Overblog Tous les blogs Top blogs Entreprises & Marques Tous les blogs Entreprises & Marques
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
MENU
18 avril 2013 4 18 /04 /avril /2013 16:32
Kuwait - C-17 GLOBEMASTER III

Apr 18, 2013 ASDNews Source : Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA)

The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress April 16 of a possible Foreign Military Sale to Kuwait for 1 C-17 GLOBEMASTER III aircraft and associated equipment, parts, training and logistical support for an estimated cost of $371 million.

The Government of Kuwait has requested a possible sale of 1 C-17 GLOBEMASTER III aircraft, 4 Turbofan F117-PW-100 Engines, 1 AN/AAR-47 Missile Approach Warning System, 1 AN/ALE-47 Countermeasure Dispenser Set (CMDS), secure radios, precision navigation equipment, spare and repair parts, support and test equipment, publications and technical documentation, tactics manuals, personnel training and training equipment, U.S. Government and contractor engineering, aircraft ferry support, aircraft fuel, and technical and logistics support services; and related elements of initial and follow-on logistical and program support. The estimated cost is $371 million.

Kuwait continues to be a key ally and strong supporter of U.S. foreign policy and national security goals in the Persian Gulf region. The proposed sale will enhance the United States foreign policy and national security objectives by increasing interoperability among the Kuwait Air Force (KAF), the United States Air Force, Gulf Cooperation Council countries, and other coalition forces. The relationships built upon current flying operations will enhance the US Air Force’s influence and access in Kuwait.

The provision of a second C-17 provides KAF a more robust regional airlift and long-range strategic airlift capability. The additional C-17 aircraft will allow the KAF to better participate in humanitarian support operations.

The proposed sale of this equipment and support will not alter the basic military balance in the region.

The prime contractor will be The Boeing Company of Chicago, Illinois. There are no known offset agreements proposed in connection with this potential sale.

Implementation of this proposed sale will require multiple U.S. Government or contractor representatives to travel to Kuwait for a period of (5) five years to establish and maintain operational capability.

There will be no adverse impact on U.S. defense readiness as a result of this proposed sale.

This notice of a potential sale is required by law and does not mean the sale has been concluded.

Partager cet article
Repost0
18 avril 2013 4 18 /04 /avril /2013 16:10
UK - HELLFIRE Missiles

Apr 18, 2013 ASDNews Source : Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA)

The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress April 16 of a possible Foreign Military Sale to the United Kingdom for 500 AGM-114-N4/P4 HELLFIRE missiles. The estimated cost is $95 million.

This program will directly contribute to the U.S. foreign and national security policies by enhancing the close air support capability of the United Kingdom in support of NATO, ISAF, and other coalition operations. Common close air support capabilities greatly increases interoperability between our two countries’ military and peacekeeping forces and allow for greater burden sharing.

The proposed sale will support the UK’s ability to meet current and future threats by providing close air support to counter enemy attacks on coalition ground forces in Afghanistan. The UK, which already has HELLFIRE missiles in its inventory, will have no difficulty absorbing these additional missiles.

The proposed sale of this equipment and support will not alter the basic military balance in the region.

The prime contractor will be Lockheed Martin Corporation of Orlando, Florida. There are no known offset agreements proposed in connection with this potential sale.

Implementation of this proposed sale will not require the assignment of any additional U.S. Government or contractor representatives to the United Kingdom.

There will be no adverse impact on U.S. defense readiness as a result of this proposed sale.

This notice of a potential sale is required by law and does not mean the sale has been concluded.

Partager cet article
Repost0
17 avril 2013 3 17 /04 /avril /2013 22:14
Partager cet article
Repost0
17 avril 2013 3 17 /04 /avril /2013 12:42
Partager cet article
Repost0
16 avril 2013 2 16 /04 /avril /2013 15:27
Partager cet article
Repost0
16 avril 2013 2 16 /04 /avril /2013 15:20
Partager cet article
Repost0
12 avril 2013 5 12 /04 /avril /2013 07:35

Sea-Based X-Band Radar source MDA

 

WASHINGTON, 11 avr 2013 marine-oceans.co (AFP)

 

Un puissant radar militaire américain a été installé en mer afin de détecter tout tir éventuel de missile par la Corée du Nord, a affirmé dans la nuit de mercredi à jeudi un haut responsable de la Défense américaine.

 

"Le SBX est en position", a déclaré cette source qui s'exprimait sous couvert d'anonymat auprès de l'AFP. Le Pentagone avait annoncé le déploiement du SBX (Sea-based X-Band Radar), arguant le 2 avril qu'il s'agissait d'une mission "de routine", officiellement "pas liée" aux tensions sur la péninsule coréenne.

 

Sans fournir plus de détail, ce responsable a confirmé que le SBX, une plate-forme semi-submersible surmontée d'un énorme radome, a été positionné en mer pour traquer d'éventuels missiles nord-coréens.

 

Cet appareil était auparavant à Pearl Harbor à Hawaii. Haut de 85 mètres, il est capable de détecter le lancement d'un missile à 2.000 kilomètres à la ronde.

 

Il complète une panoplie de radars américains dans la région capables de déterminer l'origine d'un tir et d'en suivre la trajectoire, notamment deux destroyers équipés du système antimissile Aegis.

 

Les Etats-Unis et la Corée du Sud ont sommé jeudi la Corée du Nord d'arrêter de "jouer avec le feu" et de renoncer au tir de missile qu'elle semble vouloir effectuer au mépris des sanctions internationales et au risque d'embraser la péninsule.

 

Les Américains ont par ailleurs annoncé le déploiement d'une batterie antimissile THAAD sur leur base militaire de Guam dans le Pacifique, située à 3.380 kms au sud-est de la Corée du Nord et désignée ostensiblement comme cible par le régime de Kim Jong-un.

 

Le Japon et la Corée du Sud ont eux aussi déployé leurs propres moyens antimissiles face à ce tir annoncé.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 23:11

MQ-4C BAMS Unmanned Aircraft

 

April 11, 2013 by Kris Osborn - defensetech.org

 

Development of the U.S. Navy’s maritime variant of the Air Force’s Global Hawk, the Triton UAS Broad Area Maritime Surveillance (BAMS) , will be delayed, senior Navy officials explained when rolling out the service’s FY 14 budget proposal.

 

About $25 million was taken from production of the system in the BAMS budget for fiscal year 2014 — and moved to fiscal year 2015 due to schedule changes, service officials said.

 

“The first year of production of RQ-4 Triton UAV (previously known as BAMS) was shifted from FY14 to FY15 due to schedule changes.  Funding decreased to support transition into the test phase of the System Demonstration and Deployment (SDD) program,” said Lt. Courtney Hillson, a Navy spokeswoman.

 

While the Triton BAMS UAS is expected to bring great capability to the Navy, it may need a little longer development than initially expected, said Navy Rear. Adm. Joseph Mulloy, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy, Budget.

 

“There are two technical issues in the airplane that are causing a delay in testing. First off, it has a unique double-tail rudder which is different on the Navy model. To get through that complex detail is taking a little longer on the design modules,” he said.

 

Secondly, integration work is still being done on the software on board the aircraft’s computer, he added.

 

“The Naval variant is designed to work with our P-8 and fly over the Pacific with a different set of sensors than the Air Force variant,” Mulloy added.

 

In short, it is taking a little longer than expected to engineer, develop and integrate the special maritime capabilities designed for the Triton. It is engineered to work in tandem with a manned fixed-wing surveillance aircraft called the P-8A Poseidon.

 

Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan W. Greenert, expressed great enthusiasm at the Air-Sea-Space Exposition regarding the establishment of the first P-8 Poseidon squadron slated to deploy to the Western Pacific.

 

The P-8A Poseidon is slated to replace the P-3C Orion as a long range anti-submarine warfare, anti-surface warfare, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) aircraft, according to the Navy.

 

Nevertheless, the Navy is gearing up for the first test-flight of its Triton UAS, a wide-spanning 47-foot long surveillance unmanned aircraft system equipped with high-tech, next-generation sensors able to conduct surveillance, reconnaissance and communications-relay missions over thousands of miles of ocean, service officials said.

 

The aircraft, which boasts a 130-foot wingspan and can reach altitudes of 60,000 feet, is engineered as a long-endurance surveillance platform, meaning it can stay in the air as long at 30 hours on a single mission, according to Navy figures.

 

The Triton’s first planned flight is part of an ongoing System Development and Demonstration (SDD) phase, in place since the Navy awarded Northrop Grumman a $1.16 billion deal to develop the aircraft in 2008, an industry source indicated.

 

The Triton’s first planned flight is part of an ongoing System Development and Demonstration (SDD) phase, in place since the Navy awarded Northrop Grumman a $1.16 billion deal to develop the aircraft in 2008, an industry source indicated.

 

The 89-month SDD phase, which includes initiatives to develop, test and refine the engineering of the air vehicle and integrate the sensor payload, is an acquisition phase aimed at refining requirements for the system and maturing its technologies prior to formal production, an industry source explained.

 

“The first MQ-4C Triton SDD aircraft, or SDD-1, will conduct taxi tests later this month at Northrop Grumman’s Palmdale, Calif. Facility,” said Capt. Jim Hoke, program manager.

 

Thus far, two MQ-4C Triton’s have been built and a third is under construction at a Northrop facility in Moss Point, Miss., an industry source said.  The Navy plans to build additional aircraft and move toward an Initial Operational Test and Evaluation by 2015, a move which assessed the operational and technological readiness of the system prior to formal production.

 

The Triton UAS, part of the Navy’s Broad Area Maritime Surveillance UAS developmental program, is a specially engineered maritime variant of the Air Force’s very successful RQ-4B Global Hawk platform, Navy officials explained.

 

“The modifications include anti/de-ice, bird strike and lightning protection to meet planned mission profiles and a due regard radar for safe separation from other aircraft,” Hoke added.

 

The anti/de-ice and lighting protection technologies, which include a reinforced fuselage and wing, are being engineered into the MC-4Q Triton as part of the maritime requirements for its range of anticipated mission sets, Navy and industry officials said.

 

“The Navy’s maritime variant is engineered to operate beneath the weather and have the ability to quickly be re-tasked as mission requirements dictate,” a Navy official said.

 

Since identifying ships, watercraft and coastal items are part of the Triton’s mission set, the aircraft is being engineered to ascend and descend to make identification of targets, an industry source added.

Partager cet article
Repost0
11 avril 2013 4 11 /04 /avril /2013 07:35

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-IQ81Ai7miNw/US7hui-I7OI/AAAAAAAAHCU/_AdaQbqWl_8/s1600/USS_Freedom_%2528LCS+1%2529.jpg

 

10 April 2013 By Cheryl Pellerin / American Forces Press Service – Pacific Sentinel

 

WASHINGTON, April 9, 2013 – U.S. allies and partners in the Asia-Pacific are seeing more Army, Marine Corps and special operations forces as they “come home to the Pacific” from Afghanistan and as the Defense Department enhances its forward presence across the region, Deputy Defense Secretary Ash Carter said here yesterday.
 
 
In remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the deputy secretary said the Defense Department is focused on delivering capacity, managing resources and following through on its investments in the region.
 
 
“We're watching every dollar, every ship and every aircraft to implement the rebalance successfully,” Carter said. “We also recognize that as the world is changing quickly, our operational plans need to change, and we're changing them accordingly. We are therefore taking into account new capabilities and operational concepts, advanced capabilities of potential adversaries and global threat assessments.”
 
 
Carter described the rebalance in terms of initial force structure decisions, presence and posture, investments, and innovations in operational plans and tactics. 
 

“As we draw down from Afghanistan, the Navy will release naval surface combatants and eventually carriers,” he said, “as well as naval intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, [or] ISR, and their associated processing capabilities.”
 
EP-3 signals reconnaissance aircraft already have moved from U.S. Central Command’s area of responsibility to that of U.S. Pacific Command, Carter said. The Navy also will release Fire Scout unmanned aerial vehicles from Afghanistan, and several electronic surveillance aircraft are available for redeployment.
 
 
Navy P-3 maritime patrol aircraft that have conducted surveillance missions in the Middle East for a decade will return to Pacom, he noted, and the Navy is adding a fourth forward-deployed fast-attack submarine to Guam in fiscal year 2014.
 
By 2020, 60 percent of naval assets will be assigned to the Asia-Pacific region -- “a substantial and historic shift,” Carter said, which the Navy is accomplishing in three main ways:
 
 
-- The Navy will permanently base four destroyers in Rota, Spain, to provide ballistic missile defense to European allies. This mission had been performed by 10 destroyers that rotated from the United States to the Mediterranean Sea, and now six will be released to shift their deployments to the Asia-Pacific region.
 
 
-- Destroyers and amphibious ships that have conducted security cooperation and humanitarian assistance missions in Africa, South America and Europe will be replaced for the missions by new joint high-speed vessels and littoral combat ships under construction. The destroyers and amphibious ships will deploy to the Asia-Pacific region.
 
 
-- The Navy will generate more forward presence by fielding ships such as the joint high-speed vessel and littoral combat ships, along with new mobile landing platforms and float-forward staging bases that use rotating military or civilian crews.
 
 
The Navy also is fielding the broad-area maritime surveillance sensor called BAMS aboard the Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle to expand the range and capacity for ISR in the region, Carter said, and the EA-18G carrier-based next-generation jammer aircraft will boost electronic warfare capability.
 
 
The first of four Navy littoral combat ships will arrive in Singapore later this month, he added, providing a key capability to work bilaterally and multilaterally with partners in the region.
 
 
New investments will help the Navy sustain undersea dominance in the region and elsewhere, Carter said. These include a Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarine, including the submarine itself and a new payload module for cruise missiles, as well as the P-8 maritime surveillance aircraft and the anti-submarine MH-60 helicopter.
 
 
For its part, the Air Force will capitalize on its inherent speed, range and flexibility in the region and shift capacity from Afghanistan to the Asia-Pacific region, including ISR assets such as the MQ-9 Reaper, the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft and the Global Hawk, Carter said.
 
 
The Air Force also will allocate space, cyber, tactical aircraft and bomber forces from the United States to the Asia-Pacific region with little new investment, because 60 percent of its overseas-based forces are already stationed there, he added, including 60 percent of combat-coded F-22 fighter jets.
 
 
“Our ability to strengthen the ongoing continuous-bomber-presence missions in the region will also benefit from reduced presence in Afghanistan,” the deputy secretary said. “As operations in Afghanistan end, for example, more B-1 [bombers] will become available, augmenting the B-52 continuous rotational presence in the Asia-Pacific region. The ability to provide forward strategic presence with round-trip missions by the stealthy B-2 will remain a valuable option.”
 
 
Some reductions have been made in tactical air squadrons worldwide by removing older or single-purpose aircraft to make way for newer aircraft, the deputy secretary said, “but we have made no changes in our tactical air posture for the Asia-Pacific region.”
 
 
“We have continued to invest in the fifth-generation joint strike fighter, a new stealth bomber, the KC-46 tanker replacement and a host of ISR platforms,” he added.
 
 
The Army and Marine Corps also have important roles in the Asia-Pacific rebalance, Carter said.
 
 
The Army has about 91,000 soldiers and civilians assigned to the region and maintains a forward presence of eight active-component brigade combat teams, 12 batteries of Patriot missiles and many theater-enabling units, Carter said.
 
 
“The Army is ensuring that after a decade of using Pacom assets in the Centcom area, the Pacom commander regains
command control of the other 60,000 soldiers assigned to the broader Asia-Pacific region,” he said.
 
 
As part of the regionally aligned rotational concept, Army units assigned to Pacom will focus during their training cycle on specific Pacom mission areas, Carter said, including participating in bilateral and trilateral training exercises and building partnership capacity.
 
 
“I should add that during the months of [severe budget cuts represented by] sequestration and beyond, the Army is preferentially protecting the readiness and modernization of more than 19,000 soldiers we have in South Korea so they are able to decisively respond to any North Korean provocation,” the deputy secretary said.
 
 
Carter said the Army also continues to invest in ballistic missile defense capabilities that are being deployed and improved.
 
 
“And at the DOD-wide level, we are protecting investments in future-focused capabilities that are so important to this region, such as cyber, certain science and technology investments, and space,” he added.
 
 
Also in the region, roughly 18,000 Marines are forward deployed, Carter said, split among Air Station Iwakuni, where a fighter squadron is based; Okinawa, from which the 3rd Marine Expeditionary Force operates; and Darwin, Australia, which has a new rifle company. Another 5,000 Marines are on Oahu in Hawaii, he added.
 
 
The Marines have three infantry battalions on the ground in Okinawa and will put another there later this year, he said.
 
“These are rotational battalions that will move in and out of the Western Pacific every six months,” the deputy secretary explained. “All of this will be accompanied by an EA-6 Prowler squadron in Iwakuni this fall, along with more heavy-lift and attack helicopters in Okinawa.”
 
 
In Australia, he added, the first company of Marines rotated through Darwin last year, a key first step toward using their presence to engage in bilateral and multilateral exercises as partners in the region.
 
 
“With regard to our military installations, we are making critical investments in training ranges and infrastructure, including in Guam, which we're developing as a strategic hub, as well as in Marianas, Saipan and Tinian,” Carter said.
 
 
“In addition to investing in technical capabilities,” the deputy secretary added, “we are also investing in our people, in language and culture skills and regional and strategic affairs to ensure that we cultivate the intellectual capital that will be required to make good on our rebalance.”
 
Partager cet article
Repost0
10 avril 2013 3 10 /04 /avril /2013 07:20

http://dmn.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Boar-Battlewagon.jpg

credits defensemedianetwork.com

 

Apr. 8, 2013 - By PAUL MCLEARY  - Defense News

 

WASHINGTON — If the U.S. 2nd Battalion, 4th Brigade, 10th Mountain Division, deploys to Afghanistan this year to act as a security forces advise-and-assist team mentoring Afghan troops, they’ll likely introduce a weapon to the battlefield: the Boar Battle Wagon.

 

Two privates from the 2nd Battalion, 30th Infantry Regiment “Wild Boars” constructed the beast at Fort Polk, La., during their train-up for the mission this winter. It consists of a John Deere Gator ATV stacked with the Army’s newest and most anticipated communications equipment.

 

 

Lt. Col. Al Boyer, the commander of 2/30, said he was looking for a way to use the Capability Set 13 suite of radios, mission command and on a platform lighter than a mine-resistant, ambush-protected all-terrain vehicle, to have connectivity in places where the hulking armored vehicle is too big to go.

 

The two privates equipped the vehicle with satellite voice capability and a Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below system. It also has access to intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance feeds. They loaded it on a CH-47 Chinook with a small generator to keep everything running and dropped it on top of a mountain, where Boyer was able to stay in contact with his soldiers.

 

In Afghanistan, “I need to be expeditionary,” Boyer said. “So essentially, we can drive this thing up on the back of a ’47, fly it up to some austere environment, pull it out, fire up the generator and, essentially, I had every single thing on the back of that vehicle that I could have in my [tactical operations center] in a hardwired structure.”

 

Boyer praised the CS13 package his soldiers used during their training rotation, saying it “will save people’s lives in Afghanistan, especially as we transition to retrograde and advising our Afghan partners. That situational awareness in those small teams is critical.”

 

At the training center, the unit created a BOLO list (short for “be on the lookout”) with the names and descriptions of suspects they were hunting. They blasted it through the CS13 system “so every single soldier out there on the battlefield had the BOLO list” available on the smartphone-like devices they were equipped with.

 

After that, “we started rolling up the network significantly.” The opposition force told him that “those checkpoints significantly impacted their operations” because soldiers could now spot any suspects that might be coming through, Boyer said.

 

“Capability Set 13 is a great out-of-contact system” he continued, adding that once a fight starts he wants his soldiers to be focused on the fight and not fiddling with their radios and smartphones.

 

“What it does out of contact is immediately following contact you can drop [virtual] chem lights and say ‘this is where the enemy is,’ or drop a request for help or you can take a picture and send it back, or you can locate personnel on the ground who are not in contact” for things such as casualty evacuation.

Partager cet article
Repost0
9 avril 2013 2 09 /04 /avril /2013 11:20
US Navy laser cannon shoots down drone in latest test

 

09 Apr 2013 telegraph.co.uk (AFP)

 

The US Navy says it is preparing to roll out a sea-based laser weapon capable of disabling small enemy vessels and shooting down surveillance drones in what is being hailed as a potential "game-changer".

 

 Washington - The laser system will be deployed in 2014, two years ahead of schedule, aboard the USS Ponce, an amphibious transport ship retrofitted as a waterborne staging base, the Navy said Monday.

 

Chief of Naval Research Admiral Matthew Klunder said the cost of one blast of "directed energy" could be less than $1.

 

"Compare that to the hundreds of thousands of dollars it costs to fire a missile, and you can begin to see the merits of this capability," he said in a US Navy statement.

 

The Office of Naval Research (ONR) and Naval Sea Systems Command successfully tested high-energy lasers against a moving target ship and a remotely piloted drone.

 

"The future is here," ONR official Peter Morrision said.

 

"The solid-state laser is a big step forward to revolutionizing modern warfare with directed energy, just as gunpowder did in the era of knives and swords."

 

The laser runs on electricity, so the weapon "can be fired as long as there is power," and is a lot safer than carrying explosives aboard ships.

 

The New York Times, which said the USS Ponce would deploy to the Gulf, noted the Pentagon had a "long history of grossly inflating" claims for experimental weapons.

 

Navy officials had acknowledged that the prototype laser was not yet strong enough to bring down a jet fighter or a missile, although those remained the long-term targets, the newspaper reported.

 

A March 14 report from the non-partisan Congressional Research Center said the new weapon was a potential game-changer in naval warfare.

 

"Compared to existing ship self-defense systems, such as missiles and guns, lasers could provide Navy surface ships with a more cost effective means of countering certain surface, air, and ballistic missile targets," the report read.

 

Equipping Navy ships with lasers "could lead to changes in naval tactics, ship design and procurement plans for ship-based weapons, bringing about a technological shift for the Navy - a 'game changer' - comparable to the advent of shipboard missiles in the 1950s," it added.

Partager cet article
Repost0
8 avril 2013 1 08 /04 /avril /2013 16:35

rtn11 ids jlens img1

 

April 8, 2013 defense-aerospace.com

(Source: Lexington Institute; issued April 5, 2013)

 

It takes a crisis to concentrate the mind. Faced with unusually bellicose rhetoric from the regime in Pyongyang, the Obama Administration reversed course on National Missile Defense (NMD) and is rapidly bolstering its theater air and missile defenses in the region. The Department of Defense will add 14 ground based interceptor missiles to 30 currently in place at Fort Greeley, Alaska. Two Aegis missile defense capable destroyers have been sent to waters off the Korean peninsula.

 

Equipped with the Standard Missile 3 IA, these ships can provide defense against short to medium range ballistic missiles as well as advanced cueing for the NMD system. In addition, the Army is deploying a THAAD battery to Guam, an obvious potential target for a North Korean missile. In addition, the U.S. has deployed B-2 bombers and F-22 fighters to South Korea as shows of force.

 

Without appearing bellicose, there are additional capabilities that the U.S. could and should send to the region that would provide important intelligence collection and defensive capabilities. One of these is the Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System (JLENS). This is a long-range surveillance system based on two large aerostats that carry radars, one for surveillance and the second to provide very precise intercept data. The aerostats can stay airborne for weeks at a time. Because it operates at a relatively high altitude and carries long-range sensors, JLENS can look out to about 550 km and track hundreds of targets at one time. We are not just talking about ballistic missiles or aircraft.

 

JLENS can track low flying cruise missiles, small boats and even ground vehicles all at the same time. In recent tests, JLENS demonstrated its ability to detect and track simultaneously-launched multiple ballistic missiles during their boost phase and also accurately locate their launch points. This last capability may be particularly important in finding North Korean mobile missile launchers. As a joint program, JLENS was designed from the start to support the missile and air defense operations of all the services. It carries a full array of communications capabilities allowing it to feed data to Army, Navy and Air Force units and platforms.

 

The on again/off again threat from North Korea is not the only danger U.S. and allied forces in the region face. On February 26, a Russian TU-22M Backfire bomber conducted a simulated cruise missile attack on a U.S. destroyer. The next day another practice attack was conducted against a missile defense site on Japanese soil. This is but one of dozens of such “exercises” in which Russian bombers simulate attacks on targets in Japan, NATO and even the continental U.S., on occasion penetrating into national airspace and having to be escorted out by armed fighters. It is beginning to look a lot like the bad old days of the Cold War.

 

Then there is the growing Chinese air and offensive missile threat. This includes hundreds of dual capable medium and intermediate range and ballistic and cruise missiles as well as the new DF-21 anti-ship ballistic missile intended to attack U.S. aircraft carriers. In addition, the PLA Air Force has deployed or has on order around 500 modern fourth-generation fighters and at least two fifth-generation fighters (approximately the equivalent of the F-22 and F-35) under development.

 

It is ironic that the Army is searching so intensely for a role in an Asian-centric U.S. national security strategy. As demonstrated by the decision to accelerate the planned deployment of a THAAD battery to Guam, the Army could have a major role in regional air and missile defense. Deploying JLENS to Guam would be a good first step and purely defensive. If deployed on the Korean Peninsula, JLENS could provide real-time warning and targeting information on the whole array of North Korean offensive threats from small boats to shorter-range ballistic missiles and very early cueing for the U.S. NMD. Also, JLENs is rapidly deployable and very mobile, which should be highly prized by an Army increasingly concerned about executing strategic maneuvers. The Army needs to invest in JLENS as part of a suite of advanced air and missile defense capabilities.

Partager cet article
Repost0
2 avril 2013 2 02 /04 /avril /2013 16:20

MV-22 Ospreys Land on USS Bonhomme Richard

 

Mar. 31, 2013 - By PAUL McLEARY – Defense News

 

Simulated N. Korea Conflict Shows Need for Mobile Firepower, Vessels

 

WASHINGTON — A recent U.S. Army war game against a North Korea-like failed nuclear state with powerful ground forces has exposed some materiel capability gaps that deeply worry Army planners, service leaders said.

 

After more than a decade of being able to use Kuwait as a staging area for Iraq and Afghanistan, officers worried that the ability to move into more remote areas without a nearby staging area has atrophied. Even more worrying is meeting the “anti-access/area denial” challenge presented by foes with missile and rocket standoff capabilities that would make any attempted forced entry a bloody affair.

 

The answer, officers say, lies in a variety of solutions, from light airborne forces to mobile firepower to upgraded watercraft.

 

The officers had taken part in the Army’s latest Unified Quest war game, and went over some of the game’s lessons with reporters during a daylong seminar March 19 at National Defense University in Washington.

 

“We saw the brittleness of our ability to defeat projected [year] 2020 anti-access/ area-denial challenges of potential adversaries during the game as units became isolated and some withdrew,” Col. Kevin Felix, Future Warfare Division chief at Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC), said during a roundtable discussion. While U.S. forces were able to gain a foothold in the contested territory, “there were problems with the buildup of follow-on forces and sustainment.”

 

Felix added that in the war game, “we found ways to create access” by air-dropping Stryker eight-wheeled vehicles and using the tilt-rotor V-22 Osprey aircraft to get small units in quickly. But moving so quickly with such limited numbers meant those units were often quickly surrounded by larger enemy forces.

 

TRADOC is known to be working on a joint-entry operations concept that would use Army airborne forces to counter an enemy’s potential area-denial tactics.

 

Speaking at a conference in February, Col. Rocky Kmiecik, the Mounted Requirements Division director at the Army’s Maneuver Center of Excellence, said the XVIII Airborne Corps at Fort Bragg, N.C., is helping develop the concept by looking at “mobile protected firepower for light airborne infantry.”

 

The idea is that since the Army divested its light Sheridan tanks, “airborne forces have a capability gap of mobile protected firepower,” he explained. One of the solutions the Army is considering is the Stryker Mobile Gun System (MGS), which is armed with a 105mm cannon.

 

Kmiecik warned that the Army is still developing its thinking on the subject, and that “we don’t know whether or not the MGS can meet what the light forces need.”

 

The concern over light mobile firepower was echoed by Lt. Gen. Keith Walker, director of the Army Capabilities Integration Center, at a breakfast meeting on March 20.

 

“Our force is heavy,” he said. “I’m not saying we have too many tanks and Bradleys [armored vehicles], but how do you get to the fight when you need to have the ability to do strategic maneuvering?”

 

The Army is still “probably a couple of Nobel Prizes away” from being able to field lighter vehicles that have the protection and firepower that leaders see as essential on future battlefields, he cautioned.

 

At National Defense University, Maj. Gen. Bill Hix, TRADOC’s director of Concepts Development & Learning Directorate, said that while there have been tests in air-dropping the Stryker, the problem remains, “how do you close that gap between early-entry forces and follow-on forces?”

 

Air-dropping Strykers might be the answer, he said.

 

Taking to Sea

 

Another capability that Army war gamers found useful during Unified Quest was watercraft. Since the game took place on something resembling the Korean Peninsula, “there are some new Army watercraft we used to maneuver forces around in this operation very agilely,” Hix said.

 

These boats “allowed us to get after a series of key places where [weapons of mass destruction were] suspected to be, very rapidly,” Hix said, while having the add-on effect of creating confusion within the enemy’s ranks due to multiple landings in a variety of locations.

 

The Army’s increasing desire to take to the sea has also been outlined in an Army equipment modernization strategy document released March 4. It offers a path forward for the modernization of the service’s existing watercraft fleet.

 

The Army’s landing craft utility platforms are old, having been built in the 1960s and 1970s, the paper complains, and are “in need of immediate modernization to provide the Army and the joint force the ability to meet its expeditionary employment concepts,” particularly in the Pacific region.

 

“Our aged fleet is slow and does not have the cargo capacity to deliver combat configured forces and sustainment materials/ equipment to the point of employment,” the paper continued.

 

The equipping plan, which stretches between fiscal 2014 and 2048, maintains that the Army wants to make force protection on its watercraft a priority by integrating technologies such as “scalable nonlethal-to-lethal escalation of force, selective integration of structural armor, ballistic glass, and remote weapons and robust communications architecture.”

 

While adding these capabilities, service planners admit they are willing to accept some risk in areas “such as sea mines, anti-ship cruise missiles, rockets, cannons and mortars.”

 

Between fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2027, the service also wants to find a replacement for its logistics support vessel while looking to make use of commercial solutions “with military-unique upgrades.”

 

While Unified Quest exposed capability gaps the Army must grapple with as budgets are being squeezed, the service is looking to innovate both doctrinally and materially as it continues to pore over lessons learned in Iraq.

 

In remarks at National Defense University on the 10th anniversary of the 2003 invasion, TRADOC commander Gen. Robert Cone concluded that while the United States “collapsed the Iraqis’ air defenses, their command and control, their logistics” in a matter of weeks, “that didn’t stop them from finding an alternative way of waging war.”

 

The trick, he and other Army leaders have concluded, is to try to understand and anticipate those alternative ways of making war before the enemy does.

Partager cet article
Repost0
25 mars 2013 1 25 /03 /mars /2013 17:20

M113 source FOB

 

March 25, 2013 defense-aerospace.com

(Source: US Army TACOM; issued March 21, 2013)

 

Draft RFP Sections

 

The AMPV program is releasing a Full DRAFT Request for Proposal (RFP) for industry review and comment. This DRAFT RFP, including all associated Exhibits and Attachments, are DRAFT ONLY, Pre-decisional, and are anticipated to be changed before the final RFP is released.

-- Questions from Industry

All questions or comments must be submitted through the AMPV email address at usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.ampv-program@mail.mil. Please note that ALL comments submitted in regard to the DRAFT RFP WILL NOT be released to the public and will be used for program planning purposes only. These responses MAY BE used to update the RFP if the Government determines it is in the program's best interest. All questions submitted will be posted, along with their responses, on the AMPV webpage for Industry to review.

PM AMPV remains committed to review all Industry's comments and address all questions and concerns related to the posted DRAFT RFP. Please be advised that comments and questions received close to the date of a final RFP release may not get answered or posted to the website. Due to uncertainty of a final RFP release date, the Government may lack sufficient time to respond, but will make every attempt to reconcile and post responses to submitted questions. Any previously submitted questions, which are not reconciled before a final RFP, may be resubmitted and answers will be posted until receipt of proposals.

-- *Questions to Industry (RFI Questions)
In addition to receiving industry feedback and comments based on the released DRAFT RFP and associated documents, the AMPV team would like industry feedback on specific sections within the DRAFT RFP. The following is a list of questions for industry to review and provide comment: Request for Information (RFI) Questions

-- *Please note that ALL responses to the RFI Questions WILL NOT be released to the public and will be used for program planning purposes only. These responses MAY BE used to update the RFP or Acquisition Strategy, if the Government determines it is in the program's best interest.

-- Industry Day
A second Industry Day is planned for April 23, 2013. The purpose of this event is to update industry on AMPV program requirements and provide an overview of the DRAFT RFP. Details regarding industry day, including how to register, can be found on the following link: 2013 AMPV Industry Day

-- Instructions on Requesting CUI/CLASSIFIED/FOUO/Export Controlled Information

Information on this webpage, including the referenced attachments below, marked as Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) is subject to export control. See the following instructions for access to CUI, in addition to all Classified and FOUO information: (link).


Click here to reach the RFP page, listing all related documents, on the US Army TACOM website.


(EDITOR’S NOTE: The AMPV is thus described in the RFP:
“The Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV) is the proposed United States Army program for replacement of the M113 Family of Vehicles (FOV) to mitigate current and future capability gaps in force protection, mobility, reliability, and interoperability by mission role variant within the Heavy Brigade Combat Team (HBCT).
The AMPV will have multiple variants tailored to specific mission roles within HBCT. Mission roles are as follows: General Purpose, Medical Evacuation, Medical Treatment, Mortar Carrier, and Mission Command.
AMPV is a vehicle integration program. Existing Mission Equipment Packages (MEPs) will be transferred into the AMPV platforms where applicable.)

Partager cet article
Repost0
24 mars 2013 7 24 /03 /mars /2013 12:30

http://lignesdedefense.blogs.ouest-france.fr/media/02/00/4030449997.jpg

 

23.03.2013 par P. CHAPLEAU Lignes de Défense

 

Le Tank-Automotive Command (TACOM) a diffusé vendredi un pré-appel d'offres (draft RFP) pour le remplacement des M-113 (en service depuis 53 ans) par un "Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle" (on lira le texte du draft RFP ici). La première phase de ce projet prévoit une commande de 29 prototypes sous 4 ans (d'ici à 2017) puis une première tranche de 289 véhicules (2018-2020). Coût prévu: 1,5 milliard de dollars.

 

La deuxième tranche, d'un montant de 4,7 milliards, concernera 2 618 autres exemplaires de l'AMPV. Soit 522 exemplaires pour le transport de matériels, 386 pour le transport de mortiers, 933 véhicules radio, 790 ambulances et 216 mini-cliniques mobiles.

 

Parmi les projets annoncés,

 

des modèles du Stryker

stryker.jpg

et du Bradley

bradley.jpg

Partager cet article
Repost0
14 mars 2013 4 14 /03 /mars /2013 13:20
US Army fields first AH-64E Apache Guardian helicopter

 

14 March 2013 army-technology.com

 

The US Army's 1-229th Attack Reconnaissance Battalion (ARB) has fielded the first AH-64E Apache attack helicopter during a ceremony at Gray Army Airfield within Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington, US.

 

Eight out of 24 helicopters were received by the battalion, since January 2013, and all are scheduled to be operational by the end of April this year.

 

Known as Guardian, the new heavily-armed helicopter features more powerful, fuel-efficient T700-GE-701D engines, enhanced rotor blade technology, as well as advanced electronics, and is designed to replace the army's existing AH-64D Longbow model helicopters.

 

Other features include improved drive system and sensor enhancements, improved handling and performance, as well as the ability to hover at 6,000ft with a full mission payload, providing pilots with more control during high-altitude operations.

 

Commenting on the helicopter, 1-229th Attack Reconnaissance Battalion commander lieutenant colonel Geoffrey Crawford said it would increase the battalion's lethality and survivability, while also improving its ability to support ground forces.

 

"The increased power will now allow us to stay on the objective longer and with more ammunition," Crawford added.

 

With a combat speed of around 189mph, the helicopter, which was formerly known as AH-64D Block III, can turn faster and tighter in challenging environments, and also provide pilots with options to remotely operate nearby unmanned aerial vehicles/systems.

 

In addition, 1-229th ARB maintenance test pilot chief warrant officer 3 Richard Crabtree said: "They can view UAV camera feeds, adjust their flight path and launch missiles at targets spotted by the UAV."

 

The battalion flight crews are scheduled to conduct familiarisation training using the actual aircraft and AH-64E flight simulators at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, in addition to training in preparation for upcoming rotations to the Army's National Training Center (NTC) later this year.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 mars 2013 2 12 /03 /mars /2013 12:35

UH-60 Black Hawk source asdnews

 

12 mars 2013 Romandie.com (AFP)

 

KANDAHAR (Afghanistan) - Cinq soldats américains de la coalition de l'Otan sont morts dans le crash de leur hélicoptère Black Hawk dans le sud de l'Afghanistan, ont annoncé mardi des responsables.

 

Selon la police de la province de Kandahar, l'un des fiefs des insurgés talibans, le crash s'est produit lors d'un orage tard lundi soir dans le district de Daman.

 

Un responsable taliban à Kandahar a affirmé que le crash était en fait le fruit d'une attaque des insurgés, mais les autorités locales ont balayé du revers de la main ces affirmations. Il n'y avait pas d'insurgés dans ce secteur au moment de l'incident, a rétorqué le général Abdul Razeq, chef de la police provinciale.

 

Les causes du crash font l'objet d'une enquête, mais les premières informations indiquent qu'il n'y avait pas d'activités ennemies dans cette zone à ce moment-là, a indiqué de son côté la force de l'Otan en Afghanistan (Isaf).

 

Conformément à son habitude, la coalition n'a pas dévoilé la nationalité des victimes, mais un haut responsable militaire occidental ayant requis l'anonymat a confirmé à l'AFP que les victimes étaient toutes américaines.

 

En août dernier, un hélicoptère s'était écrasé dans des conditions suspectes dans la même province de Kandahar, causant la mort de onze personnes, sept soldats américains ainsi que trois militaires et un interprète afghans. Les rebelles talibans avaient revendiqué avoir abattu l'aéronef, ce que n'avait pas démenti l'Isaf.

 

Les accidents d'hélicoptères sont relativement fréquents en Afghanistan, le plus souvent dus à des problèmes mécaniques ou à de mauvaises conditions météorologiques, et plus rarement à des attaques ennemies. L'Isaf s'appuie énormément sur le transport aérien en raison notamment d'un terrain très accidenté.

 

Deux soldats américains et des membres des forces de sécurité afghanes avaient aussi été tués lundi lorsqu'un homme portant l'uniforme afghan a ouvert le feu sur eux dans la province du Wardak, située à la porte de la capitale Kaboul, portant ainsi à sept le nombre de soldats américains ayant perdu la vie ce jour-là en sol afghan.

 

Le président afghan Hamid Karzaï avait par ailleurs accusé dimanche les Etats-Unis et les talibans de discuter hors du pays de l'avenir de l'Afghanistan après le retrait de l'essentiel des forces de l'Otan en 2014.

 

M. Karzaï avait même soutenu que des attentats récents perpétrés par les talibans servaient la rhétorique des Etats-Unis, car ils leurs permettaient de justifier leur présence au pays après le retrait de l'Otan. La Maison Blanche a rejeté sans appel lundi les propos du président Karzaï.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 mars 2013 2 12 /03 /mars /2013 12:20

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c3/OCPA-2005-08-11-080331.jpg/800px-OCPA-2005-08-11-080331.jpg

 

March 12, 2013: Strategy page

 

Faced with smaller budgets over the next decade the U.S. Army has halted evaluation of new UAVs and is standardizing on four existing models (Gray Eagle, Shadow 2000, Raven and Puma). All four of these were developed and purchased in large quantities over the last dozen years and will remain the primary army UAVs for the next 5-10 years.

 

The army currently has nearly 7,000 UAVs. Over 6,000 are micro-UAVs like the Raven and Puma, These tiny (under six kg/13.2 pound) reconnaissance aircraft have become very popular with the troops, anyone of which can become an operator after a few hours of training. These tiny UAVs are a radical new military aircraft technology that is took air recon to a new level. That level is low, a few hundred meters off the ground. The army has nearly 1,798 Raven and 325 Puma UAVs systems in use by ground troops. A complete system (controller, spare parts, and three UAVs) costs $250,000 for the Raven and over $400,000 for Puma. These tiny aircraft have changed how the troops fight and greatly reduced army dependence on the air force for air reconnaissance. The lightweight, hand launched Raven UAV can only stay airborne about an hour per sortie, but troops have found that this is enough time to do all sorts of useful work, even when there's no fighting going on. This is most of the time. The heavier Puma can stay up for 120 minutes.

 

rq-11b-raven-us-army-soldier-launch-lg

Raven B (RQ-11B)

 

The two kilogram (4.4 pound) RQ-11 Raven UAV aircraft is popular with combat and non-combat troops alike. The army has developed better training methods, which enables operators to get more out of Raven. Combat troops use it for finding and tracking the enemy, while non-combat troops use it for security (guarding bases or convoys). In both cases, troops have come to use the Raven for more than just getting a look over the hill or around the corner. The distinctive noise of a Raven overhead is very unpopular with the enemy below and is often used to scare the enemy away or make him move to where he can be more easily spotted.

 

The current model, the Raven B (RQ-11B), was introduced six years ago, a year after the original Raven entered service in large numbers. This UAV is inexpensive ($35,000 each). The Raven is battery powered (and largely silent unless flown close to the ground). It carries a color day vidcam or a two color infrared night camera. It can also carry a laser designator and new gimbaled camera is being bought. The cameras broadcast real time video back to the operator, who controls the Raven via a handheld controller, which uses a hood to shield the display from direct sunlight (thus allowing the operator to clearly see what is on the ground). The Raven can go as fast as 90 kilometers an hour but usually cruises at between 40 and 50 kilometers an hour. It can go as far as 15 kilometers from its controller and usually flies a preprogrammed route, using GPS for navigation.

 

The Raven is made of Kevlar, the same material used in helmets and protective vests. On average, a Raven can survive about 200 landings before it breaks something. While some Ravens have been shot down, the most common cause of loss is losing the communications link (as the aircraft flies out of range or behind something that interrupts the signal) or a software/hardware failure on the aircraft. Combat losses have been high, as nearly 20,000 have been built and most of those have been lost in training or the battlefield.

 

From the very beginning the Raven changed the way troops fight. With the bird's eye view of the battlefield, commanders can move their troops more quickly, confident that they won't be ambushed and often with certain knowledge of where the unseen enemy is. The big advantage with Raven is that it’s simple, reliable, and it just works. The UAV can be quickly taken apart and put into a backpack. It takes off by having the operator start the motor and then throwing it. This can be done from a moving vehicle and the Raven is a popular recon tool for convoys. It lands by coming in low and then turning the motor off. Special Forces troops like to use it at night because the enemy can’t see it and often can’t hear it either.

 

puma ae web

Puma AE UAV

 

Last year the U.S. Army began using the larger (5.9 kg) Puma AE UAVs. So far 325 RQ-20A systems have been ordered and most have been delivered. Adopting Puma is part of an army effort to find micro-UAVs that are more effective than current models and just as easy to use. The Puma, a 5.9 kg (13 pound) UAV with a 2.6 meter (8.5 feet) wingspan and a range of 15 kilometers from the operator, has proved to be the next big (or micro) thing the army was looking for. Combat commanders quickly realized how useful Puma is and wanted more, as quickly as possible. This is not surprising as SOCOM (Special Operations Command) has been using Puma since 2008.

 

The army wants to equip each infantry company with a Puma system. That would mean 18 Puma AE UAVs per brigade and nearly 400 for the entire army. These larger UAVs have been most useful in route clearance (scouting ahead to spot ambushes, roadside bombs, landslides, washouts, or whatever). The larger Puma is particularly useful in Afghanistan, which is windier than Iraq and thus more difficult for the tiny Raven to operate.

 

Top speed for Puma is 87 kilometers an hour and cruising speed is 37-50 kilometers an hour. Max altitude is 3,800 meters (12,500 feet). Puma has a better vidcam (providing tilt, pan, and zoom) than the smaller Raven and that provides steadier and more detailed pictures. Because it is larger than Raven, and three times as heavy, Puma is much steadier in bad weather. Both Puma and Raven are battery powered.

 

Puma has been around for a decade but never got purchased in large quantities by anyone. The latest model uses a lot of proven tech from the Raven (both UAVs are made by the same company). Like the Raven, Puma is hand launched and can be quickly snapped together or apart. Another version, using a fuel cell, has been tested and was able to stay in the air for nine hours at a time. There is also a naval version that floats and is built to withstand exposure to salt water.

 

Each combat brigade is now supposed to have 35 mini-UAV systems (each with three UAVs, most of them Raven, but at least ten of these systems are to be Pumas). That means that each combat brigade now has its own air force of over a hundred reconnaissance aircraft.

 

Shadow 200 UAV

RQ-7-Shadow

 

Then there are the larger UAVs. The Gray Eagle is replacing several other large UAVs. Most of these are the RQ-7 Shadow (over 300) and smaller numbers of MQ-5 Hunters, Sky Warrior Alpha and RQ-18 MAV (helicopter type) systems. The MQ-1C weighs 1.5 tons, carries 135.4 kg (300 pounds) of sensors internally, and up to 227.3 kg (500 pounds) of sensors or weapons externally. It has an endurance of up to 36 hours and a top speed of 270 kilometers an hour. MQ-1C has a wingspan of 18 meters (56 feet) and is 9 meters (28 feet) long. The MQ-1C can carry four Hellfire missiles (compared to two on the Predator), or a dozen smaller 70mm guided missiles. Each MQ-1C costs about $10 million. The army uses warrant officers as operators. The MQ-1C has automated takeoff and landing software and is equipped with a full array of electronics (target designators and digital communications so troops on the ground can see what the UAV sees).

 

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c3/OCPA-2005-08-11-080331.jpg/800px-OCPA-2005-08-11-080331.jpg

 

The army began sending platoons (each with four aircraft) of its new MQ-1C Gray Eagle UAV to Afghanistan in 2011. The first MQ-1C aviation company was formed in 2009 and was assigned to the U.S. Army 160th SOAR (Special Operations Aviation Regiment), which belongs to SOCOM (Special Operations Command). The army plans to eventually equip each combat brigade with an MQ-1C company and establish over three dozen of these companies.

 

The MQ-1C is based on the MQ-1 Predator, which is a one ton aircraft and do most everything the Gray Eagle can except carry larger sensors and more weapons. The 159 kg (350 pound) Shadow 200s carry day and night cameras and laser designators but usually no weapons. Most of the new army heavy UAVs delivered over the next five years will carry missiles, and by 2015, the army wants to have over 500 MQ-1Cs and perhaps a few Shadow 200s that have not worn out.

 

The army is proceeding to spend scare cash on new sensors for existing UAVs and the old Shadow 200s have gotten other new components (engines, wings, and so on). This is because that while the army plans to buy nearly 500 Gray Eagles it has less than a hundred so far and are expensive. So money problems may halt or slow down procurement. Gray Eagle and Shadow are the key long range UAVs used by brigade and division headquarters to take in the big picture.

Partager cet article
Repost0
12 mars 2013 2 12 /03 /mars /2013 12:20

Beretta M9 pistol

 

March 12, 2013: Strategy page

 

For the last seven years the U.S. Army has been trying to replace its standard 9mm pistol (the M9). This is all the result of numerous and continuous complaints from troops, who have found that combat in Iraq and Afghanistan provides lots of situations where the pistol is a crucial weapon. The current American Army pistol has been found wanting. The list of complaints is long. A big one is the dust and sand so common in Iraq and Afghanistan, which leads to magazine jams. That was partially fixed with a new magazine, but there were a lot of other problems that required a new pistol. The dust and sand tended to get into the loading mechanism because of the open-slide design. Other complaints included the lack of a rail on top for accessories, or threads so that a silencer can be screwed in. Then there is the poor placement of the safety switch, inability to adjust the hand grip to fit many different hand sizes and the difficulty users have in quickly replacing components in the field. The army is holding a competition for a new pistol, a process that is supposed to be completed in two years. Meanwhile the army is ordering new M9s to replace those bought in the 1980s that are dying of old age and lots of combat.  Army leadership has long resisted calls for a new pistol and ignored the different combat situations in Iraq and Afghanistan that were behind these pleas. There was just this mindset that pistols were not that important.

 

Britain had a similar problem and recently adopted the Glock 17. This weapon is typical of the more modern designs the troops want. The Glock has long been very popular pistol with police and military users and one of many new models that have the new features the troops want.

 

The Glock 17 was designed by Gaston Glock 30 years ago and initially became enormously popular with policemen. Some armed forces use it, like Austria and Norway. There are over twenty variants, usually having to do with caliber. The American FBI, for instance, uses the 10.2mm (.40 caliber). The Glock has a plastic (polymer) frame and can be safely carried in the holster, loaded and ready to fire. All one has to do is aim and pull the trigger. The Glock magazine carries 17 rounds compared to 15 in the M9. All these characteristics have proved enormously popular with police, who are often called on to use their pistol with no warning. In Iraq and Afghanistan troops often find themselves operating like SWAT teams and that made other pistols like the Glock appear so superior to the M9. Many troops would buy another pistol with their own money, a trend which has embarrassed the army leadership.

 

The Glock is a simple pistol and very reliable. The manufacturer has subjected the pistols to very extreme environmental tests and tweaked the pistol design to ensure that a Glock would always fire. Over 2.5 million Glocks have been manufactured in the last three decades, meaning that spare parts and servicing are easy to find.

 

There is also demand for a larger caliber round. SOCOM (Special Operations Command) has ordered several larger caliber pistols for their troops over the last decade. Last year the U.S. Marine Corps ordered 12,000 .45 (11.4mm) caliber pistols (at $1,900 each) for its SOCOM and recon troops. Many troops want the old M1911 .45 caliber ACP pistol back, The M1911 was replaced by the M9 in the 1980s. The M1911 is a 1.2 kg (2.45 pound) 210mm (8.25 inch) long weapon with a 127mm (5 inch) barrel and a 7 round magazine. Compared to the M9 9mm pistol the .45s have more hitting power, while the M9 is a bit more accurate at up to about 50 meters.

 

The new marine .45s are not the old M1911A1 model but the more modern Colt CQBP (Close Quarter Battle Pistol), which uses the same ammo as the M1911A1 but has a number of improvements that make the weapon more reliable, flexible, and accurate. The CQBP holds eight rounds, is built to resist salt water corrosion, accept rail mounted accessories, and so on.

 

There are several improved .45s available because of demand from police departments and government agencies (like the FBI). In the 1990s SOCOM adopted the Heckler and Koch Mk 23 SOCOM model. This is a 1.47 kg (3.2 pound) .45 pistol with a 12-round magazine and the ability to carry a silencer. It is expensive, at $2,400 each. Loaded with a silencer and laser aiming device the Mk23 weighs 2.29 kg (5 pounds). The Mk23 is a precision weapon, capable of accurate fire at 50 meters (51mm/two inch shot groups). The Mk 23 is for offensive operations while the lighter and cheaper USP Tactical model was later introduced for personal protection and other duties not requiring the heavier Mk 23.

 

Over the last decade American troops in Iraq and Afghanistan discovered, through combat experience, what types of weapons worked best at close range to take down the enemy. It was the same with SWAT teams and commandos all over the world. When conducting a raid and finding yourself up close and personal with someone trying to kill you, there is a need for a heavy caliber pistol or a shotgun (firing 00 shot or slugs). The premier pistol for ensuring you take down someone is still the .45 caliber (11.4mm) or .40 caliber (10mm, but only with a heavy bullet) pistols. These weapons are light and handy, compared to assault rifles or shotguns, and have a long history of quickly taking down an armed and determined foe.

 

As the U.S. Army Special Forces discovered, if you are well trained and know what you are doing, you should carry a pistol, in addition to your rifle. But not the official issue (since 1985) M9 but something with a bit more stopping power. The Special Forces prefer new model .45 caliber pistols, although 10mm weapons are also popular. The reason for this is that you are most likely to be using the pistol indoors, where your target is going to be really close. You want to knock him down quickly, before he can get at you with a knife or even his hands. Many troops are getting their own pistols and most commanders have been lenient on this issue. The same applies to shotguns. Although the army and marines have bought a lot of them (the Benelli M4 Combat Shotgun is a particular favorite), there never seem to be enough of them for some units (that spend a lot of time raiding buildings in hostile neighborhoods).

 

The U.S. military adopted the 9mm pistol in 1985, largely to standardize ammunition. All other NATO states used 9mm for pistols. The U.S. also noted that most 9mm pistols were carried by officers and support personnel, who rarely used them in combat. SOCOM came into being a few years later and immediately began planning to bring back .45 pistols. Actually, many Special Forces and SEAL operators never gave up using the .45, as it was the ideal pistol for many commando operations.

Partager cet article
Repost0
27 février 2013 3 27 /02 /février /2013 18:20

MQ-4C BAMS Unmanned Aircraft

 

February 27, 2013:  Strategy Page

 

The U.S. Navy has begun gathering sailors and equipment for its first Global Hawk UAV squadron. Called VUP (Unmanned Patrol Squadron) 19 it will be in service by October on the east coast of the United States, where it will handle operations over the Atlantic. For naval service the RQ-4 Global Hawk UAV is called the MQ-4C Triton and BAMS (Broad Area Maritime Surveillance). A second squadron will enter service next year on the west coast to cover the Pacific.  The navy plans to buy 68 Tritons and 117 P-8As jet aircraft to replace prop driven 250 P-3Cs. This replacement program is supposed to be complete in about a decade. The new surveillance aircraft provide more information over a wider area and do it more quickly.

 

The Triton has already been in service on an experimental basis. Last year, two years after extensive tests in the Middle East, the Triton began operating with a carrier task force at sea. Circling above the task force at 22,500 meters (70,000 feet), Triton monitored sea traffic off the Iranian coast and the Straits of Hormuz. Anything suspicious is checked out by carrier or land based aircraft, or nearby warships. The Triton aircraft fly a 24 hour sortie every three days. The first production Triton was delivered six months ago.

 

In 2009, the Triton test consisted of 60 flights and over 1,000 hours in the air. The flights were over land and sea areas, even though the UAV sensors are designed mainly to perform maritime reconnaissance. U.S. Air Force Global Hawk maintenance personnel assisted the navy in tending to the navy RQ-4 while it was on the ground, and for landings and takeoffs. The UAV was operated by navy personnel back in the United States at Patuxent River Naval Air Station. A year earlier, the navy began training four of its personnel (three P-3 pilots and one civilian) to operate RQ-4s. The four navy operator trainees were in an accelerated course (four months instead of five) and were available to help fly U.S. Air Force RQ-4s before the navy RQ-4s test model became operational in 2009.

 

The P-3 replacement, the P-8A is expected to complement Triton. Although the Boeing 737 based P-8A is a two engine jet, compared to the four engine turboprop P-3C it is replacing, it is a more capable plane. The P-8A has 23 percent more floor space than the P-3, and is larger (118 foot wingspan, versus 100 foot) and heavier (83 tons versus 61). Most other characteristics are the same. Both can stay in the air about ten hours per sortie. Speed however is different. Cruise speed for the 737 is 910 kilometers an hour, versus 590 for the propeller driven P-3. This makes it possible for the P-8A to get to a patrol area faster, which is a major advantage when chasing down subs spotted by sonar arrays or satellites. However, the P-3 can carry more weapons (9 tons, versus 5.6). This is less of a factor as the weapons (torpedoes, missiles, mines, sonobouys) are pound for pound more effective today and that trend continues. Both carry the same size crew, of 10-11 pilots and equipment operators. Both aircraft carry search radar and various other sensors.

 

The 737 has, like the P-3, been equipped with bomb hard points on the wings for torpedoes or missiles. The B-737 is a more modern design and has been used successfully since the 1960s by commercial aviation. Navy aviators are confident that it will be as reliable as the P-3 (which was based on the Electra civilian airliner that first flew in 1954. Although only 170 were built, plus 600 P-3s, about 20 Electras are still in service). The Boeing 737 first flew in 1965 and over 5,000 have been built. The P-8A will be the first 737 designed with a bomb bay and four wing racks for weapons.

 

The U.S. Air Force and Navy are buying the B version of the RQ-4 Global Hawk UAVs, at a cost of over $60 million each. This version is larger (wingspan is 5 meters/15 feet larger, at 42.2 meters/131 feet, and it's nine percent longer at 15.5 meters/48 feet) than the A model, and can carry more equipment. To support that, there's a new generator that produces 150 percent more electrical power. The RQ-4 has a range of over 22,000 kilometers and a cruising speed of 650 kilometers an hour.

 

The first three RQ-4Bs entered service in 2006. At 13 tons, the Global Hawk is the size of a commuter airliner (like the Embraer ERJ 145), but costs nearly twice as much. Global Hawk can be equipped with much more powerful and expensive sensors, which more than double the cost of the aircraft. These "spy satellite quality" sensors (especially AESA radar) are usually worth the expense because they enable the UAV, flying at over 20,000 meters (62,000 feet), to get a sharp picture of all the territory it can see from that altitude. The B version is supposed to be a lot more reliable. Early A models tended to fail and crash at the rate of once every thousand flight hours.

 

The maritime RQ-4 is seen as the ultimate replacement for all manned maritime patrol aircraft. The P-8A will probably be the last manned naval search aircraft. Some countries are using satellite communications to put the sensor operators who staff manned patrol aircraft on the ground. Some nations propose sending aircraft like the P-3 or P-8 aloft with just their flight crews, having all the other gear operated from the ground. This enables the aircraft to stay in the air longer and carry more gear.

Partager cet article
Repost0
21 février 2013 4 21 /02 /février /2013 13:20

cyber warfare

 

WASHINGTON, 21 février - RIA Novosti

 

 

Washington estime nécessaire de maintenir un dialogue sur la sécurité informatique avec Pékin, mais reste préoccupé par les cybermenaces émanant de la Chine, a déclaré mercredi soir à Washington le porte-parole de la Maison Blanche Jay Carney.

 

"Les Etats-Unis et la Chine sont parmi les plus principaux acteurs du cyberespace, et il est essentiel que nous continuions un dialogue stable et efficace en vue de définir les limites d'un comportement acceptable dans le cyberespace", a indiqué M.Carney lors d'une conférence de presse.

 

"Nous continuerons d'évoquer le problème des attaques informatiques dans nos négociations avec de hauts responsables chinois, dont des militaires", a-t-il poursuivi.

 

Auparavant, les médias occidentaux ont rapporté que le gouvernement US pourrait décréter des sanctions commerciales à l'encontre de la Chine s'il était confirmé que les attaques informatiques visant les entreprises et institutions américaines étaient perpétrées avec le soutien officiel de Pékin.

 

Ces informations ont été diffusées suite à la publication d'un rapport rédigé par la société américaine Mandiant, selon lequel les cyberattaques visant les Etats-Unis étaient menées par l'unité 61398 de l'armée chinoise déployée dans les faubourgs de Shanghai. Le porte-parole du ministère chinois des Affaires étrangères Hong Lei a ensuite démenti ces accusations.

Partager cet article
Repost0
20 février 2013 3 20 /02 /février /2013 12:20

cyber warfare

 

MOSCOU, 20 février - RIA Novosti

 

Le gouvernement US pourrait décréter des sanctions commerciales à l'encontre de la Chine s'il est confirmé que les attaques informatiques visant les entreprises et institutions américaines sont perpétrées avec le soutien officiel de Pékin, rapportent mercredi les médias occidentaux.

 

Mardi 19 février, la société américaine Mandiant spécialisée dans la sécurité informatique a présenté un rapport selon lequel les cyberattaques visant les Etats-Unis étaient menées par l'unité 61398 de l'Armée de libération du Peuple.

 

D'après le document, les signatures de ses attaques ont pu être remontées jusqu'à un immeuble situé dans le quartier de Pudong, dans les faubourgs de Shanghai. L'unité secrète pourrait compter des milliers de membres experts en anglais et en programmation.

 

Les Etats-Unis ont a plusieurs reprises qualifié la Chine et la Russie de "principales menaces" pour la sécurité informatique dans le monde. D'après le dernier rapport du National Intelligence Estimate (NIE), dont des extraits ont été publiés par le Washington Post, la Chine est le pays "le plus agressif" dans la recherche d'un accès aux informations sensibles lui permettant d'acquérir une avance dans le domaine économique.

Partager cet article
Repost0
19 février 2013 2 19 /02 /février /2013 17:20

China Armed Forces source Brahmand.com

 

Feb. 19, 2013 - By CALUM MacLEOD – Defense News (USA Today)

 

BEIJING — Hackers at a secretive unit of the Chinese military have stolen huge amounts of data from 115 companies and organizations in the U.S. since at least 2006, a U.S. computer security firm said in a research report released online Tuesday.

 

The details made public by Mandiant Corp. add weight to arguments that Chinese authorities are increasingly targeting foreign firms, institutions and government agencies. Beijing denies such charges and says China too is a victim of cyber attacks.

 

Based in a 12-story office tower in Shanghai’s Pudong district, Unit 61398 of China’s People’s Liberation Army “is likely government-sponsored and one of the most persistent of China’s cyber threat actors,” said Mandiant.

 

Unit 61398 “has systematically stolen hundreds of terabytes of data from at least 141 organizations” in diverse industries and mostly in the U.S., said the report, without naming any firms. “It is time to acknowledge the threat is originating in China, and we wanted to do our part to arm and prepare security professionals to combat that threat effectively,” it said.

 

China is the “most threatening actor in cyberspace,” concluded a draft report of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission last November, reported Bloomberg, as China’s intelligence agencies and hackers try to access U.S. military computers and defense contractors.

 

Last Tuesday, U.S. President Barack Obama signed an executive order to improve protection of the country’s critical infrastructure from cyber attacks. “We know foreign countries and companies swipe our corporate secrets. Now our enemies are also seeking the ability to sabotage our power grid, our financial institutions and our air traffic control systems,” he said in his State of the Union address the same day.

 

The Mandiant report, titled “Exposing one of China’s cyber espionage units,” said data stolen included blueprints, pricing documents, details on mergers and acquisitions, emails and contact lists. The hacking group included hundreds and possibly thousands of English speakers with advanced computer skills, said Mandiant.

 

In a new book, Eric Schmidt, the executive chairman of Google, criticizes China as the world’s “most sophisticated and prolific hacker,” according to quotes published in the Wall Street Journal. Google has tussled with Chinese authorities over the nation’s strict censorship of the Internet.

 

In common with earlier denials, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei dismissed the Mandiant allegations as “groundless” Tuesday. After the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal complained earlier this month about extensive Chinese hacking, a commentary in the People’s Daily, the mouthpiece of the ruling Communist Party, said the U.S. was seeking excuses to expand its “Internet army.”

 

Given the lack of Chinese media coverage on this sensitive issue, there was little discussion Tuesday on the nation’s censored but booming micro-blog sites. Unlike Unit 61398, some Chinese hackers, leaning heavily on their patriotic duties for protection, don’t bother to hide. On the Hongke (“red guest”) website, its name a play on the Chinese for hacker — Heike, or Black Guest/Dark Visitor — some recent posts insulted the U.S. for complaining about the high cost of Chinese cyber espionage.

Partager cet article
Repost0
19 février 2013 2 19 /02 /février /2013 13:39

rq-11b-raven-us-army-soldier-launch-lg

 

February 19, 2013: Strategy Page

 

The U.S. Army has over 6,000 micro-UAVs (Ravens and Pumas) and is still finding new ways to use these tiny (under six kg/13.2 pound) reconnaissance aircraft. The army is also evaluating tiny helicopter-type UAVs and several other models similar to the Ravens and Pumas. All this comes a century after aerial reconnaissance first revolutionized warfare. The tiny UAVs are another radical new aircraft technology that is taking air recon to a new level. That level is low, a few hundred meters off the ground. It all began in the American military during the last decade. The aircraft are the nearly 1,798 Raven and 325 Puma UAVs systems in use by ground troops. A complete system (controller, spare parts, and three UAVs) costs $250,000 for the Raven and over $400,000 for Puma. These tiny aircraft have changed how the troops fight and greatly reduced army dependence on the air force for air reconnaissance.

 

Traditional U.S. military aviators, and the 10,000 manned airplanes they operate, are somewhat disdainful of these tiny, unmanned, aircraft. But for the troops on the ground, they are a lifesaver and the key to many victories. This sort of thing has happened before. During World War I (1914-18), when aerial reconnaissance first became a major factor in military operations, it was quickly noted that regular flights over the enemy, despite the risk of getting shot down, provided invaluable information. It wasn't just what the human observer noted, but photographs of what was down there. All this was rather sudden because reasonably cheap and reliable aircraft only began to appear a few years before World War I began. This was not surprising, as the first flight of a heavier-than-air aircraft only took place in 1903. The war spurred even more aircraft innovation. But then, and now, the principal job of aircraft was to be the eyes of the ground forces. The fighters were to protect friendly recon aircraft and attack the enemy ones. Bombers were consistently oversold, and the air force partisans could never accept the fact that bombing was an adjunct to reconnaissance, not the primary mission of the air forces.  Just as the first recon aircraft a century ago changed the way armies fought, the micro-UAVs have changed the way small units of soldiers fight. A century ago the aerial observers reported to generals and their staffs. UAV video goes to platoon or company commanders, or the leader of a small Special Forces team. The lightweight, hand launched Raven UAV can only stay airborne about an hour per sortie, but troops have found that this is enough time to do all sorts of useful work, even when there's no fighting going on. This is most of the time. The heavier Puma can stay up for 120 minutes.

 

In Iraq and Afghanistan, the enemy did not want to confront U.S. troops directly (this tended to get you killed). So there was an unceasing effort to set up ambushes, plant mines and roadside bombs, and fire rockets or mortars at American bases. All of these activities can be messed with by using Raven. U.S. troops know to think like the enemy, and quickly figured out the best ambush positions, or places to plant mines or fire rockets. By sending Ravens over these spots periodically the enemy is put in danger of being spotted. The enemy knows that usually leads to a prompt attack from American mortars or helicopter gunships. These mind games, of sneaking around trying to get a shot off at the Americans, is more stressful and dangerous if the U.S. troops have Ravens. And most of them do.

 

The U.S. Army has over 5,000 RQ-11 Raven UAVs in service. This two kilogram (4.4 pound) aircraft is popular with combat and non-combat troops alike. The army has developed better training methods, which enables operators to get more out of Raven. Combat troops use it for finding and tracking the enemy, while non-combat troops use it for security (guarding bases or convoys). In both cases, troops have come to use the Raven for more than just getting a look over the hill or around the corner. The distinctive noise of Raven overhead is very unpopular with the enemy below and is often used to scare the enemy away, or make him move to where he can be more easily spotted.

 

The current model, the Raven B (RQ-11B), was introduced six years ago, a year after the original Raven entered service in large numbers. This UAV is inexpensive ($35,000 each) and can stay in the air for 80 minutes at a time. The Raven is battery powered (and largely silent unless flown close to the ground). It carries a color day vidcam, or a two color infrared night camera. It can also carry a laser designator. Both cameras broadcast real time video back to the operator, who controls the Raven via a handheld controller, which uses a hood to shield the display from direct sunlight (thus allowing the operator to clearly see what is down there). The Raven can go as fast as 90 kilometers an hour but usually cruises at between 40 and 50. It can go as far as 15 kilometers from its controller, and usually flies a preprogrammed route, using GPS for navigation.

 

The Raven is made of Kevlar, the same material used in helmets and protective vests. On average, Raven can survive about 200 landings before it breaks something. While some Ravens have been shot down, the most common cause of loss is losing the communications link (as the aircraft flies out of range) or a software/hardware failure on the aircraft. Combat losses have been high, as nearly 20,000 have been built and most of those have been lost in training or the battlefield.

 

From the very beginning, the Raven changed the way troops fight. With the bird's eye view of the battlefield, commanders can move their troops more quickly, confident that they won't be ambushed, and often with certain knowledge of where the unseen enemy is. The big advantage with Raven is that it’s simple, reliable, and it just works. The UAV can be quickly taken apart and put into a backpack. It takes off by having the operator start the motor, and then throwing it. This can be done from a moving vehicle and the Raven is a popular recon tool for convoys. It lands by coming in low and then turning the motor off. Special Forces troops like to use it at night, because the enemy can’t see it, and often can’t hear it either.

 

The controller allows the operator to capture video, or still pictures, and transmit them to other units or a headquarters. The operator often does this while the Raven is flying a pre-programmed pattern (using GPS). The operator can have the UAV stop and circle, in effect keeping the camera on the same piece of ground below. The operator can also fly the Raven, which is often used when pursuing hostile gunmen.

 

Last year the U.S. Army began using the larger (5.9 kg) Puma AE UAVs. So far 325 RQ-20A systems have been ordered and most have been delivered. Adopting Puma is part of an army effort to find micro-UAVs that are more effective than current models and just as easy to use. The Puma, a 5.9 kg (13 pound) UAV with a 2.6 meter (8.5 feet) wingspan and a range of 15 kilometers from the operator, has proved to be the next big (or micro) thing the army was looking for. Combat commanders quickly realized how useful Puma is and wanted more, as quickly as possible. This is not surprising as SOCOM (Special Operations Command) has been using Puma since 2008.

 

The army wants to equip each infantry company with a Puma system. That would mean 18 Puma AE UAVs per brigade and nearly 400 for the entire army. These larger UAVs have been most useful in route clearance (scouting ahead to spot ambushes, roadside bombs, landslides, washouts, or whatever). The larger Puma is particularly useful in Afghanistan, which is windier than Iraq and thus more difficult for the tiny Raven to operate.

 

Top speed for Puma is 87 kilometers an hour and cruising speed is 37-50 kilometers an hour. Max altitude is 3,800 meters (12,500 feet), and the UAV can stay in the air for 120 minutes at a time. Puma has a better vidcam (providing tilt, pan, and zoom) than the smaller Raven and that provides steadier and more detailed pictures. Because it is larger than Raven, and three times as heavy, Puma is much steadier in bad weather. Both Puma and Raven are battery powered.

 

Puma has been around for a decade but never got purchased in large quantities by anyone. The latest model uses a lot of proven tech from the Raven (both UAVs are made by the same company). Like the Raven, Puma is hand launched and can be quickly snapped together or apart. Another version, using a fuel cell, has been tested and was able to stay in the air for nine hours at a time. There is also a naval version that floats and is built to withstand exposure to salt water.

 

The army has bought over 10,000 of the 2 kg (4.4 pounds) Raven, but it is mostly used for convoy and base security and less so by troops in the field. Each combat brigade is now supposed to have 35 mini-UAV systems (each with three UAVs, most of them Raven, but at least ten of these systems are to be Pumas). That means that each combat brigade now has its own air force of over a hundred reconnaissance aircraft.

 

Raven, and a thousand slightly larger UAVs, don't get much publicity, but they have a larger impact on combat than the few hundred much larger (Shadow, Predator, Reaper) UAVs. These big, and often armed, UAVs carry out vital missions, but comprise a tenth of the airtime that the micro-UAVs rack up. Moreover, these smaller UAVs have opened up lots of other possibilities. There are already small, single use UAVs that are basically guided bombs. Even smaller UAVs can be used for spying, as well as battlefield recon. These little aircraft are having an enormous impact on warfare, rivaling what happened a century ago.

 

Because of anti-aircraft machine-guns and portable missile systems the air force prefers to stay high (over 3,200 meters/10,000 feet) and let the army and their UAVs and helicopters take care of the lower altitudes. The army has taken on the challenge and succeeded.

Partager cet article
Repost0
19 février 2013 2 19 /02 /février /2013 10:45

zone action-1024x716

 

19 février 2013 Romandie.com (AFP)

 

BAMAKO - Les Etats-Unis vont probablement jouer un rôle militaire plus actif au Mali, où l'armée française combat les groupes islamistes armés, mais seulement après la tenue d'élections dans ce pays, a déclaré lundi à Bamako Chris Coons, un sénateur américain.

 

Les Etats-Unis ont fourni à la France, engagée militairement au Mali depuis le 11 janvier, un soutien en matière de renseignement, ainsi que des moyens aériens, vols d'avions de transport C-17 et missions de ravitaillement en vol.

 

Mais ils ne peuvent pas coopérer directement avec l'armée malienne tant qu'un gouvernement démocratiquement élu n'aura pas remplacé les dirigeants actuels, qui ont accédé au pouvoir à la suite d'un coup d'Etat, a souligné M. Coons, président de la sous-commission des Affaires étrangères du Sénat pour l'Afrique.

 

On peut espérer une aide supplémentaire des Etats-Unis dans cette région et d'autres, mais (...) la loi américaine interdit une assistance directe à l'armée malienne après le putsch, a déclaré le sénateur à la presse à Bamako.

 

Après une pleine restauration de la démocratie, il me semble probable que nous reprendrons notre aide directe à l'armée malienne, a ajouté le sénateur.

 

M. Coons se trouve au Mali à la tête d'une délégation du Congrès américain composée de Républicains et de Démocrates pour rencontrer le président intérimaire Dioncounda Traoré et des responsables militaires français et africains.

 

Avant le coup d'Etat militaire de mars 2012, l'aide américaine consistait principalement en des missions d'entrainement et la fourniture de matériel comme des véhicules.

 

L'assistance militaire reprendrait évidemment d'une manière appropriée aux besoins actuels. Les priorités auront beaucoup changé, a relevé le sénateur.

 

La perspective d'une aide militaire américaine accrue après les élections complique encore plus la donne pour ce qui concerne la fixation d'une date.

 

Le président Traore avait indiqué qu'il espérait pourvoir organiser des élections d'ici le 31 juillet, mais cette date a été jugée prématurée par certains, compte tenu des problèmes auxquels est confronté le Mali: poursuite des attaques des insurgés, armée profondément divisée, des centaines de milliers de déplacés.

 

Le ministre malien de l'Administration territoriale (Intérieur) Moussa Sinko Coulibaly, chargé des élections, a indiqué vendredi que le délai de juillet peut être révisé si nécessaire.

 

La France est intervenue militairement au Mali le 11 janvier face à l'avancée vers Bamako des insurgés islamistes qui occupaient le nord depuis dix mois. Elle est le seul pays occidental à avoir engagé des troupes au sol au Mali. Des forces ouest-africaines - la force internationale de soutien au Mali (Misma) - ainsi que des forces tchadiennes devraient prendre le relais avec le déploiement progressif de 6.000 hommes.

 

Le putsch militaire et le trouble qui s'en était suivi avait facilité la chute du Nord du Mali aux mains des groupes islamistes.

Partager cet article
Repost0

Présentation

  • : RP Defense
  • : Web review defence industry - Revue du web industrie de défense - company information - news in France, Europe and elsewhere ...
  • Contact

Recherche

Articles Récents

Categories