtual robots.

 

The Foundation’s approach to simulation is to do the best possible job of reproducing the way physics works in the world inside a computer, Gerkey said.

 

Thanks to the increase in performance that allows the simulation to run in real time and the increased computational power available through advances in cloud computing resources, the seven teams who won the DARPA virtual challenge should be able to take the software they designed for the DARPA simulation and run it on the real Atlas robots.

 

“Our goal,” Gerkey said, “is always to have the simulator behave as close as possible to the physical system … so it should be the case that teams who … are awarded an Atlas robot from Boston Dynamics should be able to take the software that they develop for simulation and run it almost unchanged on the physical robot.”

 

He added, “That will actually be the test of how well we’ve done here in terms of building a simulation as a stand-in for the physical robot.”

 

All of what DARPA and the Open Source Robotics Foundation are building is open source, Gerkey noted, “so anyone in the world can do anything they want with this software.”

 

The next DRC live competition will be held in December 2013.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 juillet 2013 5 12 /07 /juillet /2013 07:20
US Navy details X-47B navigation system malfunction on 3rd carrier landing attempt

July 11, 2013 by Zach Rosenberg – FG

 

Washington DC - The Northrop Grumman X-47B landed twice aboard the USS George H.W. Bush aircraft carrier, but a malfunction with one of its three navigation computers prevented a third landing. The aircraft subsequently diverted to Wallops Field, Virginia, as programmed, for a safe recovery.

 

"There are three redundant navigation computers on the X-47," says Capt Jaime Engdahl, the US Navy's programme manager for unmanned systems. "We saw an issue on one of those computers and decided we had done enough for the day, flew the aircraft back and landed it."

 

The aircraft makes its approaches autonomously, without human interference. The computers onboard the aircraft noted the anomaly affecting one of the three precision GPS computers, and though capable of landing using only one, the aircraft is coded to abort landing under those circumstances. After the automatic abort, the human controller elected to divert the aircraft instead of continuing.

 

"They're working through the data right now," says Carl Johnson, Northrop Grumman's programme manager. "In terms of a malfunction it's probably a minor issue, that when we reset the computers everything will be up and running and we'll have a fully functional aircraft."

 

Two X-47Bs are flying. The aircraft used for the test has the tail number 502. An identical aircraft, tail number 501, will likely be used for the next aircraft carrier test series on 15 July. If all goes well in the second series, the X-47B's tests will be completed and the aircraft retired. A manned Learjet using X-47B's software will conduct autonomous air-to-air refueling trials in 2014.

 

The lessons learned from the X-47B demonstrations will be used to address the Unmanned Carrier-Launched Airborne Surveillance and Strike (UCLASS) programme, meant to essentially create an operational production UAV for aircraft carriers. Four companies - Northrop, Lockheed Martin, Boeing and General Atomics Aeronautical Systems - have been selected to perform design work.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 juillet 2013 5 12 /07 /juillet /2013 07:20
ITT Exelis, SAIC Team to Counter Future Radar Threats

July 10, 2013 Source: ITT Exelis

 

ITT Exelis Teams With SAIC To Counter Future Radar Threats

 

CLIFTON, N.J. --- ITT Exelis has been selected by Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) to provide engineering support for the Adaptive Radar Countermeasures (ARC) program. The five-year contract could be worth $15.6 million if all options are exercised.

 

Administered by DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), the ARC program will enable U.S. airborne electronic warfare (EW) systems to detect and counter digitally programmable radar systems whose waveforms and behaviors are new, unknown or ambiguous.

 

“With radio frequency threats evolving, we need a capability that will anticipate and meet these threats as they emerge,” said Joe Rambala, vice president and general manager of the Exelis integrated electronic warfare systems business. “SAIC and Exelis are teaming to ensure our warfighters can perform their missions safely and securely.”

 

The ARC program consists of two major elements: the SAIC-led development of new processing techniques and algorithms in a software environment and the Exelis-managed implementation of these techniques with a prototype module within a target system. This process may lead to a new, adaptive EW protection system for airborne platforms within the next five years.

 

“We look forward to producing a comprehensive ARC solution that will potentially mitigate future advanced radio frequency threats to airborne platforms,” said John Fratamico, SAIC senior vice president and group general manager. “This technology represents the future of electronic warfare systems.”

 

 

Exelis is a diversified, top-tier global aerospace, defense, information and technical services company. Headquartered in McLean, Va., the company employs about 19,900 people and generated 2012 sales of $5.5 billion.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 19:20
Chuck Hagel secrétaire américain à la Défense (Photo Glenn Fawcett DoD)

Chuck Hagel secrétaire américain à la Défense (Photo Glenn Fawcett DoD)

July 10, 2013 Source: US Department of Defense

 

WASHINGTON --- If sequestration continues into fiscal year 2014, the Defense Department will be forced to consider involuntary reductions-in-force for the civilian workforce, draconian cuts to military personnel accounts and a virtual halt to military modernization, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said in a letter to Senate leaders today.

 

The senators had requested detailed information on how continued sequestration could affect the military.

 

In the letter, Hagel detailed the “Plan B” the department must confront if Congress does not pass legislation that averts sequestration in fiscal 2014. If the process continues, DOD will be forced to cut $52 billion more from the budget that year.

 

Hagel stressed in the letter that he fully supports President Barack Obama’s fiscal 2014 budget request and noted that if sequestration remains in effect, “the size, readiness and technological superiority of our military will be reduced, placing at much greater risk the country’s ability to meet our current national security commitments.”

 

Congress gave DOD some flexibility to handle the cuts need for fiscal 2013, but more than 650,000 DOD civilians must still be furloughed without pay for 11 days. However, the cuts in 2014 are too great even for flexibility within accounts to handle.

 

DOD hopes to avoid furloughs in 2014, the defense secretary said, but if sequestration remains in effect, “DOD will have to consider involuntary reductions-in-force to reduce civilian personnel costs.”

 

Readiness has already been diminished this year, Hagel said, and it will continue to decline if sequestration continues in 2014. Hiring freezes will also continue and facilities maintenance funds will further erode, he added.

 

If the sequestration mechanism is applied to military personnel funding, “DOD could accommodate the required reductions only by putting into place an extremely severe package of military personnel actions including halting all accessions, ending all permanent-change-of-station moves, stopping discretionary bonuses and freezing all promotions,” Hagel wrote.

 

He called on Congress to work with the department to avoid sequestration in fiscal 2014 and to approve the president’s defense budget request.

 

The president’s budget request slows military pay raises and raises fees for some military retiree’s health care. It also looks to retire older Air Force and Navy assets and calls for a new base realignment and closure program.

 

“If the cuts continue, the department will have to make sharp cuts with far-reaching consequences, including limiting combat power, reducing readiness and undermining the national security interests of the United States,” Hagel said.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 19:20
Illustration of US Navy's long range land attack projectile (LRAP). Photo BAE Systems.

Illustration of US Navy's long range land attack projectile (LRAP). Photo BAE Systems.

11 July 2013 naval-technology.com

 

The US Navy's Lockheed Martin-built 155mm long-range, land-attack projectile (LRLAP) has successfully completed four engineering verification flight trials at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, US.

 

Conducted as part of the US Navy's system design and development programme, the testing involved four rocket-assisted guided projectiles being launched and successfully destroying various hard and soft targets located 45nm away.

 

Engineers collected data and assessed warhead performance, which also provided the opportunity for the US Navy to develop new employment scenarios.

 

Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control LRLAP programme manager Richard Benton said the LRLAP would greatly enhance the US Navy's ability to respond to fire support requests by deployed troops onshore.

 

"These tests bring us closer to completing the 35 tests required by the US Navy to demonstrate the maturity and performance of the system," Benton said.

 

Designed to provide precision offshore fire support from a safe standoff distance to US Marine Corps, army and coalition forces, the LRLAP supports expeditionary assaults or urban operations in coastal cities with minimal collateral damage.

 

Expected to achieve initial operational capability in 2016, the LRLAP will also be deployed onboard the US Navy's DDG 1000 Zumwalt-class guided missile vessels.

 

Each of the DDG 1000's two advanced gun systems (AGS) can fire more than ten LRLAP rounds in a minute to support land-attack operations, while providing three times more effective than traditional 5in naval ballistic rounds at a lower cost.

 

The accurate and longest-range system features a GPS-based guidance system and a unitary warhead with an adjustable height-of-burst or point-detonation fuse and will serve as an affordable, ship-launched alternative to currently used missiles for expeditionary forces.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 16:20
M982 Excalibur round photo USMC

M982 Excalibur round photo USMC

July 11, 2013: Strategy Page

 

The U.S. Army has found that GPS guided shells were more successful, but less frequently used, than anticipated. So they reduced orders for these weapons, which entered service in 2007. The GPS guided 155mm Excalibur shells were used less frequently largely because other precision munitions often take out targets before Excalibur gets a chance to. There’s a growing number of other GPS (or laser) guided weapons available.  The GPS guided MLRS (GMLRS) rocket has been especially popular. And the army uses a lot of laser guided Hellfire missiles, fired from AH-64 helicopter gunships. In addition to the reduction in Excalibur production, the army cut orders for GPS guided 120mm mortar shells (introduced in 2011) after a year of use.

 

Excalibur had other problems, mainly in the form of PGK (Projectile Guidance Kit) shells. PGK is actually a large fuze, that screws into the front of a 155mm or 105mm shell. This longer fuze contains a GPS and small fins to guide the shell to a precision hit. It is less precise than Excalibur. That is, the PGK will ensure that the shell lands within 50 meters of the target. If it does not hit within 150 meters, PGK deactivates and the shell does not explode. An unguided shell will normally land within 250-300 meters of where it is aimed. An Excalibur shell lands within four meters of the target, but costs more than twice as much as PGK. The army recently sent the first PGKs to Afghanistan, after successful testing in the United States. The big question is how important will the troops find the accuracy differences of Excalibur and PGK.

 

Another factor that hurt the popularity of Excalibur, and the 120mm guided mortar shell, is cost. Excalibur was supposed to cost about $50,000 each. Eventually. After all the debugging, and after more of the shells were produced. But the cost is still about $100,000 per shell. The 120mm GPS (using the same tech as PGK) guided shell is also pricey, but not as much as Excalibur. GMLRS cost about $100,000 each, and have a much longer range, and a bigger bang.

 

Another edge GMLRS has is the HIMARS rocket launcher. Only costing about $3 million each, these smaller, truck mounted MLRS (HIMARS) rocket launcher systems have become very popular. HIMARS carries only one, six MLRS rocket, container (instead of two in the original MLRS vehicle). But the 12 ton truck can fit into a C-130 transport (unlike the 22 ton tracked MLRS) and is much cheaper to operate. The first HIMARS entered service in 2005, about a year after GPS guided rockets did.

 

The 309 kg (680 pound) GMLRS (guided multiple launch rocket system) missile is a GPS guided 227mm rocket. It was designed to have a range of 70 kilometers and the ability to land within meters of its intended target, at any range. This is possible because it uses GPS (plus a back-up inertial guidance system) to find its target. In 2008 the army tested GMLRS at max range (about 85 kilometers) and found that it worked fine. This enabled one HIMARS vehicle to provide support over a frontage of 170 kilometers, or, in places like Afghanistan, where the fighting can be anywhere, an area of over 20,000 square kilometers. This is a huge footprint for a single weapon (an individual HIMARS vehicle), and fundamentally changes the way you deploy artillery in combat. Excalibur has a max range of 37 kilometers, and 120mm mortars about 7.5 kilometers.

 

The U.S. Army is buying over 800 HIMARS vehicles along with 100,000 GMLRS rockets, most of them fitted with an 89 kg (196 pound) high explosive warhead. About half of that is actual explosives. These have been used with great success in Iraq and Afghanistan, where nearly two thousand have been fired so far. The guided rocket is much more effective than the older, unguided, version, and is replacing it in most cases. No more of the unguided rockets are being purchased by the U.S.. The accuracy of GMLRS means that one rocket does the job that previously required a dozen or more of the unguided ones. That's why HIMARS is so popular. While it only carries six rockets, that's often enough to last for days, even when there's a lot of combat.

 

The 120mm mortar round has about 2.2 kg (five pounds) of explosives, compared to 6.6 kg (15) pounds in a 155mm shell. The smaller explosive charges limits collateral damage to civilians. But in Afghanistan, it is more common to need a large bang (which GMLRS can deliver). Excalibur was more suited to Iraq, but the American troops have left there, and all the action is in Afghanistan. Moreover, there are a lot of precision weapons readily available to the infantry that have small warheads. The Javelin missile has a 4 kg (nine pound) warhead, and the larger TOW has a 5.9 kg (13 pound one.) The Hellfire missile has a 9 kg/20 pound warhead. The air force also has its SDB (114 kg/250 pound small diameter bomb, carrying 23 kg/51 pounds of explosives.).

 

Meanwhile, there is still demand for unguided 155mm and 120mm shells. There are times when you need firepower over a large area (several hundred meters by several hundred meters), and for this, unguided shells do the job best, and cheapest.

 

In response to this competition the Excalibur manufacturer has created a model that can be used in 127mm naval guns. These are found in hundreds of warships and enable these ships to use their 127mm guns to accurately hit targets over 40 kilometers inland.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 14:20
Plainte contre les géants américains du net après l'affaire Prism

11 juillet 2013 Liberation.fr (AFP)

 

Deux ONG de défense des droits de l'homme accusent des groupes tels que Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Youtube, entre autres, d'avoir assisté le vaste programme d'espionnage des services de renseignement américains.

 

Deux associations des droits de l’homme vont déposer une plainte, ce jeudi à Paris, dans l’affaire d’espionnage des communications électroniques mondiales par l’agence de sécurité américaine NSA, visant des sociétés comme Google, Yahoo ou Apple, a appris l’AFP de source proche du dossier.

 

Cette plainte va être déposée par la Fédération internationale des droits de l’Homme (FIDH) et la Ligue des droits de l’Homme. S’exprimant sur France Info, un des avocats de la FIDH et de la LDH, Me Emmanuel Daoud, a précisé que cette plainte contre X visait notamment à éclaircir le rôle joué dans le scandale Prism par Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Paltak, Facebook, Youtube, Skype, AOL et Apple.

 

Selon lui, «à des périodes différentes», ces sociétés «sont susceptibles d’avoir mis à disposition du FBI et de la NSA leur serveur pour que ces agences de renseignement américaines les pénètrent et puissent s’installer à demeure pour collecter, siphonner toutes les données de tous les clients internautes utilisant les services de ces sociétés».

 

Il suggère qu’elles n’ont peut-être «pas dit toute la vérité» en affirmant qu’elles n’étaient pas au courant du programme Prism. Les filiales françaises de ces sociétés sont également susceptibles d’être l’objet des investigations, a ajouté Me Daoud. Sur France Info, l’avocat a précisé qu’étaient susceptibles d’être reprochés un «accès non autorisé sur un système de traitement de données, des collectes de données à caractère personnel, des atteintes volontaires à l’intimité de la vie privée, le fait de porter atteinte au secret des correspondances électroniques».

 

A la suite de révélations de son ancien consultant Edward Snowden, la NSA est accusée d’espionner les communications électroniques mondiales dans le cadre du programme Prism. Elle est également accusée d’avoir espionné des «cibles» institutionnelles dont l’Union européenne et des représentations diplomatiques alliées.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 12:45
Mali : Ugly Aftermath And Uncertain Future

July 11, 2013: Strategy Page

 

For the last five months American MQ-9 UAVs could be seen regularly over northern Mali. Some days there is one up there all day, most of the time it’s only for about half the day. The video is analyzed by U.S. and French intelligence and used by the French to coordinate operations against the remaining Islamic terrorists in northern Mali. The American UAVs have been operating from an airbase in neighboring Niger, where two MQ-9s are currently stationed.

 

France believes that a third of the 2,000 Islamic terrorists in northern Mali at the beginning of the year have been killed and most of the survivors (less the hundred or so who surrendered or were captured) have fled Mali. That leaves several hundred, most of them Tuareg or black African, still in Mali, Most are hiding but some are in the larger towns and cities carrying out attacks. Many (up to half) of the terrorists who fled went to neighboring Niger, where a weak government and a very poor population (whose cooperation can be bought) has provided opportunities for new terrorist bases to be established. As with Mali, most of the 16 million Niger population lives in the south, where there is more water. The north is mostly desert. A fifth of the population are Arab, Tuareg and similar minorities. Over 90 percent of the population is Moslem and about eight percent are slaves. The U.S., France (and other European nations) are helping the Niger government to deal with the Islamic terrorists. That will not produce a quick fix and it may take a year (and probably much longer) to clear the Islamic terrorists out of Niger.

 

Mali’s fundamental problem (and the source of the discontent that triggered the Tuareg uprising in the north and the army coup in the south last year) is widespread corruption and the chilling effect this has on the economy. Despite billions of dollars’ worth of mineral exports, the country is very poor. The money the government gets from the mineral exports is largely stolen by politicians. Economic growth is stifled by the corruption, which makes it very difficult for entrepreneurs to start new businesses or expand existing ones. The result is that a third of the population is hungry and gets by with the help of foreign aid. In the north over two thirds of the population is short of food, and much else. Most of the people in the north are Tuareg and they blame corrupt southern (black African) officials for the poverty and high unemployment in the north. That is only partially true because the north has always been very poor and the Tuareg leaders also tend to be corrupt when it comes to handling government matters.  The July 28 presidential election is expected to put another corrupt politician into office. The search for a cure for the corruption has so far been unsuccessful. There are also doubts that the government can even properly organize the July 28th election.

 

The fragile economy in Timbuktu was devastated by the nine months of Islamic radical rule. Most of the Mali government employees were driven out and their workplaces looted and trashed. Worse, the tourism activity, which was the basis of the local economy, was largely destroyed. This included the destruction of many tourist attractions and the disappearance of many Arab and other foreign businessmen who made the tourism business work. Replacing key people and restoring infrastructure will take years. In the meantime most of the 55,000 population will have to get by on foreign aid.

 

July 9, 2013: In the north (Kidal) two civilians were wounded by unidentified gunmen.

 

July 8, 2013: In Kidal anti-government demonstrations over the weekend left two peacekeepers and a French soldier wounded. The demonstrations throw lots of rockets at the troops.

 

July 6, 2013: The government ended the six month old state of emergency. This means it is now legal for crowds to assemble and demonstrations to take place. The security forces must now follow all legal procedures when making arrests and holding people in custody.

 

July 5, 2013: After arriving on the outskirts a month ago 200 Malian army soldiers finally moved into the northeastern town of Kidal. Tuareg MNLA fighters moved out, or at least aside, in accordance with the June 18 peace deal with Mali. The MNLA had controlled Kidal since March 2012 as they tried to establish a role in governing the largely Tuareg north. MNLA were forced out of Kidal by Islamic terrorists for nine months and regained control in January 2013. French and Chadian troops have been in Kidal for over six months and have been joined by some other African peacekeepers to replace the Chad force (which returned home). The MNLA controlled security in the city and this produced growing complaints that MNLA gunmen were attacking blacks in the north and trying to force them to leave. The government accused the MNLA of ethnic cleansing, as northern Mali is predominately Tuareg and Arab. Because over 90 percent of Malians are black Africans, Tuaregs have always been touchy about blacks moving north to settle or, worse, to run the government. Partly this was because some Tuaregs and Arabs in the north still kept black slaves. Now a lot of those slaves find themselves free after their masters fled, along with several thousand Tuareg, during the French liberation of the north. Groups like al Qaeda are OK with this slavery, as it is commonly discussed in Moslem scripture and the Koran. The slaves, despite being Moslem, generally do not agree with this attitude.

 

MNLA means (in French) “Liberation Army of Azawad”. That is the Tuareg term for their homeland in northern Mali and until the June 18 agreement its capital was Kidal. The Mali government was upset that MNLA men controlled most of the rural (and very thinly populated) areas in the north. Mali accuses France of letting this happen, but the French only had an informal deal with MNLA in which the Tuareg would not fire on the incoming troops and would provide information on where the Islamic terrorists were.  France pressured Mali to make some kind of political settlement with MNLA and that eventually led to the June 18 deal. Many in the Mali Army still want the Tuareg rebel group crushed.  The Mali government is also angry over the extent to which so many Arabs and Tuaregs in the north cooperated with the Islamic radicals in establishing a new government. Many Tuareg still want independence, or at least a lot of autonomy in the north. Anti-Mali demonstrations accompanied the entrance of Mali troops into Kidal and will continue. Whatever the Mali government may want, the situation in the north, and with the Tuareg, is fundamentally changed. The Tuareg have tasted power and seen how weak the southerners really are.

 

The only large town the MNLA controlled was Kidal. It was thought unlikely that the Mali soldiers and police could handle the MNLA gunmen alone, so the concentration of security forces near Kidal last month was initially seen more as a bargaining tactic than as a real threat to the MNLA. Negotiations with the MNLA did not go well at first because the rebels were insisted on an autonomy agreement first and the French and African peacekeepers were unwilling to shut down the MNLA for the Mali government. The Mali Army is seen as more of a threat to an elected Mali government than to the Tuareg rebels. The Mali troops had spent over a month moving up several hundred kilometers of road to Kidal and planning an assault that never came. The MNLA seemed to sense that they had been outmaneuvered and retreated from some checkpoints outside Kidal but maintained enough fighters in the city to keep the Mali soldiers from entering until the MNLA and the Mali government could work out a deal.

 

July 1, 2013: The UN peacekeeping force took control of peacekeeping operations in Mali. The UN force currently has 6,300 African peacekeepers although the ultimate size of the force will be over 12,000. There are still 3,200 French troops in Mali along with several thousand Mali soldiers.  The UN force is officially known as MINUSMA (Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali).

 

June 26, 2013: Captain Amadou Haya Sanogo, who led the army coup in March 2012, apologized for his actions and promised to help repair the damage.

 

June 24, 2013: Some 200 peacekeepers from Benin arrived in Kidal to help maintain order.

 

June 18, 2013: The government and the Tuareg rebels (the MNLA) signed a peace deal. The MNLA will allow Mali troops and police to enter Kidal and any other MNLA occupied area in the north and will surrender its heavy weapons. In reality the MNLA members will keep most of their weapons but will have to surrender stuff like mortars, heavy machine-guns and large stocks of ammo. The government will not try to punish any MNLA members and will negotiate more autonomy for the Tuareg north. Many Tuareg believe the MNLA gave up too much and do not trust the Mali government.

 

June 16, 2013: Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) admitted that it had lost two of its senior leaders (Abdelhamid Abou Zeid and Abdallah Al Chinguetti) to French forces earlier this year (February and March). AQIM kept insisting that these two leaders were still alive.

 

June 9, 2013: French forces captured a terrorist base in the north (in a town on the Niger River near Gao). This one contained five tons of explosives and a workshop for producing suicide bomb vests and roadside bombs.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 12:35
Mark 54 Torpedo photo US Navy

Mark 54 Torpedo photo US Navy

Jul 11, 2013 ASDNews Source : Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA)

 

The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress on July 1, 2013 of a possible Foreign Military Sale to Australia of up to 100 MK 54 All-Up-Round Torpedoes and associated equipment, parts, training and logistical support for an estimated cost of $83 million.

 

The Government of Australia has requested a possible sale of 100 MK 54 All-Up-Round Torpedoes, 13 MK 54 Exercise Sections, 13 MK 54 Exercise Fuel Tanks, 5 Recoverable Exercise Torpedoes, support and test equipment for Maintenance Facility upgrade to MK 695 Mod 1 capability, spare and repair parts, technical data and publications, personnel training and training equipment, U.S. government and contractor engineering, technical and logistics support services, and other related elements of logistics support.

 

Australia is an important ally in the Western Pacific that contributes significantly to ensuring peace and stability in the region. Australia’s efforts in peacekeeping and humanitarian operations have made a significant impact on regional, political and economic stability and have served U.S. national security interests.

 

Australia will use the MK 54 torpedo on its MH-60R helicopters and intends to use the torpedo on a planned purchase of the P-8A Increment 2 Maritime Patrol and Response aircraft. Australia, which currently has MK 54 torpedoes in its inventory, will have no difficulty absorbing these additional torpedoes into its armed forces.

 

The proposed sale of this equipment and support will not alter the basic military balance in the region.

 

The principal contractor will be Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems in Keyport, Washington. There are no known offset agreements proposed in connection with this potential sale.

 

Implementation of this proposed sale will not require the assignment of U.S. Government or contractor representatives to Australia.

 

There will be no adverse impact on U.S. defense readiness as a result of this proposed sale.

 

This notice of a potential sale is required by law and does not mean the sale has been concluded.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 12:35
US, Australian Joint Forces to Conduct Talisman Saber Exercise

11 July 2013 From U.S. Pacific Fleet Public Affairs

 

PEARL HARBOR, Hawaii - More than 27,000 U.S. and Australian personnel will participate in the military training exercise Talisman Saber 2013 in Australia beginning July 15.
 
The Talisman Saber exercise series is a biennial training event aimed at improving Australian Defence Force (ADF) and U.S. combat readiness and interoperability as a Combined Joint Task Force. The 2013 exercise, which runs through August 5, is designed to enhance collaboration in support of future combined operations, humanitarian emergencies and natural disasters.
 
In addition to improving both nations' ability to work bilaterally and multilaterally throughout the Indo-Asia-Pacific region and globally, the exercise also demonstrates the closeness of the Australian and U.S. alliance.
 

 

>> In this file photo from Talisman Saber 2011, National Guard Sgt. Bryan Bates, assigned to Charlie Troop (Long Range Surveillance) 1-158 Cavalry, Hagerstown, Md., and Australian Army Reserve Pte. Julohn Wigness, assigned to the North-West Mobile Force pause for a photo. (U.S. Navy Photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Sebastian McCormack)
 
Jointly sponsored by the U.S. Pacific Command and ADF Headquarters Joint Operations Command, Talisman Saber 2013 will incorporate U.S. Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force, the ADF and other government agencies from each country.
 
Participation by Australian government entities includes the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, the Australian Agency for International Development, the Australian Civilian Corps, the Australian Federal Police, and the Asia Pacific Civil-Military Centre of Excellence.
 
U.S. participating agencies include the U.S. Departments of State, Justice and Agriculture, Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Agency for International Development.
 
<< In this file photo from Talisman Saber 2011, a Royal Australian Air Force F/A-18 refuels from a U.S. Air Force KC-135 Stratotanker prior to re-engaging in air-to-air operations. (Australian Defence Force photo)
 
The exercise will focus on training a Combined Joint Task Force of U.S. and Australian forces in a possible conflict scenario, incorporating interagency participation. U.S. Pacific Command units and Australian forces will conduct land, sea, and air drills throughout the training areas.
 
Approximately 18,000 U.S. and 9,000 Australian personnel will take part, including ships from the George Washington Carrier Strike Group and Bonhomme Richard Amphibious Ready Group with the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit embarked, along with a variety of other U.S. Marine Corps, U.S. Air Force, and U.S. Army units working alongside their Royal Australian Navy, Royal Australian Air Force and Australian Army counterparts.
 
Exercise locations in Australia include Rockhampton, Enoggera, Amberley, Williamtown, Richmond, the maritime areas of the Coral Sea; and Australian ranges to include Shoalwater Bay Training Area and Townsville Field Training Area. For all aspects of the exercise, there have been extensive consultations between the U.S. military and Australian government agencies to identify effects and minimize harm to the environment.
 
>> In this file photo from Talisman Saber 2011, U.S. Marines with Weapons Company, 2nd Battalion, 7th Marine Regiment, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, III Marine Expeditionary Force, based in Okinawa, Japan, conduct a weapons drill with Australian Defence Force Craftsman Carl Norling, left, and Pvts. James Newton, middle, and Peter Noble, right, all with 6th Aviation Regiment. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Jerome Reed)
 
Talisman Saber will also include activities in multiple U.S. locations, including Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii; San Diego; Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash.; and Suffolk, Va.
 
Additional information on the exercise will be available on the U.S. Pacific Fleet website at http://www.cpf.navy.mil/talisman-saber/2013/ as the exercise progresses, and through a link from the Australian Defence Force site at www.defence.gov.au/opEx/exercises/ts13/.
 
Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 11:20
First X-47B Trap - U.S. Navy photo by Capt. Jane E. Campbell 10-07-2013

First X-47B Trap - U.S. Navy photo by Capt. Jane E. Campbell 10-07-2013

7/10/2013 Strategy Page

 

ATLANTIC OCEAN (July 10, 2013) An X-47B Unmanned Combat Air System (UCAS) makes a carrier-based arrested landing aboard the aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) off the coast of Virginia. The successful landing marks the first time a tailless, unmanned autonomous aircraft landed on a modern aircraft carrier. (U.S. Navy photo by Capt. Jane E. Campbell)

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 11:20
FA-18F Super Hornet – photo US NAVY

FA-18F Super Hornet – photo US NAVY

Jul 11, 2013 ASDNews Source : BAE Systems PLC

 

    Helping Navy pilots land safely, every time.

 

U.S. Navy pilots count on air traffic control and landing systems to be fully operational so they can land safely every time. BAE Systems helps to make that happen. The company has received a $78 million contract to continue providing the Navy with the technical and engineering services needed to guide landings on aircraft carriers, large-deck amphibious assault ships and shore-based facilities.

 

“Ensuring that the landing systems function properly is paramount to the Navy’s mission and the safety of all pilots,” said Mark Keeler, vice president & general manager of Land & Electronic Systems at BAE Systems. “Our team understands the critical nature of this work, and we have a proven track record of getting the job done.”

 

For 20 years, BAE Systems has provided the Navy with system installations, certifications, technical assistance, training, mission-critical computer resources, and the repair and restoration of the landing systems.

 

This new contract is expected to be completed by 2018. The work will be performed at St. Inigoes and Great Mills, Maryland, in addition to other Navy sites, including San Diego, California and Norfolk, Virginia.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 11:20
Glimpse Inside Air-Sea Battle - Nukes, Cyber At Its Heart

11 July 2013 By SYDNEY J. FREEDBERG JR – Pacifi Sentinel

 

PENTAGON: In intellectual terms, Air-Sea Battle is the biggest of the military’s big ideas for its post-Afghanistan future. But what is it, really? It’s a constantly evolving concept for high-tech, high-intensity conflict that touches on everything from cyberwar to nuclear escalation to the rise of China. In practical terms, however, the beating heart of AirSea Battle is eleven overworked officers working in windowless Pentagon meeting rooms, and the issues they can’t get to are at least as important as the ones they can.
 
“It’s like being a start-up inside a great, big, rigid corporation,” one Air-Sea Battle representative told me in an exclusive briefing last month. The Air-Sea Battle Office (ASBO) has just 17 staff: those eleven uniformed officers, drawn from all four services, plus six civilian contractors. None of them ranks higher than colonel or Navy captain. Even these personnel are technically “on loan,” seconded from other organizations and paid for out of other budgets. But those 17 people sit at the hub of a sprawling network of formal liaisons and informal contacts across the four armed services and the joint combatant commands.
 
“Air-Sea Battle has left the building,” said a second officer at the briefing. “We’ve reached the grass roots, and we’re getting ideas from the grass roots.”
 
So the good news is that the Air-Sea Battle Office isn’t just another big Pentagon bureaucracy, let alone the anti-China cabal it’s sometimes of accused of being (PDF). Instead, in essence, it is an effort to develop compatible technologies and tactics across all four services for a new kind of conflict: not the Army and Marine-led land war against low-tech guerrillas we have seen since 9/11, but an Air Force and Navy-led campaign against “anti-access/area denial” forces that could fry our networks, jam GPS, and hit our planes, ships, bases, and even satellites with long-range missiles. China is the worst case scenario here, but not the only one. 
 
Read the full story at Breaking Defense
Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 07:50
EU Parliament Civil Liberties Committee agree on surveillance inquiry's next steps

10/7/2013 EU source: European Parliament -  Ref: EP13-032EN

 

Summary: 10 July 2013, Brussels - The European Parliament inquiry into alleged spying by the US and EU countries will hold hearings with their authorities, legal and IT experts, NGOs, data protection authorities, national parliaments following this issue and private firms involved in data transfers, the Civil Liberties Committee decided on Wednesday. The first hearing takes place on 5 September.

 

The Civil Liberties Committee inquiry will gather information and evidence to investigate alleged surveillance activities by the US authorities and EU countries. It will then assess the impact of these activities on EU citizens' fundamental rights, in particular those to data protection and respect for private life, freedom of expression, the presumption of innocence and an effective remedy.

 

MEPs will also look into the best tools for redress should violations of these rights be confirmed, make recommendations to prevent further violations and advise on how to strengthen IT security in EU institutions, bodies and agencies.

 

Hearings

 

From September, the inquiry will hold public hearings of representatives of the US authorities, European Commission and Council, member states' representatives, participants in transatlantic experts groups, legal and IT experts, NGOs, data protection authorities, national parliaments and IT companies involved in transferring data to NSA or equivalent systems.

 

One of the first hearings is to be devoted to "the US PRISM programme and legal issues related to FISA" (the US Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act). Possible speakers include the US Ambassador to the EU, US National Security Agency officials, legal experts and representatives of US organisations such as the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

 

Studies

 

The Civil Liberties Committee will commission several expert studies. The first two will deal with surveillance programmes conducted by the US and EU countries and with the follow-up to recommendations made by the Echelon Committee.

 

Civil Liberties Committee delegation to Washington

 

Civil Liberties Committee MEPs could hold meetings related to this inquiry with US authorities and US Congress during a delegation visit to Washington already planned for the end of October. The Foreign Affairs Committee plans to pay a similar visit.

 

Next steps

 

MEPs' conclusions and recommendations will be set out in a report to be presented to Parliament as a whole by the end of the year. The political groups will have to agree swiftly on which MEP is to draft the report.

 

So far, twelve meetings have been scheduled to take place before the end of the year. The first will be held on 5 September in the afternoon.

 

In the chair: Juan Fernando López Aguilar (S&D, ES) and Sophie in 'T Veld (ALDE, NL)

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 07:35
a 64,000-square-foot HQ facility in Afghanistan, (photo Office of SIGAR )

a 64,000-square-foot HQ facility in Afghanistan, (photo Office of SIGAR )

Jul. 10, 2013 - By JIM McELHATTON  - Defense News

 

The Office of Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction called a 64,000-square-foot headquarters facility in Afghanistan, which cost the U.S. military $34 million to build, a 'troubling example of waste' in a letter to Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel. The building will likely never be used and torn down.

 

The military spent $34 million to build a 64,000-square-foot headquarters facility in Afghanistan, but officials concede they’ll probably just tear it down or turn it over to the Afghan government in what some officials call a case study of what can go wrong in military construction.

 

Located in the country’s Helmand province, it’s a project the Office of Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) called a “troubling example of waste” in a letter this week to Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel.

 

Whether the building is turned over to Afghan officials or torn down, both outcomes raise troubling questions about why the military would push forward on the project despite early concerns that there was no need for it, according to the July 8 letter from IG John F. Sopko.

 

Sopko praised the building as impressive, perhaps the best built facility he’s seen in his travels around Afghanistan.

 

“Unfortunately, it is unused, unoccupied and presumably will never be used for its intended purpose,” he wrote.

 

He also cited unnamed military officials who cited the project as an example of the pitfalls of military construction, saying “once a project is started, it is very difficult to stop.”

 

SIGAR investigators said the Army sought funding for the project in February 2010, but the I Marine Expeditionary Force (FORWARD) requested the project be canceled months later.

 

Nonetheless, the Air Force’s 772nd Enterprise Sourcing Squadron issued a task order to AMEC Earth and Environmental Inc. to build the facility in February 2011, and the U.S. government took control of it in November 2012, according to the letter.

 

Sopko said one senior military official noted that as U.S. military presence decreases at Camp Leatherneck, the Marine Corps base in the province, the building could fall outside of the security perimeter, making it unsafe for the military to occupy.

 

“This leaves the military with two primary options — demolish the building or give it to the Afhan government,” Sopko told Hagel.

 

But the problem with turning the building over to the Afghans is that doing so would require a “major overhaul” in heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems.

 

Yet another problem: The building was constructed based on U.S. construction standards, not Afghan standards. As a result, the power runs at a different voltage, complicating the transfer.

 

“These were some of the reasons why the U.S. military officials we spoke with believe the building will probably be demolished,” Sopko wrote.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 07:35
Camp Leatherneck sign - photo Leonard J. DeFrancisci

Camp Leatherneck sign - photo Leonard J. DeFrancisci

July 10 By Rajiv Chandrasekaran - washingtonpost.com

 

The U.S. military has erected a 64,000-square-foot headquarters building on the dusty moonscape of southwestern Afghanistan that comes with all the tools to wage a modern war. A vast operations center with tiered seating. A briefing theater. Spacious offices. Fancy chairs. Powerful air conditioning.

 

Everything, that is, except troops.

 

Read more

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 07:30
U.S. to deliver fighter jets to Egypt

Jul. 10, 2013 – Defense News (AP)

 

WASHINGTON — The U.S. is moving ahead with plans to deliver four F-16s to Egypt despite the ongoing debate about the military’s overthrow of President Mohammed Morsi and whether it legally constitutes a coup that could shut off aid to the country.

 

Defense officials say senior administration leaders discussed the delivery and decided to let it continue. The fighters are part of a $1.3 billion package approved in 2010 that included 20 F-16s and some M1A1 Abrams tank kits. About half of the aid package has been dispersed, officials said.

 

Eight of the F-16s were delivered in January, the next four are expected to be delivered in the coming weeks and the final eight will be sent later this year.

 

News of the impending weapons delivery to the Egyptian military came as the administration continued to make the case that it is staying neutral in the crisis.

 

The White House and State Department reiterated the view Wednesday that it would not be in the United States’ national security interests to interrupt U.S. aid to Egypt, including to the armed forces, as would be required by law if Morsi’s ouster is determined to have been a coup.

 

“We do not believe it is in the best interests of the United States to make immediate changes to our assistance programs,” White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters, adding that the administration is going to take its time to make any determinations about the removal of Morsi from power.

 

At the State Department, spokeswoman Jen Psaki noted that aid to Egypt “has been around for quite some time and has a range of reasons as to why we do it.”

 

The comments come after a week of violence and widespread demonstrations and as Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and other U.S. leaders make repeated calls to their counterparts in Egypt urging an end to the violence and a quick transition to a civilian government. Hagel has spoken to Egypt’s defense minister, Gen. Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi, eight times in the last nine days, with one phone call lasting as long as 45 minutes.

 

U.S. officials have expressed satisfaction with the military-backed interim government’s plans to restore democratically elected civilian leaders.

 

Members of Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood movement have denounced the ouster and have demanded Morsi’s release from detention and reinstatement.

 

Associated Press writers Matthew Lee and Josh Lederman contributed to this report.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 07:25
nsa-portable photo Pawel Kopczynski

nsa-portable photo Pawel Kopczynski

11 juillet 2013 Romandie.com (AFP)

 

MEXICO - Le Mexique enquête sur un rapport selon lequel son précédent gouvernement avait autorisé les Etats-Unis à installer sur son territoire un système d'interception des appels téléphoniques et des communications par internet, a indiqué mercredi un porte-parole gouvernemental.

 

Le président mexicain Enrique Peña Nieto a jugé mercredi soir qu'il serait totalement inacceptable que les Etats-Unis aient espionné des usagers de télécommunications en territoire mexicain, lors d'un événement dans l'Etat du Chihuahua (nord), selon le site internet du quotidien La Jornada.

 

Le président mexicain a toutefois indiqué que pour le moment il n'y a pas les conditions pour altérer le climat de respect et de cordialité que nous avons établi avec le gouvernement des Etats-Unis.

 

Le journal Excelsior avait affirmé dans son édition de mercredi que l'ex-président conservateur Felipe Calderon (2006-2012) avait passé un accord avec le Département d'Etat américain en 2007, autorisant l'installation au Mexique d'un système permettant l'interception, le traitement, l'analyse et le stockage d'appels téléphoniques, de courriers électroniques ou de conversations sur le web.

 

Le ministère mexicain de la Justice examine les documents et une enquête est en cours pour déterminer si un acte illégal a été commis, a indiqué le porte-parole du ministère de l'Intérieur, Eduardo Sanchez, lors d'une conférence de presse.

 

Selon le rapport publié par Excelsior, le système fonctionnait sous le contrôle de la défunte Agence fédérale d'investigation (AFI) et du ministère mexicain de la Justice, au nom du combat contre le trafic de drogue et le terrorisme.

 

L'équipement avait été vendu par Verint System au gouvernement américain pour un montant de 3 millions de dollars, ce qui implique, selon le journal, que les Etats-Unis avait accès à l'information en provenant.

 

Nous allons vérifier si le contrat existe et dans quelles conditions il se trouve, a dit le porte-parole.

 

L'administration de Calderon avait été marquée par une coopération étroite avec les Etats-Unis dans la lutte contre les cartels de la drogue.

 

Le président mexicain Enrique Peña Nieto, investi en décembre, s'est engagé a poursuivre sa coopération avec le Etats-Unis dans ce domaine, mais avec une différence importante : toutes les agences américaines doivent dorénavant passer par le filtre du puissant ministère mexicain de l'Intérieur, alors qu'auparavant elles pouvaient traiter directement avec leurs homologues mexicaines.

 

Le gouvernement mexicain avait exigé mardi des Etats-Unis une information complète sur les cas supposés d'espionnage de pays latino-américains, révélés par le quotidien brésilien O Globo. Ce journal citait des documents provenant de l'ex-consultant du renseignement américain Edward Snowden.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 07:20
Lawmakers Want Answers from Pentagon Over Missile Test Failure

Jul. 10, 2013 - By JOHN T. BENNETT – Defense News

 

WASHINGTON — Congress wants answers from the Pentagon about a failed missile interceptor test, and several prominent senators say it should slow efforts to build an East Coast shield.

 

The Defense Department announced on Friday that a missile interceptor failed to hit a target over the Pacific Ocean, the latest setback for a pricey program that has not had a successful test since George W. Bush occupied the White House.

 

The missile interceptor was supposed to launch from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California and shoot down a ballistic missile launched from a site in the Marshall Islands. It did not, however, and was the latest in a string of failures going back to 2008.

 

Lawmakers with oversight of the US missile defense program say Pentagon officials owe them some answers.

 

“I read the story, and I’m looking forward to getting a briefing. I haven’t drawn any conclusions yet,” Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., chairman of the Senate Armed Services strategic forces subcommittee, said during a brief interview on Wednesday.

 

“I don’t think I should until I hear what the Pentagon has to say,” said Udall, whose subcommittee has legislative jurisdiction over the missile defense program’s plans, schedule and budget.

 

One senior lawmaker with even more power than Udall to impose restrictions on the missile defense program said the failure gives him new worries about America’s ability to shoot down an adversary’s missile.

 

“I’ve got plenty of concerns about the whole program,” said Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the full Armed Services Committee.

 

Levin has yet to be briefed by Pentagon officials on the failed test launch.

 

“But I’ve asked for one,” he told Defense News.

 

New concerns were not limited to Democratic members, however.

 

“It has to be reviewed,” said Senate Armed Services Committee member Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. “Obviously, that’s a very expensive failure.”

 

Some key defense-focused lawmakers, however, told Defense News the underlying missile interceptor technology is sound, adding existing interceptors like the Capability Enhancement-II (CE-II) should do the job.

 

“I don’t think we need to put the brakes on anything,” said House Armed Services Committee Ranking Member Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash. “We need a missile defense system. Rogue actors, from North Korea to Iran, are developing missiles. We need to improve our missile technology.

 

“We need to figure out what went wrong and fix it,” Smith said.

 

Asked if he has confidence the Missile Defense Agency and its private-sector contractors have the expertise to “fix it” given the spate of failed tests since 2008, Smith was confident.

 

“Absolutely I think they can fix it,” he said. “Just look at the success they’ve had with Iron Dome in Israel. Missile defense technology has improved dramatically.”

 

SASC Ranking Member Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., said the US missile defense technology is sound — despite the run of failed test intercepts.

 

“I believe we should be entering into more tests,” Inhofe said. “The CE-II [interceptor] is going to be what we have to to rely on.”

 

Lawmakers said they intend to press the Pentagon for details of what went wrong last week.

 

“We have to get certain benchmarks,” McCain said, “and we have to review what remedial steps have to be taken.”

 

While Smith was bullish about the missile-defense program, he told Defense News that Congress and the Pentagon “need to re-look at our options and figure out what the best ones are.”

 

The Pentagon has around 30 interceptors on the West Coast, and intends to build 14 more in Alaska and California. Collectively, the price tag for erecting and operating those is in the tens of billions of dollars.

 

And GOP lawmakers in both chambers are fighting hard to secure legislative language that would require the Pentagon to build a missile shield on the East Coast.

 

“We’re going to study the East Coast,” Udall said. “But we need to finish the West Coast, I think.”

 

McCain did not rule out slowing efforts to erect the East Coast site.

 

“It’s too early to tell because we haven’t determined the reason for the failure,” he said on Wednesday.

 

“I think the East Coast proposal should not proceed until a number of other things have happened,” Levin said. “Number one, until there’s a requirement for it; and number two, until there’s an environmental assessment, which has not yet been made but is required by law.

 

“So there’s a lot of other reasons to have that proposal meet certain standards before we go ahead with it,” Levin said. “This [failure] is just … on top of all that.”

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 07:20
Phoenix AUV Now Capable of Diving to 4,500 Meters

Jul 10, 2013 ASDNews Source : Phoenix International Holdings, Inc.

 

Phoenix International Holdings, Inc. announced that the company has taken delivery of their Bluefin-21 Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) after designer and manufacturer Bluefin Robotics completed a depth upgrade from a 1,500-meter to a 4,500-meter capability.

 

The Phoenix AUV is equipped with field-swappable acoustic  and optical payloads.  The acoustic payload section can concurrently operate a Reson 7125 multibeam (400kHz), Edgetech 2200-M side scan sonar (120/410 kHz), and Edgetech DW2-16 sub-bottom profiler (2-16 kHz) on 20 hour dives at speeds up to 3.5 knots.  The optical payload section can collect high resolution black and white imagery up to 3 frames per second using a Prosilica GE1900 camera system with 1920 x 1080 pixel resolution.  This highly capable and portable deep-water vehicle ships air freight to deploy on vessels of opportunity.  The average loadout specifications which include the AUV, mission support equipment, and lithium ion batteries consist of 20 pieces totalling 10,000 lbs. and occupies 1,000 cubic feet.

 

“We are quite pleased with this upgraded vehicle,” said Phoenix CEO, Mike Kutzleb. “And we’re ready to go to work.”

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 07:20
Airmen set world's record during exercise

Jul 10, 2013 ASDNews Source : US Air Force

 

Airmen from the Dyess's 317th Airlift Group set a world's record for the largest C-130J formation during a Joint Operational Access exercise on June 19.

 

JOAX is a 12-day combined military training exercise designed to prepare Airmen and Soldiers to respond to worldwide crises and contingencies.

 

"This was the largest JOAX since September 2011," said Maj. Josh Leibel, 317th AG. "Servicemembers from all across the Air Force and Army came together to make the exercise possible."

 

Dyess supported JOAX with 20 C-130Js and 87 aircrew members, which delivered Soldiers and equipment to multiple drop zones.

 

"During the exercise the 317th AG set a world record for the largest C-130J formation," Leibel said. "Just as impressive as the 20-ship formation, our aircrew delivered 2,426 paratroopers and more than 140 tons of equipment to support the Army's training."

 

Not only did Dyess support the exercise with aircrew and aircraft, servicemembers on the ground worked nonstop to ensure operations went smoothly.

 

"I'm very proud of everything these guys did," said Senior Master Sgt. Rodney Jones, 317th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron. "They worked hard every day and every night to get the aircraft ready to go. I look forward to deploying with them."

 

"Once the engines started cranking up I got goose bumps," said Airman 1st Class Matthew Martin, 317th AMXS. "It was such a good feeling seeing the largest C-130J formation fly out knowing we all did this. It made all the hard work we put in worth it."

 

Exercises such as JOAX give Dyess servicemembers the unique opportunity to train as a team with other military branches.

 

"This training is very important," said Senior Airman Jamie Richardson-Granger, 317th AG loadmaster. "I've learned a lot since I've been out here. We actually get to see more of the real-world equipment we would drop operationally, things that aren't normally available to us at home station."

 

It's good to come out here and see how the Army and Air Force coordinate," he added. "Both branches worked together to ensure training requirements were met."

 

While JOAX plays a vital role in keeping U.S. military members trained and proficient, it's increasingly difficult to financially support these exercises under sequestration. However, Dyess were able to work through these constraints.

 

"About this time last year Dyess 317th was tasked as the lead unit for JOAX 13-03," Leibel said. "A few months ago it became apparent that under current government financial limitations that reaching the objective for both the Air Force and Army would require some creative options and divergence from the normal way of executing operations and exercises especially of this size.

 

"Through collaberation with the Army, our fiscal saving measures resulted in the exercise bed down cost of about $65,000 which is a 76.6 percent reduction and savings of around $215,000," he added.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 juillet 2013 4 11 /07 /juillet /2013 07:20
Throwbot XT

Throwbot XT

July 9, 2013 Source: ReconRobotics, Inc

 

EDINA, Minn. --- ReconRobotics, Inc., the world leader in tactical micro-robots and remotely deployed sensor systems, announced today that it has passed the 4,000 robots sold plateau, making it the second largest producer of military and police robots in the world. Recent sales of Throwbot XT and Recon Scout XL micro-robots to police agencies in Michigan, Texas, Illinois, Georgia, New York, California, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands pushed the company over this significant milestone.

 

The only company that has sold more military and police robots is iRobot, which reports 5,000 robots sold and began selling its Packbot in 2001, six years before ReconRobotics entered the market.

 

“When we came on the scene in 2007, all military and police robots were large and complex and were operated only by trained experts,” said Alan Bignall, President and CEO of ReconRobotics. “Our vision was radically different: give warfighters and SWAT operators an incredibly simple, personal system that weighed one pound and enabled them to remotely deploy video, infrared and audio sensors to reveal hidden threats. What we are most proud of is the countless lives these 4,000 deployed systems have saved over the last six years.”

Reconrobotics Surpasses 4,000 Robots Sold

Among the users of the company’s systems are the U.S. military and allied friendly forces, and more than 800 police and counterterrorism teams, worldwide. The company’s Recon Scout XL and Throwbot XT robots protect operators by providing immediate situational awareness and greater standoff distance during high-risk operations. These capabilities protect personnel from hidden threats, enhance mission planning and execution, and minimize collateral damage.

 

 

ReconRobotics is the world leader in tactical, micro-robot systems and remotely deployed sensor systems. The company is based in Edina, Minnesota, USA, and markets its products through a distribution network in 45 countries. Its international operations are based in Lugano, Switzerland.

Partager cet article
Repost0

Présentation

  • : RP Defense
  • : Web review defence industry - Revue du web industrie de défense - company information - news in France, Europe and elsewhere ...
  • Contact

Recherche

Articles Récents

Categories